Verification is a federally mandated process that requires selected students to further attest that the information reported on their Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) is accurate and complete. In this brief, we estimate institutional costs of administrating the FAFSA verification mandate and consider variation in costs by institution type and sector. Using data from 2014, we estimate that compliance costs to institutions in that year totaled nearly US$500 million with the burden falling disproportionately on public institutions and community colleges, in particular. Specifically, we estimate that 22% of an average community college’s financial aid office operating budget is devoted to verification procedures, compared with 15% at public 4-year institutions. Our analysis is timely, given that rates of FAFSA verification have increased in recent years.
BettingerE. P.LongB. T.OreopoulosP.SanbonmatsuL. (2012). The role of application assistance and information in college decisions: Results from the H&R block FAFSA experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1205–1242. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs017
3.
CampbellC. A.Deil-AmenR.Rios-AguilarC. (2015). Do financial aid policies unintentionally punish the poor, and what can we do about it?New Directions for Community Colleges, 2015(172), 67–76. https://doi.org/10/gg7m2j
4.
CochraneD. F.LaManqueA.Szabo-KubitzL. (2010). After the FAFSA: How red tape can prevent eligible students from receiving financial aid. Institute for College Access & Success. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED515393
DavidsonJ. C. (2014). Improving the financial aid process for community college students: A literature review of FAFSA simplification, information, and verification. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 39, 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2013.820157
DynarskiS. M.Scott-ClaytonJ. E. (2006). The cost of complexity in federal student aid: Lessons from optimal tax theory and behavioral economics (Working Paper No. 12227; Working Paper Series). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w12227
9.
EvansB. J.NguyenT. D.TenerB. B.ThomasC. L. (2017). Federal Pell Grant eligibility and receipt: Explaining nonreceipt and changes to EFC using national and institutional data. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 47(3), Article 4.
FriedmannE.MartorellP. (2018). Money left on the table: An analysis of financial aid receipt among financially eligible community college students. Wheelhouse Center for Community College Leadership and Research, 3(3), 1–8.
12.
GravesD. L. (2019). Cooling out in the verification process: A mixed methods exploration into the relevance of racism in community college students’ financial aid experiences [Doctoral dissertation]. eScholarship Open, University of California, Los Angeles. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8g27x3pt
13.
HooverE. (2017). The verification trap. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
14.
HooverE. (2020). The federal government is verifying fewer FAFSA filers. Here’s why that matters. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
McDonnellL. M.ElmoreR. F. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10/b8538m
17.
McKinneyL.NovakH. (2015). FAFSA filing among first-year college students: Who files on time, who doesn’t, and why does it matter?Research in Higher Education, 56(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10/f6zkj2
National College Attainment Network. (2018b). How FAFSA Verification harms low-income students and what ED can do to help—National College Attainment Network. https://www.ncan.org/news/news.asp?id=456078
23.
OsterM.WiederspanM.DesjardinsS. (2020). Exploring ways to enhance FAFSA efficiency: A stumbling block on the road to college: How FAFSA verification hinders low-income students (p. 21). Iowa College Aid.
24.
PageL. C.CastlemanB. L.MeyerK. (2020). Customized nudging to improve FAFSA completion and income verification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(1), 3–21.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
