Round and Round They Go: The Relationship Between Changing Grades and Schools and Teacher Quality and Absence Rates

Abstract

Research on teacher churn has produced conflicting conclusions as to its impact on students and teachers. We bring clarity to this work by combining and expanding on analytical approaches used in earlier research to determine how and when different types of churn (i.e., grade, school) impact teacher effectiveness and attendance. Using data from the Los Angeles Unified School District, our results suggest differences based on analytical approach but ultimately show that changing schools and grades may be less of an issue than previously reported. In addition, in the case of school churn, a beneficial match in their new school sites may matter more for teacher outcomes than potential disruptive effects of churn. We conclude with implications for policy and future research.

Keywords

school/teacher effectiveness teacher research teacher education/development regression analyses descriptive analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angrist

Pischke

(2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.

Atteberry

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2016). Teacher churning: Reassignment rates and implications for student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716659929

Becker

G. S.

(1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 9–49.

Blazar

(2015). Grade assignments and the teacher pipeline: A low-cost lever to improve student achievement? Educational Researcher, 44(4), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15580944

Boyan

(1979). Job matching and the theory of turnover. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5), 972–990.

Bryk

Camburn

Louis

K. S.

(1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 751–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x99355004

Bryk

A. S.

Schneider

(2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation.

Chetty

Friedman

J. N.

Rockoff

J. E.

(2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. The American Economic Review, 104(9), 2593–2632.

Chingos

M. M.

West

M. R.

(2011). Promotion and reassignment in public school districts: How do schools respond to differences in teacher effectiveness? Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.12.011

10.

Cohen-Vogel

(2011). “Staffing to the test”: Are today’s school personnel practices evidence based? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(4), 483–505. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711419845

11.

Feng

Sass

T. R.

(2017). Teacher quality and mobility. Education Finance and Policy, 12(3), 396–418. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP

12.

Gathmann

Schönberg

(2010). How general is human capital? A task-based approach. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/649786

13.

Gestwicki

(2013). Developmentally appropriate practice: Curriculum and development in early education. Cengage Learning.

14.

Gibbons

Waldman

(2003). Task-specific human capital. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 203–207.

15.

Gibbons

Scrutinio

Telhaj

(2021). Teacher turnover: Effects, mechanisms, and organisational responses. Labour Economics, 73, Article 102079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2021.102079

16.

Goldhaber

Gross

Player

(2011). Teacher career paths, teacher quality, and persistence in the classroom: Are public schools keeping their best? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(1), 57–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20549

17.

Goldhaber

Hansen

(2010). Assessing the potential of using estimates of teacher job performance for making tenure decisions (No. 31). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED509689

18.

Grissom

J. A.

Kalogrides

Loeb

(2017). Strategic staffing? How performance pressures affect the distribution of teachers within schools and resulting student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 54(6), 1079–1116. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217716301

19.

Grissom

J. A.

Keiser

L. R.

(2011). A supervisor like me: Race, representation, and the satisfaction and turnover decisions of public sector employees. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(3), 1036–1043. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam

20.

Grissom

J. A.

Loeb

Nakashima

N. A.

(2013). Strategic involuntary teacher transfers and teacher performance: Examining equity and efficiency. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(2), 296–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam

21.

Guin

(2004). Chronic teacher turnover in urban elementary schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(42), 1–30.

22.

Hanushek

E. A.

Rivkin

S. G.

Schiman

J. C.

(2016). Dynamic effects of teacher turnover on the quality of instruction. Economics of Education Review, 55, 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.08.004

23.

Henry

G. T.

Redding

(2018). The consequences of leaving school early: The effects of within-year and end-of-year teacher turnover. Education Finance and Policy, 15(2), 332–356. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

24.

Hock

Isenberg

(2017). Methods for accounting for co-teaching in value-added models. Statistics and Public Policy, 4(1), 1–11.

25.

Jackson

C. K.

(2013). Match quality, worker productivity, and worker mobility: Direct evidence from teachers. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(4), 1096–1116. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00339

26.

Jackson

C. K.

Bruegmann

(2009). Teaching students and teaching each other: The importance of peer learning for teachers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(4), 85–108.

27.

Jacob

B. A.

Rockoff

J. E.

(2011). Organizing schools to improve student achievement: Start times, grade configurations, and teacher assignments. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2011/9/organizationjacobrockoff/092011_organize_jacob_rockoff_brief

28.

James

Wyckoff

J. H.

(2020). Teacher evaluation and teacher turnover in equilibrium: Evidence from DC Public Schools. AERA Open, 6(2), Article 93223. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420932235

29.

Jovanovic

(1979). Firm-specific capital and turnover. Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), 1246–1260. https://doi.org/10.1086/260834

30.

Kauffman

Johnson

S. M.

Kardos

S. M.

Liu

Peske

H. G.

(2002). “Lost at sea”: New teachers’ experiences with curriculum and assessment. Teachers College Record, 104(2), 273–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00163

31.

Knight

D. S.

Strunk

K. O.

(2016). Who bears the costs of district funding cuts? Reducing inequality in the distribution of teacher layoffs. Educational Researcher, 45(7), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16670899

32.

Kraft

M. A.

Papay

J. P.

(2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 476–500. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713519496

33.

Lockwood

J. R.

McCaffrey

D. F.

(2014). Correcting for test score measurement error in ANCOVA models for estimating treatment effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39(1), 22–52. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998613509405

34.

Mortensen

D. T.

(1978). Specific capital and labor turnover. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 572–586. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003599

35.

Nickells

(1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417–1426.

36.

Ost

(2014). How do teachers improve? The relative importance of specific and general human capital. American Economic Review, 6(2), 127–151.

37.

Ost

Schiman

J. C.

(2015). Grade-specific experience, grade reassignments, and teacher turnover. Economics of Education Review, 46, 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.03.004

38.

Papay

J. P.

Bacher-Hicks

Page

L. C.

Marinell

W. H.

(2017). The challenge of teacher retention in urban schools: Evidence of variation from a cross-site analysis. Educational Researcher, 46(8), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2607776

39.

Rivkin

S. G.

Hanushek

E. A.

Kain

J. F.

(2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12145

40.

Rockoff

J. E.

(2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.

41.

Rogers

L. K.

Doan

(2019). Late to class: Estimating the relationship between teacher assignment change and student sorting. The Elementary School Journal, 120(2), 347–371. https://doi.org/10.1086/705965

42.

Ronfeldt

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212463813

43.

Simon

N. S.

Johnson

S. M.

(2015). Teacher turnover in high-poverty schools: What we know and can do. Teachers College Record, 117(3), 1–36.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.12 MB