Just Out of Reach? Unrestrained Supply,Constrained Demand,and Access to Effective Schools in and Around Detroit

Abstract

Research concerning family preferences for schooling indicates that they value proximity to home as much as academic quality when choosing schools. However, preferences for proximity likely represent inability to access schools farther away from home, especially for disadvantaged students. I test whether distance and district boundaries constrain access to high-performing and effective schools for Detroit students where families choose between intradistrict, interdistrict, and charter schools, as well as an assigned school. I employ a unique data set that includes enrollment records, addresses, and commute times for Detroit residents regardless of where they attend school. Results show that disadvantaged students have little access to the highest quality schools available, specifically those outside Detroit. However, students attend higher performing schools within Detroit.

Keywords

educational policy urban education parents and families school choice parent preferences access to effective schools descriptive analysis regression analyses

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdulkadiroğlu

Pathak

P. A.

Schellenberg

Walters

C. R.

(2020). Do parents value school effectiveness? American Economic Review, 110(5), 1502–1539.

Angrist

J. D.

Cohodes

S. R.

Dynarski

S. M.

Pathak

P. A.

Walters

C. R.

(2016). Stand and deliver: Effects of Boston’s charter high schools on college preparation, entry, and choice. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(2), 275–318.

Bell

C. A.

(2009). All choices created equal? The role of choice sets in the selection of schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 191–208.

Beuermann

Jackson

C. K.

Navarro-Sola

Pardo

(2019). What is a good school, and can parents tell? Evidence on the multidimensionality of school output (No. w25342). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Booker

T. K.

Gilpatric

S. M.

Gronberg

T. J.

Jansen

D. W.

(2008). The effect of charter schools on traditional public school students in Texas: Are children who stay behind left behind? Journal of Urban Economics, 64(1), 123–145

Bross

Harris

D. N.

Liu

(2016). The effects of performance-based closure and charter takeover on student performance [Technical Report, Education Research Alliance for New Orleans]. https://educationresearchalliancenola.org/files/publications/Bross-Harris-Liu-The-Effects-of-Performance-Based-School-Closure-and-Charter-Takeover-on-Student-Performance.pdf

Candal

(Ed.). (2018). National charter school law rankings and scorecard-2018: The essential guide for policymakers and advocates. The Center for Education Reform. https://edreform.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/CER_National-Charter-School-Law-Rankings-and-Scorecard-2018_screen_1-30-19.pdf

Carlson

Cowen

J. M.

Fleming

D. J.

(2013). Life after vouchers: What happens to students who leave private schools for the traditional public sector? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(2), 179–199.

Chubb

J. E.

Moe

T. M.

(1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Brookings Institution Press.

10.

Coalition for the Future of Detroit Schoolchildren. (2015). The choice is ours: Road to excellence for troubled Michigan begins in Detroit. http://detroiteducationcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/CFDS_ChoiceIsOurs.pdf

11.

Community Education Commission. (2019). Participating GOAL line schools. https://www.goaldetroit.org

12.

Cordes

S. A.

(2017). In pursuit of the common good: The spillover effects of charter schools on public school students in New York City. Education Finance and Policy, 13, 484–512.

13.

Denice

Gross

(2016). Choice, preferences, and constraints: Evidence from public school applications in Denver. Sociology of Education, 89(4), 300–320.

14.

Edwards

D. S.

Anderson

K. P.

Mohr

(2019). Transportation, choice, and parental priorities: An analysis of Detroit’s GOAL line program. Education Policy Innovation Collaborative. https://epicedpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/GOALLine_Ridership.pdf

15.

Ekmekci

Yenmez

M. B.

(2019). Common enrollment in school choice. Theoretical Economics, 14(4), 1237–1270.

16.

Figlio

Hart

(2014). Competitive effects of means-tested school vouchers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(1), 133–156.

17.

Friedman

(1962). Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press.

18.

Glazerman

S. M.

(1998, Apirl). School quality and social stratification: The determinants and consequences of parental school choice [Paper presentation]. The American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, United States.

19.

Glazerman

S. M.

Dotter

(2017). Market signals: Evidence on the determinants and consequences of school choice from a citywide lottery. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(4), 593–619.

20.

Gray

(2016, June 9). Legislature OKs $617M Detroit public schools rescue plan. Detroit Free Press. https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2016/06/09/dps-package-wins-gop-support-headed-gov-snyder/85630880/

21.

Gross

DeArmond

Denice

(2015). Common enrollment, parents, and school choice: Early evidence from Denver and New Orleans [Making School Choice Work Series]. Center on Reinventing Public Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED556474.pdf

22.

Harris

D. N.

(2017). Why managed competition is better than a free market for schooling. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/harris-paper.pdf

23.

Harris

D. N.

Larsen

(2019). The identification of schooling preferences: Methods and evidence from post-Katrina New Orleans [Technical report]. Education Research Alliance for New Orleans. https://educationresearchalliancenola.org/files/publications/Harris-Larsen-How-Parents-Choose-2019-07-05.pdf

24.

Harris

D. N.

Liu

Gerry

Arce-Trigatti

(2019). From revolution to evolution: Market dynamic in school value-added and marketed program offering under the post-Katrina school reforms in New Orleans [Technical report]. Education Research Alliance for New Orleans. https://educationresearchalliancenola.org/files/publications/2019-08-20-Harris-et-al-From-Revolution-to-Evolution.pdf

25.

Hastings

J. S.

Kane

T. J.

Staiger

D. O.

(2005). Parental preferences and school competition: Evidence from a public school choice program (No. w11805). National Bureau of Economic Research.

26.

Hastings

J. S.

Weinstein

J. M.

(2008). Information, school choice, and academic achievement: Evidence from two experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4), 1373–1414.

27.

Hesla

White

Gerstenfeld

(2019). A growing movement: America’s largest public charter school communities. National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED595146.pdf

28.

Hill

P. T.

(2006). Put learning first: A portfolio approach to public schools [PPI Policy Report]. Progressive Policy Institute. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED491223.pdf

29.

Imberman

S. A.

(2011). The effect of charter schools on achievement and behavior of public school students. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 850–863.

30.

Jabbar

(2015). “Every kid is money” market-like competition and school leader strategies in New Orleans. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(4), 638–659.

31.

Jochim

DeArmond

Gross

Lake

(2014). How parents experience public school choice. Center for Reinventing Public Education. https://www.crpe.org/publications/how-parents-experience-public-school-choice

32.

Koedel

Mihaly

Rockoff

J. E.

(2015). Value-added modeling: A review. Economics of Education Review, 47, 180–195.

33.

Levin

(2015). Issues in education privatization. In Ladd

H. F.

Goertz

M. E.

(Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (pp. 411–422). Routledge.

34.

Levin

(2019, March 21). Mayor Duggan launched a bus route to draw students back to Detroit schools. Is it working? Chalkbeat. https://chalkbeat.org/posts/detroit/2019/03/21/goal-line-bus-route-childcare/

35.

Lincove

J. A.

Cowen

J. M.

Imbrogno

J. P.

(2018). What’s in your portfolio? How parents rank traditional public, private, and charter schools in post-Katrina New Orleans’ citywide system of school choice. Education Finance and Policy, 13(2), 194–226.

36.

Lincove

J. A.

Valant

Cowen

J. M.

(2018). You can’t always get what you want: Capacity constraints in a choice-based school system. Economics of Education Review, 67, 94–109.

37.

Loeb

Valant

Kasman

(2011). Increasing choice in the market for schools: Recent reforms and their effects on student achievement. National Tax Journal, 64(1), 141–164.

38.

Long

B. T.

(2004). How have college decisions changed over time? An application of the conditional logistic choice model. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1–2), 271–296.

39.

McFadden

(1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Zarembka

(Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). Academic Press.

40.

McShane

Shaw

(2020, March). Transporting school choice students: A primer on states’ transportation policies related to private, charter, and open enrollment students. Edchoice. https://www.edchoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Transporting-School-Choice-Students-by-Michael-Q-McShane-and-Michael-Shaw.pdf

41.

Michigan Department of Education. (2013). Michigan State School Aid Act (MCL 388.1705; 388.1705c; Sections 105, 105c). http://mi.gov/documents/mde/choice1_279579_7.pdf

42.

Michigan Department of Education. (2017). Charter schools- questions and answers. https://www.michigan.gov/documents/PSAQA_54517_7.pdf

43.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2018). Digest of Education Statistics, 2016 (NCES 2017-094), Table 206.40. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED580954.pdf

44.

Sass

T. R.

(2006). Charter schools and student achievement in Florida. Education Finance and Policy, 1(1), 91–122.

45.

Schneider

Buckley

(2002). What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the Internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 133–144.

46.

Schneider

Teske

Marshall

Roch

(1998). Shopping for schools: In the land of the blind, the one-eyed parent may be enough. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 769–793.

47.

Singer

(2020). Student stratification among a combination of school choice policies in Detroit. Journal of School Choice, 14(1), 122–153.

48.

Strauss

(2016, July 15). How charter schools in Michigan have hurt traditional public schools, new research finds. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2016/07/15/how-charter-schools-in-michigan-have-hurt-traditional-public-schools-new-research-finds/

49.

Urban Institute Student Transportation Working Group. (2018). The road to school: How far students travel to school in Denver, Detroit, New Orleans, New York City, and Washington, DC. Urban Institute. https://greaterdc.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/97151/the_road_to_school_7.pdf

50.

Valant

(2014). Better data, better decisions: Informing school choosers to improve education markets. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED555547.pdf

51.

Winters

M. A.

(2012). Measuring the effect of charter schools on public school student achievement in an urban environment: Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 293–301.

52.

Winters

M. A.

(2015). Narrowing the charter enrollment gap: Denver’s common-enrollment system. https://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/narrowing-charter-enrollment-gap-8235.html

53.

Wixom

M. A.

(2018). 50-state comparison: Charter school policies. Education Commission of the States. https://www.ecs.org/charter-school-policies/

54.

Wixom

M. A.

Keily

(2018). 50-state comparison: Open enrollment policies (2018 update). Education Commission of the States. https://www.ecs.org/open-enrollment-policies/

55.

Wolf

P. J.

Kisida

Gutmann

Puma

Eissa

Rizzo

(2013). School vouchers and student outcomes: Experimental evidence from Washington, DC. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(2), 246–270.

56.

Ziebarth

(2019). Measuring up to the model: A ranking of state public charter school laws. National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. https://www.publiccharters.org/ranking-state-public-charter-school-laws-2019

57.

Zimmer

Buddin

(2009). Is charter school competition in California improving the performance of traditional public schools? Public Administration Review, 69(5), 831–845.

58.

Zimmer

Gill

Booker

Lavertu

Sass

Witte

(2009). Charter schools in eight states: Effects on achievement, attainment, integration, and competition (MG-869). RAND.