Interdistrict desegregation programs, which provide opportunities for urban children of color to attend suburban schools, are a potential means of addressing persistent racial inequalities in educational opportunities and outcomes. These voluntary programs offer a test of whether nonresident students can leverage the resources and social capital available at high-performing suburban schools to improve their educational outcomes. In the first impact study of Boston’s long-running program, I find large differences in the adjusted high-school graduation and college enrollment rates of applicants referred to a suburban district, compared with observably similar applicants who were not referred. The college effect is due to enrollment in 4-year institutions and does not vary by gender. Estimates are robust to adjustments for remaining omitted variables bias.
AltonjiJ. G.ElderT. E.TaberC. R. (2005). Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools. Journal of Political Economy, 113(1), 151–184.
2.
AutorD. H. (2014). Skill, education, and the rise of earnings inequality among the “other 99 percent.”Science, 344(6186), 843–851.
3.
BergmanP. L. S. (2016, October). The effects of school integration: Evidence from a randomized desegregation program (CESifo Working Paper Series No. 6119). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2871152
4.
BifulcoR.CobbC. D.BellC. (2009). Can interdistrict choice boost student achievement? The case of Connecticut’s interdistrict magnet school program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 323–345.
5.
BowenW. G.ChingosM. M.McPhersonM. S. (2009). Crossing the finish line. Princeton University Press.
6.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.RonfeldtM.WyckoffJ. (2011). The effect of school neighborhoods on teachers’ career decisions. In DuncanG. J.MurnaneR. J. (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 377–395). Russell Sage Foundation.
BruhnJ. (2020). The consequences of sorting for understanding school quality [Unpublished manuscript].
9.
ChapmanT. K. (2014). Is integration a dream deferred? Students of color in majority white suburban schools. Journal of Negro Education, 83(3), 311–326.
10.
CrainR. L. (1992). Finding niches: Desegregated students sixteen years later. Institute for Urban and Minority Education, Columbia University.
11.
de BreyC.MusuL.McFarlandJ.Wilkinson-FlickerS.DilibertiM.ZhangA.BranstetterC.WangX. (2019). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups 2018 (NCES 2019-038). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
12.
DiamondJ. B. (2006). Still separate and unequal: Examining race, opportunity, and school achievement in “integrated” suburbs. Journal of Negro Education, 75(3), 495–505.
13.
EatonS. E. (2001). The other Boston busing story: What’s won and what’s lost across the boundary line. Yale University Press.
14.
EatonS. E.ChirichignoG. (2011). METCO merits more: The history and status of METCO (White Paper No. 74). Pioneer Institute.
15.
Executive Office of Education. (2013). METCO report to the Massachusetts State Legislature.
16.
FrankK. A.MaroulisS. J.DuongM. Q.KelceyB. M. (2013). What would it take to change an inference? Using Rubin’s causal model to interpret the robustness of causal inferences. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(4), 437–460.
17.
GelmanA.HillJ. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press.
18.
HarrisD. N. (2010). How do school peers influence student educational outcomes? Theory and evidence from economics and other social sciences. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1163–1197.
19.
HollandM. (2012). Only here for the day: The social integration of minority students at a majority white high school. Sociology of Education, 85(2), 101–120.
20.
Ispa-LandaS. (2013). Gender, race, and justifications for group exclusion: Urban Black students bussed to affluent suburban schools. Sociology of Education, 86(3), 218–233.
21.
Ispa-LandaS.ConwellJ. (2015). “Once you go to a White school, you kind of adapt”: Black adolescents and the racial classification of schools. Sociology of Education, 88(1), 1–19.
22.
JencksC.MayerS. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In Lynn Jr.L. E.McGearyM. G. H. (Eds.), Inner-city poverty in the United States (pp. 111–186). The National Academies Press.
23.
LazearE. (2001). Educational production. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(3), 777–803.
24.
LeeD. S. (2009). Training, wages, and sample selection: Estimating sharp bounds on treatment effects. The Review of Economic Studies, 76(3), 1071–1102.
25.
LewisA. E.DiamondJ. B. (2016). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. Oxford University Press.
26.
LoebS.Darling-HammondL.LuczakJ. (2005). How teaching conditions predict teacher turnover in California schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 80, 44–70.
McFarlandJ.HussarB.ZhangJ.WangX.WangK.HeinS.DilibertiM.Forrest CataldiE.Bullock MannF.BarmerA. (2019). The condition of education 2019 (NCES 2019-144). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
29.
O’ConnorC.MuellerJ.LewisR. L.Rivas-DrakeD.RosenbergS. (2011). “Being” Black and strategizing for excellence in a racially stratified academic hierarchy. American Educational Research Journal, 48(6), 1232–1257.
30.
OrfieldG.FrankenbergE.GarcesL. (2008). Statement of American social scientists of research on school desegregation to the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents v. Seattle School District and Meredith v. Jefferson County. The Urban Review, 40(1), 96–136.
OwensA. (2010). Neighborhoods and schools as competing and reinforcing contexts for educational attainment. Sociology of Education, 83(4), 287–311.
33.
ReardonS. F.TownsendJ.FoxL. (2017). A continuous measure of the joint distribution of race and income among neighborhoods. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 3, 34–62.
34.
ReardonS. F.WeathersE. S.FahleE. M.JangH.KalogridesD. (2019, September). Is separate still unequal? New evidence on school segregation and racial academic achievement gaps (CEPA Working Paper No. 19-06). http://cepa.stanford.edu/wp19-06
35.
RumbergerR.PalardyG. (2005). Does segregation still matter? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school. Teachers College Record, 107(9), 1999–2045.
36.
RyanC. L.BaumanK. (2016, March). Educational attainment in the United States: 2015. U.S. Census Bureau.
37.
SacerdoteB. (2011). Peer effects in education: How might they work, how big are they, and what do we know so far? In HanushekE. A.MachinS.WoessmanL. (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 3, pp. 249–277). North Holland.
38.
SteeleJ. L.PepperM. J.SpringerM. G.LockwoodJ. R. (2015). The distribution and mobility of effective teachers: Evidence from a large, urban school district. Economics of Education Review, 48, 86–101.
WarikooN.CarterP. (2009). Cultural explanations for racial and ethnic stratification in academic achievement: A call for a new and improved theory. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 366–394.
41.
WellsA. S.CrainR. L. (1997). Stepping over the color line: African-American students in White suburban schools. Yale University Press.
42.
XuR.FrankK. A.MaroulisS. J.RosenbergJ. M. (2019). Konfound: Command to quantify robustness of causal inferences. The Stata Journal, 19(3), 523–550.
