English learners (ELs) lag behind their peers in academic achievement and attainment, partly due to limited exposure to academic content. Prior studies that examine high school course-taking find significant course access gaps between ELs and non-ELs but provide little information on the relation between course-taking and time spent as an EL. This study improves upon previous research by addressing this dimension of heterogeneity and reporting detailed by-subject analyses. I use student-level data (N = 41,343) from a unique district in California with a large number of Chinese and Spanish ELs. I find substantial heterogeneity in general and advanced course-taking based on time spent as an EL. But differences disappear once eighth grade test scores are taken into consideration.
AttewellP.DominaT. (2008). Raising the bar: Curricular intensity and academic performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 51–71.
4.
BakerS.LesauxN.JayanthiM.DiminoJ.ProctorC. P.MorrisJ.. . . Newman-GoncharR. (2014). Teaching academic content and literacy to English learners in elementary and middle school (NCEE 2014-4012). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
CallahanR. M. (2005). Tracking and high school English Learners: Limiting opportunity to learn. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 305–328.
11.
CallahanR. M.ShifrerD. (2016). Equitable access for secondary English Learner students: Course taking as evidence of EL program effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52, 463–496.
12.
CallahanR. M.WilkinsonL.MullerC. (2010). Academic achievement and course taking among language minority youth in U.S. schools: Effects of ESL placement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 84–117.
13.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2010). Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school: A cross-subject analysis with student fixed effects. The Journal of Human Resources, 45, 655–681.
14.
CongerD.LongM. C.IatarolaP. (2009). Explaining race, gender, and poverty disparities in advanced course-taking. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28, 555–576.
15.
DeCapuaA.MarshallH. W. (2010). Limited formally schooled English language learners in U.S. classrooms. Urban Review, 42, 159–173.
Every Student Succeeds Act. (2015). Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95 § 114 Stat. 1177 (2015–2016).
19.
EstradaP. (2014). English learner curricular streams in four middle schools: Triage in the trenches. The Urban Review, 46, 535–573.
20.
EstradaP.WangH. (2018). Making English learner reclassification to fluent English proficient attainable or elusive: When meeting criteria is and is not enough. American Educational Research Journal, 55, 207–242.
21.
FaltisC.WolfeP. (1999). So much to say: Adolescents, bilingualism, and ESL in the secondary school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
22.
FloresN.KleynT.MenkenK. (2015). Looking holistically in a climate of partiality: Identities of students labeled Long-Term English Language Learners. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 14, 113–132.
23.
FreemanY. S.FreemanD. E.MercuriS. (2002). Closing the achievement gap: How to reach limited-formal-schooling and long-term English learners. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
24.
GamoranA. (2010). Tracking and inequality: New directions for research and practice. In AppleM.BallS. J.GandinL. A. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 213–228). London, England: Routledge.
25.
GoldhaberD. D.BrewerD. J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 129–145.
26.
HainmuellerJ. (2012). Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20, 25–46.
27.
HainmuellerJ.XuY. (2013). Ebalance: A Stata package for entropy balancing. Journal of Statistical Software, 54(7), 1–18.
28.
HakutaK.ButlerY.WittD. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency? Policy report 2000-1. Berkeley: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
HoxbyC. M. (2000). Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation (Working Paper 7867). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
31.
JaquetK.FongA. B. (2017). How do Algebra I course repetition rates vary among English learner students by length of time to reclassification as English proficient? (REL 2017–222). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory West.
32.
KannoY.KangasS. E. (2014). “I’m not going to be, like, for the AP”: English Language Learners’ limited access to advanced college-preparatory courses in high school. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 848–878.
33.
KimW. G.GarciaS. (2014). Long-Term English Language Learners’ perceptions of their language and academic learning experiences. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 300–312.
34.
KlopfensteinK. (2004). Advanced placement: Do minorities have equal opportunity?Economics of Education Review, 23, 115–131.
35.
Lau v. Nichols. 414 U.S. 563, 569. (1974).
36.
LillieK. E.MarkosA.AriasM. B.WileyT. G. (2012). Separate and not equal: The implementation of Structured English immersion in Arizona’s classrooms. Teachers College Record, 114, 1–33.
37.
LinquantiR.CookH. G.BaileyA. L.MacDonaldR. (2016). Moving toward a more common definition of English learner: Collected guidance for states and multi-state assessment consortia. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
38.
LongM. C.CongerD.IatarolaP. (2012). Effects of high school course-taking on secondary and postsecondary success. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 285–322.
39.
LongM. C.IatarolaP.CongerD. (2009). Explaining gaps in readiness for college-level math: The role of high school courses. Education Finance and Policy, 4, 1–33.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Promoting AHD educational success of children and youth learning English: Promising futures. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/24677
43.
OlsenL. (2010). Reparable harm: Fulfilling the unkept promise of educational opportunity for California’s Long Term English Learners. Long Beach: Californians Together.
44.
OlsenL. (2014). Meeting the unique needs of Long Term English Language Learners: A guide for educators. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
45.
OlsenL.JaramilloA. (1999). Turning the tides of exclusion: A guide for educators and advocates for immigrant students. Oakland: The California Tomorrow.
46.
RaudenbushS. W.RowanB.CheongY. F. (1993). Higher order instructional goals in secondary schools: Class, teacher, and school influences. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 523–553.
47.
RoseH.BettsJ. R. (2004). The effect of high school courses on earnings. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 497–513.
48.
SaundersW. M.MarcellettiD. J. (2013). The gap that can’t go away: The Catch-22 of reclassification on monitoring the progress of English Learners. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35, 139–156.
49.
ShortD.FitzsimmonsS. (2007). Double the work: Challenges and solutions to acquiring language and academic literacy for adolescent English language learners. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
50.
SlavinR. E.MaddenN.CalderonM.ChamberlainA.HennessyM. (2011). Reading and language outcomes of a multi-year randomized evaluation of transitional bilingual education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 47–58.
51.
SpenceM. (2002). Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. The American Economic Review, 92, 434–459.
52.
SteeleJ. L.SlaterR. O.ZamarroG.MillerT.LiJ.BurkhauserS.BaconM. (2017). Effects of dual-language immersion programs on student achievement: Evidence from lottery data. American Educational Research Journal, 54(Suppl. 1), 282S–306S.
53.
StevensonD. L.SchillerK. S.SchneiderB. (1994). Sequences of opportunities for learning. Sociology of Education, 67, 184–198.
54.
SugarmanJ. (2017). Beyond teaching English: Supporting high school completion by immigrant and refugee students. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
55.
ThompsonK. D. (2015). Questioning the Long-Term English Learner label: How categorization can blind us to students’ abilities. Teachers College Record, 117, 1–50.
56.
ThompsonK. D. (2017). What blocks the gate? Exploring current and former English Learners’ math course-taking in secondary school. American Educational Research Journal, 54, 757–798.
57.
UmanskyI. (2016). Leveled and exclusionary tracking: English learners’ access to core content in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 53, 1792–1833.
58.
UmanskyI.HopkinsM.DabachD. B.PorterL.ThompsonK.PompaD. (2018). Understanding and supporting the educational needs of recently arrived immigrant English learner students: Lessons for state and local education agencies. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
U.S. Department of Education. (2018). Educational experiences of English learners: Access to and enrollment in Early learning programs, advanced coursework, and dual credit programs. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/datastory/el-experiences/index.html
61.
ValentinoR. A.ReardonS. F. (2015). Effectiveness of four instructional programs designed to serve English Learners: Variation by ethnicity and initial English proficiency. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37, 612–637.
62.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. New York: State University of New York Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
