We replicate and extend prior work on Florida’s Bright Futures merit aid scholarship to consider its effect on college enrollment and degree completion. We estimate causal impacts using a regression discontinuity design to exploit SAT thresholds that strongly determine eligibility. We find no positive impacts on attendance or attainment, and instrumental variable results generally reject estimates as small as 1 to 2 percentage points. Across subgroups, we find that eligibility slightly reduces 6-year associate degree attainment for lower socioeconomic status students and may induce small enrollment shifts among Hispanic and White students toward 4-year colleges. Our findings of these minimal-at-best impacts contrast those of prior works, attributable in part to methodological improvements and more robust data, and further underscore the importance of study replication.
AngristJ. D.ImbensG. W.RubinD. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434), 444–455.
2.
BeckerG. (1975). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (2nd ed.). National Bureau of Economic Research.
3.
BettingerE. P.GurantzO.KawanoL.SacerdoteB. I.StevensM. (2019). The long-run impacts of financial aid: Evidence from California’s Cal Grant. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(1), 64–94.
CarruthersC. K.FoxW. F. (2016). Aid for all: College coaching, financial aid, and post-secondary persistence in Tennessee. Economics of Education Review, 51, 97–112.
6.
CastlemanB. L.LongB. T. (2016). Looking beyond enrollment: The causal effect of need-based grants on college access, persistence, and graduation. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(4), 1023–1073.
7.
ChapmanS. (2016). Student loans and the labor market: Evidence from merit aid programs. Washington Center for Equitable Growth.
8.
ChenR.DesJardinsS. L. (2010). Investigating the impact of financial aid on student dropout risks: Racial and ethnic differences. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(2), 179–208.
9.
CohodesS. R.GoodmanJ. S. (2014). Merit aid, college quality and college completion: Massachusetts’ Adams scholarship as an in-kind subsidy. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(4), 251–285.
10.
CornwellC. M.MustardD. B.SridharD. J. (2006). The enrollment effects of merit-based financial aid: Evidence from Georgia’s HOPE Program. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(4), 761–786.
11.
CowenC. D.HauserR. M.KominskiR. A.LevinH. M.LucasS. R.MorganS. L.. . . ChapmanC. (2012). Improving the measurement of socioeconomic status for the National Assessment of Educational Progress: A theoretical foundation. National Center for Education Statistics.
12.
DemingD. J.DynarskiS. (2010). College aid. In LevineP. B.ZimmermanD. J. (Eds.), Targeting investments in children: Fighting poverty when resources are limited (pp. 283–302). The University of Chicago Press.
13.
DenningJ. T.MarxB. M.TurnerL. J. (2019). ProPelled: The effects of grants on graduation, earnings, and welfare. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(3), 193–224.
14.
DominaT. (2014). Does merit aid program design matter? A cross-cohort analysis. Research in Higher Education, 55(1), 1–26.
15.
DynarskiS. M. (2000). Hope for whom? Financial aid for the middle class and its impact on college attendance. National Tax Journal, 53(3), 629–662.
16.
DynarskiS. M. (2003). Does aid matter? Measuring the effect of student aid on college attendance and completion. American Economic Review, 93(1), 279–288.
17.
DynarskiS. M. (2004). The new merit aid. In HoxbyC. (Ed.), College choice: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 63–97). The University of Chicago Press.
18.
DynarskiS. M. (2008). Building the stock of college-educated labor. The Journal of Human Resources, 43(3), 576–610.
19.
DynarskiS. M.HemeltS. W.HymanJ. M. (2015). The missing manual: Using National Student Clearinghouse data to track postsecondary outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37, 53S–79S.
20.
DynarskiS. M.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2013). Financial aid policy: Lessons from research. The Future of Children, 23(1), 67–91.
21.
EvansB. J.NguyenT. D. (2019). Monetary substitution of loans, earnings, and need-based aid in postsecondary education: The impact of Pell grant eligibility. Economics of Education Review, 70, 1–19.
22.
FitzpatrickM. D.JonesD. (2016). Post-baccalaureate migration and merit-based scholarships. Economics of Education Review, 54, 155–172.
23.
Florida Department of Education. (2011). Florida Bright Futures Scholarship Program (BF): End-of-year report (2010-11). Office of Student Financial Assistance, Florida Department of Education.
24.
Florida Department of Education. (2018). Florida Bright Futures Scholarship Program (BF): End-of-year report (2017-18). Office of Student Financial Assistance, Florida Department of Education.
25.
Florida Department of Education. (2019). Florida Bright Futures scholarship statistical reports: B-Florida high school graduates eligible for and receiving Bright Futures. Office of Student Financial Assistance, Florida Department of Education.
26.
GoodmanJ. S.GurantzO.SmithJ. (2020). Take two! SAT retaking and college enrollment gaps. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 12(2), 115–158.
27.
GrangerR. C.MaynardR. (2015). Unlocking the potential of the “what works” approach to policymaking and practice: Improving impact evaluations. American Journal of Evaluation, 36(4), 558–569.
28.
GurantzO.HurwitzM.SmithJ. (2017). College enrollment and completion among nationally recognized high-achieving Hispanic students. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 36(1), 126–153.
29.
HarkreaderS.HughesJ.TozziM. H.VanlandinghamG. (2008). The impact of Florida’s Bright Futures scholarship program on high school performance and college enrollment. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 38(1), 5–16.
30.
HedgesL. V. (2018). Challenges in building usable knowledge in education. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 11(1), 1–21.
31.
HerbautE.GevenK. (2020). What works to reduce inequalities in higher education? A systematic review of the (quasi-)experimental literature on outreach and financial aid. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 65, 100442.
32.
ImbensG. W.LemieuxT. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615–635.
33.
JangH.ReardonS. F. (2019). States as sites of educational (in)equality: State contexts and the socioeconomic achievement gradient. AERA Open, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419872459
34.
KaneT. J. (2003, May). A quasi-experimental estimate of the impact of financial aid on college-going (NBER Working Paper No. 9703). National Bureau of Economic Research.
35.
LeeD. S.LemieuxT. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281–355.
36.
LongB. T.RileyE. (2007). Financial aid: A broken bridge to college access?Harvard Educational Review, 77(1), 39–63.
37.
National Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs. (2018). 49th annual survey report on state-sponsored student financial aid: 2017-18 academic year.
38.
NguyenT. D.KramerJ. W.EvansB. J. (2019). The effects of grant aid on student persistence and degree attainment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 89(6), 831–874.
39.
PageL. C.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2016). Improving college access in the United States: Barriers and policy responses. Economics of Education Review, 51, 4–22.
40.
PallaisA. (2009). Taking a chance on college: Is the Tennessee education lottery scholarship program a winner?The Journal of Human Resources, 44(1), 199–222.
41.
Scott-ClaytonJ. (2011). On money and motivation: A quasi-experimental analysis of financial incentives for college achievement. The Journal of Human Resources, 46(3), 614–646.
42.
SingellL. D.StoneJ. A. (2002). The good, the poor, and the wealthy: Who responds most to college financial aid?Bulletin of Economic Research, 54(4), 393–407.
43.
SjoquistD. L.WintersJ. V. (2012). Building the stock of college-educated labor revisited. The Journal of Human Resources, 47(1), 270–285.
44.
SjoquistD. L.WintersJ. V. (2014). Merit aid and post-college retention in the state. Journal of Urban Economics, 80, 39–50.
45.
StranahanH. A.BorgM. O. (2004). Some futures are brighter than others: The net benefits received by Florida bright futures scholarship recipients. Public Finance Review, 32(1), 105–126.
46.
WongV. C.AnglinK.SteinerP. M. (2021, March). Design-based approaches to causal replication studies (EdWorking Paper: 20-311). Annenberg Institute, Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/xsqw-c323
47.
ZhangL.HuS.SensenigV. (2013). The effect of Florida’s Bright Futures program on college enrollment and degree production: An aggregated-level analysis. Research in Higher Education, 54(7), 746–764.
48.
ZhangL.HuS.SunL.PuS. (2016). The effect of Florida’s Bright Futures program on college choice: A regression discontinuity approach. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(1), 115–146.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
