In this article, we examine the effects of receiving a modest Pell Grant on financial aid packages, labor supply while in school, and academic outcomes for community college students. Using administrative data from one state, we compare students just above and below the expected family contribution cutoff for receiving a Pell Grant. We find that other financial aid adjusts in ways that vary by institution: Students at schools that offer federal loans borrowed more if they just missed the Pell eligibility threshold, but at other schools, students were instead compensated with higher state grants. Focusing on the loan-offering schools, we find suggestive evidence that receiving a modest Pell Grant leads students to reduce labor supply and increase enrollment intensity. We also provide indirect evidence that students’ initial enrollment choices are influenced by an offer of Pell Grants versus loans.
BaumS.MaJ. (2011). Trends in college pricing 2010. New York, NY: The College Board.
2.
BaumS.MaJ.PenderM.WelchM. (2017). Trends in student aid 2017. New York, NY: The College Board.
3.
BettingerE. (2004). How financial aid affects persistence. In HoxbyC. M. (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 207–238). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
4.
BettingerE.GurantzO.KawanoL.SacerdoteB. (2016). The long run impacts of merit aid: Evidence from California’s Cal Grant (NBER Working Paper No. W22347). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w22347
5.
BettingerE.LongB. T.OreopoulosP.SanbonmatsuL. (2012). The role of application assistance and information in college decisions: Results from the H&R Block FAFSA experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 1205–1242.
6.
BettingerE.WilliamsB. (2013). Federal and state financial aid during the great recession. In BrownJ.HoxbyC. M. (Eds.), How the financial crisis and great recession affected higher education (pp. 235–262). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
7.
BoadwayR.TremblayJ. F. (2012). Reassessment of the Tiebout model. Journal of Public Economics, 96, 1063–1078.
8.
BrotonK. M.Goldrick-RabS.BensonJ. (2016). Working for college: The causal impacts of financial grants on undergraduate employment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38, 477–494.
9.
CalcagnoJ. C.LongB. T. (2008). The impact of postsecondary remediation using a regression discontinuity approach: Addressing endogenous sorting and noncompliance (NBER Working Paper No. 14194). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
CastlemanB. L.LongB. T. (2016). Looking beyond enrollment: The causal effect of need-based grants on college access, persistence, and graduation. Journal of Labor Economics, 34, 1023–1073.
14.
CelliniS. R. (2010). Financial aid and for-profit colleges: Does aid encourage entry?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29, 526–552.
DemingD.DynarskiS. (2009). Into college, out of poverty? Policies to increase the postsecondary attainment of the poor (NBER Working Paper No. 15387). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
17.
DenningJ. T. (2018). Born under a lucky star: Financial aid, college completion, labor supply, and credit constraints. Journal of Human Resources. Advance online publication. doi:10.3368/jhr.54.3.1116.8359R1
18.
DenningJ. T.MarxB.TurnerL. (2017). ProPelled: The effects of grants on graduation, earnings, and welfare (NBER Working Paper No. 23860). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
19.
DesJardinsS. L.McCallB. P. (2014). The impact of the Gates Millennium Scholars Program on college and post-college related choices of high ability, low-income minority students. Economics of Education Review, 38, 124–138.
20.
DongY. (2017). Regression discontinuity designs with sample selection. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/07350015.2017.1302880
21.
DynarskiS.Scott-ClaytonJ. E. (2006). The cost of complexity in federal student aid: Lessons from optimal tax theory and behavioral economics (NBER Working Paper No. 12227). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
22.
DynarskiS.Scott-ClaytonJ.WiederspanM. (2013). Simplifying tax incentives and aid for college: Progress and prospects. In BrownJ. (Ed.), Tax policy and the economy (Vol. 27, pp. 161–201). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
23.
DynarskiS.WiederspanM. (2012). Student aid simplification: Looking back and looking ahead (NBER Working Paper No. 17834). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
24.
EngA.MatsudairaJ. (2017). The impact of Pell Grants on college choice, completion and student earnings: Evidence from the administrative data covering the universe of federal aid recipients [Mimeo]. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
25.
FanJ.GijbelsI. (1996). Local polynomial modelling and its applications: Monographs on statistics and applied probability 66. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
26.
GerardF.RokkanenM.RotheC. (2016). Identification and inference in regression discontinuity designs with a manipulated running variable (CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP11048). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2717597
27.
Goldrick-RabS.KelchenR.HarrisD. N.BensonJ. (2016). Reducing income inequality in educational attainment: Experimental evidence on the impact of financial aid on college completion. American Journal of Sociology, 121, 1762–1817.
28.
HahnJ.ToddP.Van der KlaauwW. (2001). Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design. Economet-rica, 69, 201–209.
29.
HansenW. L. (1983). Impact of student financial aid on access. Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, 35, 84–96.
30.
ImbensG. W.KalyanaramanK. (2012). Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator. The Review of Economic Studies, 79, 933–959.
31.
ImbensG. W.LemieuxT. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 615–635.
32.
JohnsonW. R. (1988). Income redistribution in a federal system. The American Economic Review, 78, 570–573.
33.
KaneT. J. (1995). Rising public college tuition and college entry: How well do public subsidies promote access to college? (NBER Working Paper No. 5164). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
34.
LeeD. S. (2009). Training, wages, and sample selection: Estimating sharp bounds on treatment effects. The Review of Economic Studies, 76, 1071–1102.
35.
LeeD. S.LemieuxT. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48, 281–355.
36.
LongB. T. (2008). What is known about the impact of financial aid? Implications for policy (NCPR working paper). New York, NY: National Center for Postsecondary Research.
37.
LudwigJ.MillerD. L. (2005). Does Head Start improve children’s life chances? Evidence from a regression discontinuity design (NBER Working Paper No. 11702). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
38.
MarxB. M.TurnerL. J. (2015). Borrowing trouble? Student loans, the cost of borrowing, and implications for the effectiveness of need-based grant aid (NBER Working Paper No. 20850). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
39.
MatsudairaJ. (2017). Not so simple: Aid simplification and the impact of Pell grants on college enrollment [Mimeo]. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
40.
McCraryJ. (2008). Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 698–714.
41.
McCraryJ.RoyerH. (2011). The effect of female education on fertility and infant health: Evidence from school entry policies using exact date of birth. American Economic Review, 101(1), 158–195.
42.
McPhersonM. S.SchapiroM. O. (1991). Does student aid affect college enrollment? New evidence on a persistent controversy. The American Economic Review, 81, 309–318.
43.
PageL. C.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2016). Improving college access in the United States: Barriers and policy responses. Economics of Education Review, 51, 4–22.
44.
RizzoM.EhrenbergR. G. (2004). Resident and nonresident tuition and enrollment at flagship state universities. In HoxbyC. M. (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 303–354). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
45.
SchuddeL. (2013). Heterogeneous treatment effects in higher education: Exploring variation in the effects of college experiences on student success (Doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin–Madison.
46.
Scott-ClaytonJ. (2013). Information constraints and financial aid policy. In HellerD. E.CallenderC. (Eds.), Student financing of higher education: A comparative perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
47.
Scott-ClaytonJ.ZafarB. (2016). Financial aid, debt management, and socioeconomic outcomes: Post-college effects of merit-based aid (No. W22574). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
48.
SeftorN. S.TurnerS. E. (2002). Back to school: Federal student aid policy and adult college enrollment. Journal of Human Resources, 37, 336–352.
49.
SingellL. D.StoneJ. A. (2007). For whom the Pell tolls: The response of university tuition to federal grants-in-aid. Economics of Education Review, 26, 285–295.
50.
TurnerL. J. (2014, August). The road to Pell is paved with good intentions: The economic incidence of federal student grant aid (Working paper). College Park: University of Maryland. Retrieved from http://econweb.umd.edu/~turner/Turner_FedAidIncidence.pdf
51.
WiederspanM. (2016). Denying loan access: The student-level consequences when community colleges opt out of the Stafford Loan Program. Economics of Education Review, 51, 79–96.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
