Addressing the educational needs of students in math early on is critical given that early gaps in math skills widen further over the course of schooling. This study examines the effectiveness and costs of Kentucky’s Math Achievement Fund—a unique state-level program that combines targeted interventions, peer-coaching, and close collaboration among teachers to improve math achievement in grades K–3. The program is found to improve not only math achievement, but also reading test scores and non-test outcomes including student attendance and disciplinary incidents. The benefits exist across students from various socioeconomic backgrounds, and they are slightly higher for racial minorities.
AltonjiJ. G.PierretC. R. (2001). Employer learning and statistical discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 313–350.
2.
AndersonM. L. (2008). Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: A reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484), 1481–1495.
3.
AngristJ. D.LavyV. (1999). Using Maimonides’ rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 533–575.
4.
AustinW.FiglioD.GoldhaberD.HanushekE. A.KilbrideT.KoedelC.LeeJ. S.LuoJ.ÖzekU.ParsonsE.RivkinS. G.SassT. R.StrunkK. O. (2023). Academic mobility in US public schools: Evidence from nearly 3 million students. Journal of Public Economics, 228, 105016.
5.
BarrettC.VanDerHeydenA. (2020). A cost-effectiveness analysis of classwide math intervention. Journal of School Psychology, 80, 54–65.
6.
BaumertJ.NagyG.LehmannR. (2012). Cumulative advantages and the emergence of social and ethnic inequality: Matthew effects in reading and mathematics development within elementary schools?. Child Development, 83(4), 1347–1367.
7.
BehrmanJ. R.RossD. R.SabotR. (2008). Improving quality versus increasing the quantity of schooling: Estimates of rates of return from rural Pakistan. Journal of Development Economics, 85(1–2), 94–104.
8.
BertrandM.DufloE.MullainathanS. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275.
9.
BlazarD.HellerB.KaneT.PolikoffM.StaigerD.CarrellS.GoldhaberD.HarrisD. N.HitchR.HoldenK. L.KurlaenderM. (2019). Learning by the book: Comparing math achievement growth by textbook in six common core states (Research report). Center for Education Policy Research, Harvard University.
10.
BransfordJ. D.BrownA. L.CockingR. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
11.
BuysseV.CastroD. C.Peisner-FeinbergE. (2010). Effects of a professional development program on classroom practices and outcomes for Latino Dual Language Learners. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(1), 94–206.
12.
CallawayB.Sant’AnnaP. H. (2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200–230.
13.
CardD.PayneA. A. (2021). High school choices and the gender gap in STEM. Economic Inquiry, 59(1), 9–28.
14.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ.WolfeC. B.SpitlerM. E. (2013). Longitudinal evaluation of a scale-up model for teaching mathematics with trajectories and technologies: Persistence of effects in the third year. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 812–850.
15.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.CliftonC. R.TuraevaM. R. (2021). School segregation at the classroom level in a southern “New destination” state. Race and Social Problems, 13(2), 131–160.
16.
ConnorC. M.MazzoccoM. M.KurzT.CroweE. C.TigheE. L.WoodT. S.MorrisonF. J. (2018). Using assessment to individualize early mathematics instruction. Journal of School Psychology, 66, 97–113.
17.
CortesK. E.GoodmanJ. S.NomiT. (2015). Intensive math instruction and educational attainment long-run impacts of double-dose algebra. Journal of Human Resources, 50(1), 108–158.
18.
CrossC. T.WoodsT. A.SchweingruberH. E. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. National Academies Press.
19.
de ChaisemartinC.d’HaultfoeuilleX. (2020). Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects. American Economic Review, 110(9), 2964–2696.
20.
DiamondK. E.JusticeL. M.SieglerR. S.SnyderP. A. (2013). Synthesis of IES research on early intervention and early childhood education (NCSER 2013-3001). National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
21.
DongN.MaynardR.KelceyB.SpybrookJ.LiW.BowdenA. B.PhamD. (2024). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for incremental cost-effectiveness ratios: A comparison of five methods. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2024.2393412
22.
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP.PaganiL. S.FeinsteinL.EngelM.Brooks-GunnJ.SextonH.DuckworthK.JapelC.SextonH. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428.
23.
EllisonG.SwansonA. (2010). The gender gap in secondary school mathematics at high achievement levels: Evidence from the American Mathematics Competitions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 109–128.
24.
FiglioD.HoldenK. L.OzekU. (2018). Do students benefit from longer school days? Regression discontinuity evidence from Florida’s additional hour of literacy instruction. Economics of Education Review, 67, 171–183.
25.
FuchsL. S.GearyD. C.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.SchatschneiderC.HamlettC. L.DeSelmsJ.SeethalerP. M.WilsonJ.CraddockC. F.BryantJ. D.LutherK.ChangasP. (2013). Effects of first-grade number knowledge tutoring with contrasting forms of practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 58–77.
26.
FuchsL. S.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M.FuchsD.HamlettC. L. (2010). The effects of strategic counting instruction, with and without deliberate practice, on number combination skill among students with mathematics difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 89–100.
27.
FinnJ. D.GerberS. B.AchillesC. M.Boyd-ZahariasJ. (2001). The enduring effects of small classes. Teachers College Record, 103, 145–183.
28.
FosterJ.TomaE.TroskeS. (2013). Does teacher professional development improve Math and Science outcomes and is it cost effective?Journal of Education Finance, 38(3), 255–275.
29.
GaretM. S.HeppenJ. B.WaltersK.ParkinsonJ.SmithT. M.SongM.BormanG. D. (2016). Focusing on mathematical knowledge: The impact of content-intensive teacher professional development (NCEE 2016-4010). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
30.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.NugentL.BaileyH. D. (2013). Adolescents’ functional numeracy is predicted by their school entry number system knowledge. PLOS ONE, 8(1), e54651.
31.
GerstenR.RolfhusE.ClarkeB.DeckerL. E.WilkinsC.DiminoJ. (2015). Intervention for first graders with limited number knowledge large-scale replication of a randomized controlled trial. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 516–546.
32.
GlewweP. (1996). The relevance of standard estimates of rates of return to schooling for education policy: A critical assessment. Journal of Development Economics, 51(2), 267–290.
33.
GoldhaberD.WolffM.DalyT. (2021). Assessing the accuracy of elementary school test scores as predictors of students’ high school outcomes (CALDER Working Paper No. 235-0821-2). Center for the Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research. https://caldercenter.org/sites/default/files/CALDER%20WP%20235-0520-2.pdf.
34.
Goodman-BaconA. (2021). Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. Journal of econometrics, 225(2), 254–277.
35.
GuthrieG. (2015). The formalistic education paradigm in Papua New Guinea. Contemporary PNG Studies, 22, 33.
36.
HanushekE.WoessmannL. (2008). The role of cognitive skills in economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(3), 607–668.
JacobR.HillH.CoreyD. (2017). The impact of a professional development program on teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching, instruction, and student achievement. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(2), 379–407.
39.
JacobseA. E.HarskampE. G. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effects of instructional interventions on students’ mathematics achievement. GION, Gronings Instituut voor Onderzoek van Onderwijs, Opvoeding en Ontwikkeling, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
40.
KoonS.FoormanB.GallowayT. (2020). Identifying North Carolina students at risk of scoring below proficient in reading at the end of grade 3 (REL 2020–030). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED607256.pdf.
41.
LazearE. P. (2003). Teacher incentives. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 10(3), 179–214.
42.
LevinH.McEwanP.BelfieldC.BowdenB.ShandR. (2018). Economic evaluation in education: Cost-effectiveness and benefit-cost analysis. Sage Publications.
43.
LoebS.BassokD. (2007). Early childhood and the achievement gap. In H. F. Ladd & E. B. Fiske (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (pp. 517–534). Routledge.
44.
MagnusonK. A.DuncanG. J. (2006). The role of family socioeconomic resources in the black–white test score gap among young children. Developmental Review, 26(4), 365–399.
45.
MashburnA. J.PiantaR. C.HamreB. K.DownerJ. T.BarbarinO. A.BryantD.BurchinalM.EarlyD. M.HowesC. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in pre-kindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79(3), 732–749.
46.
MenyhartO.WeltzB.GyőrffyB. (2021). MultipleTesting. com: A tool for life science researchers for multiple hypothesis testing correction. PLOS One, 16(6), e0245824.
47.
MokherC. G.LeedsD. M.HarrisJ. C. (2018). Adding it up: How the Florida College and Career Readiness Initiative impacted developmental education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(2), 219–242.
48.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.WuQ. (2011). Kindergarten children’s growth trajectories in reading and mathematics: Who falls increasingly behind?. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(5), 472–488.
49.
MurnaneR. J.WillettJ. B.DuhaldebordeY.TylerJ. (2000). How important are the cognitive skills of teenagers in predicting subsequent earnings. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(4), 547–568.
50.
NyeB.HedgesL. V.KonstantopoulosS. (2001). Are effects of small classes cumulative? Evidence from a Tennessee experiment. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 336–345.
51.
OuD. (2010). To leave or not to leave? A regression discontinuity analysis of the impact of failing the high school exit exam. Economics of Education Review, 29(2), 171–186.
52.
PapayJ. P.MurnaneR. J.WillettJ. B. (2011). How performance information affects human-capital investment decisions: The impact of test-score labels on educational outcomes (NBER Working Paper No. 17120). National Bureau of Economic Research.
53.
PellegriniM.LakeC.InnsA.SlavinR. E. (2018, October). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Annual meeting of the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, Washington, DC.
54.
PennerA. M.ParetM. (2008). Gender differences in mathematics achievement: Exploring the early grades and the extremes. Social Science Research, 37(1), 239–253.
55.
PetscherY.FienH.StanleyC.GearinB.GaabN.FletcherJ. M.JohnsonE. (2019). Screening for dyslexia. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Improving Literacy.
56.
RandelB.ApthorpH.BeesleyD.ClarkF.WangX. (2016). Impacts of professional development in classroom assessment on teacher and student outcomes. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(5), 491–502.
57.
RouseC. E.HannawayJ.GoldhaberD.FiglioD. (2013). Feeling the Florida heat? How low-performing schools respond to voucher and accountability pressure. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(2), 251–281.
58.
SavelsberghE. R.PrinsG. T.RietbergenC.FechnerS.VaessenB. E.DraijerJ. M.BakkerA. (2016). Effects of innovative science and mathematics teaching on student attitudes and achievement: A meta-analytic study. Educational Research Review, 19, 158–172.
59.
SchoenR. C.LaVeniaM.TazarA. M. (2018, March). Effects of a two-year Cognitively Guided Instruction professional development program on first- and second-grade student achievement in mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research in Effective Education, Washington, DC.
60.
SlavinR. E.KarweitN. L. (1985). Effects of whole-class, ability grouped and individualized instruction on mathematics achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 22(3), 351–367.
61.
SlavinR. E.LakeC. (2008). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 427–515.
62.
SlavinR. E.LakeC.DavisS.MaddenN. A. (2011). Effective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Educational Research Review, 6(1), 1–26.
63.
SmithT. M.CobbP.FarranD. C.CordrayD. S.MunterC. (2013). Evaluating math recovery: Assessing the causal impact of a diagnostic tutoring program on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 397–428.
64.
StevensR. J.SlavinR. E. (1995). The cooperative elementary school: Effects on students’ achievement, attitudes, and social relations. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 321–351.
65.
StipekD. (2002). At what age should children enter kindergarten? A question for policy makers and parents. Society for Research in Child Development Policy Report, 16, 13–16.
66.
StyersM.Baird-WilkersonS. (2011). A final report for the evaluation of Pearson’s focusMATH Program. Magnolia Consulting.
67.
SunL.AbrahamS. (2021). Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 175–199.
68.
TaylorE. (2014). Spending more of the school day in math class: Evidence from a regression discontinuity in middle school. Journal of Public Economics, 117, 162–181.
69.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
70.
WanzekJ.VaughnS.ScammaccaN.GatlinB.WalkerM. A.CapinP. (2016). Meta-analyses of the effects of tier 2 type reading interventions in grades K-3. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 551–576.
71.
WattsT. W.ClementsD. H.SaramaJ.WolfeC. B.SpitlerM. E.BaileyD. H. (2017). Does early mathematics intervention change the processes underlying children’s learning?. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(1), 96–115.
72.
WattsT. W.DuncanG. J.SieglerR. S.Davis-KeanP. E. (2014). What’s past is prologue: Relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 352–360.
73.
WeisR.OsborneK. J.DeanE. L. (2015). Effectiveness of a universal, interdependent group contingency program on children’s academic achievement: A countywide evaluation. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 31(3), 199–218.
74.
XuZ.ÖzekU.HansenM. (2015). Teacher performance trajectories in high-and lower-poverty schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(4), 458–477.
75.
YehS. S. (2010). The cost effectiveness of 22 approaches for raising student achievement. Journal of Education Finance, 36(1), 38–75.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
