Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Reclassification can be an important juncture in the academic experience of English Learners (ELs). Literature has explored the potential for reclassification to influence academic outcomes like achievement, yet its impact on social-emotional learning (SEL) skills, which are as malleable and important to long-term success, remains unclear. Using a regression discontinuity design, we examine the causal effect of reclassification on SEL skills (self-efficacy, growth mindset, self-management, and social awareness) among 4th to 8th graders. In the districts studied, reclassification improved academic self-efficacy by 0.2 standard deviations for students near the threshold. Results are robust to alternative specifications and analyses. Given this evidence, we discuss ways districts might establish practices that instill more positive academic beliefs among ELs.

Keywords

student behavior/attitude equity educational policy regression discontinuity quasi-experimental analysis secondary data analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abedi

(2008). Classification system for English language learners: Issues and recommendations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(3), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00125.x

Almlund

Duckworth

Heckman

Kautz

(2011). Personality psychology and economics. In Hanushek

E. A.

Machin

Woessman

(Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 4, Issue 5500, pp. 1–181). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53444-6.00001-8

Bandura

(1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Betts

Hill

Bachofer

Hayes

Lee

Zau

(2019). English Learner Trajectories and Reclassification. https://www.ppic.org/wp-content/uploads/english-learner-trajectories-and-reclassification.pdf

Bolger

K. E.

Patterson

C. J.

Thompson

W. W.

Kupersmidt

J. B.

(1995). Psychosocial adjustment among children experiencing persistent and intermittent family economic hardship. Child Development, 66, 1107–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00926.x

Brooks

M. D.

(2019). Transforming literacy education for long-term English learners. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315151236

Bui

S. A.

(2013). How do limited English proficient students affect each other’s educational outcomes? Evidence from student panel data. https://silo.tips/download/how-do-limited-english-proficient-students-affect-each-other-s-educational-outco

California Department of Education. (2021). Facts about English Learners in California. https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/ad/cefelfacts.asp

California English Language Development Test: Technical Report. (2015, November). https://www.cde.ca.gov/re/pr/documents/celdt1415techrpt.pdf

10.

Callahan

R. M.

(2013). The English learner dropout dilemma: Multiple risks and multiple resources. https://cdrpsb.org/researchreport19.pdf

11.

Callahan

R. M.

Humphries

M. H.

(2016). Undermatched? School-based linguistic status, college going, and the immigrant advantage. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 263–295. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215627857

12.

Callahan

R. M

Wilkinson

Muller

(2010). Academic achievement and course taking among language minority youth in U.S. schools: Effects of ESL placement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(1), 84–117. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373709359805

13.

Callahan

R. M.

Wilkinson

Muller

Frisco

(2009). ESL placement and schools: Effects on immigrant achievement. Educational Policy, 23(2), 355–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904807310034

14.

Calonico

Cattaneo

M. D.

Farrell

M. H.

Titiunik

(2017). rdrobust: Software for regression discontinuity designs. Stata Journal, 17, 372–404.

15.

CASEL. (2005). Safe and sound: An educational leader’s guide to evidenced based SEL programs.

16.

Catalano

R. F.

Hawkins

J. D.

Berglund

M. L.

Pollard

J. A.

Arthur

M. W.

(2002). Prevention science and positive youth development: Competitive or cooperative frameworks? Journal of Adolescent Health, 31(6), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00496-2

17.

Choudhury

Blakemore

S. J.

Charman

(2006). Social cognitive development during adolescence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1(3), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsl024

18.

Cimpian

J. R.

Thompson

K. D.

Makowski

M. B.

(2017). Evaluating English learner reclassification policy effects across districts. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1_Suppl.), 255S–278S. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216635796

19.

Claro

Loeb

(2019a). Self-management skills and student achievement gains: Evidence from California’s CORE Districts [PACE Working Paper]. https://www.edworkingpapers.com/sites/default/files/ai19-138.pdf

20.

Claro

Loeb

(2019b). Students with growth mindset learn more in school. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED600488

21.

Conley

D. T.

(2008). Rethinking college readiness. New Directions for Higher Education, 2008(144), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.321

22.

Cunha

Heckman

J. J.

(2006). Formulating, identifying and estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Journal of Human Resources, 53(4), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.12.001

23.

Dabach

D. B.

(2014). “I am not a shelter!”: Stigma and social boundaries in teachers’ accounts of students’ experience in separate “sheltered” English Learner Classrooms. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 19, 98–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.954044

24.

de Boer

Timmermans

A. C.

van der Werf

M. P. C

. (2018). The effects of teacher expectation interventions on teachers’ expectations and student achievement: Narrative review and meta-analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 24(3–5), 180–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2018.1550834

25.

Deming

D. J.

(2017). The growing importance of social skills in the labor market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4), 1593–1640. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx022

26.

Destin

Hanselman

Buontempo

Tipton

Yeager

D. S.

(2019). Do student mindsets differ by socioeconomic status and explain disparities in academic achievement in the United States? AERA Open, 5(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419857706

27.

Duckworth

Peterson

Matthews

M. D.

Kelly

D. R.

(2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087

28.

Duckworth

Tsukayama

May

. (2010). Establishing causality using longitudinal hierarchical linear modeling: An illustration predicting achievement from self-control. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609359707

29.

Duckworth

A. L.

Seligman

M. E.

(2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x

30.

Dusenbury

Calin

Domitrovich

Weissberg

R. P.

(2015). What does evidence-based instruction in social and emotional learning actually look like in practice? (Issue October). https://selforteachers.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/PDF-25-CASEL-Brief-What-Does-SEL-Look-Like-in-Practice-11-1-15.pdf

31.

Dweck

C. S.

(2006). The mindsets. In Dweck

C. S.

(Ed.), Mindset: The new psychology of success (pp. 3–14). Random House.

32.

Dweck

C. S.

Walton

G. M.

Cohen

G. L.

(2011). Academic tenacity: Mindset and skills that promote long-term learning. https://ed.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/manual/dweck-walton-cohen-2014.pdf

33.

Education Commission of the States. (2020). 50-state comparison: English learner policies. https://www.ecs.org/50-state-comparison-english-learner-policies/

34.

Equal Educational Opportunities Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1701 (1974).

35.

Estrada

Wang

(2018). Making English learner reclassification to fluent ENGLISH proficient attainable or elusive: When meeting criteria is and is not enough. American Educational Research Journal, 55(2), 207–242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217733543

36.

Fahle

E. M.

Lee

M. G.

Loeb

(2019). A middle school drop: Consistent gender differences in students’ self-efficacy. https://edpolicyinca.org/sites/default/files/PB_Fahle_Oct19.pdf

37.

Farrington

C. A.

Roderick

Allensworth

Nagaoka

Keyes

T. S.

Johnson

D. W.

Beechum

N. O.

(2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners. The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: A critical literature review. https://doi.org/10.1353/esp.2016.0016

38.

Flores

Kleyn

Menken

(2015). Looking holistically in a climate of partiality: Identities of students labeled long-term English Language Learners. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 14(2), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2015.1019787

39.

Flores

S. M.

Drake

T. A.

(2014). Does English language learner (ELL) identification predict college remediation designation? A comparison by race and ethnicity, and ELL waiver status. Review of Higher Education, 38, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2014.0041

40.

Frey

B. B.

(2018). Every student succeeds act. In The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n245

41.

Gándara

Maxwell-Jolly

Driscoll

(2005). Listening to teachers of English Language Learners: A survey of California teachers’ challenges, experiences, and professional development needs. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED491701.pdf

42.

Gaspar

Cerqueira

Branquinho

De Matos

M. G.

(2018). Dimensions of social and personal skills in children and adolescents: Age and gender differences. International Journal of Development Research, 8(2), 18394–18400.

43.

Gelman

Imbens

(2019). Why high-order polynomials should not be used in regression discontinuity designs. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 37(3), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2017.1366909

44.

Goldenberg

Coleman

(2010). Promoting academic achievement among English learners: A guide to the research. Corwin.

45.

González

Moll

L. C.

Amanti

(2006). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Routledge.

46.

Heckman

J. J.

Humphries

J. E.

Kautz

Heckman

J. J.

Kautz

(2015). Achievement tests and the role of character in American life. In The myth of achievement tests. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226100128.003.0001

47.

Heckman

J. J.

Kautz

(2013). Fostering and measuring skills: Interventions that improve character and cognition (Vol. 1). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

48.

Heckman

J. J.

Rubinstein

(2001). The benefits of skill: The importance of noncognitive skills: Lessons from the GED testing program. American Economic Review, 91(2), 145–154.

49.

Hill

L. E.

Weston

Hayes

J. M.

(2014). Reclassification of English learner students in California. Public Policy Institute of California.

50.

Honigsfeld

Dove

M. G.

(2019). Collaborating for English learners: A foundational guide to integrated practices (2nd ed.). SAGE.

51.

Huang

(2013). Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0097-y

52.

Imbens

Kalyanaraman

(2012). Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 79(3), 933–959. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdr043

53.

Imbens

G. W.

Lemieux

(2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 615–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.001

54.

Jacobs

J. E.

Lanza

Osgood

D. W.

Eccles

J. S.

Wigfield

(2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73(2), 509–527.

55.

Johnson

(2020). The impact of English learner reclassification on high school reading and academic progress. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719877197

56.

Kanno

Kangas

S. E. N.

(2014). “I’m not going to be, like, for the AP”: English language learners’ limited access to advanced college-preparatory courses in high school. American Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 848–878. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214544716

57.

LeClair

Doll

Osborn

Jones

(2009). English language learners’ and non–English language learners’ perceptions of the classroom environment. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 568–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20398

58.

Lee

D. S.

Lemieux

(2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48, 281–355. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.2.281

59.

Mavrogordato

White

R. S.

(2017). Reclassification variation: How policy implementation guides the process of exiting students from English learner status. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 281–310. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716687075

60.

McCrary

(2008). Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 698–714.

61.

McNeish

Wolf

M. G.

(2020). Thinking twice about sum scores. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01398-0

62.

Merolla

D. M.

(2017). Self-efficacy and academic achievement. Sociological Perspectives, 60(2), 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121416629993

63.

Meyer

R. H.

Wang

Rice

A. B.

(2018). Measuring students’ social-emotional learning among California’s CORE districts: An IRT modeling approach policy analysis for California education. https://edpolicyinca.org/sites/default/files/Measuring_SEL_May-2018.pdf

64.

Muraki

(1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169201600206

65.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). English language learners in public schools. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgf.asp

66.

Niehaus

Adelson

J. L.

(2014). School support, parental involvement, and academic and social-emotional outcomes for English language learners. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 810–844. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214531323

67.

Oakes

(1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. Yale University Press.

68.

Pajares

Britner

S. L.

Valiante

(2000). Relation between achievement goals and self-beliefs of middle school students in writing and science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(4), 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1027

69.

Papay

J. P.

Willett

J. B.

Murnane

R. J.

(2011). Extending the regression-discontinuity approach to multiple assignment variables. Journal of Econometrics, 161, 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.12.008

70.

Papini

D. R.

Farmer

F. F.

Clark

S. M.

Micka

J. C.

Barnett

J. K.

(1990). Early adolescent age and gender differences in patterns of emotional self-disclosure to parents and friends. Adolescence, 25(100), 959–976.

71.

Parrish

T. B.

Perez

Merickel

Linquanti

(2006). Effects of the implementation of proposition 227 on the education of English learners, K-12. https://www2.wested.org/www-static/online_pubs/227Reportb.pdf

72.

Pintrich

P. R.

Zusho

(2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50012-7

73.

Pope

N. G.

(2016). The Marginal effect of K-12 English language development programs: Evidence from Los Angeles Schools. Economics of Education Review, 53, 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.04.009

74.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Rowan

Cheong

Y. F.

(1993). Higher order instructional goals in secondary schools: Class, teacher, and school influences. American Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 523–553. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312030003523

75.

Reardon

S. F.

Galindo

(2009). The Hispanic-White achievement gap in math and reading in the elementary grades. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 853–891. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209333184

76.

Reardon

S. F.

Robinson

J. P.

(2012). Regression discontinuity designs with multiple rating-score variables. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2011.609583

77.

Robinson

J. P.

(2011). Evaluating criteria for English learner reclassification: A causal-effects approach using a binding-score regression discontinuity design with instrumental variables. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 267–292. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711407912

78.

Robinson-Cimpian

J. P.

Thompson

K. D.

(2016). The effects of changing test-based policies for reclassifying English learners. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(2), 279–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21882

79.

Robinson-Cimpian

J. P.

Thompson

K. D.

Umansky

(2016). Research and policy considerations for English learner equity. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215623553

80.

Rosenthal

Jacobson

(1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. The Urban Review, 3, 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02322211

81.

Rumberger

R. W.

Gándara

(2004). Seeking equity in the education of California’s English learners. In. Teachers College Record, 106, 2032–2056. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00426.x

82.

Samejima

(1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika, 34, 1–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03372160

83.

Santibañez

Umansky

(2018). English learners: Charting their experiences and mapping their futures in California schools. In Getting down to facts II (Issue September). https://gettingdowntofacts.com/sites/default/files/2018-09/GDTFII_Brief_EnglishLearners.pdf

84.

Schunk

D. H.

Meece

J. L.

(2006). Self-efficacy development in adolescents. In Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 71–96). http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/03SchunkMeeceAdoEd5.pdf

85.

Schunk

D. H.

Pajares

(2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. Development of Achievement Motivation, 1446, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50003-6

86.

Shin

(2017). The effects of the initial English language learner classification on students’ later academic outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717737378

87.

Sklad

Diekstra

de Ritter

Ben

Gravesteijn

(2012). Effectiveness of school-based universal social, emotional, and behavioral programs: Do they enhance students’ development in the area of skill, behavior, and adjustment? Psychology in the Schools, 49(9), 892–909. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits

88.

Slama

R. B.

(2014). Investigating whether and when English learners are reclassified into mainstream classrooms in the United States: A discrete-time survival analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 220–252. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214528277

89.

Snipes

Tran

(2017). Growth mindset, performance avoidance, and academic behaviors in Clark County School District (REL 2017-226). Regional Educational Laboratory West.

90.

Soland

(2022). Evidence that selecting an appropriate item response theory–based approach to scoring surveys can help avoid biased treatment effect estimates. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 82(2), 376–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644211007551

91.

Soland

Hamilton

L. S.

Stecher

B. M.

(2013). Measuring 21st century competencies: Guidance for educators [Society Global Cities Education Network Report]. Asia Society.

92.

Soland

Kuhfeld

Wolk

(2019). Examining the state-trait composition of social-emotional learning constructs: Implications for practice, policy, and evaluation. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 12(3), 550–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2019.1615158

93.

Soland

Rimm-Kaufman

S. E.

Kuhfeld

Ventura-Abbas

(2022). Empirical benchmarks for changes in social and emotional skills over time. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13741

94.

Soland

Sandilos

L. E.

(2020). English language learners, self-efficacy, and the achievement gap: Understanding the relationship between academic and social-emotional growth. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 26, 20–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2020.1787171

95.

Steele

J. L.

Slater

R. O.

Zamarro

Miller

Burkhauser

Bacon

(2017). Effects of dual-language immersion programs on student achievement: Evidence from lottery data. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 282S–306S. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216634463

96.

Thompson

K. D.

(2015). Questioning the long-term English learner label: How categorization can blind us to students’ abilities. Teachers College Record, 117, 50.

97.

Umansky

(2016a). Leveled and exclusionary tracking. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1792–1833. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216675404

98.

Umansky

(2016b). To be or not to be EL: An examination of the impact of classifying students as English learners. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(4), 714–737. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716664802

99.

Umansky

(2018). State policies to advance English learners’ experiences and outcomes in California’s schools. https://gettingdowntofacts.com/sites/default/files/2018-09/GDTFII_Report_Umansky.pdf

100.

Umansky

Dumont

(2021). English learner labeling: How English learner classification in kindergarten shapes teacher perceptions of student skills and the moderating role of bilingual instructional settings. American Educational Research Journal, 58(5), 993–1031. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831221997571

101.

Umansky

Reardon

(2014). Reclassification patterns among Latino English learner students in bilingual, dual immersion, and English immersion classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 879–912. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214545110

102.

Umansky

Reardon

S. F.

Hakuta

Thompson

K. D.

Estrada

Hayes

Maldonado

Tandberg

Goldenberg

(2015). Improving the opportunities and outcomes of California’s students learning English: Findings from school district-university collaborative partnerships. PACE Policy Brief, 15–1, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(12)01439-9

103.

Valdés

(1998). The world outside and inside schools: Language and immigrant children. Educational Researcher, 27(6), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027006004

104.

Valentino

R. A.

Reardon

S. F.

(2015). Effectiveness of four instructional programs designed to serve English learners: Variation by ethnicity and initial English proficiency. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(4), 612–637. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715573310

105.

Valenzuela

(1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. State University of New York Press.

106.

Villegas

Pompa

(2020). The patchy landscape of state English learner policies under ESSA. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/ESSA-Compendium-Final.pdf

107.

Weissberg

R. P.

Cascarino

(2013). Academic learning + social-emotional learning = national priority. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171309500203

108.

West

M. R.

Buckley

Krachman

S. B.

Bookman

(2018). Development and implementation of student social-emotional surveys in the CORE Districts. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 55, 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.06.001

109.

West

M. R.

Pier

Fricke

Hough

Loeb

Meyer

R. H.

Rice

A. B.

(2020). Trends in student social-emotional learning: Evidence from the first large-scale panel student survey. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(2), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720912236

110.

Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

Mac Iver

Reuman

D. A.

Midgley

(1991). Transitions during early adolescence: Changes in children’s domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27(4), 552–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.4.552

111.

Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

Pintrich

P. R.

(1996). Development between the ages of 11 and 25. In Berliner

D. C.

Calfee

R. C.

(Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 148–185). Prentice Hall.

112.

Yoon

(2008). Uninvited guests: The influence of teachers’ roles and pedagogies on the positioning of English language learners in the regular classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 495–522. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208316200

113.

Zimmerman

B. J.

Bandura

Martinez-Pons

(1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 663–676. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029003663

114.

Zimmerman

B. J.

Martinez-Pons

(1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.82 MB

Does Reclassification Change How English Learners Feel About School and Themselves? Evidence From a Regression Discontinuity Design

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material