There are unique challenges to estimating causal effects of preschool for students with special needs that have not received attention in the literature. We revisit the Head Start Impact Study (HSIS) to illustrate that when and how special needs is defined has implications for the internal validity of and interpretation of special needs subgroup impact estimates. We find that the treatment group in the HSIS was three percentage points more likely to be classified as special education (SD = 0.11, p < .001) at baseline, likely biasing the impact estimates for this subgroup. We also find that the estimated intent-to-treat effects of Head Start on cognitive and socioemotional measures are sensitive to subgroup definition.
AronL.LoprestP. (2012). Disability and the education system. The Future of Children, 22, 97–122. doi:10.1353/foc.2012.0007
2.
ArtilesA. J. (2003). Special education’s changing identity: Paradoxes and dilemmas in views of culture and space. Harvard Educational Review, 73, 164–202. doi:10.17763/haer.73.2.j78t573x377j7106
3.
BassokD.FinchJ.LeeR.ReardonS.WaldfogelJ. (2016). Socioeconomic gaps in early childhood experiences: 1998 to 2010. AERA Open, 2(3), 1–22. doi:10.1177/2332858416653924
ConyersL.ReynoldsA.OuS.-R. (2003). Effect of early childhood intervention and subsequent special education services: Findings from the Chicago Child-Parent Centers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 75–95. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3699518
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP.. . . JapelC. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
10.
DuncanG. J.MagnusonK. (2013). Investing in preschool programs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27, 109–132. doi:10.1257/jep.27.2.109
11.
DunnL. M.DunnL. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.
12.
GrahamJ. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530
13.
HarryB.KlingnerJ. K. (2006). Why are so many minority students in special education? Understanding race and disability in schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
HebblerK.SpikerD. (2016). Supporting young children with disabilities. The Future of Children, 25, 185–205.
16.
Individuals With Disabilities in Education Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446 Sec. 303.300-346 (2004a).
17.
Individuals With Disabilities in Education Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446 Sec. 655(a)(5) (2004b).
18.
JenkinsJ.DaleP.MillsP.ColeK.PiousC.RonkJ. (2006). How special education preschool graduates finish: Status at 19 years of age. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 737–781. doi:10.3102/00028312043004737
19.
JusticeL. M.LoganJ. A. R.LinT.-J.KaderavekJ. N. (2014). Peer effects in early childhood education: Testing the assumptions of special-education inclusion. Psychological Science, 25, 1722–1729. doi:10.1177/0956797614538978
20.
KruegerA.ZhuP. (2004). Another look at the New York City school voucher experiment. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 658–698. doi:10.1177/0002764203260152
21.
LazarI.DarlingtonR.MurrayH.RoyceJ.SnipperA.RameyC. (1982). Lasting effects of early education: A report from the consortium for longitudinal studies. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 47(2/3), 1–151. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1165938
MaddenJ.O’HaraJ.LevensteinP. (1984). Home again: Effects of the mother–child home program on mother and child. Child Development, 55, 636–647. doi:10.2307/1129975
MarkowitzJ.CarlsonE.FreyW.RileyJ.ShimshakA.HeinzenH.. . . LeeH. (2006). Preschoolers’ characteristics, services, and results: Wave 1 overview report from the Pre-Elementary Education Longitudinal Study (PEELS). Rockville, MD: Westat. Retrieved from http://www.peels.org/
26.
McCartonC.Brooks-GunnJ.WallaceI.BauerC.BennettF.BerbaumJ.. . . MeinertC. (1997). Results at age 8 years of early intervention for low-birth-weight premature infants: The Infant Health Development Program. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 126–132. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540260040033
27.
MichelmoreK.DynarskiS. (2017). The gap within the gap: Using longitudinal data to understand income differences in educational outcomes. AERA Open, 3, 1–18. doi:10.1177/2332858417692958
28.
MorganP.FarkasG.HillemeierM.MattisonR.MaczugaS.LiH.CookM. (2015). Minorities are disproportionately underrepresented in special education: Longitudinal evidence across five disability conditions. Educational Researcher, 44, 278–292. doi:10.3102/0013189X15591157
29.
MorrierM.GallagherP. (2012). Racial disparities in preschool special education eligibility for five southern states. The Journal of Special Education, 44, 152–169. doi:10.1177/0022466910380465
30.
MurnaneR.WillettJ. (2010). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31.
MuschkinC.LaddH.DodgeK. (2015). Impact of North Carolina’s early childhood initiatives on special education placements in third grade. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37, 478–500. doi:10.3102/0162373714559096
National Center for Education Statistics. (2016b). Table 204.70: Number and percentage of children served under Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), part B, by age group and state or jurisdiction: Selected years, 1990-91 through 2013-14. Digest of Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d15/tables/dt15_204.70.asp?current=yes
34.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2016c). Table 202.20: Percentage of 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children enrolled in preprimary programs, by level of program, attendance status, and selected child and family characteristics: 2014. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d15/tables/dt15_202.20.asp
35.
National Center for Special Education Research. (2006). Preschoolers with disabilities: Characteristics, services, and results: Wave 1 overview report from the Pre-Elementary Education Longitudinal Study (PEELS). Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=NCSER20063003
Office of Child Development. (1975, July). Head Start program performance standards (OCD-N-30-364-4). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED122936.pdf
38.
OswaldD. P.CoutinhoM. J.BestA. M.SinghN. (1999). Ethnic representation in special education: The influence of school-related economic and demographic variables. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 194–206. doi:10.1177/002246699903200401
39.
PhillipsD.GormelyW.AndersonS. (2016). The effects of Tulsa’s CAP Head Start program on middle-school academic outcomes and progress. Developmental Psychology, 52, 1247–1261. doi:10.1037/dev0000151
PhillipsD.MeloyM. (2012). High-quality school-based pre-k can boost early learning for children with special needs. Exceptional Children, 78, 471–490. doi:10.1177/001440291207800405
42.
PumaM.BellS.CookR.HeidC.LopezM. (2005). Head Start Impact Study: First year findings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/first_yr_finds.pdf
PumaM.BellS.CookR.HeidC.BroeneP.JenkinsF.. . . DownerJ. (2012). Third grade follow-up to the Head Start Impact Study: Final report (OPRE Report No. 2012-45). Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/head_start_report.pdf
45.
RameyC.CampbellF.BurchinalM.SkinnerM.GardnerD.RameyS. (2000). Persistent effects of early childhood education on high-risk children and their mothers. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 2–14. doi:10.1207/S1532480XADS0401_1
46.
RameyS.RameyC.PhillipsM.LanziR.BrezausekC.KatholiC.SnyderS. (2000). Head Start children’s entry into public school: A report on the National Head Start/Public School Early Childhood Transition Demonstration Study. Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Service. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/transition_study.pdf
47.
RaverC. C.JonesS. M.Li-GriningC. P.ZhaiF.MetzgerM.SolomonB. (2009). Targeting children’s behavior problems in preschool classrooms: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 302–316. doi:10.1037/a0015302
48.
RicciutiA. E.St. PierreR. G.LeeW.ParsadA.RimdziusT. (2004). Third national even start evaluation: Follow-up findings from the experimental design study. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pdf/20053002.pdf
49.
SeitzV.RosenbaumL.ApfelN. (1985). Effects of family support intervention: A ten-year follow-up. Child Development, 56, 376–391. doi:10.2307/1129727
50.
SullivanA. L.BalA. (2013). Disproportionality in special education: Effects of individual and school variables on disability risk. Exceptional Children, 79, 475–494. doi:10.1177/001440291307900406
51.
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, & Research and Evaluation. (2018, February8). Head Start Impact Study (HSIS), 2002-2006 [United States] (ICPSR 29462). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29462.v7
52.
WeilandC. (2016). Impacts of the Boston prekindergarten program on the school readiness of young children with special needs. Developmental Psychology, 52, 1763–1776.
53.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock–Johnson® III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
ZiglerE.MeunchowS. (1992). Head Start: The inside story of America’s most successful educational experiment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
