This study examines the community-wide effects of investments in two early childhood initiatives in North Carolina (Smart Start and More at Four) on the likelihood of a student being placed into special education. We take advantage of variation across North Carolina counties and years in the timing of the introduction and funding levels of the two programs to identify their effects on third-grade outcomes. We find that both programs significantly reduce the likelihood of special education placement in the third grade, resulting in considerable cost savings to the state. The effects of the two programs differ across categories of disability, but do not vary significantly across subgroups of children identified by race, ethnicity, and maternal education levels.
AronL.LoprestP. (2012). Disability and the education system. Future of Children, 22, 97–122.
2.
ArteagaI.ReynoldsA. J.TempleJ. A. (2010). Low birth weight, preschool education, and school remediation. Education and Urban Society, 42, 705–729.
3.
BarnettW. S. (2011). Effectiveness of early educational intervention. Science, 333, 975–978.
4.
BarnettW. S.EpsteinD. J.CarolanM. E.FitzgeraldJ.DebraJ.AckermanD. J.FriedmanA. H. (2010). The state of preschool 2010: State preschool yearbook. New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research.
5.
BartikT. J. (2011). Investing in kids: Early childhood programs and local economic development. Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute.
BurkamD. T.LeeV. E. (2002). Inequality at the starting gate: Social background differences in achievement as children begin school. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
8.
CamilliG.VargasS.RyanS.BarnettW. (2010). Meta-analysis of the effects of early education interventions on cognitive and social development. Teachers College Record, 112, 579–620.
9.
CampbellF. A.RameyC. T. (1995). Cognitive and school outcomes for high-risk African American students at midlife adolescence: Positive effects of early intervention. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 743–772.
10.
CarlsonE.DaleyT.BittermanA.HeinzenH.KellerB.MarkowitzJ.RileyJ. (2009). Early school transitions and the social behavior of children with disabilities: Selected findings from the Pre-Elementary Education Longitudinal Study. Wave 3 overview report from the Pre-Elementary Education Longitudinal Study (PEELS) (NCSER 2009-3016). Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pdf/20093016.pdf
11.
CaspiA.MoffittT. E. (2006). Gene-environment interactions in psychiatry: Joining forces with neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 583–590.
12.
ConyersL. M.OuS.ReynoldsA. J. (2003). The effect of early childhood intervention and subsequent special education services: Findings from the Chicago child-parent centers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 75–95.
13.
CunhaF.HeckmanJ. J.SchennachS. M. (2010). Estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Econometrica, 78, 883–931.
14.
CurrieJ.ThomasD. (1995). Does Head Start make a difference?The American Economic Review, 85, 341–364.
15.
DaleyT. C.CarlsonE. (2009). Predictors of change in eligibility status among preschoolers in special education. Exceptional Children, 75, 412–426.
16.
Davis-KeanP. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 294–304.
17.
DodgeK. A.MaloneP. S.LansfordJ. E.MillerS.PettitG. S.BatesJ. E. (2009). A dynamic cascade model of the development of substance-use onset. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 74(3), vii–119.
18.
DongY. (2010). Kept back to get ahead? Kindergarten retention and academic performance. European Economic Review, 54, 219–236.
GormleyW. T.GayerT.PhillipsD.DawsonB. (2005). The effects of universal pre-K on cognitive development. Developmental Psychology, 41, 872–884.
21.
HarrJ. J.ParrishT.ChambersJ. T. (2008). Special education. In FiskeE. B. (Ed.), Handbook of research in education and finance (pp. 573–590). New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
HeckmanJ. J.MasterovD. V. (2007). The productivity argument for investing in young children. Review of Agricultural Economics, 29, 446–493.
23.
HibelJ.FarkasG.MorganP. L. (2010). Who is placed into special education?Sociology of Education, 83, 312–332.
24.
HuangF. L.InvernizziM. A.DrakeE. A. (2012). The differential effects of preschool: Evidence from Virginia. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 33–45.
25.
InnocentiM. S. (2005). Classification status of children once enrolled in early intervention programs. Salt Lake City: Utah State Office of Education.
26.
JenkinsJ. R.DaleP. S.MillsP. E.ColeK. N.PiousC.RonkJ. (2006). How special education preschool graduates finish: Status at 19 years of age. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 737–781.
27.
LaddH. F.MuschkinC. G.DodgeK. A. (2014). From birth to school: Early childhood initiatives and third-grade outcomes in North Carolina. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33, 162–187. doi:10.1002/pam.21734
28.
MagnusonK.RuhmC.WaldfogelJ. (2007). Does prekindergarten improve school preparation and performance?Economics of Education Review, 26, 33–51.
29.
MannE. A.McCartneyK.ParkJ. M. (2007). Preschool predictors of the need for early remedial and special education services. The Elementary School Journal, 107, 273–285.
30.
MervisJ. (2011). Giving children a head start is possible—But it’s not easy. Science, 333, 956–957.
31.
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (2006). Current expense expenditures by LEAs, purpose codes and years, and exceptional children December child count by LEAs, years. Education Statistics Access System. Retrieved from http://beyond2020.dpi.state.nc.us/wds80_1/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx
Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., & the More at Four Evaluation Team. (2008). Evaluation of the North Carolina More at Four pre-kindergarten program, year 6. Chapel Hill: Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, The University of North Carolina.
34.
PhillipsD. A.MeloyM. E. (2012). High-quality school-based pre-K can boost early learning for children with special needs. Exceptional Children, 78, 471–490.
35.
PonderK. W. (2011). The Smart Start story. Unpublished manuscript.
36.
ReschlyA. L.ChristensonS. L. (2006). Prediction of dropout among students with mild disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 276–292.
37.
SchultingA. B.MaloneP. S.DodgeK. A. (2005). The effect of school-based kindergarten transition policies and practices on child academic outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 41, 860–871.
38.
SchweinhartL.MontieJ.XiangZ.BarnettW. S.BelfieldC. R.NoresM. (2005). Lifetime effects: The High/Scope Perry preschool study through age 40. Ypsilanti, MI: High Scope Press.
39.
SilversteinM.GuppyN.YoungR.AugustynM. (2009). Receipt of special education services following elementary school grade retention. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 163, 547–553.
40.
U.S. Department of Education. (2012). 1995-2010. OSEP’s annual reports to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/index.html
41.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (2010). Head Start impact study (Final report). Author: Washington, DC.
42.
VerstegenD. A. (2011). Public education finance systems in the United States and funding policies for populations with special education needs. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19(21), 1–26.
43.
WongV. C.CookT. D.BarnettW. S.JungK. (2008). An effectiveness-based evaluation of five state pre-kindergarten programs. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 122–154.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
