Systems-level data dashboards, those that provide education data aggregated to or used by leaders from school to state to federal levels, have become increasingly prevalent in the field of education both in the United States and in many education systems worldwide. This study provides a systematic review of the literature on systems-level data dashboards in K–12 schooling. The review demonstrates that research on systems-level dashboards lags that of student and teacher-focused learning analytics dashboards; that academic achievement remains the primary focus of dashboards, but contextual and non-test-score outcomes are now included in many dashboards and that use of dashboards by educators and the public is lower than desired but may be improved through alternative dissemination methods. It also demonstrates that research on the impacts of dashboards is particularly limited, a concern given the potential for unintended negative consequences. The article discusses the need to further incorporate systems-level dashboards into the organizational structures of education systems in order to enhance their utility for improving outcomes. The findings provide insights for stakeholders designing and using dashboards and hold the potential to improve dashboard use and student outcomes.
AgasistiT.BowersA. J. (2017). Data analytics and decision-making in education: Towards the educational data scientist as a key actor in schools and higher education institutions. In JohnesG.JohnesJ.AgasistiT.López-TorresL. (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of education (pp. 184–210). Edward Elgar Publishing.
2.
AlalawiS. J. S.ShaharaneeI. N. M.JamilJ. M. (2016, October). Profiling Oman education data using data visualization technique. In AIP conference proceedings (Vol. 1782, No. 1, p. 020003). AIP Publishing LLC.
3.
AlexanderP. (2020). Methodological guidance paper: The art and science of quality systematic reviews. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319854352
BeggC. B. (1994). Publication bias. In CooperH.HedgesL. V. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (chap. 25, pp. 299–409). Russell Sage Foundation.
7.
BodilyR.VerbertK. (2017). Review of research on student-facing learning analytics dashboards and educational recommender systems. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(4), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2017.2740172
8.
BowersA. J. (Ed.). (2021a). Data visualization, dashboards, and evidence use in schools: Data collaborative workshop perspectives of educators, researchers, and data scientists. Teachers College, Columbia University. https://doi.org/10.7916/d8-jj2g-e225
9.
BowersA. J. (2021b). Early warning systems and indicators of dropping out of upper secondary school: The emerging role of digital technologies. In OECD digital education outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with artificial intelligence, blockchain and robots (pp. 173–194). Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) Publishing.
BowersA. J.ChoiY. (2023). Building school data equity, infrastructure, and capacity through FAIR data standards: Findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. Educational Researcher, 52(7), 450–458. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231181103
12.
BowersA. J.KrummA. E. (2021). Supporting the initial work of evidence-based improvement cycles through a data-intensive partnership. Information and Learning Sciences, 122(9/10), 629–650. https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-09-2020-0212
13.
Braunack-MayerA. J.StreetJ. M.TooherR.FengX.Scharling-GambaK. (2020). Student and staff perspectives on the use of big data in the tertiary education sector: A scoping review and reflection on the ethical issues. Review of Educational Research, 90(6), 788–823. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320960213
BrykA.SebringP.AllensworthE.LuppescuS.EastonJ. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
17.
BurasK. L.AppleM. W. (2005). Reviewing policy school choice, neoliberal promises, and unpromising evidence. Reviewing Policy, 19(3), 550–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805276146
18.
CaglarE. (2016). Administrators’ perceptions of the implementation of a data dashboard in one Texas charter school system [Dissertation]. Lamar University.
19.
CardS. K.MoranT. P.NewellA. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction (1st ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
CarrollS. R.GarbaI.Figueroa-RodriguezO. L.HolbrookJ.LovettR.MaterecheraS.ParsonsM.RaserokaK.Rodriguez-LonebearD.RoweR.SaraR.WalkerJ. D.AndersonJ.HudsonM. (2020). The CARE principles for Indigenous data governance. Practice Papers, 19(1), Article 1. https//doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043
21.
CarrollS. R.HerczogE.HudsonM.RussellK.StallS. (2021). Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR principles for Indigenous data futures. Scientific Data, 8(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00892-
22.
ChubbJ. E.MoeT. M. (1991). Politics, markets and America’s schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 12(3), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569910120306
23.
CoburnC. E.TurnerE. O. (2011). Research on data use: A framework and analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 9(4), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2011.626729
24.
CoburnC. E.TurnerE. O. (2012). The practice of data use: An introduction. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1086/663272
25.
Cohen-VogelL.CannataM.RutledgeS. A.SocolA. R. (2016). A model of continuous improvement in high schools: A process for research, innovation design, implementation, and scale. Teachers College Record, 118(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611801301
26.
ColyarJ.MichaelK.MacIejewskiR.TateL. (2021, October1–8). Constructing a visualization dashboard to improve educational standards in Arizona legislative districts [Symposium]. International Symposium on Technology and Society, Proceedings, Waterloo, ON, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS52410.2021.9629195
CottinghamB. W. (2020). Fostering parent engagement: Removing barriers to data accessibility. Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE).
29.
CrooksR. (2017). Representationalism at work: Dashboards and data analytics in urban education. Educational Media International, 54(4), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2017.1408267
30.
D’AmicoN. (2021). Building on each other’s strengths: Reflections from an education data scientist on designing actionable data tools at the 2019 NSF Data Collaborative. In BowersA. J. (Ed.), Data visualization, dashboards, and evidence use in schools: Data collaborative workshop perspectives of educators, researchers, and data scientists (pp. 183–194). Columbia University.
DatnowA.HubbardL. (2016). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17, 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9264-2
34.
Deakin CrickR.KnightS.BarrS. (2017). Towards analytics for wholistic schooli: Hierarchical process modelling and evidence visualization. Journal of Learning Analytics, 4(2), 160–188. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2017.42.13
35.
DrakeT. A. (2021). “We have all the data in one place”: Examining principals’ use of a data warehouse during an academic school year. NASSP Bulletin, 105(2), 84–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/01926365211015311
36.
EcheverriaV.Martinez-MaldonadoR.ShumS. B.ChiluizaK.GrandaR.ConatiC. (2018). Exploratory versus explanatory visual learning analytics: Driving teachers’ attention through educational data storytelling. Journal of Learning Analytics, 5(3), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2018.53.6
FairchildS.ScaramellinoD.CarrinoG. E.CarranoJ.GuntonB.DonohueB. (2013). Navigating the data ecosystem: A case study of the adoption of a school data management system in New York City. New Visions for Public Schools.
40.
FariaA.-M.GreenbergA.MeakinJ.BichayK.HeppenJ. (2013). Replicating the relationship between teachers’ data use and student achievement: The urban data study and the data dashboard usage study [Conference session]. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness Spring 2013 Conference Abstract, 1-B2, Washington, DC.
41.
Farley-RippleE. N.JenningsA.JenningsA. B. (2021). Tools of the trade: A look at educators’ use of assessment systems. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(1), 96–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1777171
FewS. (2004). Show me the numbers: Designing tables and graphs to enlighten (1st ed.). Analytics Press.
44.
FewS. (2006). Information dashboard design: The effective visual communication of data (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media.
45.
FewS. (2013). Information dashboard design: Displaying data for at-a-glance monitoring (2nd ed.). Analytics Press.
46.
FiglioD.LoebS. (2011). School accountability. Handbook of the Economics of Education, 3, 383–421.
47.
FirestoneW. A.GonzalezR. A. (2007). Culture and processes affecting data use in school districts. Teachers College Record, 109(13), 132–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810710901308
48.
FitzgeraldK. G.TiptonE. (2024). A knowledge mobilization framework: Toward evidence-based statistical communication practices in education research. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 17(21), 540–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2023.2209082
49.
FoxM. S. (2021). An ontology engineering approach to measuring city education system performance. Expert Systems With Applications, 186, 115734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115734
50.
FranconeriS. L.PadillaL. M.ShahP.ZacksJ. M.HullmanJ. (2021). The science of visual data communication: What works. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(3), 110–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006211051956
51.
FriendlyM. (2006). A brief history of data visualization. Springer-Verlag.
52.
FrontieraC. (2019). A mixed methods study of principals’ experience using data analytics tools in Hawai’i [Dissertation]. University of Hawaii at Manoa.
GorurR.ArnoldB. (2021). Governing by dashboard: Reconfiguring education governance in the global south. In C. Wyatt-Smith, B. Lingard, E. Heck (Eds.), Digital disruption in teaching and testing (pp. 166–181). Routledge.
57.
GrabarekJ.KallemeynL. M. (2020). Does teacher data use lead to improved student achievement? A review of the empirical evidence. Teachers College Record, 122(12), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012201201
58.
HakimiL.EynonR.MurphyV. A. (2021). The ethics of using digital trace data in education: A thematic review of the research landscape. Review of Educational Research, 91(5), 671–717. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211020116
HattabG.RhyneT. M.HeiderD. (2020). Ten simple rules to colorize biological data visualization. PLOS Computational Biology, 16(10), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PCBI.1008259
61.
HawnA. (2021). Team arrow’s path to trust and value: Getting the right data for the right task to the right person at the right time. In BowersA. J. (Ed.), Data visualization, dashboards, and evidence use in schools: Data collaborative workshop perspectives of educators, researchers, and data scientists (pp. 207–217). Columbia University.
HernandezD. J. (2012). PreK-3rd: Next steps for state longitudinal data systems (PreK-3rd Policy Action Brief. No. Eight). Foundation for Child Development.
HögbergB.LindgrenJ. (2021). Outcome-based accountability regimes in OECD countries: A global policy model?. Comparative Education, 57(3), 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1849614
66.
HumphreyD. C.O’DayJ. (2019). The early implementation of California’s system of support: Counties, differentiated assistance, and the new school dashboard. Local Control Funding Formula Research Collaborative. https://edpolicyinca.org/sites/default/files/R_Humphrey_Dec19_01_0.pdf
67.
HunterG. P.WilliamsonS.WilksA.HanleyJ. M.StecherB. M. (2020). Using data to support the intensive partnerships for effective teaching initiative: Data collection, metric and dashboard creation, and lessons learned. RAND Corporation.
68.
Izant-GonzalesJ. (2021). The effectiveness of California’s system of support: Dashboard and differentiated assistance, as perceived by county office of education, court and community school administrators [Dissertation]. San Jose State University.
69.
John W. Gardner Center. (2020). Report & recommendations of the California Advisory Task Force on Alternative Schools: Building knowledge and consensus to improve outcomes for California’s 350,000 alternative school students. https://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/activeschools.asp
70.
KadijevićĐ.StephensM. (2020). Modern statistical literacy, data science, dashboards, and automated analytics and its applications. Teaching of Mathematics, 23(1), 71–80. https://teaching.matf.bg.ac.rs/vol/tm2318.pdf
71.
Knoop-van CampenC. A. N.MolenaarI. (2020). How teachers integrate dashboards into their feedback practices. Frontline Learning Research, 8(4), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v8i4.641
72.
KoretzD. (2008). Measuring up: What educational testing really tells us. Harvard University Press.
73.
KowalskiT. J.LasleyT. J. (2009). Handbook of data-based decision making in education. Routledge.
74.
LacefieldW. E.ApplegateE. B. (2018). Data visualization in public education: Longitudinal student-, intervention-, school-, and district-level performance modeling [Conference session]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
75.
LachatM. A.SmithS. (2009). Practices that support data use in urban high schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(3), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327671ESPR1003_7
76.
LaiM. K.SchildkampK. (2013). Data-based decision making: An overview. In SchildkampK.LaiM. K.EarlL. (Eds.), Data-based decision making in education: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 9–21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4816-3_2
77.
LeeV. R.PimentelD. R.BhargavaR.D’IgnazioC. (2022). Taking data feminism to school: A sythesis and review of pre-collegiate data science education projects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(5), 1096–1113. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13251
78.
LewisJ. (2020). 3 sides to the story: To get a more complete picture of its financial health, one school took the dashboard concept and pushed it further. Independent School, Winter Issue, 64–69.
79.
LongP.SiemensG. (Eds.). (2011). Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. ACM.
80.
MacariniL. A.Lemos Dos SantosH.CehinelC.OchoaX.RodesV.Perez CasasA.LucasP. P.MayaR.AlonsoG. E.DiazP. (2020). Towards the implementations of a countrywide K-12 learning analytics initiative in Uruguay. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(2), 166–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636082
81.
MandinachE. B.JimersonJ. B. (2021). Data ethics in education: A theoretical, practical, and policy issue. Studia Paedagogica, 26(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2021-4-1
82.
MandinachE. B.SchildkampK. (2021). Misconceptions about data-based decision making in education: An exploration of the literature. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 69, 100842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100842
83.
MarkerK. C. (2016). Understanding how principals use data dashboards to inform systemic school improvement [Dissertation]. North Carolina State University.
84.
MarshJ. A.BertrandM.HuguetA. (2015). Using data to alter instructional practice: The mediating role of coaches and professional learning communities. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700411
85.
MarshJ. A.McCombsJ. S.MartorellF. (2012). Reading coach quality: Findings from Florida middle schools. Literacy Research and Instruction, 51(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2010.518662
86.
MarshJ. A.PaneJ. F.HamiltonL. S. (2006). Making sense of data-driven decision making in education: Evidence from recent RAND research (Occasional Paper). Rand Corporation.
87.
MarshS. (2010). Multiple pathways to graduation: New routes to high school completion (CRPE Working Paper# 2010_2). Center on Reinventing Public Education.
88.
MatchaW.GaševićD.PardoA. (2020). A systematic review of empirical studies on learning analytics dashboards: A self-regulated learning perspective. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13(2), 226–245. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2019.2916802
89.
MeansB.PadillaC.GallagherL. (2010). Use of education data at the local level: From accountability to instructional improvement. U.S. Department of Education.
90.
MerollaD. M.JacksonO. (2019). Structural racism as the fundamental cause of the academic achievement gap. Sociology Compass, 13(6), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12696
91.
MichaeliS.KroparoD.HershkovitzA. (2020). Teachers’ use of education dashboards and professional growth. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(4), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i4.4663
92.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
93.
MunznerT. (2014). Visualization analysis and design. CRC Press.
94.
MurphyJ. R. (2018). Understanding and assessing the impact of data visualization on stakeholder access to data, sensemaking and decision making in the context of the local control funding formula [Dissertation]. University of California.
95.
O’GrearyM.SmithL. (2021). Direct data dashboard. In BowersA. J. (Ed.), Data visualization, dashboards, and evidence use in schools: Data collaborative workshop perspectives of educators, researchers, and data scientists (pp. 244–256). Columbia University.
96.
PageM. J.MoherD.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS., . . . McKenzieJ. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(160), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
97.
PenuelW. R.BriggsD. C.DavidsonK. L.HerlihyC.ShererD.HillH. C.FarrellC.AllenA.-R. (2017). Howschool and district leaders access, percieve, and use research. AERA Open, 3(2), 2332858417705370. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417705370
98.
PietyP. J.HickeyD. T.BishopM. J. (2014, March). Educational data sciences: Framing emergent practices for analytics of learning, organizations, and systems [Conference session]. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Indianapolis, USA.
99.
PigottT. D.PolaninJ. R. (2020). Methodological guidance paper: High-quality meta-analysis in a systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877153
100.
PinkusL. (2008). Using early-warning data to improve graduation rates: Closing cracks in the education system. Alliance for Excellent Education.
101.
PolaninJ. R.PigottT. D.EspelageD. L.GrotpeterJ. (2019). Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large-evidence systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Research Synthesis Methods, 10, 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1354
102.
PolaninJ. R.Tanner-SmithE. E.HennessyE. (2016). Estimating the difference between published and unpublished effect sizes: A meta-review. Review of Educational Research, 86, 207–236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582067
103.
PolikoffM. S. (2019). Gauging the revised California school dashboard: Evidence from the 2019 PACE/USC Rossier voter poll. Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE).
104.
PolikoffM. S.KornS.McFallR. (2018). In need of improvement? Assessing the California dashboard after one year (Vol. 2). Getting Down to Facts.
105.
PrattM. (2021). Look who’s talking—Facilitating data conversations that match data visualizations with educators’ needs. In BowersA. J. (Ed.), Data visualization, dashboards, and evidence use in schools: Data collaborative workshop perspectives of educators, researchers, and data scientists (pp. 161–176). Columbia University.
106.
PynooB.van BraakJ. (2014). Predicting teachers’ generative and receptive use of an educational portal by intention, attitude and self-reported use. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.024
107.
RatnerH.RuppertE. (2019). Producing and projecting data: Aesthetic practices of government data portals. Big Data & Society, 6(2), 2053951719853316. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719853316
108.
RavitchD.ViterittiJ. P. (1997). New schools for a new century: The redesign of urban education (1st ed.). Yale University Press.
109.
ReddingC. (2022). The effective use of data. Research review of impact Florida’s five conditions that support great teaching (working paper). UF Education Policy Research Center.
110.
ReesS.PerryM. (2016). Education stats made visible: Helping school district managers write better three-year plans. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08770.
RobertsonS.NguyenT.SalehiN. (2022). Not another school resource map: Meeting underserved families’ information needs requires trusting relationships and personalized care. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.15795.
113.
RoegmanR.Perkins-WilliamsR.BudzynM.Killian-TarrO.AllenD. (2022). How conceptions of equity inform principal data use: A purposeful examination of principals from four school districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 58(2), 183–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211056084
114.
RothmanR. (2015). Data dashboards: Accounting for what matters. Alliance for Excellent Education.
RothsteinR.JacobsenR.WilderT. (2008). Grading education: Getting accountability right. Teachers College Press.
117.
RozaM.SwartzC. (2007). School spending profiles: A framework to enlighten resource allocation decisions. Public Budgeting & Finance, 27(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 5850.2007.00869.x
118.
SarikayaA.CorrellM.BartramL.ToryM.FisherD. (2019). What do we talk about when we talk about dashboards?. IEEE transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 25(1), 682–692. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2018.2864903
119.
SchildkampK.LaiM. K.EarlL. (Eds.). (2012). Data-based decision making in education: Challenges and opportunities. Springer.
120.
SchneiderJ.JacobsenR.WhiteR. S.GehlbachH. (2018). The (mis) measure of schools: How data affect stakeholder knowledge and perceptions of quality. Teachers College Record, 120(5), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000507
121.
SchwabishJ. (2021). Better data visualizations: A guide for scholars, researchers, and wonks. Columbia University Press.
122.
SchwendimannB. A.Rodriguez-TrianaM. J.VozniukA.PrietoL. P.BoroujeniM. S.HolzerA.GilletD.DillenbourgP. (2017). Perceiving learning at a glance: A systematic literature review of learning dashboard research. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(1), 30–41. https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TLT.2016.2599522
123.
SellarS. (2020). Machinic affects: Education data infrastructure and the pedagogy of objects. In B. Dernikos, N. Lesko, S. McCall, & A. Niccolini (Eds.), Mapping the affective turn in education (pp. 164–178). Routledge.
124.
ShabaninejadS.KhosraviH.IndulskaM.BakhariaA.IsaiasP. (2020, March). Automated insightful drill-down recommendations for learning analytics dashboards [Conference session]. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Frankfurt, Germany.
125.
SkalitzkyE.JoynerH.WeymouthL. (2022). Local data for action: Statewide dissemination of school wellness policy evaluations in Wisconsin. Health Promotion Practice, 23(1), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839920973650
126.
SupovitzJ. A.WeathersJ. M. (2004). Dashboard lights: Monitoring implementation of district instructional reform strategies. Consortium for Policy Research in Education. https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/45
127.
SuttonA. J. (2009). Publication bias. In The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 435–452). Russell Sage Foundation.
128.
StewartM. S.PierE.RalyeaD.RiceA. (2023). Interoperability and data standards in the K-12 education sector: Intersections with data justice. Learning, Media, and Technology, 48(2), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2190121
129.
TeasleyS. D. (2019). Learning analytics: Where information science and the learning sciences meet. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(1/2), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2018-0045
130.
Toledo. (2021). Direct data dashboard. In BowersA. J. (Ed.), Data visualization, dashboards, and evidence use in schools: Data collaborative workshop perspectives of educators, researchers, and data scientists (pp. 177–182). Columbia University.
131.
TufteE. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information (1st ed.). Graphics Press.
132.
Vazquez-IngelmoA.Garcia-PenalvoF. J.TheronR. (2021). Towards a technical ecosystem to provide information dashboards as a service: A dynamic proposal for supplying dashboards adapted to specific scenarios. Applied Sciences, 11(7), 3249. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11073249
133.
VerbertK.DuvalE.KlerkxJ.GovaertsS.SantosJ. L. (2013). Learning analytics dashboard applications. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1500–1509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479363
134.
VerbertK.GovaertsS.DuvalE.SantosJ. L.Van AsscheF.ParraG.KlerkxJ. (2014). Learning dashboards: An overview and future research opportunities. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1499–1514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0751-2
135.
WatsonW. L. (2015). The role of an early warning system to support freshmen: An action research study. Washington State University.
136.
WenningR.BetebennerD. (2010). Improving educational accountability in Colorado. Public Manager, 39(4), 18.
137.
WexlerS.ShafferJ.CotgreaveA. (2017). The big book of dashboards: Visualizing your data using real-world business scenarios. John Wiley & Sons.
WilkinsonM. D.DumontierM.AalbersbergIj.AppletonG.AxtonM.BaakA.BlombergN.BoitenJ.-W.da Silva SantosL. B.BourneP. E.BouwmanJ.BrookesA. J.ClarkT.CrosasM.DilloI.DumonO.EdmundsS.EveloC. T.FinkersR., . . . MonsB. (2016). The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
140.
WilliamsonB. (2015). Digital education governance: Data visualization, predictive analytics, and “real-time” policy instruments. Journal of Education Policy, 31(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1035758
141.
WisemanA. W. (2010). The uses of evidence for educational policymaking: Global contexts and international trends. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x09350472
142.
WohlstetterP.DatnowA.ParkV. (2008). Creating a system for data-driven decision-making: Applying the principal-agent framework. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450802246376
YooY.LeeH.JoI. H.ParkY. (2015). Educational dashboards for smart learning: Review of case studies. In ChenG.KumarV.KinshukR.HuangS. C.Kong (Eds.), Emerging issues in smart learning (pp. 145–155). Springer.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
