A Meta-Analysis of the Relation Between Syntactic Skills and Reading Comprehension: A Cross-Linguistic and Developmental Investigation

Abstract

Theories of reading comprehension have widely predicted a role for syntactic skills, or the ability to understand and manipulate the structure of a sentence. Yet, these theories are based primarily on English, leaving open the question of whether this remains true across typologically different languages such as English versus Chinese. There are substantial differences in the sentence structures of Chinese versus English, making the comparison of the two particularly interesting. We conducted a meta-analysis contrasting the relation between syntactic skills and reading comprehension in first language readers of English versus Chinese. We test the influence of languages as well as the influence of the grade and the metrics on the magnitude of this relation. We identified 59 studies published between 1986 and 2021, generating 234 effect sizes involving 15,212 participants from kindergarten to high school and above. The magnitude of effects was remarkably similar for studies of English (r = .54) and Chinese (r = .54) readers, with similarities at key developmental points and syntactic tasks. There was also some evidence of modulation by grade levels and the nature of syntactic tasks. These findings confirm theory-based predictions of the importance of syntactic skills to reading comprehension. Extending these predictions, demonstrating these effects for both English and Chinese suggests a universal influence of syntactic skills on reading comprehension.

Keywords

child development correlational analysis effect size language comprehension/development meta-analysis reading reading comprehension school psychology student development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahn

Kang

(2018). Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 71(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2018.71.2.103

Altmann

G. T.

Kamide

(1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00059-1

Anderson

S. R.

(2012). Languages: A very short introduction (Vol. 320). Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com.hk/books?id=A9AnPjrEB_EC&lpg=PP2&ots=hQUT14lZcW&dq=urls%20Anderson%2C%20S.%2C%20%26%20Anderson%2C%20S.%20R.%20(2012).%20Languages%3A%20A%20very%20short%20introduction%20(Vol.%20320).%20Oxford%20University%20Press.&lr&pg=PP2#v=onepage&q&f=false

*Babayiğit

(2014). The role of oral language skills in reading and listening comprehension of text: A comparison of monolingual (L1) and bilingual (L2) speakers of English language. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(S1), S22–S47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01538.x

Baker

E. S.

Brown

D. R.

Jonas

(1984). Self-diffusion in compressed supercritical ethylene. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 88(22), 5425–5429. https://doi.org/10.1021/j150666a064

Bentin

Deutsch

Liberman

I. Y.

(1990). Syntactic competence and reading ability in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49(1), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(90)90053-B

Bishop

D. V.

(2006). Beyond words: Phonological short-term memory and syntactic impairment in specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(4), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406210397

Bishop

D. V.

Snowling

M. J.

(2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 858–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.858

*Biemiller

Siegel

L. S.

(1997). A longitudinal study of the effects of the Bridge Reading Program for children at risk for reading failure. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20(2), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511216

10.

*Blackmore

A. M.

Pratt

(1997). Grammatical awareness and reading in Grade 1 children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43(4), 567–590. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23093360

11.

*Botting

Simkin

Conti-Ramsden

(2006). Associated reading skills in children with a history of specific language impairment (SLI). Reading and Writing, 19, 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4322-4

12.

Bowey

J. A.

(1986). Syntactic awareness in relation to reading skill and ongoing reading comprehension monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41(2), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(86)90041-X

13.

*Bowey

J. A.

Patel

R. K.

(1988). Metalinguistic ability and early reading achievement. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9(4), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400008067

14.

*Brimo

Apel

Fountain

(2017). Examining the contributions of syntactic awareness and syntactic knowledge to reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12050

15.

Brimo

Lund

Sapp

(2018). Syntax and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis of different spoken-syntax assessments. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53(3), 431– 445. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12362

16.

*Cain

(2007). Syntactic awareness and reading ability: Is there any evidence for a special relationship? Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(4), 679–694. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070361

17.

Cajkler

Hislam

(2002). Trainee teachers' grammatical knowledge: The tension between public expectation and individual competence. Language Awareness, 11(3), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410208667054

18.

Chang

H. W.

(1992). The acquisition of Chinese syntax. In Chen

H. C.

Tzeng

O. J. L.

(Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 277–311). North–Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61895-6

19.

Chao

Y. R.

(1968). Language and symbolic systems. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/in/universitypress/subjects/languages-linguistics/english-language-and-linguistics-general-interest/language-and-symbolic-systems

20.

Chen

H. C.

(1992). Reading comprehension in Chinese: Some implications from character reading times. In Chen

Tzeng

(Eds.), Language processing in Chinese, (pp. 175–205). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61892-0

21.

*Chik

P. P. M.

C. S. H.

Yeung

P. S.

Chan

D. W. O.

Chung

K. K. H.

Luan

L. Y.

Lau

W. S. Y.

(2012a). Syntactic skills in sentence reading comprehension among Chinese elementary school children. Reading and Writing, 25, 679–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9293-4

22.

*Chik

P. P. M.

C. S. H.

Yeung

P. S.

Wong

Y. K.

Chan

D. W. O.

Chung

K. K. H.

L. Y.

(2012b). Contribution of discourse and morphosyntax skills to reading comprehension in Chinese dyslexic and typically developing children. Annals of Dyslexia, 62(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-010-0045-6

23.

Chomsky

A. N.

(1976). Conditions on rules of grammar. Linguistic Analysis 2, 303–351. https://philpapers.org/rec/CHOCOR

24.

*Chung

K. K. H.

C. S. H.

Chan

D. W.

Tsang

S. M.

Lee

S. H.

(2013). Contributions of syntactic awareness to reading in Chinese-speaking adolescent readers with and without dyslexia. Dyslexia, 19(1), 11–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1448

25.

*Chung

K. K. H.

J. C. M.

C. S. H.

Xiao

Chan

D. W.

(2014). Syntactic and discourse skills in Chinese adolescent readers with dyslexia: A profiling study. Annals of Dyslexia, 64(3), 222–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-014-0095-2

26.

Cohen

West

S. G.

Aiken

L. S.

(2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral science. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774441

27.

Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards initiate: Preparing America’s students for college & career. http://www.corestandards.org/

28.

Curran

(2020). Complex sentences in an elementary science curriculum: A research note. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(2), 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-00064

29.

Cutting

L. E.

Scarborough

H. S.

(2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5

30.

*Deacon

S. H.

Kieffer

(2018). Understanding how syntactic awareness contributes to reading comprehension: Evidence from mediation and longitudinal models. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000198

31.

Department for Education. (2013). English programmes of study: Key Stages 1 and 2, National Curriculum in England. Department for Education, United Kingdom. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/335186/PRIMARY_national_curriculum_-_English_220714.pdf

32.

*Dixon

Thomson

Fricke

(2020). Language and reading development in children learning English as an additional language in primary school in England. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12305

33.

Duke

N. K.

Cartwright

K. B.

(2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56, S25–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411

34.

English Language Education. (2017). The Curriculum Development Council, The Education Bureau, HKSARG. https://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/kla/eng-edu/Curriculum%20Document/ELE%20KLACG_2017.pdf

35.

Favier

Meyer

A. S.

Huettig

(2021). Literacy can enhance syntactic prediction in spoken language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(10), 2167–2174. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001042

36.

Fisher

Tipton

Zhipeng

(2017). Robumeta: Robust variance meta-regression (Version 1.0) [computer software]. R package. https://github.com/zackfisher/robumeta

37.

*Foorman

B. R.

Petscher

Herrera

(2018). Unique and common effects of decoding and language factors in predicting reading comprehension in grades 1-10. Learning and Individual Differences, 63, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.02.011

38.

Gartlehner

Grant

Shamliyan

Sedrakyan

Wilt

T. J.

Griffith

Oremus

Raina

Ismaila

Santaguida

Lau

Trikalinos

T. A.

(2011). Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(11), 1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.08.010

39.

Gambi

Pickering

M. J.

Rabagliati

(2016). Beyond associations: Sensitivity to structure in pre-schoolers’ linguistic predictions. Cognition, 157, 340–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.003

40.

García

J. R.

Cain

(2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of Educational Research, 84(1), 74–111. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313499616

41.

Gajdoš

. (2011). The discrepancy between spoken and written Chinese—Methodological notes on linguistics. Studia Orientalia Slovaca, 10(1), 155–159.

42.

Geva

Farnia

(2012). Developmental changes in the nature of language proficiency and reading fluency paint a more complex view of reading comprehension in ELL and EL1. Reading and Writing, 25(8),1819–1845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9333-8

43.

*Glass

A. L.

Perna

(1986). The role of syntax in reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19(6), 354–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948601900610

44.

*Gottardo

Stanovich

K. E.

Siegel

L. S.

(1996). The relationship between phonological sensitivity, syntactic processing, and verbal working memory in the reading performance of third-grade children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63(3), 563–582. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1996.0062

45.

Graesser

A. C.

McNamara

D. S.

Kulikowich

J. M.

(2011). Coh-metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40(5), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11413260

46.

*Guan

C. Q.

Meng

Leong

C. K.

(2013). Are poor Chinese text comprehenders also poor in written composition? Annals of Dyslexia, 63(3-4), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-013-0081-0

47.

*Guan

C. Q.

Wagner

R. K.

Meng

Leong

C. K.

(2014). Text comprehension mediates morphological awareness, syntactic processing, and working memory in predicting Chinese written composition performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 779–798. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035984

48.

*Guarini

Sansavini

Fabbri

Savini

Alessandroni

Faldella

Karmiloff-Smith

(2010). Long-term effects of preterm birth on language and literacy at eight years. Journal of Child Language, 37(4), 865–885. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000909990109

49.

*Guo

Roehrig

Mason

R. S.

(2011). The relation of morphological awareness and syntactic awareness to adults’ reading comprehension: Is vocabulary knowledge a mediating variable? Journal of Literacy Research, 43(2), 159–183. http://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X11403086

50.

Gough

P. B.

Hoover

W. A.

Peterson

C. L.

(1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. In Cornoldi

Oakhill

J. V.

(Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties. Processes and intervention (pp. 1–13). Erlbaum

51.

Halliday

M. A. K.

(2004). The language of science (Vol. 5 in The collected words of Halliday.

M. A. K.

Webster

[Ed.]). Continuum.

52.

Harris

R. J.

(1962). An experimental inquiry into the functions and value of formal grammar in the teaching of English with special reference to the teaching of correct written English to children aged 12 to 14 [Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Education of University of London]. https://www.harris-meltzer-trust.org.uk/pdfs/Harris_Grammar_Experiment.pdf

53.

Hedges

L. V.

Tipton

Johnson

M. C.

(2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.5

54.

Higgins

J. P.

Thomas

Chandler

Cumpston

Page

M. J.

Welch

V. A.

(Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. John Wiley & Sons.

55.

*Ho

C. S. H.

Zheng

McBride

Hsu

L. S. J.

Waye

M. M.

Kwok

J. C. Y.

(2017). Examining an extended simple view of reading in Chinese: The role of naming efficiency for reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.08.009

56.

*Holsgrove

J. V.

Garton

A. F.

(2006). Phonological and syntactic processing and the role of working memory in reading comprehension among secondary school students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 58(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530600730476

57.

Hoover

W. A.

Gough

P. B.

(1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799

58.

Hoppe

D. B.

Hendriks

Ramscar

van Rij

(2022). An exploration of error-driven learning in simple two-layer networks from a discriminative learning perspective. Behavior Research Methods, 54, 2221–2251. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01711-5

59.

Huettig

Pickering

M. J.

(2019). Literacy advantages beyond reading: Prediction of spoken language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(6), 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.008

60.

*Hung

C. O. Y.

(2020). The role of executive function in reading comprehension among beginning readers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 600–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12382

61.

*Hung

C. O. Y.

Loh

E. K. Y.

(2021). Examining the contribution of cognitive flexibility to metalinguistic skills and reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 41(6), 712–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1734187

62.

Imms

(2008). Children with cerebral palsy participate: A review of the literature. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(24), 1867–1884. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701673542

63.

*Jared

Cormier

Levy

B. A.

Wade-Woolley

(2011). Early predictors of biliteracy development in children in French immersion: A 4-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021284

64.

Kennedy

D. K.

Weener

(1973). Visual and auditory training with the Cloze procedure to improve reading and listening comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 8(4), 524–541. https://doi.org/10.2307/747173

65.

*Kieffer

M. J.

Petscher

Proctor

C. P.

Silverman

R. D.

(2016). Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts? Modeling the contributions of language comprehension skills to reading comprehension in the upper elementary grades. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(6), 436–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2016.1214591

66.

*Kim

Y. S. G.

(2015). Developmental, component-based model of reading fluency: An investigation of predictors of word-reading fluency, text-reading fluency, and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(4), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.107

67.

*Kim

Y. S. G.

(2017). Why the simple view of reading is not simplistic: Unpacking component skills of reading using a direct and indirect effect model of reading (DIER). Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(4), 310–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643

68.

*Kim

Y. S. G.

(2020). Hierarchical and dynamic relations of language and cognitive skills to reading comprehension: Testing the direct and indirect effects model of reading (DIER). Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000407

69.

*Kim

Y. S.

Otaiba

S. A.

Folsom

J. S.

Gruelich

(2013). Language, literacy, attentional behaviors, and instructional quality predictors of written composition for first graders. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(3), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.01.001

70.

*Kim

Y. S.

Otaiba

S. A.

Puranik

Folsom

J. S.

Greulich

Wagner

R. K.

(2011). Componential skills of beginning writing: An exploratory study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 517–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.06.004

71.

Kintsch

(1992). A cognitive architecture for comprehension. In Pick

H. L.

Jr. van den Broek

P. W.

Knill

D. C.

(Eds.), Cognition: Conceptual and methodological issues (pp. 143–163). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10564-00

72.

Kintsch

(1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49(4), 294–303. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.4.294

73.

*Kuo

L. J.

Y. M.

Chen

Gezer

M. Ü

. (2020). The relationship between input and literacy and metalinguistic development: A study with Chinese–English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006918768

74.

Koutsoftas

A. D.

(2013). School–age language development: Application of the five domains of language across four modalities. In Capone-Singleton

Shulman

B. B.

(Eds.), Language Development: Foundations, Processes, and Clinical Applications (pp. 215–229). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

75.

Laliberté

M. E.

(2009). Package ‘metacor’. (Version 1.0–2.1) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=metacor

76.

Language and Reading Research Consortium. (2015). The dimensionality of language ability in young children. Child Development, 86(6), 1948–1965. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12450

77.

*Language and Reading Research Consortium, & Chiu

Y. D

. (2018). The simple view of reading across development: Prediction of Grade 3 reading comprehension from prekindergarten skills. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518762055

78.

*Lesaux

N. K.

Lipka

Siegel

L. S.

(2006). Investigating cognitive and linguistic abilities that influence the reading comprehension skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 99–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4713-6

79.

Letts

Wilkins

Law

Stewart

Bosch

Westmorland

(2007). Guidelines for critical review form: Qualitative studies (Version 2.0). McMaster University Occupational Therapy Evidence-based Practice Research Group.

80.

Levy

(2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006

81.

Lin

Y.-A.

(2006). Against the deficit in computational grammatical complexity hypothesis: A corpus-based study. Concentric: Studies in linguistics, 32(2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.6241/concentric.ling.200607_32(2).0003

82.

Liu

P. P.

W. J.

Lin

X. S.

(2013). Do Chinese readers follow the national standard rules for word segmentation during reading? PloS one, 8(2), Article e55440. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055440

83.

*Low

P. B.

Siegel

L. S.

(2005). A comparison of the cognitive processes underlying reading comprehension in native English and ESL speakers. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.2.09low

84.

Luo

Z. Q.

Pang

J. S.

Ralph

(1996). Mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511983658

85.

MacKay

Lynch

Duncan

T. S.

Deacon

S. H.

(2021). Informing the science of reading: Student’s awareness of sentence-level information is important for reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(1), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.397

86.

Martin

A. E.

McElree

(2018). Retrieval cues and syntactic ambiguity resolution: speed-accuracy tradeoff evidence. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(6), 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1427877

87.

Matthews

Lieven

Theakston

Tomasello

(2005). The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order. Cognitive Development, 20(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.08.001

88.

McBride

(2015). Children's literacy development: A cross-cultural perspective on learning to read and write. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315849409

89.

McNamara

D. S.

Graesser

A. C.

McCarthy

P. M.

Cai

(2014). Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894664

90.

Menyuk

Chesnick

Liebergott

J. W.

Korngold

D’Agostino

Belanger

(1991). Predicting reading problems in at-risk children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 34(4), 893–903. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3404.893

91.

*Metsala

J. L.

Sparks

David

Conrad

Deacon

S. H.

(2021). What is the best way to characterise the contributions of oral language to reading comprehension: Listening comprehension or individual oral language skills? Journal of Research in Reading, 44(3), 675–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12362

92.

*Mimeau

Laroche

Deacon

S. H.

(2019). The relation between syntactic awareness and contextual facilitation in word reading: What is the role of semantics? Journal of Research in Reading, 42(1), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12260

93.

Ministry of Education. (2020). English Language Syllabus Primary, Singapore. https://www.moe.gov.sg/primary/curriculum/syllabus

94.

Mikami

(2012). Heavy NP shift in English and A-movement in subject-prominent languages. English Linguistics, 29(2), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.9793/elsj.29.2_259

95.

Montague

Maddux

C. D.

Dereshiwsky

M. I.

(1990). Story grammar and comprehension and production of narrative prose by students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(3), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949002300310

96.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

Altman

D. G.

(2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

97.

*Mokhtari

Niederhauser

(2013). Vocabulary and syntactic knowledge factors in 5th grade students’ reading comprehension. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 5(2), 157–170. https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/18

98.

*Muter

Hulme

Snowling

M. J.

Stevenson

(2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40(5), 665–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.665

99.

Namkung

J. M.

Peng

Lin

(2019). The relation between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance among school-aged students: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 459–496. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319843494

100.

Nation

Snowling

M. J.

(2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27(4), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2004.00238.x

101.

National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2019). Primary Language Curriculum, Ireland. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-english-programmes-of-study

102.

Nippold

M. A.

(2016). Later language development: School-age children, adolescents, and young adults. PRO-ED.

103.

*Nippold

M. A.

(2017). Reading comprehension deficits in adolescents: Addressing underlying language abilities. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_LSHSS-16-0048

104.

Orwin

R. G.

Vevea

J. L.

(2009). Evaluating coding decisions. In Cooper

Hedges

L. V.

Valentine

J. C.

(Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 177–203). Russell Sage Foundation.

105.

*Pan

D. J.

Yang

Lui

K. F. H.

J. C. M.

McBride

C. S. H.

(2021). Character and word reading in Chinese: Why and how they should be considered uniquely vis-a-vis literacy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65, Article 101961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101961

106.

*Peets

K. F.

Yim

Bialystok

(2019). Language proficiency, reading comprehension and home literacy in bilingual children: The impact of context. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(1), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1677551

107.

Peng

Lee

Luo

Joshi

R. M.

Tao

(2021). Simple view of reading in Chinese: A one-stage meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Review of Educational Research, 91(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320964198

108.

Perfetti

Stafura

(2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37.https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687

109.

Phillips

B. M.

(2014). Promotion of syntactical development and oral comprehension: Development and initial evaluation of a small-group intervention. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30, 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/026565901348774

110.

Pickering

M. J.

Gambi

(2018). Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(10), 1002–1044. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/bul0000158

111.

Poulsen

Gravgaard

A. K.

(2016). Who did what to whom? The relationship between syntactic aspects of sentence comprehension and text comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(4), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2016.1180695

112.

Proctor

C. P.

Silverman

R. D.

Harring

J. R.

Jones

R. L.

Hartranft

A. M.

(2019). Teaching bilingual learners: Effects of a language-based reading intervention on academic language and reading comprehension in Grade 4 and 5. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(1), 95–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.258

113.

Pritchett

B. L.

(1988). Garden path phenomena and the grammatical basis of language processing. Language, 64(3), 539–576. https://doi.org/10.2307/414532

114.

*Pumfrey

P. D.

Fletcher

(1989). Differences in reading strategies among 7- to 8-year-old children. Journal of Research in Reading, 12(2), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1989.tb00161.x

115.

Ricketts

(2011). Research review: Reading comprehension in developmental disorders of language and communication. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(11), 1111–1123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02438.x

116.

Ruan

Georgiou

G. K.

Song

Shu

(2018). Does writing system influence the associations between phonological awareness, morphological awareness, and reading? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(2), 180–202. https://doi-org.ezproxy.eduhk.hk/10.1037/edu0000216

117.

Schmucker

C. M.

Blümle

Schell

L. K.

Schwarzer

Oeller

Cabrera

von Elm

Briel

Meerpohl

J. J.

, & OPEN consortium. (2017). Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research. PloS One, 12(4), Article e0176210. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176210

118.

D. L.

(2008). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584

119.

*Siegel

L. S.

Ryan

E. B.

(1988). Development of grammatical-sensitivity, phonological, and short-term memory skills in normally achieving and learning-disabled children. Development Psychology, 24(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.1.28

120.

*Silva

Cain

(2015). The relations between lower and higher level comprehension skills and their role in prediction of early reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037769

121.

Siu

T. S. C.

S. H. C.

(2015). Cross-language transfer of syntactic skills and reading comprehension among young Cantonese–English bilingual students. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(3), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.101

122.

*Siu

T. S. C.

S. H. C.

(2020). A longitudinal investigation of syntactic awareness and reading comprehension in Chinese-English bilingual children. Learning and Instruction, 67, Article 101327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101327

123.

*Siu

C. T. S.

C. S. H.

Chan

D. W. O.

Chung

K. K. H.

(2016). Development of word order and morphosyntactic skills in reading comprehension among Chinese elementary school children. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.023

124.

Silverman

R. D.

Johnson

Keane

Khanna

(2020). Beyond decoding: A meta-analysis of the effects of language comprehension interventions on K–5 students’ language and literacy outcomes. Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S207–S233. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.346

125.

*Sorenson Duncan

Mimeau

Crowell

Deacon

S. H

. (2021b). Not all sentences are created equal: Evaluating the relation between children’s understanding of basic and difficult sentences and their reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000545

126.

Spencer

Wagner

R. K.

(2018). The comprehension problems of children with poor reading comprehension despite adequate decoding: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(3), 366–400. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465431774918

127.

Sterne

J. A. C.

Egger

(2005). Regression methods to detect publication and other bias in meta-analysis. In Rothstein

H. R.

Sutton

A. J.

Borestein

(Eds.), Publication Bias in Meta-analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments (pp. 99–110). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch6

128.

*Sun

Xiao

L. C. C.

(2020). Metalinguistic contribution to reading comprehension: A comparison of Primary 3 students from China and Singapore. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(3), 657–684. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716420000132

129.

*Tan

Y. H.

Poon

K. K.

Liow

S. J. R.

(2013). Predictors of reading ability in English for Mandarin-speaking bilingual children in Singapore. Early Child Development and Care, 183(10), 1420–1431. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2013.788817

130.

*Tong

Deacon

S. H.

Cain

(2013). Morphological and syntactic awareness in poor comprehenders: Another piece of the puzzle. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413509971

131.

*Tong

McBride

(2017). A reciprocal relationship between syntactic awareness and reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 57, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.05.005

132.

Tong

Kwan

J. L. Y.

Xiuli Tong

Deacon

S. H.

(2022). How Chinese–English bilingual fourth graders draw on syntactic awareness in reading comprehension: Within-and cross-language effects. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(2), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.400

133.

*Tong

Tong

Shu

Chan

McBride-Chang

(2014). Discourse-level reading comprehension in Chinese children: What is the role of syntactic awareness? Journal of Research in Reading, 37(S1), S48–S70. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12016

134.

Toste

J. R.

Didion

Peng

Filderman

M. J.

McClelland

A. M.

(2020). A meta-analytic review of the relations between motivation and reading achievement for K–12 students. Review of Educational Research, 90(3), 420–456. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465432091935

135.

Traxler

M. J.

Tooley

K. M.

Pickering

M. J.

(2014). Syntactic priming during sentence comprehension: Evidence for the lexical boost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(4), 905–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036377

136.

Trueswell

J. C.

Sekerina

Hill

N. M.

Logrip

M. L.

(1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73(2), 89–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00032-3

137.

*Tsung

Zhang

Hau

K. T.

Leong

C. K.

(2017). Contribution of working memory, orthographic and sentential processing to Chinese text comprehension by Tibetan and Yi students. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 17, 16–39. https://readingmatrix.com/files/16-1w30xp12.pdf

138.

Tunmer

W. E.

Bowey

J. A.

(1984). Metalinguistic awareness and reading acquisition. In Tunmer

W. E.

Pratt

Herriman

M. L.

(Eds.), Metalinguistic awareness in children (pp. 144–168). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69113-3_9

139.

*Tunmer

W. E.

Herriman

M. L.

Nesdale

A. R.

(1988). Metalinguistic abilities and beginning reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(2), 134–158. https://doi.org/10.2307/747799

140.

Tunmer

W. E.

Hoover

(1992). Cognitive and linguistic factors in learning to read. In Gough

P. B.

Ehri

L. C.

, and R. Treiman (eds.), Reading Acquisition (pp. 175–224). Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351236904-7

141.

Uccelli

Barr

C. D.

Dobbs

C. L.

Galloway

E. P.

Meneses

Sánchez

(2015). Core academic language skills: An expanded operational construct and a novel instrument to chart school-relevant language proficiency in preadolescent and adolescent learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(5), 1077–1109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641400006X

142.

Uccelli

Deng

Galloway

E. P.

Qin

(2019). The role of language skills in mid-adolescents’ science summaries. Journal of Literacy Research, 51(3), 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X19860206

143.

van Gompel

R. P.

Pickering

M. J

. (2007). Syntactic parsing. In Gaskell

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 289–307). Oxford University Press. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=425c6ec37f780aac6a2530e1c1fc4d7cef7e0433

144.

*van Gelderen

Schoonen

de Glopper

Hulstijn

Snellings

Simis

Stevenson

. (2003). Roles of linguistic knowledge, metacognitive knowledge and processing speed in L3, L2 and L1 reading comprehension: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069030070010201

145.

Verhoeven

Perfetti

(2017). Learning to read across languages and writing systems. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316155752

146.

Verhoeven

Perfetti

(2021). Universals in learning to read across languages and writing systems. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2021.1938575

147.

Viechtbauer

M. W.

(2020). Package ‘metafor’. (Version 2.4-0) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/metafor/metafor.pdf

148.

Weaver

P. A.

(1979). Improving reading comprehension: Effects of sentence organization instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 15(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.2307/747435

149.

Weighall

A. R.

(2008). The kindergarten path effect revisited: Children’s use of context in processing structural ambiguities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99(2), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2007.10.004

150.

Wisher

R. A.

(1976). The effects of syntactic expectations during reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(5), 597–602. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.68.5.597

151.

Woolley

(2011). Reading comprehension: Assisting children with learning difficulties. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1174-7

152.

Wong

T. S.

Gerdes

Leung

Lee

J. S.

(2017, September). Quantitative comparative syntax on the Cantonese-Mandarin parallel dependency treebank. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Dependency Linguistics.(Depling 2017) (pp. 266–275). https://aclanthology.org/W17-6530.pdf

153.

*Xiao

X. Y.

C. S. H.

(2013). Weaknesses in semantic, syntactic and oral language expression contribute to reading difficulties in Chinese dyslexic children. Dyslexia, 20(1), 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1460

154.

Yang

(2014, May). The disambiguation and application of the English syntactic ambiguity. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Intercultural Communication (ICELAIC-14) (pp. 329–333). Atlantis Press.

155.

*Yeung

P. S.

C. S. H.

Chan

D. W. O.

Chung

K. K. H.

(2016). A componential model of reading in Chinese. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.007

156.

*Yeung

P. S.

C. S. H.

Chan

D. W. O.

Chung

K. K. H.

Wong

Y. K.

(2013). A model of reading comprehension in Chinese elementary school children. Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.03.004

157.

*Yeung

P. S.

C. S. H.

Chik

P. P. M.

L. Y.

Luan

Chan

D. W. O.

Chung

K. K. H.

(2011). Reading and spelling Chinese among beginning readers: What skills make a difference? Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(4), 285–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.482149

158.

*Yu

Tong

(2022). Family socialization and loneliness correlate with third graders’ reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 35(1), 223–244. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s11145-021-10180-3

159.

*Zhao

Guo

Sun

Lai

M. H.

Breit

(2021). The contributions of language skills and comprehension monitoring to Chinese reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 625555. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.625555

160.

Zhu

(2021). Formation of the typological view of Mandarin as a topic-prominent language: A review. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 49(2), 287–329. https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2021.0010

161.

Zipke

(2007). The role of metalinguistic awareness in the reading comprehension of sixth and seventh graders. Reading Psychology, 28(4), 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710701260615

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.21 MB