The provision of grant aid is important to students’ postsecondary opportunities and success. It is well established that grant aid increases the probability of enrollment in postsecondary education. A slate of studies in recent years has extended this research to examine whether grant aid also has an impact on persistence and degree attainment. This article presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the best available evidence of the effect of grant aid on postsecondary persistence and degree attainment. The systematic review identifies and describes the landscape of the literature on grant aid programs and their effects on postsecondary success. A meta-analysis of 43 studies yielding 75 effect sizes estimates that grant aid increases the probability of student persistence and degree completion between 2 and 3 percentage points. When considering the dollar amount of aid, we estimate an additional $1,000 of grant aid improves persistence and attainment by 1.5 to 2 percentage points. Suggestions for future research and implications for policy are discussed.
*AllinS. (2015). Financial aid in Mississippi: How three state-funded programs affect college enrollment and degree attainment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
3.
*AlonS. (2011). Who benefits most from financial aid? The heterogeneous effect of need-based grants on students’ college persistence. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 807–829.
4.
*AndersonD. M.Goldrick-RabS. (2016). Aid after enrollment: Impacts of a statewide grant program at public two-year colleges. Madison: Wisconsin Hope Lab.
5.
*AndrewsR. J.ImbermanS. A.LovenheimM. F. (2016). Recruiting and supporting low-income, high-achieving students at flagship universities (NBER Working Paper No. 22260). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
6.
*AngristJ.AutorD.HudsonS.PallaisA. (2017). Leveling up: Early results from a randomized evaluation of post-secondary aid (NBER Working Paper No. 20800). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
7.
*AngristJ.LangD.OreopoulosP. (2006). Lead them to water and pay them to drink: An experiment with services and incentives for college achievement (NBER Working Paper No. 12790). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
8.
AngristJ.OreopoulosP.WilliamsT. (2014). When opportunity knocks, who answers? New evidence on college achievement awards. Journal of Human Resources, 49, 572–610.
9.
~ArendtJ. N. (2013). The effect of public financial aid on dropout from and completion of university education: Evidence from a student grant reform. Empirical Economics, 44, 1545–1562.
10.
AveryC.HoxbyC. M. (2004). Do and should financial aid packages affect students’ college choices? In HoxbyC. (Eds.), College choices: The new economics of choosing, attending, and completing college (pp. 239–299). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
*BarrA. (2016). Fighting for education: The effect of the post-9/11 GI Bill on degree attainment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). College Station: Texas A&M University.
12.
*BarrowL.Richburg-HayesL.RouseC. E.BrockT. (2014). Paying for performance: The education impacts of a community college scholarship program for low-income adults. Journal of Labor Economics, 32, 563–599.
13.
*BartikT. J.HershbeinB. J.LachowskaM. (2015). The effects of the Kalamazoo Promise Scholarship on college enrollment, persistence, and completion (Upjohn Institute Working Paper 15-229). Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
14.
BartolucciA. A.HillegassW. B. (2010). Overview, strengths, and limitations of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In ChiappelliF. (Eds.), Evidence based practice: toward optimizing clinical outcomes (pp. 17–33). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
15.
BaumS. (2007). Hard heads and soft hearts: Balancing equity and efficiency in institutional student aid policy. New Directions for Higher Education, 140, 75–85.
16.
*BettingerE. (2004). How financial aid affects persistence. In HoxbyC. (Eds.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 207–238). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
*BettingerE. (2015). Need-based aid and college persistence: The effects of the Ohio College Opportunity Grant. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(1 Suppl.), 102S–119S.
18.
BettingerE.BakerR. (2014). The effects of student coaching: An evaluation of a randomized experiment in student advising. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36, 3–19.
19.
*BettingerE.GurantzO.KawanoL.SacerdoteB. (2016). The long run impacts of merit aid: Evidence from California’s Cal Grant (NBER Working Paper No. 22347). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
20.
BoatmanA.EvansB. J.SolizA. (2017). Understanding loan aversion in education: Evidence from high school seniors, community college students, and adults. AERA Open, 3(1), 1–16.
21.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
22.
BurdS.FishmanR.KeaneL.HabbertJ.BarrettB.DancyK.NguyenS.WilliamsB. (2018, June). Decoding the cost of college: The case for transparent financial aid award letters (Policy paper). Washington, DC: New America.
23.
CarruthersC. K.FoxW. F. (2016). Aid for all: College coaching, financial aid, and post-secondary persistence in Tennessee. Economics of Education Review, 51,97–112.
24.
*CarruthersC. K.ÖzekU. (2016). Losing HOPE: Financial aid and the line between college and work. Economics of Education Review, 53, 1–15.
*CastlemanB. L.LongB. T. (2016). Looking beyond enrollment: The causal effect of need-based grants on college access, persistence, and graduation. Journal of Labor Economics, 34, 1023–1073.
27.
*CastlemanB. L.LongB. T.MabelZ. (2018). Can financial aid help to address the growing need for STEM education? The effects of need-based grants on the completion of science, technology, engineering, and math courses and degrees. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 37, 136–166.
28.
*ChenJ.HosslerD. (2017). The effects of financial aid on college success of two-year beginning nontraditional students. Research in Higher Education, 58, 40–76.
29.
ChenR.DesJardinsS. L. (2008). Exploring the effects of financial aid on the gap in student dropout risks by income level. Research in Higher Education, 49, 1–18.
30.
ChingosM. M.PetersonP. E. (2015). Experimentally estimated impacts of school vouchers on college enrollment and degree attainment. Program on Education Policy and Governance Working Papers Series. PEPG 15-01. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government.
31.
*ClotfelterC. T.HemeltS. W.LaddH. F. (2016). Multifaceted aid for low-income students and college outcomes: Evidence from North Carolina (NBER Paper No. 22217). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
32.
*CohodesS. R.GoodmanJ. S. (2014). Merit aid, college quality, and college completion: Massachusetts’ Adams scholarship as an in-kind subsidy. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(4), 251–285.
33.
College Board. (2016). Trends in student aid 2016. New York, NY: Author.
34.
College Board. (2017). Trends in college pricing 2017. New York, NY: Author.
35.
~DavidsonJ. C. (2015). The effects of a state need-based access grant on traditional and non-traditional student persistence. Higher Education Policy, 28, 235–257.
36.
DemingD.DynarskiS. (2010). College aid. In LevineP. B.ZimmermanD. J. (Eds.), Targeting investments in children: Fighting poverty when resources are limited (pp. 283–302). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
DenningJ. T. (2017). Born under a lucky star: Financial aid, college completion, labor supply, and credit constraints (Upjohn Institute Working Paper 17-267. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
38.
*DenningJ. T.MarxB. M.TurnerL. J. (2017). ProPelled: The effects of grants on graduation and earnings (NBER Working Paper No. 23860). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
39.
DesJardinsS. L. (2002). Understanding and using efficiency and equity criteria in the study of higher education policy. In PernaL. W. (Series ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 173–219). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
DowdA. C.ShiehL. T. (2013). Community college financing: Equity, efficiency, and accountability. NEA Almanac of Higher Education, 2013, 37–65.
42.
*DoyleW. R.LeeJ.NguyenT. D. (2017). Impact of need-based financial aid on student persistence at public institutions: An application of the regression-discontinuity design (Working paper). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2930286
43.
DunlopE. R. (2012). The impact of financial aid and college quality on educational attainment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
44.
DynarskiS. M. (2003). Does aid matter? Measuring the effect of student aid on college attendance and completion. American Economic Review, 93, 279–288.
45.
DynarskiS. (2004). The new merit aid. In HoxbyC. (Eds.), College choices: The new economics of choosing, attending, and completing college (pp. 63–100). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46.
*DynarskiS. (2008). Building the stock of college-educated labor. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 576–610.
47.
DynarskiS.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2013). Financial aid policy: Lessons from research. Future of Children, 23, 67–91.
48.
*ErwinC.BinderM. (2017). Does broad-based merit aid improve college completion? Evidence from New Mexico’s lottery scholarship (Working paper). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico.
49.
*EvansB. J.NguyenT. D. (2017). Monetary substitution of loans, earnings, and need-based aid in postsecondary education: The impact of Pell Grant eligibility (Working paper). Stanford, CA: Center for Education Policy Analysis.
50.
*FackG.GrenetJ. (2015). Improving college access and success for low-income students: Evidence from a large need-based grant program. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(2), 1–34.
GardellaJ. H.FisherB. W.Teurbe-TolonA. R. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of cyber-victimization and educational outcomes for adolescents. Review of Educational Research, 87, 283–308.
54.
*GershenfeldS. C. (2016). The impact of the Illinois Promise Grant on college graduation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chicago: University of Illinois.
55.
*Goldrick-RabS.KelchenR.HarrisD. N.BensonJ. (2016). Reducing income inequality in educational attainment: Experimental evidence on the impact of financial aid on college completion. American Journal of Sociology, 121, 1762–1817.
56.
GunnesT.KirkebøenL. J.RønningM. (2013). Financial incentives and study duration in higher education. Labour Economics, 25, 1–11.
57.
HellerD. E.MarinP. (2002). Who should we help? The negative social consequences of merit scholarships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Civil Rights Project.
58.
~HenryG. T.RubensteinR.BuglerD. T. (2004). Is HOPE enough? Impacts of receiving and losing merit-based financial aid. Educational Policy, 18, 686–709.
59.
HolmeJ. J.RichardsM. P.JimersonJ. B.CohenR. W. (2010). Assessing the effects of high school exit examinations. Review of Educational Research, 80, 476–526.
60.
HosslerD.ZiskinM.GrossJ. P.KimS.CekicO. (2009). Student aid and its role in encouraging persistence. In SmartJ. C. (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 389–425). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
61.
JensenE. L. (1983). Financial aid and educational outcomes: A review. College and University, 58, 287–302.
62.
KaneT. J.RouseC. E. (1995). Labor-market returns to two-and four-year college. American Economic Review, 85, 600–614.
63.
KezarA.ChambersA. C.BurkhardtJ. C. (Eds.). (2015). Higher education for the public good: Emerging voices from a national movement. New York, NY: Jossey Bass.
64.
LeslieL. L.BrinkmanP. T. (1988). The economic value of higher education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
65.
LiddellR. L. (2015). Florida’s Bright Futures Scholarship program: The effects of losing merit-based financial aid on persistence (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, Tampa.
66.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis: Applied social research methods series (Vol. 49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
67.
*LiuV. Y. T. (2017). The impact of year-round Pell Grants on academic and employment outcomes for community college students (CCRC Working Paper No. 95). New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
68.
LongB. T.RileyE. (2007). Financial aid: A broken bridge to college access?Harvard Educational Review, 77, 39–63.
69.
Lumina Foundation. (2017). A stronger nation: Learning beyond high school builds American talent. Indianapolis, IN: Author.
70.
MaasI. L.NolteS.WalterO. B.BergerT.HautzingerM.HohagenF.. . .SpäthC. (2017). The regression discontinuity design showed to be a valid alternative to a randomized controlled trial for estimating treatment effects. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 82, 94–102.
71.
MarginsonS. (2011). Higher education and public good. Higher Education Quarterly, 65, 411–433.
72.
*MarxB. M.TurnerL. J. (2018). Borrowing trouble? Human capital investment with opt-in costs and implications for the effectiveness of grant aid. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(2), 163–201.
73.
*MayerA. K.PatelR.GutierrezM. (2016). Four-year degree and employment findings from a randomized controlled trial of a one-year performance-based scholarship program in Ohio. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9,283–306.
74.
McFarlandJ.HussarB.de BreyC.SnyderT.WangX.Wilkinson-FlickerS.. . . Bullock MannF. (2017). The condition of education 2017 (NCES 2017–144). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
75.
*MealliF.RampichiniC. (2012). Evaluating the effects of university grants by using regression discontinuity designs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 175, 775–798.
76.
MelguizoT.SanchezF.VelascoT. (2016). Credit for low-income students and access to and academic performance in higher education in Colombia: A regression discontinuity approach. World Development, 80, 61–77.
77.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 6(7), e1000097.
78.
MurnaneR. J.WillettJ. B. (2010). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
79.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Table 306.30: Fall enrollment of U.S. residents in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by race/ethnicity: Selected years, 1976 through 2026. In U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (Ed.), Digest of education statistics (p. 457). Washington, DC: Author.
80.
*PageL. C.KehoeS. S.CastlemanB. L.SahadewoG. A. (2017). More than dollars for scholars: The impact of the Dell Scholars Program on college access, persistence and degree attainment. Journal of Human Resources. Advance online publication. doi:10.3368/jhr.54.3.0516.7935R1
81.
*PantalM. A. (2006). Retaking the ACT: The effect of a state merit scholarship on test-taking, enrollment, retention, and enrollment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri, Columbia.
82.
*ParkR. S .E.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2017). The impact of Pell Grant eligibility on community college students’ financial aid packages, labor supply, and academic outcomes. New York, NY: Center for Analysis of Postsecondary Education and Employment Working Paper.
83.
*PartridgeM. A. (2013). Topics in the economics of education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tallahassee: Florida State University.
84.
*PatelR.ValenzuelaI. (2013). Moving forward: Early findings from the performance-based scholarship demonstration in Arizona. New York, NY: MDRC.
85.
PernaL. W.LeighE. W. (2017). Understanding the promise: A typology of state and local college promise programs. Educational Researcher, 47, 155–180. doi:10.3 102/0013189X17742653
*RamseyD. (2013). Financial assistance and educational attainment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
88.
*Richburg-HayesL.PatelR.BrockT.de la CampaE.RuddT.ValenzuelaI. (2015). Providing more cash for college: Interim findings from the performance-based scholarship demonstration in California. New York, NY: MDRC.
89.
RileyR. D.HigginsJ. P.DeeksJ. J. (2011). Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ, 342, d549.
90.
RothsteinH. R. (2008). Publication bias as a threat to the validity of meta-analytic results. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 4, 61–81.
91.
*SchuddeL.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2016). Pell grants as performance-based scholarships? An examination of satisfactory academic progress requirements in the nation’s largest need-based aid program. Research in Higher Education, 57,943–967.
92.
Scott-ClaytonJ. (2011a). The causal effect of federal work-study participation: Quasi-experimental evidence from West Virginia. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 506–527.
93.
*Scott-ClaytonJ. (2011b). On money and motivation a quasi-experimental analysis of financial incentives for college achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 46, 614–646.
94.
*ScrivenerS.WeissM. J.RatledgeA.RuddT.SommoC.FresquesH. (2015). Doubling graduation rates: Three-year effects of CUNY’s Accelerated Study in Associate Programs (ASAP) for developmental education students. New York, NY: MDRC.
95.
ShadishW.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
96.
*SjoquistD. L.WintersJ. V. (2015). State merit-based financial aid programs and college attainment. Journal of Regional Science, 55, 364–390.
97.
St. JohnE. P. (1991). The impact of student financial aid: A review of recent research. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 21, 18–32.
98.
*ToutkoushianR. K.HosslerD.DesJardinsS. L.McCallB.González CanchéM. G. (2013). Effect of twenty-first century scholars program on college aspirations and completion (Working paper). Retrieved from http://closup.umich.edu/files/Desjardins-Indiana-scholars.pdf
99.
TurnerL. J. (2014). The road to Pell is paved with good intentions: The economic incidence of federal student grant aid. College Park: University of Maryland, Department of Economics.
100.
*UptonG. B. (2016). The effects of merit-based scholarships on educational outcomes. Journal of Labor Research, 37, 235–261.
ValentineJ. C.KonstantopoulosS.Goldrick-RabS. (2017). What happens to students placed into developmental education? A meta-analysis of regression discontinuity studies. Review of Educational Research, 87, 806–833.
103.
*VillarrealM. U. (2017). Making ends meet: Student grant aid, cost saving strategies, college completion, and labor supply (Working paper). Austin: University of Texas.
104.
*WelchJ. G. (2014). HOPE for community college students: The impact of merit aid on persistence, graduation, and earnings. Economics of Education Review, 43, 1–20.
105.
WestS. G.DuanN.PequegnatW.GaistP.Des JarlaisD. C.HoltgraveD.. . . ClattsM. (2008). Alternatives to the randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1359–1366.
106.
~ZhangL.HuS.SensenigV. (2013). The effect of Florida’s Bright Futures program on college enrollment and degree production: An aggregated-level analysis. Research in Higher Education, 54, 746–764.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
