Educational Impacts and Cost-Effectiveness of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs in Developing Countries: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

We meta-analyze for impact and cost-effectiveness 94 studies from 47 conditional cash transfer programs in low- and middle-income countries worldwide, focusing on educational outcomes that include enrollment, attendance, dropout, and school completion. To conceptually guide and interpret the empirical findings of our meta-analysis, we present a simple economic framework on household decision making that generates predictions, all else constant, for the association between certain program context and design characteristics and impact estimates. We also present a simple model for the analysis of program costs, using it to compute cost-effectiveness estimates for a subsample of programs. For all schooling outcomes, we find strong support for heterogeneity in impact, transfer-effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness estimates. Our meta-analytic results of impact and transfer-effectiveness estimates provide support to some—but not all—of the predictions from the household decision-making model.

Keywords

meta-analysis conditional cash transfers school enrollment attendance dropout completion cost-effectiveness developing countries

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

*Ahmed

A. U.

Gilligan

Kudat

Colasan

Tatlidil

Ozbilgin

(2006). Interim impact evaluation of the Conditional Cash Transfers Program in Turkey: A quantitative assessment. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

*Akresh

de Walque

Kazianga

(2013). Cash transfers and child schooling: Evidence from a randomized evaluation of the role of conditionality (Policy Research Working Paper No. 6340). Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/1813-9450-6340

*Alam

Báez

Del Carpio

X. V.

(2011). Does cash for school influence young women’s behavior in the longer term? Evidence from Pakistan (Policy Research Working Paper No. 5669). Washington, DC: World Bank.

*Alatas

Cahyadi

Ekasari

Harmoun

Hidayat

Janz

. . . Wai-Poi

(2011). Program Keluarga Harapan: Main findings from the impact evaluation of Indonesia’s pilot household conditional cash transfer program. Jakarta, Indonesia: World Bank.

*Armand

Carneiro

(2013). Impact evaluation of the conditional cash transfer program for secondary school attendance in Macedonia: Results from the first follow-up. Skopje, Republic of Macedonia: Ministry of Labour and Social Policy.

*Arraiz

Rozo

(2011). Same bureaucracy, different outcomes in human capital? How indigenous and rural non-indigenous areas in panama responded to the CCT (Working Paper OVE/WP-03/11). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

*Attanasio

Fitzsimons

Gomez

Gutiérrez

M. I.

Meghir

Mesnard

(2010). Children’s schooling and work in the presence of a conditional cash transfer program in rural Colombia. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58, 181–210. doi:10.1086/648188

*Báez

Camacho

(2011). Assessing the long-term effects of conditional cash transfers on human capital: Evidence from Colombia (Policy Research Working Paper No. 5681). Washington, DC: World Bank.

Baird

Ferreira

Özler

Woolcock

(2014). Conditional, unconditional and everything in between: A systematic review of the effects of cash transfer programs on schooling outcomes. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 6, 1–43. doi:10.1080/19439342.2014.890362

10.

Baird

McIntosh

Özler

(2009). Designing cost-effective cash transfer programs to boost schooling among young women in Sub-Saharan Africa (Policy Research Working Paper No. 5090). Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/1813-9450-5090

11.

*Baird

McIntosh

Özler

(2011). Cash or condition? Evidence from a cash transfer experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 1709–1753. doi:10.1093/qje/qjr032

12.

*Barrera-Osorio

Bertrand

Linden

Perez-Calle

(2011). Improving the design of conditional transfer programs: Evidence from a randomized education experiment in Colombia. American Economic Journal, 3, 167–195. doi:10.1257/app.3.2.167

13.

*Barrera-Osorio

Filmer

(2016). Incentivizing schooling for learning. Journal of Human Resources, 51, 461–499. doi:10.3368/jhr.51.2.0114-6118R1

14.

*Barrera-Osorio

Linden

Saavedra

J. E.

(2016). Medium term educational consequences of alternative conditional cash transfer designs: Experimental evidence from Colombia. Unpublished manuscript, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

15.

*Baulch

(2011). The medium-term impact of the primary education stipend in rural Bangladesh. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 3, 243–262. doi:10.1080/19439342.2011.570449

16.

*Behrman

J. R.

Gallardo-García

Parker

S. W.

Todd

P. E.

Vélez-Grajales

(2012). Are conditional cash transfers effective in urban areas? Evidence from Mexico. Education Economics, 20, 233–259. doi:10.1080/09645292.2012.672792

17.

*Behrman

J. R.

Parker

S. W.

Todd

P. E.

(2004). Medium-term effects of the oportunidades program package, including nutrition, on education of rural children age 0–8 in 1997 (Technical Document No. 9). Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública.

18.

Behrman

J. R.

Parker

S. W.

Todd

(2005). Long-term impacts of the Oportunidades conditional cash transfer program on rural youth in Mexico (Discussion Paper No. 122). Goettingen, Germany: Ibero-American Institute for Economic Research.

19.

*Benedetti

Ibarrarán

McEwan

(2015). Do education and health conditions matter in a large cash transfer? Evidence from a Honduran experiment (IDB Working Paper Series No. IDB-WP-577). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

20.

*Benhassine

Devoto

Duflo

Dupas

Pouliquen

(2015). Turning a shove into a nudge: A “labeled cash transfer” for education. American Economic Journal, 7, 86–125. doi:10.1257/pol.20130225

21.

Buddelmeyer

Skoufias

(2004). An evaluation of the performance of regression discontinuity design on PROGRESA (Policy Research Working Paper No. 3386). Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/1813-9450-3386

22.

Caldés

Coady

Maluccio

J. A.

(2006). The cost of poverty alleviation transfer programs: A comparative analysis of three programs in Latin America. World Development, 34, 818–837.

23.

Caldés

Maluccio

J. A.

(2005). The cost of conditional cash transfers. Journal of International Development, 17, 151–168.

24.

*Cameron

(2009). Can a public scholarship program successfully reduce school drop-outs in a time of economic crisis? Evidence from Indonesia. Economics of Education Review, 28, 308–317. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.09.013

25.

*Cardoso

Souza

A. P.

(2004). The impact of cash transfers on child labor and school attendance in Brazil (Working Paper No. 04-W07). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.

26.

*Chaudhury

Friedman

Onishi

(2013). Philippines conditional cash transfer program impact evaluation 2012 (Report Number No. 75533-PH). Washington, DC: World Bank.

27.

Cook

Wong

(2008). Empirical tests of the validity of the regression discontinuity design. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 91, 127–150.

28.

*Dammert

A. C.

(2009). Heterogeneous impacts of conditional cash transfers: Evidence from Nicaragua. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58, 53–83. doi:10.1086/605205

29.

*De Brauw

Gilligan

. (2011). Using the regression discontinuity design with implicit partitions: The impacts of comunidades solidarias rurales on schooling in El Salvador (IFPRI Discussion Paper No. 01116). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

30.

*De Brauw

Gilligan

D. O.

Hoddinott

Roy

. (2015). The impact of Bolsa Familia on schooling. World Development, 70, 303–316. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.02.001

31.

*De Janvry

Finan

Sadoulet

. (2006). Evaluating Brazil’s Bolsa Escola Program: Impact on schooling and municipal roles. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley.

32.

*Departamento Nacional de Planeación. (2006). Programa Familias en Acción. Impacto del Programa a un Año y Medio de su Ejecución [Program Familias en Accion: Program impacts after one and one-half years of implementation] (Vol. 4). Bogotá, Colombia: Departamento Nacional de Planeación.

33.

*De Souza

P. Z

. (2005). An impact evaluation of the conditional cash transfers to education under PRAF: An experimental approach. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Fundacao Getulio Vargas.

34.

Dhaliwal

Duflo

Glennerster

Tulloch

(2013). Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis to inform policy in developing countries: A general framework with applications for education. In Glewwe

Paul

(Ed.), Education Policy in Developing Countries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

35.

Doss

(2013). Intrahousehold bargaining and resource allocation in developing countries. World Bank Research Observer, 28, 52–78.

36.

*Evans

Hausladen

Kosec

Reese

(2014). Community-based conditional cash transfers in Tanzania: Results from a randomized trial. Washington, DC: World Bank.

37.

*Ferré

Sharif

(2014). Can conditional cash transfers improve education and nutrition outcomes for poor children in Bangladesh? Evidence from a pilot project (Policy Research Working Paper No. 7077). Washington, DC: World Bank.

38.

*Filmer

Schady

(2008). Getting girls into school: Evidence from a scholarship program in Cambodia. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 56, 581–617. doi:10.1086/533548

39.

*Filmer

Schady

(2009). School enrollment, selection and test scores (Policy Research Working Paper No. 4998). Washington, DC: World Bank.

40.

*Filmer

Schady

(2011). Does more cash in conditional cash transfer programs always lead to larger impacts on school attendance? Journal of Development Economics, 96, 150–157. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.05.006

41.

Fiszbein

Schady

Ferreira

Grosh

Kelleher

Olinto

Skoufias

(2009). Conditional cash transfers: Reducing present and future poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank.

42.

*Gajate-Garrido

(2013). Assessing the differential impact of “Juntos” conditional cash transfer on indigenous peoples. Unpublished manuscript, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.

43.

*Galiani

McEwan

(2013). The heterogeneous impact of conditional cash transfers. Journal of Public Economics, 103, 85–96. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.04.004

44.

Grosh

del Ninno

Tesliuc

Ouerghi

with the assistance of Milazzo

Weignand

(2008). For protection and promotion: The design and implementation of effective safety nets. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

45.

*Gutiérrez

J. P.

Abreu

Charles

(2011). Evaluación Externa de Impacto del Programa de Transferencias Monetarias Condicionadas: Efectos en Indicadores de Educación [External Evaluation of the Impact of the Conditional Cash Transfer Program: Effects on Education Indicators]. México: Institución Nacional de Salud Pública.

46.

Haddad

L. J.

Hoddinott

J. F.

Alderman

(1997). Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

47.

*Handa

Park

Osei

Osei-Akoto

Davis

Diadone

(2013). Livelihood empowerment against poverty program impact evaluation. Chapel Hill: Carolina Population Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

48.

*Hasan

(2010). Gender-targeted conditional cash transfers: Enrollment, spillover effects and instructional quality (Policy Research Working Paper No. 5257). Washington, DC: World Bank.

49.

Hedges

L. V.

Tipton

Johnson

M. C.

(2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1, 39–65. doi:10.1002/jrsm.5

50.

*Heinrich

(2005). Demand and supply-side determinants of conditional cash transfer program effectiveness: Improving the first-generation programs (Working Paper No. OVE/WP-05/05). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

51.

Independent Evaluation Group. (2011). Evidence and lessons learned from impact evaluations on social safety nets. Washington, DC: World Bank.

52.

Institute of Educational Sciences. (2011). What works clearinghouse: Procedures and standards handbook version 2.1. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/reference_resources/wwc_procedures_v2_1_standards_handbook.pdf

53.

*Khandker

S. R.

Pitt

M. M.

Fuwa

(2003). Subsidy to promote girls’ secondary education: The female stipend program in Bangladesh. Unpublished manuscript, The World Bank, Washington, DC.

54.

*Levy

Ohls

(2010). Evaluation of Jamaica’s PATH conditional cash transfer programme. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 2, 421–441. doi:10.1080/19439342.2010.519783

55.

Lindert

Skoufias

Shapiro

(2006). Redistributing income to the poor and the rich: Public transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean (Social Protection Discussion Paper 605). Washington, DC: World Bank.

56.

*Macours

Vakis

(2014). Changing household’s investment behavior through social interactions with local leaders: Evidence from a randomised transfer programme. Economic Journal, 124, 607–633. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12145

57.

*Maluccio

J. A.

Flores

(2005). Impact evaluation of a conditional cash transfer program (Research Report No. 141). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

58.

*Maluccio

Murphy

Regalia

(2010). Does supply matter? Initial schooling conditions and the effectiveness of conditional cash transfers for grade progression in Nicaragua. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 2, 87–116. doi:10.1080/19439340903584085

59.

Milazzo

(2009). Conditional cash transfers: An annotated bibliography. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/SAFETYNETSANDTRANSFERS/Resources/281945-1131738167860/CCT_Biblio_6Feb2009.pdf

60.

*Mo

Zhang

Luo

Brinton

S. R. C.

(2013). School dropouts and conditional cash transfers: Evidence from a randomised controlled trial in rural China’s junior high schools. Journal of Development Studies, 49, 190–207. doi:10.1080/00220388.2012.724166

61.

Molina-Millan

Barham

Macours

Maluccio

J. A.

Stampini

(2016). Long-term impacts of conditional cash transfers in Latin America: Review of the evidence (IDB Working Paper Serial No. IDB-WP-732). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

62.

*No author. (2008). Impacto del Programa Solidaridad en Asistencia Escolar y Niveles Nutricionales: Un Enfoque Empírico [Impacts of the Solidaridad Program on School Attendance and Nutritional Levels: An Empirical Approach]. Unpublished manuscript.

63.

*Núñez

Llanos

Rivas

Pedraza

Villegas

Bateman

. . . Castañeda

(2011). Evaluación del programa Familias en Acción en grandes centros urbanos: Informe Final [Evaluation of the Familias en Accion Program in large urban centers: Final Report]. Bogotá, Colombia: Centro Nacional de Consultoría.

64.

*Parker

Todd

P. E.

Wolpin

K. I.

(2006). Within-family treatment effect estimators: The impact of oportunidades on schooling in Mexico. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

65.

*Perez-Ribas

R. P.

Veras-Soares

Teixeira

Silva

Hirata

(2011). Externality and behavioural change effects of a non-randomised CCT programme: Heterogeneous impact on the demand for health and education (PEP-PIERI Working Paper No. 2011-19). Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipc/wpaper/82.html

66.

*Perova

Vakis

(2012). 5 Years in Juntos: New evidence on the program’s short and long-term impacts. Economía, 35(69), 53–82.

67.

Petrosino

Morgan

Fronius

T. A.

Tanner-Smith

E. E.

Boruch

R. F.

(2013). Interventions in developing nations for improving primary and secondary school enrolment of children: A systematic review, 3ie systematic review. London, England: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation.

68.

*Ponce

(2006). The impact of a conditional cash transfer program on school enrolment: the “Bono de Desarrollo Humano” of Ecuador (Working Paper 06/302). Quito, Ecuador: Facultad Latinoamerica de Ciencias Sociales—Sede Ecuador.

69.

Rawlings

L. B.

Rubio

G. M.

(2005). Evaluating the impact of conditional cash transfer programs. World Bank Research Observer, 20, 29–55. doi:10.1093/wbro/lki001

70.

*Robertson

Mushati

Eaton

J. W.

Dumba

Mavise

Makoni

. . . Gregson

(2013). Effects of unconditional and conditional cash transfers on child health and development in Zimbabwe: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet, 381, 1283–1292. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62168-0

71.

*Salvia

Tuñón

Poy

(2015). Asignación Universal por Hijo para Protección Social: impacto sobre el bienestar económico y el desarrollo humano de la infancia. [Program Asignacion Universal por Hijo para Proteccion Social: Impacts on economic welfare and children’s human development] Población & Sociedad, 22, 101–134.

72.

*Schady

Araujo

M. C.

(2008). Cash transfers, conditions, and school enrollment in Ecuador. Economia, 8, 43–77.

73.

*Schultz

T. P.

(2004). School subsidies for the poor: Evaluating the Mexican progresa poverty program. Journal of Development Economics, 74, 199–250. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.12.009

74.

*Sinha

Yoong

(2009). Long-term financial incentives and investment in daughters: Evidence from conditional cash transfers in North India (Working Paper No. WR-667). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

75.

Skoufias

(2005). PROGRESA and its impacts on the welfare of rural households in Mexico. Research Report 139. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

76.

*Skoufias

Parker

(2009). The impact of PROGRESA on child labor and schooling. In Orazem

P. F.

Sedlacek

Tzannatos

(Eds.), Child labor and education in Latin America: An economic perspective (pp. 167–185). Houndmills, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

77.

Snilstveit

Stevenson

Phillips

Vojtkova

Gallagher

Schmidt

. . . Eyers

(2015). Interventions for improving learning outcomes and access to education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review: International initiative for impact evaluation (3ie). London, England: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation.

78.

*Sparrow

(2007). Protecting education for the poor in times of crisis: An evaluation of a scholarship programme in Indonesia. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69, 99–122. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2006.00438.x

79.

Stampini

Tornarolli

(2012). The growth of conditional cash transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean: Did they go too far? (IDB Policy Brief No. 185). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

80.

*Todd

P. E.

Gallardo-Garcia

Behram

J. R.

Parker

S. W.

(2005). Impacto de Oportunidades sobre la Educación de Niños y Jóvenes de Áreas Urbanas Después de un Año de Participación en el Programa. In Hernández-Prado

Hernández-Ávlia

(Eds.), Evaluación Externa de Impacto del Programa Oportunidades [External Evaluation of the Impact of the Oportunidades Program] (pp. 165–227). Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública.

81.

*Vera

(2011). Matriculación y Trabajo Infantil: Un Análisis Quasi Experimental. Serie de Documentos de Trabajo sobre Desarrollo [Enrollment and Child Work: A quasi-experimental analysis. Development Working Paper Series] (No. 11/2011). La Paz, Bolivia: Instituto de Estudios Avanzados en Desarrollo.

82.

*Ward

Hurrell

Visram

Riemenschneide

(2010). Cash transfer programme for orphans and vulnerable children (OT_OVC), Kenya: Operational and impact evaluation, 2007–2009. Final report. Oxford, England: Oxford Policy Management.

83.

World Bank. (2014). The state of social safety nets. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/18376/879840WP0FINAL00Box385208B00PUBLIC0.pdf

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.11 MB