Attention has been directed toward extended school time as a measure to improve academic achievement. The school year and day length have varied over time and across localities depending on the particular needs of the community. Proponents argue that extending time will have learning and nonacademic benefits. Opponents suggest increased time is not guaranteed to lead to more effective instruction and suggest other costs. Despite noted limitations in the research, past reviewers have argued that any positive relation between allocated time and achievement is tentative and instructional quality needs to be addressed first. After a comprehensive search of the literature, 15 empirical studies of various designs conducted since 1985 were found. The literature revealed that (a) designs are generally weak for making causal inferences and (b) outcomes other than achievement are scarcely studied. That said, findings suggest that extending school time can be an effective way to support student learning, particularly (a) for students most at risk of school failure and (b) when considerations are made for how time is used. Of note, the strongest research designs produced the most consistent positive results. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.
AdelmanN. E.HaslamM. B.PringleB. A. (1996). Studies of education reform: The uses of time for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED397562)
2.
AlexanderR.ArmstrongM.FlutterJ.HargreavesL.HarlenW.HarrisonD.. . . UttingD. (2009). Children, their world, their education: Final report and recommendations of the Cambridge Primary Review. New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
AronsonJ.ZimmermanJ.CarlosL. (1999). Improving student achievement by extending school: Is it just a matter of time?San Francisco, CA: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED435082)
BakerD. P.FabregaR.GalindoC.MishookJ. (2004). Instructional time and national achievement: Cross national-evidence. Prospects: Quarterly Review of Comparative Education, 34, 311–334. doi: 10.1007/s11125-004-5310-1
6.
BarrettM. J. (1990). The case for more school days. Atlantic Monthly, 266, 78–106.
7.
BishopJ.WornerW.WeberL. (1988). Extending the school day: An evaluation of a seven-period class schedule. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 14, 361–380.
8.
BrownC. G.RochaE.SharkeyA.HadleyE.HandleyC.KronleyR. A. (2005). Getting smarter, becoming fairer: A progressive education agenda for a stronger nation. Washington DC: Center for American Progress and Institute for America’s Future.
9.
BrownM. E. M. (1998). A comparative study of the effectiveness of an extended year program for kindergartners (intervention, at risk, readiness) (Doctoral dissertation). Available from Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9825653).
10.
CaldwellJ. H.HuittW. G.GraeberA. O. (1982). Time spent in learning: Implications from research. Elementary School Journal, 82, 171–180.
11.
Carnegie Corporation. (1994). A matter of time: Risk and opportunity in the out-of-school hours. New York, NY: Author.
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
CooperH.AllenA. B.PatallE. A.DentA. L. (2010). Effects of full-day kindergarten on academic achievement and social development. Review of Educational Research, 80, 34–70. doi: 10.3102/0034654309359185
14.
CooperH.NyeB.CharltonK.LindsayJ.GreathouseS. (1996). The effects of summer vacation on achievement test scores: A narrative and meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 6, 227–268. doi: 10.3102/00346543066003227
15.
CottonK. (1989). Classroom questioning, close-up #5. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED312030)
16.
CubanL. (2008). The perennial reform: Fixing school time. Phi Delta Kappan, 90, 240–250.
17.
DenhamC.LiebermanA. (1980). Time to learn. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
Educational Research Service. (1984). Teachers and Principals: May 1984. ERS Educator Opinion Poll. Reporting the Opinions, Status, and Experiences of American Public School Educators. Arlington, VA: ERS. Retrieved from ERIC database. ED249643.
20.
ElamS. (1989). The second Gallup/Phi Delta Kappa Poll of teachers’ attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 785–798.
21.
EllisT. L. (1984). Extending the school year and day. ERIC Digest, 7. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED259450)
22.
EvansW.BechtelD. (1998). Extended school day/year programs: A research synthesis. Philadelphia, PA: Laboratory for Student Success. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED461695)
23.
FarbmanD.KaplanC. (2005). Time for a change: The promise of extended-time schools for promoting student achievement. Boston: Massachusetts 2020.
24.
FrazierJ. A.MorrisonF. J. (1998). The influence of extended-year schooling on growth of achievement and perceived competence in early elementary school. Child Development, 69, 495–517. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org
25.
FredrickW. C.WalbergH. J. (1980). Learning as a function of time. Journal of Educational Research, 73, 183–194.
26.
FunkhouserJ. E.HumphreyD. C.PantonK. L. M.RosenthalE. D. (1995). A research review: The educational uses of time (Vol. 4). Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED397565)
27.
GandaraP. (2000). The dimensions of time and the challenge of school reform. Albany: State University of New York Press.
28.
GewertzC. (2008). Consensus on increasing learning time builds. Education Week, 28, 14–17.
29.
GoldK. M. (2002). School’s in: The history of summer education in American public schools. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
30.
GonzalesP.GuzmánJ. Z.PartelowL.PahlkeE.JocelynL.KastbergD.WilliamsT. (2004). Highlights from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003 (NCES 2005–005). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
31.
GreenC. A. (1998). The Extended School Year Program consolidated report: Achievement test scores and survey findings (Tech. Rep.). Detroit, MI: Detroit Public Schools Office of Research, Evaluation, and Testing. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED417245)
32.
HarmsT.CliffordR. M. (1980). Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale. New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College.
33.
HarterS.PikeR. (1984). The Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children. Child Development, 55, 1969–1982. doi: 10.2307/1129772
34.
HosslerC.StageF.GallagherK. (1988, March). The relationship of increased instructional time to student achievement. Policy Bulletin: Consortium on Educational Policy Studies, pp. 1-5. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED298671)
KarweitN. (1985). Should we lengthen the school term?Educational Researcher, 14(6), 9. doi: 10.3102/0013189X014006009
38.
KarweitN.SlavinR. E. (1981). Measurement and modeling choices in studies of time and learning. American Educational Research Journal, 18, 157–171. doi: 10.3102/00028312018002157
39.
KepnerA. (2007, February19). More school can mean more learning: Vision 2015 wants to add 140 teaching hours to Delaware school year. The News Journal (Wilmington, Delaware). Retrieved from http://www.vision2015delaware.org/resources/21907moreschool.pdf
LevinH. M. (1984). Clocking instruction: A reform whose time has come?Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED245318)
43.
MazzarellaJ. A. (1984). Longer day, longer year: Will they make a difference?Principal, 63(5), 14.
44.
MeierM. (2009). Exploring the effects of school calendars on student achievement. (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3372338).
45.
McDonaldA. J.RossS. M.AbneyJ.ZoblotskyT. (2008, March). Urban school reform: Year 4 outcomes for the Knowledge Is Power Program in an urban middle school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY. Retrieved from http://www.kipp.org/files/dmfile/CREP_KIPP_Diamond_Year4.pdf
46.
National Education Association. (1987). What research says about series: Extending the school day/year: Proposals and results. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED321374)
47.
New York City Board of Education. (2000). Analyses of performance of extended-time and nonextended time SURR school(Flash Research Rep. 1). Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED451314)
48.
NickersonK. S. (1971, March). Extended educational opportunities and the extended school year (revised). Paper presented at the Maine Secondary and Post-Secondary Schools annual educational conference. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED052531)
PittmanR.CoxR.BurchfielG. (1986). The extended school year: Implications for student achievement. Journal of Experimental Education, 54, 211–215. Retrieved from http://schoolyear.info/extendedyear.pdf
52.
QuartarolaB. (1984). A research paper on time on task and the extended school day/year and their relationship to improving student achievement. Sacramento: Association of California School Administrators. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED245347)
53.
RasberryQ. (1992). The extended school year: Is more necessarily better?Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED353657)
54.
RobinK. B. (2005). The effects of extended-day, extended-year preschool on learning in literacy and mathematics. (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3233695).
55.
RoseL.GallupA. (2006). The 38th annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 88, 41–56.
56.
RossS. M.McDonaldA. J.AlbergM.McSparrin-GallagherB. (2007). Achievement and climate outcomes for the Knowledge Is Power Program in an inner-city middle school. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12, 137–165.
SimsD. P. (2008). Strategic responses to school accountability measures: It’s all in the timing. Economics of Education Review, 27, 58–68. doi: 10.1016/j.econe durev.2006.05.003
StevensonH. W. (1983). Comparison of Japanese, Taiwanese and American mathematics achievement. Stanford, CA: Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences.
61.
StevensonH. W.StiglerJ. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York, NY: Summit Books.
62.
StrotherD. B. (1984). Another look at time-on-task. Phi Delta Kappan, 65(10), 714–717.
63.
TyackD.CubanL. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64.
van der GraafV. K. (2008). A five year comparison between an extended year school and a conventional year school: Effects on academic achievement (Doctoral dissertation, Lindenwood University, St. Charles, MO). Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED505912)
65.
Virginia State Department of Education. (1992). Instructional time and student learning: A study of the school calendar and instructional time. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED356555)
66.
WeissJ.BrownR. S. (2003). Telling tales over time: Constructing and deconstructing the school calendar. Teachers College Record, 105, 1720–1757. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-9620.2003.00307.x
67.
WheelerP. (1987). The relationship between grade six test scores and the length of the school day. Educational Research Quarterly, 11(3), 10–17.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
