Active learning involves instructional approaches that engage students in meaningful thinking and reflection. This work evaluated the effect of active learning on academic achievement in music education. While prior meta-analyses in other disciplines showed positive effects, no quantitative review existed for music. A comprehensive search identified 27 eligible studies, with 20 reporting usable quantitative data. After addressing an outlier, pooled results from 15 independent effect sizes showed a moderate, statistically significant positive effect (ES = 0.46, 95% CI [0.22, 0.70]). Comparisons across groups detected no significant moderation by educational level or strategy, though higher education showed the largest mean effects. Although variation across studies was high, active learning consistently benefited music-specific achievement. The review highlights gaps in methodological rigor and a scarcity of studies in primary and higher education. Overall, findings indicate that active learning enhances achievement in music education, though more high-quality controlled studies are needed.
*AnH.SungW.YoonS. Y. (2022). Hands-on, minds-on, hearts-on, social-on: A collaborative maker project integrating arts in a synchronous online environment for teachers. TechTrends, 66, 590–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00740-x
2.
BarbarouxM.DittingerE.BessonM. (2019). Music training with Démos program positively influences cognitive functions in children from low socio-economic backgrounds. PLOS ONE, 14(5), Article e0216874. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216874
3.
*BenitoJ.PastorJ. J. (2022). Música, aprendizaje cooperativo y experiencia emocional: Análisis de una intervención literario-musical en la formación inicial del docente [Music, cooperative learning, and emotional experience: Analysis of a literary-musical intervention in initial teacher training]. Educatio Siglo XXI, 40(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.6018/educatio.432101
4.
*BilenS. (2010). The effect of cooperative learning on the ability of prospect of music teachers to apply Orff-Schulwerk activities. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4872–4877. http://10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.787
5.
BinkleyM.ErstadO.HermanJ.RaizenS.RipleyM.Miller-RicciM.RumbleM. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In GriffinP.McGawB.CareE. (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Springer.
6.
BonwellC. C.EisonJ. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. George Washington University.
7.
*Botella-NicolásA. M.Adell-ValeroJ. R. (2016). Una propuesta experimental en la enseñanza de la música en secundaria [An experimental proposal in the teaching of music in secondary education]. Cuadernos de Música, Artes Visuales y Artes Escénicas, 11(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.mavae11-1.peem
8.
*Botella-NicolásA. M.Adell-ValeroJ. R. (2018). El aprendizaje cooperativo por proyectos: Una aportación a la didáctica de la música en la educación universitaria de magisterio en el grado de infantil [Project-based cooperative learning: A contribution to music didactics in university teacher education for the early childhood degree]. Praxis, 14(2), 153–170. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6992736
*CangroR. M. (2013). Effects of cooperative learning strategies on the music achievement of beginning instrumentalists. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 2(7), 133–139.
11.
ChickeringA.GamsonZ. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association for Higher Education.
12.
*CobanS.DubazI. (2011). The relationship between active learning models in music lessons in elementary schools and multiple intelligence areas. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 684–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.129
*CuadradoF. (2018). Music and Talent: An experimental project for personal development and well-being through music. International Society for Music Education, 37(1), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761418794720
15.
*CuervoL. (2018). Study of an interdisciplinary didactic model in a secondary education music class. Music Education Research, 20(4), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2018.1433148
16.
*DavyT. K.EllenH. L.SamuelK. W. (2022). Engaging students in creative music making with musical instrument application in an online flipped classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10568-2
17.
*DuranD.RibosaJ.SánchezG. (2020). Peer tutoring for improvement in rhythm reading fluency and comprehension. International Journal of Music Education, 38(2), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761419898313
18.
*EggerJ. O. (2019). Effects of cooperative learning on preservice elementary teachers’ interest in and integration of music into core academic subjects. International Journal of Music Education, 37(4), 608–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761419852173
19.
EggerM.SmithG. D.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634.
20.
Fernández-BarrosA.DuranD.ViladotL. (2023). Peer tutoring in music education: A literature review. International Journal of Music Education, 41(1), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/02557614221087761
21.
FiorellaL.MayerR. E. (2015). Learning as a generative activity: Eight learning strategies that promote understanding. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107707085
22.
FreemanS.EddyS. L.McDonoughM.SmithM. K.OkoroaforN.JordtH.WenderothM. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
*GrahamM. F. (2024). The effects of peer-assisted learning on rhythmic and melodic sight-reading in a middle school chorus. International Journal of Music Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02557614241288957
25.
*GuzzettaC. A. (2019). Learning method preferences in a steel drum classroom: Exploring a learner-centered pedagogy through composition, peer teaching, and student-led Modern Band projects in a middle school setting. International Journal of Music Education, 38(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761419877575
26.
HaddawayN. R.PageM. J.PritchardC. C.McGuinnessL. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimized digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18, Article e1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
27.
Hmelo-SilverC. E.BarrowsH. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1004
28.
*HogenesM.van OersB.DiekstraR. F. W.SkladM. (2015). The effects of music composition as a classroom activity on engagement in music education and academic and music achievement: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Music Education, 34(1), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761415584296
29.
JellisonJ. A.BrownL. S.DraperE. A. (2015). Peer-assisted learning and interactions in inclusive music classrooms: Benefits, research, and applications. General Music Today, 28(3), 18–22.
30.
JellisonJ. A.DraperE. A.BrownL. S. (2017). Learning together: The instinct to do good and peer-assisted strategies that work. Music Educators Journal, 104(2), 15–20.
31.
*JohnsonE. (2011). The effect of peer-based instruction on rhythm reading achievement. Contributions to Music Education, 38(2), 25–42.
32.
*JohnsonE. (2017). The effect of symmetrical and asymmetrical peer-assisted learning structures on music achievement and learner engagement in seventh-grade band. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429417712486
33.
*JohnsonE.LaGasseA. B. (2021). Musical creativity in autism: Exploring growth through collaborative peer interaction. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69(1), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2021.1940883
34.
JürimaR.KivetsuT.SteinbachK. (2016). Possibilities of using active learning methods in secondary schools’ music lessons. Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/book.5.8
35.
*KährikP.LeigenÄ.KivestuT. (2012). Developing music listening skills using active learning methods in secondary education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 45, 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.557
36.
*KoksalO.YagisanN.AksoyY. (2013). The impact of active learning activities on attainment, attitudes and retention in secondary school students in music lessons. Journal of Education and Sociology, 4(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.7813/jes.2013/4-2/13
37.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
38.
KozanitisA.NencioviciL. (2022). Effect of active learning versus traditional lecturing on the learning achievement of college students in humanities and social sciences: A meta-analysis. Higher Education, 86, 1377–1394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00977-8
39.
*LiR.SrikhaoS.JantharajitN. (2024). An experimental study on the impact of collaborative and active learning on vocational students’ learning achievement and self-motivation. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 28(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.1805
40.
MartellaA. M.MartellaR. C.YatcillaJ. K.NewsonA.ShannonE. N.VoorhisC. (2023). How rigorous is active learning research in STEM education? An examination of key internal validity controls in intervention studies. Educational Psychology Review, 35, 107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09826-1
41.
McGuinnessL. A.HigginsJ. P. T. (2020). Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments.Research Synthesis Methods, 12(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1411
42.
NiemiH. (2002). Active learning—A cultural change needed in teacher education and schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(7), 763–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00042-2
43.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.. . .MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372(71), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
44.
*Palazón-HerreraJ. (2021). Secondary school music education students’ perception of technology-assisted cooperative learning. Culture and Education, 33(1), 160–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2020.1859737
45.
PiagetJ. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. Harcourt, Brace.
46.
PigottT. D.PolaninJ. R. (2019). Methodological guidance paper: High-quality meta-analysis in a systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877153
47.
*PikeP. D. (2014). An exploration of the effect of cognitive and collaborative strategies on keyboard skills of music education students. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 23(2), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083713487214
48.
PolaninJ. R.Tanner-SmithE. E.HennessyE. A. (2016). Estimating the difference between published and unpublished effect sizes: A meta-review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 207–236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582067
49.
PrinceM. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
50.
PustejovskyJ. E. (2019, July2). Sometimes, aggregating effect sizes is fine. James E. Pustejovsky Blog.
51.
RauscherF. H.ShawG. L.KyC. N. (1993). Music and spatial task performance. Nature, 365(6447), 611. https://doi.org/10.1038/365611a0
52.
Román-CaballeroR.VadilloM. A.TrainorL. J.LupiáñezJ. (2022). Please don’t stop the music: A meta-analysis of the cognitive and academic benefits of instrumental musical training in childhood and adolescence. Educational Research Review, 35, 100436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100436
53.
RuizH. (2024). How do we learn? A scientific approach to learning and teaching (evidence-based education). Jossey-Bass.
54.
*SağerT.KalaycıoğluG. K.ZahalO. (2022). The effect of active learning activities on the performance and motivation of viola students. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 9(4), 2019–2037.
55.
SalaG.GobetF. (2017). When the music’s over. Does music skill transfer to children’s and young adolescents’ cognitive and academic skills? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 20, 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.005
56.
SalaG.GobetF. (2020). Cognitive and academic benefits of music training with children: A multilevel meta-analysis. Memory y Cognition, 48(8), 1429–1441. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01060-2
ScottS. (2006). A constructivist view of music education: Perspectives for deep learning. General Music Today, 19(2), 17–21.
59.
ScottS. (2011). Contemplating a constructivist stance for active learning within music education. Ars Education Policy Review, 112(4), 191–198.
60.
ShroffR. H.TingF. S. T.LamW. H.CecotT.YangJ.ChanL. K. (2021). Conceptualization, development and validation of an instrument to measure learners’ perceptions of their active learning strategies within an active learning context. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(1), 201–223.
61.
SterneJ. A. C.HernánM. A.ReevesB. C.SavovićJ.BerkmanN. D.ViswanathanM.HenryD.AltmanD. G.AnsariM. T.BoutronI.CarpenterJ. R.ChanA. W.ChurchillR.DeeksJ. J.HróbjartssonA.KirkhamJ.JüniP.LokeY. K.RamsayC. R.. . .HigginsJ. P. (2016). ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. British Medical Journal, 355, Article i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
62.
SterneJ. A. C.SavovićJ.PageM. J.ElbersR. G.BlencoweN. S.BoutronI.CatesC. J.ChengH. Y.CorbettM. S.EldridgeS. M.EmbersonJ. R.HernánM. A.HopewellS.HróbjartssonA.JunqueiraD. R.JüniP.KirkhamJ. J.LassersonT.LiT.HigginsJ. P. T. (2019). RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. British Medical Journal, 366, l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
63.
TierneyA. T.KrizmanJ.KrausN. (2015). Music training alters the course of adolescent auditory development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(32), 10062–10067. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1505114112
64.
TingF. S. T.LamW. H.ShroffR. H. (2019). Active learning via problem-based collaborative games in a large mathematics university course in Hong Kong. Education Sciences, 9(3), 1–22.
*VanWeeldenK.Heath-ReynoldsJ.LeamanS. (2017). The effect of a peer mentorship program on perceptions of success in choral ensembles: Pairing students with and without disabilities. Applications of Research in Music Education, 36(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123316675480
67.
*Veniel MartíF. (2024). El impacto del aprendizaje activo en la educación musical: Una revisión sistemática con metaanálisis y un estudio cuasi-experimental [The impact of active learning in music education: A systematic review with meta-analysis and a quasi-experimental study] [Doctoral dissertation, Universitat de València]. RODERIC Repository. https://hdl.handle.net/10550/97650
68.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
69.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2022). What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook, version 5.0. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE). https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks
