Using nationally representative data from 2000 to 2021, we examine the distribution of teacher characteristics and qualifications over time, with an emphasis on early career teacher (ECT) qualifications, access to induction supports, and perceptions of preparedness and their distribution across majority-minority, high-poverty, and rural schools. We find the proportion of ECTs and first-year teachers has remained mostly stable and even declined slightly between 2000 and 2021. Despite efforts to diversify the profession in recent years, there is little change in the proportion of teachers of color. ECTs have greater access to induction supports and feelings of preparedness on most measures over time, particularly in nonrural schools. However, we find growing disparities between teacher qualifications and preparedness in rural and nonrural school contexts.
BartanenB.BellC.JamesJ.TaylorE. C.WyckoffJ. H. (2023). “Refining” our understanding of early career teacher skill development: Evidence from classroom observations (EdWorkingPaper 23-845). Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/wykj-e663
3.
BartanenB.KwokA. (2023). From interest to entry: The teacher pipeline from college application to initial employment. American Educational Research Journal, 60(5), 941–985.
4.
BeauducelA. (2011). Indeterminacy of factor score estimates in slightly misspecified confirmatory factor models. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 10(2), 16.
5.
BristolT. J.Carver-ThomasD. (2024). Facing the rising sun: Black teachers’ positive impact post-Brown. Spencer Foundation, Learning Policy Institute, California Association of African-American Superintendents and Administrators.
6.
Carver-ThomasD. (2018). Diversifying the teaching profession: How to recruit and retain teachers of color. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/559.310.
7.
ÇelikH.Zehir TopkayaE. (2024). Preservice English teachers’ preparedness to teach: Stakeholders’ perceptions in teaching practicum. Journal of Teacher Education, 75(1), 92–106.
8.
ChesnutS. R.BurleyH. (2015). Self-efficacy as a predictor of commitment to the teaching profession: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 15, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.001
9.
ChettyR.FriedmanJ. N.RockoffJ. E. (2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633–2679.
10.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.CliftonC. R. (2023). Racial differences in student access to high-quality teachers. Education Finance and Policy, 18(4), 738–752.
11.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. (2005). Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. Economics of Education Review, 24(4), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.06.008
12.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. (2011). Teacher mobility, school segregation, and pay-based policies to level the playing field. Education Finance and Policy, 6(3), 399–438. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00040
13.
GoldhaberD.HoldenK. L. (2021). The early teacher pipeline: What data do — and don’t — tell us. Phi Delta Kappan, 103(3), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217211058507
14.
GoldhaberD.LaveryL.TheobaldR. (2015). Uneven playing field? Assessing the teacher quality gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15592622
15.
GoldhaberD.QuinceV.TheobaldR. (2018). Has it always been this way? Tracing the evolution of teacher quality gaps in US public schools. American Educational Research Journal, 55(1), 171–201.
16.
GoldhaberD.StrunkK. O.BrownN.NaitoN.WolffM. (2020). Teacher staffing challenges in California: Examining the uniqueness of rural school districts. AERA Open, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420951833
17.
GoldhaberD.TheobaldR. (2023). Teacher turnover three years into the pandemic era: Evidence from Washington State (CALDER Policy Brief 32–0223). American Institutes for Research.
18.
GrissomJ. A.Nicholson-CrottyS.HarringtonJ. R. (2014). Estimating the effects of No Child Left Behind on teachers’ work environments and job attitudes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 417–436.
19.
HafenC. A.RuzekE. A.GregoryA.AllenJ. P.MikamiA. Y. (2015). Focusing on teacher–student interactions eliminates the negative impact of students’ disruptive behavior on teacher perceptions. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39(5), 426–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415579455
20.
HanushekE. A.RivkinS. G. (2007). Pay, working conditions, and teacher quality. The Future of Children, 17(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2007.0002
21.
IngersollR.MerrillE.StuckeyD.CollinsG.HarrisonB. (2021). The demographic transformation of the teaching force in the United States. Education Sciences, 11(5), Article 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050234
22.
IngersollR. M. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028002026
23.
IngersollR. M.StrongM. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311403323
24.
JohnsonS. M.KardosS. M.KauffmanD.LiuE.DonaldsonM. L. (2004). The support gap: New teachers’ early experiences in high-income and low-income schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(61), Article 61. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v12n61.2004
25.
KalogridesD.LoebS.BéteilleT. (2013). Systematic sorting: Teacher characteristics and class assignments. Sociology of Education, 86(2), 103–123.
26.
KnightD. S. (2020). Accounting for teacher labor markets and student segregation in analyses of teacher quality gaps. Educational Researcher, 49(6), 454–458. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20925805
27.
KraftM. A.BlazarD.HoganD. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
28.
KraftM. A.BleibergJ. F. (2022). The inequitable effects of teacher layoffs: What we know and can do. Education Finance and Policy, 17(2), 367–377.
29.
KraftM. A.LyonM. A. (2024). The rise and fall of the teaching profession: Prestige, interest, preparation, and satisfaction over the last half century. American Educational Research Journal, 61(6), 1192–1236. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312241276856
30.
KwokA.KeeseJ.SuárezM. I.MitchelD.HustonD. (2021). Novice teacher vertical professional development? Exploring teachers’ and coaches’ beliefs throughout a two-year induction program. Learning Environments Research, 25, 255–270https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09360-3
31.
Mason-WilliamsL. (2015). Unequal opportunities: A profile of the distribution of special education teachers. Exceptional Children, 81(2), 247–262.
32.
Moore-HayesC. (2011). Technology integration preparedness and its influence on teacher-efficacy. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2B597
NguyenT. D. (2020). Examining the teacher labor market in different rural contexts: Variations by urbanicity and rural states. AERA Open, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420966336
35.
NguyenT. D.BettiniE.ReddingC.GilmourA. F. (2025). Comparing teacher turnover intentions to actual turnover: Cautions and lessons for the field. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 47(3), 970–979.
36.
NguyenT. D.PhamL. D.CrouchM.SpringerM. G. (2020). The correlates of teacher turnover: An updated and expanded meta-analysis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100355
PapayJ. P.KraftM. A. (2015). Productivity returns to experience in the teacher labor market: Methodological challenges and new evidence on long-term career improvement. Journal of Public Economics, 130, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.02.008
39.
ReddingC. (2019). A teacher like me: A review of the effect of student–teacher racial/ethnic matching on teacher perceptions of students and student academic and behavioral outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 89(4), 499–535.
40.
ReddingC.NguyenT. D. (2021). Greener than ever? A look at the newest teachers in our public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 103(3), 8–12.
41.
ReddingC.SmithT. M. (2016). Easy in, easy out: Are alternatively certified teachers turning over at increased rates?American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1086–1125. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216653206
42.
RonfeldtM.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212463813
43.
RonfeldtM.McQueenK. (2017). Does new teacher induction really improve retention? Journal of Teacher Education, 68(4), 394–410. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216687401
44.
RonfeldtM.ReiningerM.KwokA. (2013). Recruitment or preparation? Investigating the effects of teacher characteristics and student teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(4), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113488143
45.
RodriguezL. A.NguyenT. D.SpringerM. G. (2025). Revisiting teaching quality gaps: Urbanicity and disparities in access to high-quality teachers across Tennessee. Urban Education, 60(2), 467–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859231153409
WhippJ. L.GeronimeL. (2017). Experiences that predict early career teacher commitment to and retention in high-poverty urban schools. Urban Education, 52(7), 799–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915574531
50.
ZeeM.KoomenH. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
