Abstract
Two major sets of U.S. content standards have changed since 2010: the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Whereas the CCSS received widespread pushback, the NGSS were broadly uncontentious. Why? Drawing from policy learning and networked publics theories, we used mixed-effects modeling to estimate how tweet authors, hashtags, and time explain sentiment in almost 2 million tweets related to both reforms from 2011 to 2023. Politically motivated, negative tweets from heterogeneous individuals and organizations explained CCSS’s sentiment. In contrast, tweets discussing NGSS were more uniform across science education professionals. We propose two educational reform trajectories—(a) politically driven to gradually accepted and (b) niche-specific to widely accepted—to guide future policy actors.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
