Coaching is an increasingly used professional development approach involving ongoing, individualized teacher-coach exchanges hypothesized to drive immediate changes in teachers’ practices with students. Examining this hypothesis, the present study quantifies marginal changes after individual coaching cycles in a set of commonly considered, high-quality teacher practices using a teacher fixed effects approach. It draws on panel data from 169 early childhood educators participating in a 9-month coaching intervention using the MyTeachingPartner approach intended to improve practices outlined in the Teaching Through Interactions framework. Results indicated that emotional support and classroom organization practices improved immediately after any coaching cycle, whereas others, like instructional support and literacy focus practices, only changed after cycles focused on those specific practices. Some immediate postcycle differences in practices endured over time, whereas others dissipated quickly.
AllenJ. P.PiantaR. C.GregoryA.MikamiA. Y.LunJ. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333(6045), 1034–1037. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207998
2.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
3.
BassokD.MagouirkP.MarkowitzA. J. (2021). Systemwide quality improvement in early childhood education: Evidence from Louisiana. AERA Open, 7, Article 1610. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211011610
4.
BlazarD.KraftM. A. (2015). Exploring mechanisms of effective teacher coaching: A tale of two cohorts from a randomized experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(4), 542–566. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715579487
5.
BlazarD.KraftM. A. (2017). Teacher and teaching effects on students’ attitudes and behaviors. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716670260
CoogleC. G.RahnN. L.OttleyJ. R. (2015). Pre-service teacher use of communication strategies upon receiving immediate feedback. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 32, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.03.003
8.
CuartasJ.McCoyD. C.MolanoA. (2018). The acute effect of community violent crime on maternal engagement in cognitive and socioemotional stimulation. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 45, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.06.001
9.
Darling-HammondL.WeiR. C.AndreeA.RichardsonN.OrphanosS. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. National Staff Development Council.
10.
DesimoneL. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
DownerJ. T.Locasale-CrouchJ.HamreB.PiantaR. (2009). Teacher characteristics associated with responsiveness and exposure to consultation and online professional development resources. Early Education and Development, 20(3), 431–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802688626
13.
DownerJ. T.PiantaR.BurchinalM.FieldS.HamreB.LoCasale-CrouchJ.HowesC.LaParoK.Scott-LittleC. (2018). Coaching and coursework focused on teacher-child interactions during language/literacy instruction: Effects on teacher outcomes and children’s classroom engagement [Manuscript in preparation].
14.
EgertF.FukkinkR. G.EckhardtA. G. (2018). Impact of in-service professional development programs for early childhood teachers on quality ratings and child outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(3), 401–433. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317751918
15.
ElekC.PageJ. (2019). Critical features of effective coaching for early childhood educators: A review of empirical research literature. Professional Development in Education, 45(4), 567–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1452781
EricssonA.PoolR. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise. Mariner Books.
18.
GaretM. S.PorterA. C.DesimoneL.BirmanB. F.YoonK. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
19.
GoldsmithL. T.DoerrH. M.LewisC. C. (2014). Mathematics teachers’ learning: A conceptual framework and synthesis of research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(1), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9245-4
20.
GregoryA.RuzekE.HafenC. A.MikamiA. Y.AllenJ. P.PiantaR. C. (2017). My Teaching Partner–Secondary: A video-based coaching model. Theory Into Practice, 56(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1260402
HamreB. (2014). Teachers’ daily interactions with children: An essential ingredient in effective early childhood programs. Child Development Perspectives, 8(4), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12090
23.
HamreB.DownerJ. T.JamilF. M.PiantaR. C. (2012). Enhancing teachers’ intentional use of effective interactions with children: Designing and testing professional development interventions. Handbook of early childhood education (pp. 507–532). Guilford Press.
24.
HamreB.PiantaR. C.DownerJ.DeCosterJ.MashburnA. J.JonesS. M.BrownJ. L.CappellaE.AtkinsM.RiversS. E.BrackettM. A.HamagamiA. (2013). Teaching through interactions: Testing a developmental framework of teacher effectiveness in over 4,000 classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 113(4), 461–487. https://doi.org/10.1086/669616
25.
HannoE. C.JonesS. M.LesauxN. K. (2021). Back to basics: Developmental catalysts of quality improvement in early education and care. Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(2), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322211032258
KnightD.HockM.SkrticT. M.BradleyB. A.KnightJ. (2018). Evaluation of video-based instructional coaching for middle school teachers: Evidence from a multiple baseline study. Educational Forum, 82(4), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2018.1474985
28.
KolbD. A.BoyatzisR. E.MainemelisC. (2000). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In SternbergR. J.ZhangL. E. (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 193–210). Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
KraftM. A.BlazarD.HoganD. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
30.
LeinhardtG.YoungK. M.MerrimanJ. (1995). Integrating professional knowledge: The theory of practice and the practice of theory. Learning and Instruction, 5(4), 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(95)00025-9
31.
MarkowitzA. J.BassokD.HamreB. (2017). Leveraging developmental insights to improve early childhood education. Child Development Perspectives, 12(2), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12266
32.
McCoyD. C.RaverC. C.SharkeyP. (2015). Children’s cognitive performance and selective attention following recent community violence. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 56(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146514567576
33.
McDonaldM.KazemiE.KavanaghS. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113493807
34.
PiantaR. C.BurchinalM. (2007). National Center for Research on Early Childhood Education Teacher Professional Development Study. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) [distributor]. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34848.v2
35.
PiantaR. C.DeCosterJ.CabellS.BurchinalM.HamreB.DownerJ.LoCasale-CrouchJ.WillifordA.HowesC. (2014). Dose–response relations between preschool teachers’ exposure to components of professional development and increases in quality of their interactions with children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(4), 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.06.001
36.
PiantaR. C.HamreB.Jason Downer, BurchinalM.WillifordA.LoCasale-CrouchJ.HowesC.La ParoK.Scott-LittleC. (2017). Early childhood professional development: Coaching and coursework effects on indicators of children’s school readiness. Early Education and Development, 28(8), 956–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2017.1319783
37.
PiantaR. C.La ParoK.HamreB. (2008). Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) manual, pre-K. Paul H. Brookes.
38.
PiantaR. C.MashburnA. J.DownerJ. T.HamreB.JusticeL. (2008). Effects of web-mediated professional development resources on teacher–child interactions in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(4), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.02.001
39.
PutnamR. T.BorkoH. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029001004
40.
RakapS. (2017). Impact of coaching on preservice teachers’ use of embedded instruction in inclusive preschool classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116685753
SharkeyP. T. (2010). The acute effect of local homicides on children’s cognitive performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(26), 11733–11738. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000690107
43.
SharkeyP. T.Tirado-StrayerN.PapachristosA. V.RaverC. C. (2012). The effect of local violence on children’s attention and impulse control. American Journal of Public Health, 102(12), 2287–2293. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300789
44.
WeilandC.McCormickM.MatteraS.MaierM.MorrisP. (2018). Preschool curricula and professional development features for getting to high-quality implementation at scale: A comparative review across five trials. AERA Open, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418757735
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
