A Choice Too Far: Transit Difficulty and Early High School Transfer

Abstract

The challenge of a long and difficult commute to school each day is likely to wear on students, leading some to change schools. We used administrative data from approximately 3,900 students in the Baltimore City Public School System in 2014–2015 to estimate the relationship between travel time on public transportation and school transfer during the ninth grade. We show that students who have relatively more difficult commutes are more likely to transfer than peers in the same school with less difficult commutes. Moreover, we found that when these students change schools, their newly enrolled school is substantially closer to home, requires fewer vehicle transfers, and is less likely to have been included among their initial set of school choices.

Keywords

educational policy high schools regression analyses urban education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdulkadiroğlu

Sönmez

(2003). School choice: A mechanism design approach. American Economic Review, 93(3), 729−747.

Baltimore City Public Schools. (2018). Transportation. https://www.baltimorecityschools.org/transportation

Baltimore City Public Schools. (2020). Transfer requests. https://www.baltimorecityschools.org/transfer-requests

Bell

(2009). Geography in parental choice. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 493−521.

Blagg

Chingos

Corcoran

S. P.

Cordes

S. A.

Cowen

Denice

Gross

Lincove

J. A.

Sattin-Bajaj

Schwartz

A. E.

Valant

(2018). The road to school: How far students travel to school in the choice-rich cities of Denver, Detroit, New Orleans, New York City, and Washington, DC. Urban Institute.

Blagg

Rosenboom

Chingos

M. M.

(2018). The extra mile: Time to school and student outcomes in Washington, DC. Urban Institute.

Burdick-Will

Stein

M. L.

Grigg

(2019). Danger on the way to school: Exposure to violent crime, public transportation, and absenteeism. Sociological Science, 6(5), 118−142.

Campbell

(2018, June 18). “The traffic is horrible”: Baltimore commute ranks among nation’s longest. The Baltimore Sun. https://www.baltimoresun.com/maryland/baltimore-city/bs-md-commute-times-20180510-story.html

Cordes

S. A.

Schwartz

A. E.

(2019). Does pupil transportation close the school quality gap? Evidence from New York City. Urban Institute.

10.

Einhorn

(2016, April 8). Six hours, eight buses: The extreme sacrifice Detroit parents make to access better schools. Detroit: Chalkbeat. https://detroit.chalkbeat.org/posts/detroit/2016/04/08/six-hours-eight-buses-the-extreme-sacrifice-detroit-parents-make-to-access-better-schools/

11.

Ely

Teske

(2014). Success express: Transportation innovation in Denver Public Schools. Center for Education Policy Analysis.

12.

Engec

(2006). Relationship between mobility and student performance and behavior. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(3), 167−178.

13.

Esri. (2017). Add GTFS to a network dataset [Computer software]. Esri.

14.

Glazerman

Dotter

(2016). Market signals: How do DC parents rank schools, and what does it mean for policy? Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.

15.

Glenn

(2013, May 17). Getting to school is harder than you think. WYPR. http://news.wypr.org/post/getting-school-harder-you-think#stream/0

16.

Grigg

(2012). School enrollment changes and student achievement growth: A case study in educational disruption and continuity. Sociology of Education, 85(4), 388−404.

17.

Grigg

(2014). Student mobility, identity, and attitudes: The social and academic consequences of changing schools [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], The University of Wisconsin-Madison.

18.

Hanushek

E. A.

Kain

J. F.

Rivkin

S. G.

(2004). Disruption versus tiebout improvement: The costs and benefits of switching schools. Journal of Public Economics, 88(9−10), 1721−1746.

19.

Harris

D. N.

Larsen

(2015). What schools do families want (and why). Education Research Alliance for New Orleans.

20.

Hastings

J. S.

Weinstein

J. M.

(2008). Information, school choice, and academic achievement: Evidence from two experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4), 1373−1414.

21.

Holme

J. J.

(2002). Buying homes, buying schools: School choice and the social construction of school quality. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 177−206.

22.

Jochim

DeArmond

Gross

Lake

(2014). How parents experience public school choice. Center for Reinventing Public Education.

23.

Koslowsky

Kluger

A. N.

Reich

(1995). Commuting stress: Causes, effects, and methods of coping. Springer Science & Business Media.

24.

Lareau

Goyette

(Eds.). (2014). Choosing homes, choosing schools. Russell Sage Foundation.

25.

Lash

A. A.

Kirkpatrick

S. L.

(1994). Interrupted lessons: Teacher views of transfer student education. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 813−843.

26.

Maryland State Department of Education. (2019). Maryland public schools report card. https://reportcard.msde.maryland.gov/

27.

McKone

(2015, August 24). No yellow buses here: One student’s MTA commute. WYPR. https://www.wypr.org/post/no-yellow-buses-here-one-students-mta-commute

28.

Novaco

R. W.

Stokols

Milanesi

(1990). Objective and subjective dimensions of travel impedance as determinants of commuting stress. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(2), 231−257.

29.

Parthasarathi

Levinson

Hochmair

(2013). Network structure and travel time perception. PLOS One, 8(10), Article e77718. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077718

30.

Reynolds

A. J.

Chen

C. C.

Herbers

J. E.

(2009, June 29−30). School mobility and educational success: A research synthesis and evidence on prevention [Paper presentation]. Workshop on the Impact of Mobility and Change on the Lives of Young Children, Schools, and Neighborhoods, Washington, DC, United States.

31.

Rhodes

Warkentien

(2017). Unwrapping the suburban “package deal”: Race, class, and school access. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 168S−189S.

32.

Rumberger

R. W.

Larson

K. A.

(1998). Student mobility and the increased risk of high school dropout. American Journal of Education, 107(1), 1−35.

33.

Schwartz

A. E.

Stiefel

Cordes

S. A.

(2017). Moving matters: The causal effect of moving schools on student performance. Education Finance and Policy, 12(4), 419−446.

34.

Steele

J. L.

Vernez

Gottfried

M. A.

Schwam-Baird

(2011). The transformation of a school system: Principal, teacher, and parent perceptions of charter and traditional schools in post-Katrina New Orleans. RAND Corporation.

35.

Stein

Goldring

Cravens

(2011). Do parents do as they say? Choosing Indianapolis charter schools. In Berends

Goldring

Cannata

(Eds.), School choice and school improvement. Harvard Education Press.

36.

Stein

M. L.

Grigg

J. A.

(2019). Missing bus, missing school: Establishing the relationship between public transit use and student absenteeism. American Educational Research Journal, 56(5), 1834–1860. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219833917

37.

Stein

M. L.

Grigg

Cronister

Chavis

Connolly

(2017). Getting to high school in Baltimore: Student commuting and public transportation. Baltimore Education Research Consortium. http://baltimore-berc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/GettingtoHighSchoolinBaltimoreJanuary2017.pdf

38.

Steinmetz

de Vries

D. H.

Tijdens

K. G.

(2014). Should I stay or should I go? The impact of working time and wages on retention in the health workforce. Human Resources for Health, 12(1), 23.

39.

Welsh

R. O.

(2017). School hopscotch: A comprehensive review of K–12 student mobility in the United States. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 475−511.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB