Massive funding cuts to public education took place around the country following the Great Recession. Many school districts were forced to conduct teacher layoffs at a larger scale than any other time in recent history. We show that prior to a district intervention, the layoff process disproportionately impacted historically disadvantaged students in the Los Angeles Unified School District. We then demonstrate the success of a policy designed to reduce inequality in the distribution of teacher layoffs.
American Civil Liberties Union. (2014). BREAKING: Settlement of Reed lawsuit delivers for students at 37 struggling L.A. schools. Retrieved from https://www.aclusocal.org/pr-reed-settlement/
3.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ. S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
BakerB. D.SciarraD. G.FarrieD. (2015). Is school funding fair? A national report card (4th Ed.). Newark, NJ: Education Law Center.
5.
BertrandM.DufloE.MullainathanS. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275.
BoydD.LankfordD.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2011). Teacher layoffs: An empirical illustration of seniority versus measures of effectiveness. Education Finance and Policy, 6(3), 439–454.
8.
California Education Code §44955d. (2016).
9.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2005). Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. Economics of Education Review, 24, 377–392.
10.
Darling-HammondL. (1998). Unequal opportunity: Race and education. The Brookings Review, 16(2), 28.
11.
Darling-HammondL. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1.
12.
Darling-HammondL. (2004). Inequality and the right to learn: Access to qualified teachers in California’s public schools. The Teachers College Record, 106(10), 1936–1966.
GoldhaberD.LaveryL.TheobaldR. (2015). Uneven playing field? Assessing the teacher quality gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 293–307.
16.
GoldhaberD.StrunkK. O.BrownN.KnightD. S. (2016). Lessons learned from the Great Recession: Layoffs and the RIF-induced teacher shuffle. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(3), 517–548.
17.
GoldhaberD.TheoboldR. (2013). Managing the teacher workforce in austere times: The determinants and implications for teacher layoffs. Education Finance and Policy, 8(4), 494–527.
18.
GuinK. (2004). Chronic teacher turnover in urban elementary schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(42). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n42/.
19.
HahnelC.BarondessH.RamanathanA. (2011). Victims of the churn: The damaging impact of California’s teacher layoff policies on schools, students, and communities in three large school districts. Oakland, CA: Education Trust-West.
20.
ImbensG. W.WooldridgeJ. M. (2009). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 5–86.
21.
IngersollR. M. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 26–37.
22.
IngersollR.MayH. (2011). Recruitment, retention, and the minority teacher shortage. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania and Center for Educational Research in the Interest of Underserved Students, University of California, Santa Cruz.
23.
IsenbergE.MaxJ.GleasonP.PotamitesL.SantillanoR.HockH.HansenM. (2013). Access to effective teaching for disadvantaged students. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, U.S. Department of Education.
24.
KnightD. S. (2016). Are higher-need school districts disproportionately impacted by state funding cuts? School finance equity in Texas following the Great Recession (CERPS Working Paper 2016-1). El Paso, TX: University of Texas at El Paso.
25.
KraftM. (2015). Teacher layoffs, teacher quality and student achievement: Evidence from a discretionary layoff policy. Education Finance and Policy, 10(4), 467–507.
26.
LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37–62.
27.
LevinsonM.Theisen-HomerV. (2015). No justice, no teachers: Theorizing less-unjust teacher firings in Los Angeles Unified. Theory and Research in Education, 13(2), 1–16. doi:10.1177/ 1477878514566556
OrfieldG.KucseraJ.Siegel-HawleyG. (2012). “E Pluribus” . . . separation: Deepening double segregation for more students. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project.
31.
PleckiM. L.ElfersA. M.FinsterM. (2010). Examining the impact of reduction in force (RIF) notices in Washington schools districts: 2009–2010. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
32.
QuiochoA.RiosF. (2000). The power of their presence: Minority group teachers and schooling. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 485–528.
33.
Reed et al. v. State of California, et al. (Super. Ct., 2010). Case number BC432420.
SepeC.RozaM. (2010). The disproportionate impact of seniority-based layoffs on poor, minority students. Seattle, WA: Center for Redesigning School Finance.
UshomirskyN.WilliamsD. (2015). Funding gaps 2015: Too many states still spend less on educating students who need the most. Washington, DC: The Education Trust.
42.
VillegasA. M.LucasT. (2004). Diversifying the teacher workforce: A retrospective and prospective analysis. In SmylieM. A.MiretkyD. (Eds.), Developing the teacher workforce (pp. 70–104). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
WintersM. A.CowenJ. M. (2013). Who would stay, who would be dismissed? An empirical consideration of value-added teacher retention policies. Educational Researcher, 42(6), 330–337.
44.
UCLA/IDEA (2009). Sharing the burden: The impact of proposed teacher layoffs in LAUSD. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
