Recent research has focused on issues of retention and turnover among K–12 school administrators, yet it fails to address some important complexities in administrator career paths. This article examines three conceptual and methodological issues in the current literature involving administrative turnover: the complexity of role and place in administrators’ job transitions, job opportunity and choice open to administrators, and static versus dynamic approaches to assessing administrators’ movement and retention. This evaluation includes empirical examples from the authors’ study of administrator career paths in Delaware. The authors conclude that these issues have not yet been adequately acknowledged in the literature but that they have significant implications for how administrator career behavior is measured and understood for both research and policy.
AkibaM.ReichardtR. (2004). What predicts the mobility of elementary school leaders? An analysis of longitudinal data in Colorado. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(18). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/173
2.
BakerB.PunswickE.BeltC. (2010). School leadership stability, principal moves, and departures: Evidence from Missouri. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(4), 523–557. doi:10.1177/0013161X1038383210.1177/0013161X10383832
3.
BeteilleT.KalogridesL.LoebS. (2011). Stepping stones: Principal career paths and school outcomes (Working Paper No. 58). Washington, CD: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
4.
DeAngelisKaren J.WhiteBradford R. (2011). Principal turnover in Illinois public schools, 2001–2008 (IERC 2011-1). Edwardsville: Illinois Education Research Council.
5.
Farley-RippleE. N.MeadH.RaffelJ.SherretzK.WelchJ. (2010). Tracking transitions: An analysis of school administrator career paths in Delaware. Newark, DE: University of Delaware.
6.
FinkD.BraymanC. (2006). School leadership succession and the challenges of change. Education Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 62–89. doi:10.1177/0013161X0527818610.1177/0013161X05278186
7.
FullerE.YoungM. (2009a). Principal attrition: Where do principals go after they leave the principalship?Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
8.
FullerE.YoungM. (2009b). Tenure and retention of newly hired principals in Texas. Austin: University Council of Educational Administration, Department of Educational Administration, University of Texas at Austin.
9.
FullerE.YoungM.OrrM. T. (2007, April). Career pathways of principals in Texas. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
10.
GatesS.RingleJ.SantibanezL.GuarinoC.Ghosh-DastidarB.BrownA. (2006). Mobility and turnover among school principals. Economics of Education Review, 25, 289–302. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.01.00810.1016/j.econedurev.2005.01.008
11.
HallingerP.HeckR. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 157–191. doi:10.1080/092434598009020310.1080/0924345980090203
12.
HargreavesA.FinkD. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
LeithwoodK.Seashore LouisK.AndersonS.WahlstromK. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/
14.
LoebS.KalogridesD.HorngE. (2010). Principal preferences and the uneven distribution of principals across schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(2), 205–229. doi:10.3102/016237371036983310.3102/0162373710369833
15.
MacMillanR. B. (2000). Leadership succession: Cultures of teaching and educational change. In BasciaN.HargreavesA. (Eds.), The sharp edge of educational change: Teaching, leading and the realities of reform (pp. 52–71). New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
16.
PapaF. C.Jr. (2007). Why do principals change schools? A multivariate analysis of principal retention. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6, 267–290. doi:10.1080/1570076070126372510.1080/15700760701263725
17.
PapaF. C.Jr.LangfordH.WycoffJ. (2002). The attributes and career paths of principals: Implications for improving policy. Albany: State University of New York.
18.
PartlowM. (2007). Contextual factors related to elementary principal turnover. Planning and Changing, 38, 60–76.
19.
RobinsonV. M.LloydC. A.RoweK. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. doi:10.1177/0013161X0832150910.1177/0013161X08321509
SolanoP. L.McDuffieM. J.Farley-RippleE. N. (2010). Principal retention in the state of Delaware. Newark, DE: University of Delaware, Center for Community Research and Service.
22.
WatersT.MarzanoR. J.McNultyB. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on pupil achievement (Working paper). Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
