Over the past several decades, researchers have used economics to understand a number of issues in education policy. This article argues that some education researchers have defined economics too narrowly, neglecting several areas of economics research that cut across disciplinary boundaries. One subdiscipline of economics that might be of use in education, but which has not been applied much to it, is behavioral economics, which incorporates psychological knowledge about human behavior to enhance and extend economic models of decision making. This article reviews some of the behavioral concepts in economics that are most likely to inform education research and policy—prospect theory, framing effects, status quo bias, paradox of choice, and intrinsic motivation—and suggests directions for further research.
AkerlofG. A. (2002). Behavioral macroeconomics and macroeconomic behavior. American Economic Review, 92(3), 411–433. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3083349
André-BechelyL. (2005). Public school choice at the intersection of voluntary integration and not-so-good neighborhood schools: Lessons from parents’ experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(2), 267–305. doi:10.1177/0013161X0426959310.1177/0013161X04269593
4.
ArielyD. (2009). Predictably irrational. New York: HarperCollins.
5.
ArielyD.WertenbrochK. (2002). Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Self-control by precommitment. Psychological Science, 13(3), 219–224.
6.
AveryC.KaneT. J. (2004). Student perceptions of college opportunities: The Boston COACH program. In HoxbyC. M. (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 355–394). National Bureau of Economic Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/h/nbr/nberch/10104.html
7.
BakerE.BartonP.Darling-HammondL.HaertelE.LaddH. F.LinnR. L.. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers (Briefing Paper No. 278). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
8.
BeattieI. R. (2002). Are all “adolescent econometricians” created equal? Racial, class, and gender differences in college enrollment. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 19–43. doi:10.2307/309025210.2307/3090252
9.
BellC. (2009). All choices created equal? The role of choice sets in the selection of schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 191–208.
10.
BenartziS.ThalerR. H. (2000). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. In KahnemanD.TverskyA. (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 301–316). Cambridge, UK, and New York: Cambridge University Press and Russell Sage Foundation.
11.
BertrandM.MullainathanS.ShafirE. (2004). A behavioral- economics view of poverty. American Economic Review, 94(2), 419–423. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3592921
12.
BettingerE. P.LongB. T.OreopoulosP.SanbonmatsuL. (2009). The role of simplification and information in college decisions: Results from the H&R Block FAFSA experiment (NBER Working Paper No. 15361). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
13.
BruhinA.Fehr-DudaH.EpperT. (2010). Risk and rationality: Uncovering heterogeneity in probability distortion. Econometrica, 78(4), 1375–1412.
14.
CamererC.BabcockL.LoewensteinG.ThalerR. (1997). Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: One day at a time. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 407–441. doi:10.1162/00335539755524410.1162/003355397555244
15.
CamererC.IssacharoffS.LoewensteinG.O’DonoghueT.RabinM. (2003). Regulation for conservatives: Behavioral economics and the case for “asymmetric paternalism.”University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151(3), 1211–1254. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3312889
16.
CamererC. F.LoewensteinG. (2004). Behavioral economics: Past, present, future. In CamererC. F.LoewensteinG.RabinM. (Eds.), Advances in behavioral economics (pp. 3–51). New York and Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.
17.
CamererC. F.LoewensteinG.RabinM. (2004). Advances in behavioral economics. New York and Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.
18.
CameronJ.PierceW. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 363–423. doi:10.3102/0034654306400336310.3102/00346543064003363
19.
CameronJ.PierceW. D. (1996). The debate about rewards and intrinsic motivation: Protests and accusations do not alter the results. Review of Educational Research, 66(1), 39–51. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1170725
20.
CampbellD. T. (1976). Assessing the impact of planned social change (Occasional Paper Series, No. 8). Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University Evaluation Center.
21.
ChangO. H.NicholsD. R.SchultzJ. J. (1987). Taxpayer attitudes toward tax audit risk. Journal of Economic Psychology, 8(3), 299–309.
22.
ChettyR.LooneyA.KroftK. (2009). Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1145–1177. doi:10.1257/aer.99.4.114510.1257/aer.99.4.1145
23.
ChoiJ. J.LaibsonD.MadrianB. C. (2011). $100 bills on the sidewalk: Suboptimal investment in 401(k) plans. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(3), 748–763. doi:10.1162/REST_a_0010010.1162/REST_a_00100
24.
CohnE.GeskeT. (1990). Education and economic growth. In The Economics of Education (pp. 134–158). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
25.
DeciE. L. (1972). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22(1), 113–120. doi:10.1037/h003235510.1037/h0032355
26.
DeciE. L. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
27.
DellaVignaS. (2007). Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field (NBER Working Paper No. 13420). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
28.
DellaVignaS.KaplanE. (2006). The Fox News effect: Media bias and voting. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University, Institute for International Economic Studies. Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/iiessp/0748.html
29.
DellaVignaS.ListJ.MalmendierU. (2009). Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving (NBER Working Paper No. 15629). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
DohmenT.FalkA. (2010). You get what you pay for: Incentives and selection in the education system. Economic Journal, 120(546), 256–271.
33.
DynarskiS.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2006). The cost of complexity in federal student aid: Lessons from optimal tax theory and behavioral economics (Faculty Research Working Papers Series, RWP06-013). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Program on Education Policy and Governance. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED494312
34.
Executive Office of the President, Council of Economic Advisors, & National Economic Council. (2009). Simplifying student aid: The case for an easier, faster, and more accurate FAFSA. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/cea/FAFSAReport/
35.
FreyB. S. (1997). On the relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic work motivation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(4), 427–439. doi:10.1016/S0167-7187(96)01028-410.1016/S0167-7187(96)01028-4
36.
FriedmanM. (1953). Essays in positive economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
GneezyU.RustichiniA. (2000). A fine is a price. Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), 1–17.
41.
Goldrick-RabS.HarrisD. N.TrostelP. A. (2009). Why financial aid matters (or doesn’t) for college success: Toward a new interdisciplinary perspective. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 24, 1–45.
42.
GrodskyE.JonesM. T. (2007). Real and imagined barriers to college entry: Perceptions of cost. Social Science Research, 36(2), 745–766. doi:16/j.ssresearch.2006.05.00116/j.ssresearch.2006.05.001
43.
GrubbW. N. (2009). The money myth: School resources, outcomes, and equity. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
44.
HanushekE. A. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 45–62.
45.
HarrisD. N. (2011). Value-added measures and the future of educational accountability. Science, 333(6044), 826–827. doi:10.1126/science.119379310.1126/science.1193793
46.
HastingsJ. S.Van WeeldenR.WeinsteinJ. (2007). Preferences, information, and parental choice behavior in public school choice (NBER Working Paper No. 12995). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
47.
HeilbronerR. L. (1999). The worldly philosophers: The lives, times and ideas of the great economic thinkers (Rev. 7th ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster.
48.
HeymanJ.ArielyD. (2004). Effort for payment: A tale of two markets. Psychological Science, 15(11), 787–793.
49.
HossainT.MorganJ. (2006). . . . Plus shipping and handling: Revenue (non)equivalence in field experiments on eBay. Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy, 6(2), Article 3.
50.
IyengarS. S.KamenicaE. (2010). Choice proliferation, simplicity seeking, and asset allocation. Journal of Public Economics, 94(7–8), 530–539. doi:16/j.jpubeco.2010.03.00616/j.jpubeco.2010.03.006
51.
KahnemanD. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475.
52.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1914185
53.
KaufmanB. (1999). Expanding the behavioral foundations of labor economics. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52(3), 361–392. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2525140
KühbergerA. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75(1), 23–55.
56.
LankfordH.WyckoffJ. (2005). Why are schools racially segregated? Implications for school choice policies. In ScottJ. (Ed.), School choice and diversity: What the evidence says (pp. 9–26). New York: Teachers College Press.
57.
LazearE. P. (1996). Performance pay and productivity (NBER Working Paper No. 5672). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/5672.html
58.
LepperM. R.GreeneD. (1975). Turning play into work: Effects of adult surveillance and extrinsic rewards on children’s intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(3), 479–486. doi:10.1037/h007648410.1037/h0076484
59.
LevinH. M. (1989). Mapping the economics of education: An introductory essay. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 13–17. doi:10.3102/0013189X01800401310.3102/0013189X018004013
LongB. T. (2007). The contributions of economics to the study of college access and success. Teachers College Record, 109(10), 2367–2443.
62.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
MadrianB.SheaD. (2000). The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. (NBER Working Paper No. 7682). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/7682.html
64.
ManskiC. F. (1993). Adolescent econometricians: How do youth infer the returns to schooling? In ClotfelterC. T.RothschildM. (Eds.), Studies of supply and demand in higher education (pp. 43–60). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65.
MarshJ. A.SpringerM. G.McCaffreyD.YuanK.EpsteinS.KoppichJ.KalraN.. (2011). A Big Apple for educators: New York City’s experiment with schoolwide performance bonuses (Monograph No. MG-1114-FPS). RAND. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1114.html
66.
MullainathanS. (2011). The psychology of poverty. Focus, 28(1), 19–22.
67.
MullainathanS.ThalerR. H. (2000). Behavioral economics (NBER Working Paper No. 7948). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w7948
MuralidharanK.SundararamanV. (2011). Teacher performance pay: Experimental evidence from India. Journal of Political Economy, 119(1), 39–77. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/659655
70.
MurnaneR. J.CohenD. K. (1986). Merit pay and the evaluation problem: Why most merit pay plans fail and a few survive. Harvard Educational Review, 56(1), 1–17.
71.
NelsonW. W. (1987). Cheap or efficient: An examination of English elementary education during the era of payment by results: 1863–1890 (Accountability). (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Database. (UMI No. 8729496)
72.
O’DonoghueT.RabinM. (1999). Doing it now or later. American Economic Review, 89(1), 103–124. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/116981
73.
O’DonoghueT.RabinM. (2001). Choice and procrastination. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 121–160. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2696445
74.
PageL.Levy GarbouaL.MontmarquetteC. (2007). Aspiration levels and educational choices: An experimental study. Economics of Education Review, 26(6), 747–757.
75.
PsacharopoulosG. (1994). Returns to investment in education: A global update. World Development, 22(9), 1325–1343. doi:16/0305-750X(94)90007-816/0305-750X(94)90007-8
RabinM.WeizsäckerG. (2007, September). Narrow bracketing and dominated choices (IZA Discussion Paper No. 3040). Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
78.
ReadD.LoewensteinG.RabinM. (1999). Choice bracketing. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1), 171–197. doi:10.1023/A:100787941148910.1023/A:1007879411489
79.
RothsteinJ. (2009). Student sorting and bias in value added estimation: Selection on observables and unobservables (NBER Working Paper No. 14666). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w14666
80.
RubinD. B.StuartE. A.ZanuttoE. L. (2004). A potential outcomes view of value-added assessment in education. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 103–116. doi:10.3102/1076998602900110310.3102/10769986029001103
81.
Scott-ClaytonJ. (2011a). On money and motivation: A quasi- experimental analysis of financial incentives for college achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 46(3), 614–646.
82.
Scott-ClaytonJ. (2011b). The shapeless river: Does a lack of structure inhibit students’ progress at community colleges? (CCRC Working Paper No. 25). New York: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
SimonH. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10
85.
SpringerM. G.BallouD.HamiltonL.LeV.LockwoodJ.McCaffreyD.. (2010). Teacher pay for performance: Experimental evidence from the project on incentives in teaching. Nashville, TN: National Center on Performance Incentives at Vanderbilt University.
86.
ThalerR. H.BenartziS. (2004). Save More Tomorrow™: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112(S1), S164–S187. doi:10.1086/38008510.1086/380085
87.
ThalerR.SunsteinC. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
88.
WileyE. W.SpindlerE. R.SubertA. N. (2010). Denver ProComp: An outcomes evaluation of Denver’s alternative teacher compensation system. Denver, CO: Denver Public Schools.
89.
WilsonT. (2011). The moral complexity of choice: Reconsidering frameworks for parental preferences. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
