The growing fiscal cost of K–12 teacher pension plans and pension-induced labor market distortions have led to calls for teacher pension reforms. Dynamic structural econometric models are a useful way to analyze the fiscal and staffing consequences of current and alternative retirement plans. This article lays out the benefits of the structural econometric modeling approach for analyzing changes to teacher pension plans and estimates such a model for Missouri public school teachers. The results are then used to simulate effects of a pension reform on teacher retirement and employer pension costs.
BackesB.GoldhaberD.GroutC.KoedelC.NiS.PodgurskyM.XiangP.XuZ. (2016). Benefit or burden? On the intergenerational inequity of teacher pension plans. Educational Researcher, 45(6), 367–377.
2.
BrownK. M. (2013). The link between pensions and retirement timing: Lessons from California teachers. Journal of Public Economics, 98, 1–14.
3.
BurnetteD.WillM. (2018). Costly pension plans are fanning the flames of teacher unrest. Education Week37(28), 1.
4.
ChettyRFriedmanJ. N.RockoffJ. E. (2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633–2679.
5.
ChingosM. M.WestM. R. (2015). Which teachers choose a defined contribution pension plan? Evidence from the Florida retirement system. Education Finance and Policy, 10(2), 193–222.
6.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Human Resources, 41(4), 778–820.
7.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 26, 673–682.
CostrellR.McGeeJ. (2010). Teacher pension incentives, retirement behavior, and potential for reform in Arkansas. Education Finance and Policy, 5(4), 492–518.
10.
CostrellR.MaloneyL. (2013). The big squeeze: Retirement costs and school district budgets paying the pension price and Philadelphia. Fordham Foundation.
11.
CostrellR.PodgurskyM. (2009). Peaks, cliffs, and valleys: The peculiar incentives of teacher retirement systems and their consequences for school staffing. Education Finance and Policy, 4(2), 175–211.
12.
DohertyK. M.JacobsS.MaddenT. M. (2012). No one benefits: How teacher pension systems are failing both teachers and taxpayers. National Council on Teacher Quality.
13.
FitzpatrickM.LovenheimM. (2014). Early retirement incentives and student achievement. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6, 120–154.
14.
FriedbergL.TurnerS. (2010). Labor market effects of pensions and implications for teachers. Education Finance and Policy, 5(4), 463–491.
15.
FurgesonJ.StraussR.VogtW. (2006). The effects of defined benefit pension incentives and working conditions on teacher retirement decisions. Education Finance and Policy, 1(3), 316–348.
16.
GlazermanS.ProtikA.TehB.BruchJ.SeftorN. (2012). Moving high-performing teachers: Implementation of transfer incentives in seven districts (NCEE 2012-4051). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
17.
GoldhaberD.HoldenK. (2020). How much do teachers value deferred compensation? Evidence from defined contribution rate choices. CALDER Working paper No. 242-0920.
18.
HansenJ. S. (2010). An introduction to teacher retirement benefits. Education Finance and Policy, 5(2), 402–437.
19.
HanushekE. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141–164.
20.
HarrisD. N.AdamsS. J. (2007). Understanding the level and causes of teacher turnover: A comparison with other professions. Economics of Education Review, 26(3), 325–337.
21.
KimD.KongW.KoedelC.NiS.PodgurskyM.WuW. (2021). Pensions and late career teacher retention. Education Finance and Policy, 16(1), 42–65.
22.
KnappD.BrownK. M.HosekJ.MattockM. G.AschB. J. (2016). Retirement benefits and teacher retention: A structural modeling approach. RAND.
23.
KoedelC.GrissomJ.NiS.PodgurskyM. (2012). Pension-induced rigidities in the labor market for school leaders. CALDER Working Paper No. 67.
24.
KoedelC.NiS.PodgurskyM. (2014). Who benefits from pension enhancement?Education Finance and Policy, 9(2), 165–92.
25.
KongW.NiS.PodgurskyM.WuW. (2018). Pension enhancements and teacher retirement. CALDER Working Paper No. 195–0618–1.
26.
KrausenK.WillisJ. (2018). Silent recession: Why California school districts are underwater despite increases in funding. WestEd.
27.
LowH.MeghirC. (2017). The use of structural models in econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 33–58.
28.
MalangaS.McGeeJ. (2018). Garden State crowd out: How New Jersey’s pension crisis threatens the state budget. Manhattan Institute.
29.
McGeeJ. (2016). Feeling the squeeze: Pension costs are crowding out education spending. Manhattan Institute.
30.
McGeeJ.WintersM. (2016). Better pay, fairer pensions III. Manhattan Institute.
31.
McGeeJ.WintersM. (2019). Rethinking the structure of teacher retirement benefits: Analyzing the preferences of entering teachers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(1), 63–78.
32.
NiS.PodgurskyM. (2016). How teachers respond to pension system incentives: New estimates and policy applications. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(4), 1075–1104.
33.
NiS.PodgurskyM.WangX. (2020). Teacher pension plan incentives, retirement decisions, and workforce quality. Journal of Human Resources. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.57.1.1218-9912R2
34.
Novy-MarxR.RauhJ. (2011). Public pension promises: How big are they and what are they worth?Journal of Finance, 66(4), 1211–1249.
35.
StockJ.WiseD. (1990). Pensions, the option value of work, and retirement. Econometrica, 58(5), 1151–1180.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
