Little research has examined how K–12 fiscal accountability policies and practices intersect with district finances and student outcomes during periods of economic crises. Employing a critical policy analysis perspective that distinguishes between the concepts of fiscal accountability and fiscal austerity and differences-in-differences and event studies approaches, this study examines the practice of early fiscal intervention in California’s AB 1200 fiscal accountability system during and after the 2008 financial crisis and recession. In particular, the study estimates the relationship between early fiscal intervention, district finances, and student academic outcomes in mathematics and reading and language arts. Findings suggest that intervention led to significant cuts in per-pupil expenditures, resulted in no increase in state or federal revenues and an increase in local revenues through property taxes, and was negatively associated with student outcomes, especially in reading and language arts and for Hispanic/Latinx students. When taken together, the findings imply K–12 fiscal accountability in California was leveraged to promote fiscal austerity in educational spending during and after the 2008 financial crisis. Implications and policy recommendations are discussed.
AdamsonF.BrownA.WelnerK. (2020). Austerity, subsistence, or investment: Will congress and the president choose to bail out our children’s future?National Education Policy Center.
2.
AnglumJ. C.ShoresK. A.SteinbergM. P. (2021). Federal stimulus aid and school finance: Lessons from the great recession (EdWorkingPaper No. 21-497). Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University.
3.
ArsenD.MasonM. L. (2013). Seeking accountability through state-appointed emergency district management. Educational Policy, 27(2), 248–278.
4.
ArsenD.DeLucaT. (2016). Which districts get into financial trouble and why: Michigan’s story. Journal of Education Finance, 42(2), 100–126.
5.
BakerB. D. (2014). Evaluating the recession’s impact on state school finance systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 22, 1–30.
6.
BakerB. D. (2016). Does money matter in education?Albert Shanker Institute.
7.
BakerB. D.Di CarloM. (2020). The coronavirus pandemic and K–12 education funding. Albert Shanker Institute.
8.
BakerB. D.Di CarloM.ReistK.WeberM. (2021). The adequacy and fairness of state school finance systems, school year 2018–19. Albert Shanker Institute.
9.
BakerB.GreenP. (2015). Conceptions of equity and adequacy in school finance. In LaddH. F.FiskeE. D. (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (pp. 203–221). Routledge.
BleibergJ. F.LyonM. A.SchuelerB. E. (2023). State takeover of school systems and within-district fiscal equity. Journal of Education Human Resources, 41(1), 172–204.
12.
BlythM. (2013). Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea. Oxford University Press.
13.
BowmanK. L. (2013). State takeovers of school districts and related litigation: Michigan as a case study. The Urban Lawyer, 45, 1.
14.
BowmanK. L. (2010). Before school districts go broke: A proposal for federal reform. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 79, 895.
15.
BowmanK. L.ZuschlagD. F. (2022). Balancing state and local power over school districts’ finances. Education Finance and Policy, 17(3), 564–577.
ChakrabartiR.LivingstonM. (2021). Tough choices: New Jersey schools during the great recession and beyond. Economic Policy Review, 27(1), 1–34.
20.
ChakrabartiR.LivingstonM.RoyJ. (2014). Did cuts in state aid during the Great Recession lead to changes in local property taxes?Education Finance and Policy, 9(4), 383–416.
21.
Darling-HammondL. (2013). Inequality and school resources: What it will take to close the opportunity gap. In CarterP. L.WelnerK. G. (Eds.), Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance (pp. 83–110). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199982981.003.0006
22.
De ChaisemartinC.D’HaultfoeuilleX. (2020). Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects. American Economic Review, 110(9), 2964–2996.
23.
De ChaisemartinC.D’HaultfoeuilleX. (2022). Difference-in-differences estimators of intertemporal treatment effects (No. w29873). National Bureau of Economic Research.
24.
DeeT. S.GoldhaberD. (2017). Understanding and addressing teacher shortages in the United States. The Hamilton Project, 5, 1–28.
25.
DiemS.YoungM. D.WeltonA. D.MansfieldK. C.LeeP. L. (2014). The intellectual landscape of critical policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(9), 1068–1090.
26.
EvansW. N.SchwabR. M.WagnerK. L. (2019). The great recession and public education. Education Finance and Policy, 14(2), 298–326.
FeldmanA. F.MatjaskoJ. L. (2005). The role of school-based extracurricular activities in adolescent development: A comprehensive review and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 159–210.
29.
HahnelC.RamanathanA.BassettoJ.CerratoA. (2022). Unjust legacy. The Opportunity Institute.
30.
HandelD. V.HanushekE. A. (2022). US school finance: Resources and outcomes (No. w30769). National Bureau of Economic Research.
31.
HandelD. V.HanushekE. A. (2023). Contexts of convenience: Generalizing from published evaluations of school finance policies (No. w31653). National Bureau of Economic Research.
32.
HenryK. L.Jr. (2021). “The price of disaster”: The charter school authorization process in post-Katrina New Orleans. Educational Policy, 35(2), 235–258.
33.
HirschmanA. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states (Vol. 25). Harvard University Press.
34.
JacksonC. K. (2020). Does school spending matter? The new literature on an old question. American Psychological Association.
35.
JacksonC. K.MackevičiusC. L. (2024). What impacts can we expect from school spending policy? Evidence from evaluations in the United States. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 16(1), 412–446.
36.
JacksonC. K.PersicoC. (2023). Point column on school spending: Money matters. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 42(4), 1118–1124.
37.
JacksonC. K.WiggerC.XiongH. (2021). Do school spending cuts matter? Evidence from the Great Recession. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 13(2), 304–335.
38.
KissellR. E. (2022). Coercion and consent for the US education market: Community engagement policy under racialized fiscal surveillance. Journal of Education Policy, 25(6), 757–766.
39.
KnightD. S. (2017). Are high-poverty school districts disproportionately impacted by state funding cuts? School finance equity following the Great Recession. Journal of Education Finance, 169–194.
40.
KnightD. S.StrunkK. O. (2016). Who bears the costs of district funding cuts? Reducing inequality in the distribution of teacher layoffs. Educational Researcher, 45(7), 395–406.
41.
LafortuneJ. (2023). Financing California’s public schools. Public Policy Institute of California.
42.
LafortuneJ.MehlotraR.PaluchJ. (2020). Funding California schools when budgets fall short. Public Policy Institute of California.
43.
LafortuneJ.SchönholzerD. (2022). The impact of school facility investments on students and homeowners: Evidence from Los Angeles. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 14(3), 254–289.
44.
LeachmanM.MaiC. (2014). Most states still funding schools less than before the recession. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 16, 1–12.
45.
LeachmanM.MastersonK.FigueroaE. (2017). A punishing decade for school funding. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 29, 1–17.
46.
LevinH. M.McEwanP. J.BelfieldC.BowdenA. B.ShandR. (2017). Economic evaluation in education: Cost-effectiveness and benefit-cost analysis. Sage Publications.
47.
LipmanP. (2013). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. Taylor & Francis.
48.
LyonM. A.BleibergJ.SchuelerB. E. (2022). Does centralization promote fiscal health? The effect of state takeover of Local School Districts on Education Finance. Annenberg Institute at Brown University.
McDermottK. A. (2007). “Expanding the moral community” or “blaming the victim”? The politics of state education accountability policy. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 77–111.
51.
MeansA. (2013). Schooling in the age of austerity: Urban education and the struggle for democratic life. Springer.
52.
MorelD. (2018). Takeover: Race, education, and American democracy. Oxford University Press.
53.
NelsonS. L. (2018). Could the state takeover of public schools create a state-created danger: Theorizing at the intersection of state takeover districts, the school-to-prison pipeline, and racial oppression. The National Black Law Journal, 27, 1.
54.
OakesJ.WelnerK. (2023). From schools of opportunity to systems of opportunity. In YorkA.WelnerK.Molner-KelleyL. (Eds.), Schools of opportunity: 10 Research-based models for creating equity in action (pp. 193–217). Teachers College Press.
55.
OddenA.PicusL. O. (2011). Improving teaching and learning when budgets are tight. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(1), 42–48.
56.
OluwoleJ. O.GreenP. CIII. (2009). State takeover of school districts: Race and the equal protection clause. Indiana Law Review, 42, 343.
57.
PicusL. O. (2001). Improving student learning: How does money matter? In JosephL. B. (Ed.), Education policy for the 21st century. Challenges and opportunities in standards-based reform (pp. 205–232). University of Illinois Press.
58.
PicusL. O.MonkD. H.KnightD. (2012). Measuring the cost effectiveness of rich clinical practice in teacher preparation: Part one, understanding the problem. Report prepared for the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP).
59.
ReckhowS.SnyderJ. W. (2014). The expanding role of philanthropy in education politics. Educational Researcher, 43(4), 186–195.
60.
SaltmanK. J. (2014). The austerity school: Grit, character, and the privatization of public education. Symplokē, 22(1–2), 41–57.
61.
SchuelerB. E.BleibergJ. F. (2022). Evaluating education governance: Does state takeover of school districts affect student achievement?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 41(1), 162–192.
62.
ShoresK.SteinbergM. P. (2019a). The great recession, fiscal federalism and the consequences for cross-district spending inequality. Journal of Education Finance, 45(2), 123–148.
63.
ShoresK.SteinbergM. P. (2019b). Schooling during the Great Recession: Patterns of school spending and student achievement using population data. AERA Open, 5(3), 2332858419877431.
64.
SpainA. K. (2016). Situating school district resource decision making in policy context. American Journal of Education, 122(2), 171–197.
65.
SpainA. K. (2017). Just talk? Discourses and deinstitutionalization in school district policy making. American Journal of Education, 124(1), 101–126.
66.
StrunkK. O.GoldhaberD.KnightD. S.BrownN. (2018). Are there hidden costs associated with conducting layoffs? The impact of reduction-in-force and layoff notices on teacher effectiveness. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 37(4), 755–782.
67.
SnyderJ. W.ReckhowS. (2017). Political determinants of philanthropic funding for urban schools. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(1), 91–107.
68.
TaylorL. L.BakerB. D.VedlitzA. (2005). Measuring educational adequacy in public schools. The Bush School of Government & Public Service, Texas A&M University.
69.
TaylorL. L.FowlerW. J.Jr. (2006). A comparable wage approach to geographic cost adjustment. Research and Development Report. NCES-2006-321. National Center for Education Statistics.
ThompsonP. N. (2016). School district and housing price responses to fiscal stress labels: Evidence from Ohio. Journal of Urban Economics, 94, 54–72.
72.
ThompsonP. N.St. JohnM. (2019). The effects of performance audits on school district financial behavior. Public Finance Review, 47(6), 1042–1075.
73.
TurnerE. O.BakerD. J.JabbarH. (2024). Improving researchers’ capacity to address injustice: An introduction to the special issue. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 46(2), 175–191.
74.
TurnerE. O.SpainA. K. (2020). The multiple meanings of (in) equity: Remaking school district tracking policy in an era of budget cuts and accountability. Urban Education, 55(5), 783–812.
75.
TyackD. B.LoweR.HansotE. (1984). Public schools in hard times: The Great Depression and recent years. Harvard University Press.
76.
WrightJ.WhitakerR.KhalifaM.BriscoeF. (2020). The color of neoliberal reform: A critical race policy analysis of school district takeovers in Michigan. Urban Education, 55(3), 424–447.
77.
ZuschlagD. F.BowmanK. L. (2019). States’ intervention in school districts’ finances. National Education Policy Center.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
