Employing an innovative arts-based approach to professional learning, this study examined in-service teachers’ reflective processes, insights, and pedagogic practices through the use of creative thinking journals. Using photovoice methodology, we conducted a thematic analysis of teachers’ journals and individual semi-structured interviews, focusing on how creative thinking journals enhanced reflective practices and teaching efficacy. Our findings demonstrate that creative journaling significantly deepened self-reflection, fostered a collaborative community among teachers, and supported the adoption of innovative teaching strategies. The integration of arts-based methods transformed classroom practices, promoting a more dynamic and responsive educational environment and offering valuable insights into effective professional learning strategies.
BarnumS. (2017). Professional learning in and through the arts. In DiazG.McKennaM. B. (Eds.), Preparing educators for arts integration: Placing creativity at the center of learning (pp. 125–135). Teachers College Press.
3.
BeauchampC. (2015). Reflection in teacher education: Issues emerging from a review of current literature. Reflective Practice, 16(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2014.982525
4.
Blackburn MillerJ. (2020). Transformative learning and the arts: A literature review. Journal of Transformative Education, 18(4), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344620932877
5.
BlytheT. (1998). The teaching for understanding guide. Jossey-Bass.
6.
BrunerJ. (1973). The relevance of education (No. 690). WW Norton & Company.
7.
BrunerJ. (1996). Frames for thinking: Ways of making meaning. In OlsenD.TorranceN. (Eds.), Modes of thought: Explorations in culture and cognition (Vol. 8, pp. 93-105). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BrunerJ.SherwoodV. (1983). Thought, language and interaction in infancy. In CallJ.GalensonE.TysonR. (Eds.), Frontiers of infant psychiatry, (pp. 38–52). New York: Basic Books.
CinquemaniS.KraeheA. (2020). Thinking alongside children: Explorations of artistic practice and research in early childhood. Art Education, 73(6), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2020.1813527
11.
ClaràM. (2015). What is reflection? Looking for clarity in an ambiguous notion. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114552028
12.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
13.
D’AdamoK. (2017). Creative research stages, student guide: Scaffolding creative research for students and teachers, by students and teachers. Digital Commons at University of Nebraska–Lincoln. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsgpirw/48/
14.
DavisS. (2017). Drama and arts-based professional learning: Exploring face-to-face, online and transmedia models. Teaching Education, 28(4), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2017.1296830
15.
DavisS. M. (2005). Developing reflective practice in pre-service student teachers: What does art have to do with it?Teacher Development, 9(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530500200238
16.
DesimoneL. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x08331140
17.
DeweyJ. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. DC Heath.
18.
DeweyJ. (1997). How we think. Dover Books.
19.
DiazG.McKennaM. B. (2017). Preparing educators for arts integration: Placing creativity at the center of learning. Teachers College Press.
20.
DimovaY.LoughranJ. (2009). Developing a big picture understanding of reflection in pedagogical practice. Reflective Practice, 10(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940902786214
FlintM. A.ToledoW. (2021). Beyond the visual: Artful inquiry in higher education journals 2000-2020. The Review of Higher Education, 45(2), 239–265. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2021.0022
28.
GoldenT. (2020). Reframing photovoice: Building on the method to develop more equitable and responsive research practices. Qualitative Health Research, 30(6), 960–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320905564
29.
GreeneM. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. Jossey-Bass.
30.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage.
31.
GudeO. (2007). Principles of possibility: Considerations for a 21st-century art and culture curriculum. Art Education, 60(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2007.11 651621
32.
HansenA. (2015). How to develop PLCs for singletons and small schools. Solution Tree.
33.
HetlandL. (2013). Connecting creativity to understanding. Educational Leadership, 70(5), 65–70.
34.
HillC. E.KnoxS. (2021). Essentials of consensual qualitative research. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000215-000
35.
HippJ.Sulentic DowellM. M. (2019). Challenges and supports to elementary teacher education: Case study of preservice teachers’ perspectives on arts integration. Journal for Learning Through the Arts, 15(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.21977/d915144538
36.
IrwinR. L.De CossonA. (2004). A/R/Tography: Rendering self through arts-based living inquiry. Pacific Educational Press.
37.
JenlinkP. M.Kinnucan-WelschK. (2001). Case stories of facilitating professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(6), 705–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00025-7
38.
KervinL.HowardS.JonesR.McKnightA. (2023). Research for educators (3rd ed.). Cengage Australia.
KörkköM.Kyrö-ÄmmäläO.TurunenT. (2016). Professional development through reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.014
41.
LaBelleJ. T.BelknapG. (2016). Reflective journaling: Fostering dispositional development in preservice teachers. Reflective Practice, 17(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2015.1134473
42.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
43.
LawrenceR. L. (2008). Powerful feelings: Exploring the affective domain of informal and arts-based learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2008(120), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.317
44.
LeonardN. (2020). Entanglement art education: Factoring ARTificial intelligence and nonhumans into future art curricula. Art Education, 73(4), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2020.1746163
MarshallJ. (2014). Transdisciplinarity and art integration: Toward a new understanding of art-based learning across the curriculum. Studies in Art Education, 55(2), 104–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2014.11518922
47.
MarshallJ.D’AdamoK. (2018). Art studio as thinking lab: Fostering metacognition in art classrooms. Art Education, 71(6), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2018.150 5377
48.
MeltzerC. (2020). The reflexive practitioner; Using arts-based methods and research for professional development. In McKayL.BartonG.GarvisS.SappaV. (Eds.), Arts-based research, resilience and well-being across the lifespan (pp. 209–231). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26053-8_12
49.
McChesneyK.AldridgeJ. M. (2021). What gets in the way? A new conceptual model for the trajectory from teacher professional development to impact. Professional Development in Education, 47(5), 834–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1667412
50.
McKayL.SappaV. (2020). Harnessing creativity through arts-based research to support teachers’ identity development. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 26(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477971419841068
51.
Møller-SkauM.LindstølF. (2022). Arts-based teaching and learning in teacher education: “Crystallising” student teachers’ learning outcomes through a systematic literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, art. 103545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103545
OreckB. (2004). The artistic and professional development of teachers: A study of teachers’ attitudes toward and use of the arts in teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487103260072
PakesA. (2003). Original embodied knowledge: The epistemology of the new in dance practice as research. Research in Dance Education, 4(2), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464789032000130354
56.
PalincsarA. S. (1998). Keeping the metaphor of scaffolding fresh—-a response to C. Addison Stone's “The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities”. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(4), 370-373.
57.
ParnellW. (2012). Experiences of teacher reflection: Reggio inspired practices in the studio. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 10(2), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718x11407982
58.
PerkinsD. (2014). Future wise: Educating our children for a changing world. Wiley.
59.
PoekertP. E.SwaffieldS.DemirE. K.WrightS. A. (2022). Leadership for professional learning towards educational equity: A systematic literature review (Working Papers No. 21/5). Stockholm School of Economics, Center for Educational Leadership and Excellence.
60.
PrytulaM. P. (2012). Teacher metacognition within the professional learning community. International Education Studies, 5(4), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n4p112
61.
ReeveJ. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1086/501484
62.
RitchhartR.ChurchM.MorrisonK. (2011). Making thinking visible: How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners. Wiley.
Sanz-CamareroR.Ortiz-RevillaJ.GrecaI. M. (2025). The place of the arts within integrated education. Arts Education Policy Review, 126(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2023.2260917
65.
SaranieroP.GoldbergM. R.HallB. (2014). “Unlocking my creativity”: Teacher learning in arts integration professional development. Journal for Learning through the Arts, 10(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.21977/d910119060
66.
SchönD. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
67.
SchwabJ. J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum. The School Review, 78(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1086/442881
68.
ShahM. A. (2022). Teachers as reflective practitioners: From individualism to Vygotskian social constructivism. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 68(3), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/ajer.v68i3.68598
69.
SullivanG. (2010). Art practice as research: Inquiry in visual arts. Sage.
TamA. C. F. (2015). The role of a professional learning community in teacher change: A perspective from beliefs and practices. Teachers and Teaching, 21(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.928122
72.
TayL. Y.TanL. S.AiyoobT. B.TanJ. Y.OngM. W. L.Ratnam-LimC.ChuaP. H. (2023). Teacher reflection–call for a transformative mindset. Reflective Practice, 24(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2022.2130224
73.
TimperleyH. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development (Educational Practices Series18). International Academy of Education.
UpitisR. (2005). Experiences of artists and artist-teachers involved in teacher professional development programs. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 6(8), 1–12. http://www.ijea.org/v6n8/
77.
VangriekenK.MeredithC.PackerT.KyndtE. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001
78.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard University Press.
79.
WangC.BurrisM. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309
80.
WassR.AndersonV.RabelloR.GoldingC.RangiA.EteuatiE. (2020). Photovoice as a research method for higher education research. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(4), 834–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1692791
81.
Webster-WrightA. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 702–739. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308330970
82.
WilliamsR.GrudnoffL. (2011). Making sense of reflection: A comparison of beginning and experienced teachers’ perceptions of reflection for practice. Reflective Practice, 12(3), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2011.571861
83.
WoodD. R. (2007). Professional learning communities: Teachers, knowledge, and knowing. Theory into Practice, 46(4), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840701593865
84.
WrightS. (2018). Good question: Exploring epistemology and ontology in arts education and creativity. In de BruinL. R.BurnardP.DavisS. (Eds.), Creativities in arts education, research and practice: International perspectives for the future of learning and teaching (pp. 101–115). Brill.
85.
YeeB. C.AbdullahT.Mohd NawiA. (2022). Exploring pre-service teachers’ reflective practice through an analysis of six-stage framework in reflective journals. Reflective Practice, 23(5), 552–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2022.2071246
86.
ZeichnerK. (1996). Teachers as reflective practitioners and the democratization of school reform. In ZeichnerK.MelnickS.GomezM. (Eds.), Currents of reform in pre-service teacher education (pp. 199–214). Teachers College Press.
