The participants in this study are 9-year-olds who demonstrate signs of incipient alienation. Even with an experienced teacher who had a positive relationship with her students, some students describe school as boring. The arts may provide a path away from alienation when learning is embedded in the students’ cultural knowledge and when the artistic process is primary. Our research question was, “What do students learn when engaged in a playwriting experience in school?” The evidence suggests that students discovered fun, freedom, and a sense of agency with language arts as a result of their participation in the program.
BanduraA. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
4.
BassoD.McCoyN. (2007). The co-teaching manual: How general education and special education teachers work together to educate students in an inclusive classroom. Columbia, SC: Twin Publications.
5.
BeghettoR. A.KaufmanJ. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73-79.
6.
BerrymanS. E. (1991). Designing effective learning environments: Cognitive apprenticeship models. New York, NY: Columbia University Institute on Education and the Economy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED337689).
7.
BoutteG. S. (2012). Urban schools: Challenges and possibilities for early childhood and elementary education. Urban Education, 47, 515-550.
BrunerJ. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BurtonJ.HorowitzR.AbelesH. (2000). Learning in and through the arts: Curriculum implications. In Champions of change: The Impact of the arts on learning. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership and the President’s Commission on the Arts and the Humanities.
11.
CharmazK. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook for qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
CornettC. E. (2007). Creating meaning through literature and the arts: An integration resource for classroom teachers (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
14.
CreminT.GoouchK.BlakemoreL.GoffE.MacdonaldR. (2006). Connecting drama and writing: Seizing the moment to write. Research in Drama in Education, 11, 273-291.
15.
DanielsE.ArapostathisM. (2005). What do they really want? Student voices and motivation. Urban Education, 40, 34-59.
16.
Darling-HammondL. (2014). Foreword. In MilnerH. R.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education. (pp. xi-xiv). New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
DavisE. A.KrajcikJ. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34, 3-14.
18.
DeasyR. J. (Ed.). (2002). Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.
19.
DeFauwD. L. (2013). 10 writing opportunities to “teach to the test.”The Reading Teacher, 66, 569-573.
20.
DemirciogluS. (2010). Teaching English vocabulary to young learners via drama. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 439-443.
21.
DeweyJ. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Perigee.
EdmistonB. (2011). Teaching for transformation: Drama and language arts education. In LappD.FisherD. (Eds.), The handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 224-230). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
EganK. (1992). Imagination in teaching and learning: The middle school years. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
EisnerE. (2002). The arts and the creation of the mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.
30.
FishmanB. J.MarxR. W.BestS.TalR. T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education19, 643-658.
31.
FordA. C.SassiK. (2014). Authority in cross-racial teaching and learning (re)considering the transferability of warm demander approaches. Urban Education, 49, 39-74.
32.
GambrellL. (2011). Seven rules of engagement: What’s most important to know about motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 65, 172-178.
33.
GambrellL.HughesE. M.CalvertL.MalloyJ. A.IgoB. (2011). Authentic reading, writing and discussion. The Elementary School Journal, 112, 234-258.
34.
GambrellL.MalloyJ. A.MazzoniS. A. (2007). Evidence-based best practices for comprehension literacy instruction. In GambrellL. B.MorrowL. M.PressleyM. (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (Vol. 3, pp. 11-29). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
35.
GirouxH.McLarenP. (1986). Teacher education and the politics of engagement: The case for democratic schooling. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 213-238.
36.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
37.
GoldenbergB. M. (2014). White teachers in urban classrooms: Embracing non-white students’ cultural capital for better teaching and learning. Urban Education49, 111-144.
38.
HallidayM. A. K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic. London, England: Edward Arnold.
39.
HanleyM. S. (1998). Learning to fly: Knowledge construction of African American adolescents through drama (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington College of Education, Seattle.
40.
HanleyM. S. (2010). The arts and social justice in a critical multicultural education classroom. In SleeterC.MayS. (Eds.), Critical multiculturalism: From theory to practice (pp. 191-201). New York, NY: Routledge.
41.
HanleyM. S. (2011). Resisting Sankofa: Art-based educational research as counter-narrative. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 8, 4-13.
42.
HattieJ. A. C. (2002). Distinguishing expert teachers from novice and experienced teachers: What are the attributes of excellent teachers? In Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? (pp. 3-26). Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
43.
HattieJ. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A syntheses of over 800 meta-analyses related to achievement. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
44.
HetlandL.WinnerE. (Ed.). (2000). The arts and academic achievement: What the evidence shows. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 3-10.
45.
IngramD.MeathJ. (2007). Arts for academic achievement: A compilation of evaluation findings from 2004-2006 (Executive summary, report for the University of Minnesota). Minneapolis, MN: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement.
46.
KaneR. (1994). Reconceptualising pre-service teacher education: The applicability of a cognitive apprenticeship model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian Education Association, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. July 3-6, 1994. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED374126).
47.
KirklandD. E. (2010). English(es) in urban contexts: Politics, pluralism, and possibilities. English Education, 42, 293-306.
48.
KrullE.OrasK.SisaskS. (2007). Differences in teachers’ comments on classroom events as indicators of their professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 23, 1038-1050.
49.
LemosM. S.VerissimoL. (2014). The relationships between intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and achievement, along elementary school. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 930-938.
50.
LevstikL. S.BartonK. C. (2005). Doing history: Investigating with children in the elementary and middle schools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
MannS. J. (2001). Alternative perspectives on the student experience: Alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 26, 8-19.
52.
MartinJ.SugarmanJ.ThompsonJ. (2003). Psychology and the question of agency. Albany: State University of New York Press.
McCammonL. A.O’FarrellL.Aud BerggrafS.HeapB. (2010). Connecting with their inner beings: An international survey of drama/ theatre teachers’ perceptions of creative teaching and teaching for creative achievement. Youth Theatre Journal, 24, 140-159.
55.
McLarenP. (1994). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
56.
MilesM.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
MilnerH. R. (2012). But, what is urban education?Urban Education, 47, 556-561.
58.
MilnerH. R. (2014). Scripted and narrowed curriculum reform in urban schools. Urban Education, 49, 743-749.
59.
MilnerH. R.LomoteyK. (Eds.) (2014). Introduction. In Handbook of urban education. (pp. xv-xxiv). New York, NY: Routledge.
60.
OrzulakM. M. (2006). Reviving empathy and imagination: Arts integration enlivens teaching and learning, English Journal, 96, Retrieved from: http://www.ncte.org/journals/ej/issues/v96-1
61.
ParksM.RoseD. (1997). The impact of whirlwind’s reading comprehension through drama program on 4th grade students’ reading skills and standardized test scores. In DeasyR. J. (Ed.), Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development. (pp. 47-48). Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.
62.
ParsonsS. A.MalloyJ. A.ParsonsA. W.BurrowbridgeS. C. (2015). Students’ engagement in literacy tasks. The Reading Teacher, 69, 223-231.
RuncoM. A. (1996). Creativity and development: Recommendations. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 87-90.
65.
SchiefeleU.CsikszentmihalyiM. (1994). Interest and the quality of experience in classrooms. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 9, 251-269.
66.
SeidelS.TishmanS.WinnerE.HetlandL.PalmerP. (2009). The qualities of quality: Understanding excellence in arts education. Cambridge, MA: Project Zero, Harvard University.
67.
SupovitzJ. A.ZeifS. G. (2000). Why they stay away. Journal of Staff Development, 21, 24-28.
68.
TealeW. H.GambrellL. B. (2007). Raising urban students’ literacy achievement by engaging in authentic, challenging work. The Reading Teacher, 60, 728-739.
69.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70.
WareF. (2006). Warm demander pedagogy: Culturally responsive teaching that supports a culture of achievement for African American students. Urban Education41, 427-456.
