Undermatching identifies high school graduates who do not attend selective colleges even if they have high academic performance. To date, the study of undermatching is restricted to access to selective colleges and to the United States and the United Kingdom. We expand this concept to identify students who, having high academic performance, do not undertake five critical educational transitions: graduating from high school, enrolling in higher education, taking the college-entry exam, enrolling in university, and enrolling in a selective university. Using the case of Chile and a novel population-level panel dataset combining administrative and survey data, we found that undermatching is prevalent, highly stratified by socioeconomic status, and stronger among disadvantaged boys than girls. A Gelbach decomposition analysis suggested that inequality in undermatching is largely accounted for by the students’ sorting across schools. We discuss the implications of undermatching for countries around the world.
AppleM. (2004). Ideology and curriculum. Routledge.
3.
ArmstrongE. M.HamiltonL. (2013). Paying for the party: How college maintains inequality. Harvard University Press.
4.
AutorD.FiglioD.KarbownikK.RothJ.WassermanM. (2019). Family disadvantage and the gender gap in behavioral and educational outcomes. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(3), 338–381. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20170571
5.
BelascoA. S.TrivetteM. J. (2015). Aiming low: Estimating the scope and predictors of postsecondary undermatch. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(2), 233–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2015.11777363
6.
BelleyP.LochnerL. (2007). The changing role of family income and ability in determining educational achievement. Journal of Human Capital, 1(1), 37–89. https://doi.org/10.1086/524674
7.
BernasconiA.RojasF. (2003). Informe sobre la educación superior en Chile: 1980–2003. Digital Observatory for Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean. http://www.iesalc.unesco.org.ve/
8.
BlackD. A.SmithJ. A. (2006). Estimating the returns to college quality with multiple proxies for quality. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 701–728. https://doi.org/10.1086/505067
9.
BlackD. A.SmithJ. A. (2004). How robust is the evidence on the effects of college quality? Evidence from matching. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1–2), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.006
BrewerD. J.EideE. R.EhrenbergR. G. (1999). Does it pay to attend an elite private college? Cross-cohort evidence on the effects of college type on earnings. The Journal of Human Resources, 34(1), 104. https://doi.org/10.2307/146304
17.
BucareyA. (2018). Who pays for free college? Crowding out on campus (Working Paper). Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
18.
BucareyA.ContrerasD.MuñozP. (2020). Labor market returns to student loans for university: Evidence from Chile. Journal of Labor Economics, 38(4), 959–1007. https://doi.org/10.1086/706486
19.
BuchmannC.DwyerR.YaoM. (2025). The deepening gender divide in credentials, 2000–2020: Continuity, change and implications. The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences. 11(1), 154–177. https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2025.11.1.08
20.
CalarcoJ. M. (2018). Negotiating opportunities: How the middle class secures advantages in school. Oxford University Press.
21.
CameronS. V.HeckmanJ. J. (2001). The dynamics of educational attainment for Black, Hispanic, and White males. Journal of Political Economy, 109(3), 455–499. https://doi.org/10.1086/321014
22.
CampbellS.MacmillanL.MurphyR.WynessG. (2022). Matching in the dark? Inequalities in student to degree match. Journal of Labor Economics, 40(4), 807–850. https://doi.org/10.1086/718433
23.
CanalesA. (2016). Diferencias Socioeconómicas en la postulación a las Universidades Chilenas: El rol de factores académicos y no académicos. Calidad en la Educacion, 44, 129–157. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-45652016000100006
24.
CarlanaM.MiglinoE.TincaniM. (2024). How far can inclusion go? The long-term impact of preferential college admissions (NBER Working Paper No. 32525). National Bureau of Economic Research.
25.
CarneiroP.HeckmanJ. J. (2002). The evidence on credit constraints in post-secondary schooling. The Economic Journal, 112(482), 705–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00075
26.
CarnevaleA. P.RoseS. J. (2004). Socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, and selective college admissions. In KahlebergR. (Ed.), America’s untapped resource: Low-income students in higher education (pp. 101–156). Century Foundation.
27.
CatalánX.SantelicesM. V.HornC. (2022). The role of an equity policy in the reproduction of social inequalities: High school ranking and university admissions in Chile. Journal of Sociology, 58(3), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833211072592
28.
CavagliaC.MacmillanL.MaragkouK.MurphyR.WynessG. (2024). The mismatch earnings penalty (Discussion Paper No. 041). Centre for Vocational Education Research.
29.
ChettyR.FriedmanJ.SaezE.TurnerN.YaganD. (2020). The determinants of income segregation and intergenerational mobility: Using test scores to measure undermatching (NBER Working Paper No. w26748; p. w26748). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26748
30.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
31.
ContrerasD.SepúlvedaP.BustosS. (2010). When schools are the ones that choose: The effects of screening in Chile. Social Science Quarterly, 91(5), 1349–1368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00735.x
32.
CookA. M. (2022). Margins that matter: Exploring the association between academic match and bachelor's degree completion over time. Research in Higher Education, 63(4), 672–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-021-09664-6
33.
CoxL. (2024). Great expectations: The effect of unmet labor market expectations after higher education on ideology. American Journal of Political Science, 68(4), 1419–1430. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12836
34.
CummingsP. M. M.MizalaA.SchneiderB. R. (2023). Chile’s inclusion law: The arduous drive to regulate an unequal education system, 2006–19. Educational Review, 77(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2023.2234661
35.
DaleS. B.KruegerA. B. (2014). Estimating the effects of college characteristics over the career using administrative earnings data. Journal of Human Resources, 49(2), 323–358. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2014.0015
36.
DaleS. B.KruegerA. B. (2002). Estimating the payoff of attending a more selective college. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1491–1527. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935089
37.
DelisleJ.BernasconiA. (2018). Lessons from Chile's transition to free college. Economic Studies at Brookings, Evidence Speaks Reports, 2(43), 1–14.
38.
DillonE. W.SmithJ. A. (2017). Determinants of the match between student ability and college quality. Journal of Labor Economics, 35(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1086/687523
39.
DiPreteT.BuchmannC. (2013). The rise of women: The growing gender gap in education and what it means for American schools. Sage.
DynarskiS.LibassiC.MichelmoreK.OwenS. (2021). Closing the gap: The effect of reducing complexity and uncertainty in college pricing on the choices of low-income students. American Economic Review, 111(6), 1721–1756. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20200451
42.
EngbergM. E.WolniakG. C. (2010). Examining the effects of high school contexts on postsecondary enrollment. Research in Higher Education, 51(2), 132–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9150-y
43.
EriksonR.GoldthorpeJ. H.JacksonM.YaishM.CoxD. R. (2005). On class differentials in educational attainment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(27), 9730–9733. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502433102
44.
EspinozaO.GonzálezL. E.SandovalL.McGinnN.CorradiB. (2022). Reducing inequality in access to university in Chile: The relative contribution of cultural capital and financial aid. Higher Education, 83(6), 1355–1370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00746-z
45.
Farmer-HintonR. L. (2008). Social capital and college planning: Students of color using school networks for support and guidance. Education and Urban Society, 41(1), 127–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124508321373
46.
FarrellW.GrayJ. (2019). The boy crisis. Berghahn Books.
47.
FortinN. M.OreopoulosP.FortinS. P. (2015). Gender disparities in high academic achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 50(3), 549–579. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.3.549
48.
GelbachJ. B. (2016). When do covariates matter? And which ones, and how much?Journal of Labor Economics, 34(2), 509–543. https://doi.org/10.1086/683668
49.
GiaconiV.BressouxP.FelmerP. (2022). The effect of voucher and public school education on Chilean students’ mathematics and reading test score trajectories. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 33(2), 303–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.2014896
50.
González-VelosaC.UrzúaS.RucciG.SarzosaM. (2015). Returns to higher education in Chile and Colombia. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0011686
51.
GrantM.BehrmanJ. (2010). Gender gaps in educational attainment in less developed countries. Population Research and Policy Review, 36(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00318.x
52.
GutiérrezG.CarrascoA. (2021). Chile’s enduring educational segregation: A trend unchanged by different cycles of reform. British Educational Research Journal, 47(6), 1611–1634. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3746
53.
HanushekE. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737019002141
54.
HastingsJ. S.NeilsonC.ZimmermanS. D. (2013). Are some degrees worth more than others? Evidence from college admission cutoffs in Chile (NBER Working Paper No. 19241). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w19241
55.
HearnJ. C. (1992). Emerging variations in postsecondary attendance patterns: An investigation of part-time, delayed, and nondegree enrollment. Research in Higher Education, 33(6), 657–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992053
56.
HillC. B.WinstonG. C. (2010). Low-income students and highly selective private colleges: Geography, searching, and recruiting. Economics of Education Review, 29(4), 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.12.004
57.
HillL. (2008). School strategies and the “college-linking” process: Reconsidering the effects of high schools on college enrollment. Sociology of Education, 81, 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070808100103
58.
HorvatE. M.WeiningerE. B.LareauA. (2003). From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between schools and parent networks. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 319–351. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040002319
59.
HoutM. (2012). Social and economic returns to college education in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev .soc.012809.102503
60.
HoxbyB. C. M.TurnerS. (2015). What high-achieving low-income students know about college. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 105(5), 514–517. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151027
61.
HoxbyC.AveryC. (2013). The missing “one-offs”: The hidden supply of high-achieving, low-income students. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2013.0000
62.
HsiehC. T.UrquiolaM. (2006). The effects of generalized school choice on achievement and stratification: Evidence from Chile's voucher program. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1477–1503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.11.002
63.
JackA. A. (2019). The privileged poor: How Elite colleges are failing disadvantaged students. Harvard University Press.
64.
JacksonM.BucknerE. (2016). Opportunity without equity: Educational inequality and constitutional protections in Egypt. Sociological Science, 3, 730–756. https://doi.org/10.15195/v3.a31
65.
JacksonM.JonssonJ. (2013). Why does inequality of educational opportunity vary across countries? Primary and secondary effects in comparative context. In JacksonM. (Ed.), Determined to succeed? Performance versus choice in educational attainment. Stanford University Press.
66.
JacksonM.EriksonR.GoldthorpeJ. H.YaishM. (2007). Primary and secondary effects in class differentials in educational attainment: The transition to A-Level courses in England and Wales. Acta Sociologica, 50(3), 211–229. https://doi .org/10.1177/0001699307080926
67.
KaneT. (1999). The price of admission: Rethinking how Americans pay for college. Brookings Institution Press.
68.
KangC.García TorresD. (2021). College undermatching, bachelor's degree attainment, and minority students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(2), 264–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000145
69.
KeaneM. P.WolpinK. I. (1997). The career decisions of young men. Journal of Political Economy, 105(3), 473–522. https://doi.org/10.1086/262080
70.
KhanS. (2011). Privilege: The making of an adolescent elite at St. Paul's School. Princeton University Press.
71.
LaraB.MizalaA.RepettoA. (2011). The effectiveness of private voucher education: Evidence from structural school switches. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711402990
LiX.YeX.WuX. (2023). How college-student academic undermatch affects students: Quasi-experimental evidence on multifaceted student outcomes. Social Science Research, 113, 102896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102896
74.
LochnerL. J.Monge-NaranjoA. (2011). The nature of credit constraints and human capital. American Economic Review, 101(6), 2487–2529. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.6.2487
75.
LovenheimM.SmithJ. (2023). Returns to different postsecondary investments: Institution type, academic programs, and credentials. In HanushekE.MachinS.WoessmannL. (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (pp. 187–318). Elsevier.
76.
LucasS. (1999). Tracking inequality: Stratification and mobility in American high schools. Teachers College Press.
77.
ManskiC.WiseD. (1983). College choice in America. Harvard University Press.
78.
MaragkouK. (2020). Socio-economic inequality and academic match among post-compulsory education participants. Economics of Education Review, 79, 102060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.102060
79.
MarcucciP. N.JohnstoneD. B. (2007). Tuition fee policies in a comparative perspective: Theoretical and political rationales. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800600980015
80.
MizalaA.TorcheF. (2017). Means-tested school vouchers and educational achievement: Evidence from Chile's universal voucher system. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 674(1), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217732033
81.
MizalaA.TorcheF. (2012). Bringing the schools back in: The stratification of educational achievement in the Chilean voucher system. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(1), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.09.004
82.
MonksJ. (2000). The returns to individual and college characteristics: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Economics of Education Review, 19(3), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(99)00023-0
83.
MorganS. L. (2012). Models of college entry in the United States and the challenges of estimating primary and secondary effects. Sociological Methods and Research, 40(1), 17–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112440797
84.
MuskensM. (2020). The long-term consequences of college undermatching on career and personal well-being [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2020 AERA Annual Meeting. https://doi.org/10.3102/1581497
85.
MuskensM.FrankenhuisW. E.BorghansL. (2019). Low-income students in higher education: Undermatching predicts decreased satisfaction toward the final stage in college. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(7), 1296–1310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01022-1
86.
NiuS.TiendaM. (2013). High school economic composition and college persistence. Research in Higher Education, 54(1), 30–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9265-4
87.
OakesJ. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. Yale University Press.
88.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Education at a glance 2024: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
89.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2022). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing.
90.
OvnikS.KalogridesD.NanneyM.DelaneyP. (2018). College match and undermatch: Assessing student preferences, college proximity, and inequality in post- college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 59, 553–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9482-y
91.
OwensA.ReardonS. F.JencksC. (2016). Income segregation between schools and school districts. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216652722
92.
PalardyG. J. (2013). High school socioeconomic segregation and student attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 714–754. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213481240
93.
PallaisA.TurnerS. (2006). Opportunities for low-income students at top colleges and universities: Policy initiatives and the distribution of students. National Tax Journal, 59(2), 357–386. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2006.2.08
94.
PernaL. (2006). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. In SmartC. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XXI, pp. 99–157). Springer.
95.
PsacharopoulosG.PatrinosH. A. (2018). Returns to investment in education: A decennial review of the global literature. Education Economics, 26(5), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1484426
ReevesR. (2022). Of boys and men: Why the modern male is struggling, why it matters, and what to do about it. Brookings Institution Press.
98.
RoderickM.CocaV.NagaokaJ. (2011). Potholes on the road to college: High school effects in shaping urban students’ participation in college application, four-year college, and college match. Sociology of Education, 84(3), 178–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040711411280
99.
RodríguezJ.UrzúaS.ReyesL. (2016). Heterogeneous economic returns to post-secondary degrees: Evidence from Chile. Journal of Human Resources, 51(2), 416–460. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.51.2.0213-5474R1
100.
SchindlerS.LorzM. (2012). Mechanisms of social inequality development: Primary and secondary effects in the transition to tertiary education between 1976 and 2005. European Sociological Review, 28(5), 647–660. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcr032
101.
Sistema Nacional de Información de la Educación Superior (SIES). (2015). Informe de Matrícula en Educación Superior en Chile (Higher Education Enrollment in Chile: Report). Ministry of Education, Chile.
SolisA. (2017). Credit access and college enrollment. Journal of Political Economy, 125(2), 562–622. https://doi.org/10.1086/690829
104.
Stanton-SalazarR. D. (2011). A social capital framework for the study of institutional agents and their role in the empowerment of low-status students and youth. Youth & Society, 43(3), 1066–1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X10382877
105.
Stanton-SalazarR. D. (2001). Manufacturing hope and despair: The school and Kin support networks of U.S.-Mexican youth. Teachers College Press.
106.
Stanton-SalazarR. D. (1997). A social capital framework for understanding the socialization of racial minority children and youth. Harvard Education Review, 67(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.67.1.140676g74018u73k
StuberJ. (2011). Inside the college gates: How class and culture matter in higher education. Lexington Books.
109.
ThomasS. L. (2003). Longer-term economic effects of college selectivity and control. Research in Higher Education, 44(2), 263–298. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:10230 58330965
110.
ThomasS. L.ZhangL. (2005). Post-baccalaureate wage growth within four years of graduation: The effects of college quality and college major. Research in Higher Education, 46(4), 437–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-2969-y
111.
TorcheF. (2005). Privatization reform and inequality of educational opportunity: The case of Chile. Sociology of Education, 78(4), 316–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070507800403
112.
TorcheF.SpilermanS. (2009). Intergenerational influences of wealth in Mexico. Latin American Research Review, 44(3), 75–101.
113.
ValenzuelaJ. P.BelleiC.RíosD. D. L. (2014). Socioeconomic school segregation in a market-oriented educational system. The case of Chile. Journal of Education Policy, 29(2), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.806995
114.
Van HoutteM. (2024). Understanding gender gaps in education: The role of stereotypes and the intersection with social class. In DownesP. (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of equity and inclusion in education (pp. 246–259). Routledge.
115.
Von HippelP. T.HofflingerA. (2021). The data revolution comes to higher education: Identifying students at risk of dropout in Chile. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 43(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2020.1739800
116.
WolniakG. C.MuskensM. (2021). Undermatching and noncognitive development during the first year of college: A longitudinal study of college students in the Netherlands. Research in Higher Education, 62(6), 855–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09620-w
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
