Despite the high level of literacy, near universal enrolment in elementary education, and higher indices of social and human development among Indian States, Kerala has not made an impressive headway in higher education. Several studies show that there is ubiquitous relationship between ‘place’ and educational opportunities. Learners’ choice in enrolling to a programme and or an institution of study is largely driven by the geography and physical access to these institutions. This aspect has been widely covered in the Western context, but there are not many studies in the Indian context, especially so in Kerala. In this article, we propose a spatial-metric tool to assess disparity in educational opportunities by assigning a fixed dimension to define the ‘catchment’ area of an institution. We integrated our results with a model of higher education opportunity markets proposed in earlier studies for better understanding. This provides information about the graded nature in the choice of opportunities available in a region and its spatial distribution. Such regions are further classified as regions of negligible opportunities (education deserts) and abundant opportunities (education oases). The spatial-analytical tool proposed here can be recreated and applied across different regions employing various socio-economic and other relevant components of interest. This can have significant implications in educational planning and administration of a region.
AlmJ., & WintersJ. V. (2009). Distance and intrastate college student migration. Economics of Education Review, 28(6), 728–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.06.008
2.
BlaggK., & ChingosM. M. (2016). Choice deserts: How geography limits the potential impact of earnings data on higher education. Urban Institute. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/431744
3.
CabreraA. F., & La NasaS. M. (2000). Understanding the college-choice process. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2000(107), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.10701
4.
ChathukulamJ., & TharamangalamJ. (2021). The Kerala model in the time of COVID19: Rethinking state, society and democracy. World Development, 137, 105207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105207
5.
Dache-GerbinoA. (2018). College desert and oasis: A critical geographic analysis of local college access. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 11(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000050
6.
DenzlerS., & WolterS. (2011). Too far to go? Does distance determine study choices? (IZA Discussion Paper 5712). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1849467
7.
DoC. (2004). The effects of local colleges on the quality of college attended. Economics of Education Review, 23(3), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2003.05.001
8.
FrenetteM. (2004). Access to college and university: Does distance to school matter? Canadian Public Policy, 30(4), 427–443.
9.
FrenetteM. (2006). Too far to go on? Distance to school and university participation. Education Economics, 14(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645290500481865
10.
GibbonsS., & VignolesA. (2012). Geography, choice and participation in higher education in England. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(1–2), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.07.004
11.
González CanchéM. S. (2018). Nearby college enrollment and geographical skills mismatch: (Re)conceptualizing student out-migration in the American higher education system. Journal of Higher Education, 89(6), 892–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1442637
12.
GriffithA. L., & RothsteinD. S. (2009). Can’t get there from here: The decision to apply to a selective college. Economics of Education Review, 28(5), 620–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.01.004
13.
GuzmanL. A.,, OviedoD., & RiveraC. (2017). Assessing equity in transport accessibility to work and study: The Bogotá region. Journal of Transport Geography, 58, 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.12.016
14.
HillmanN., & BolandW. C. (2019). Geography of college choice. In contemporary issues in higher education (1st ed., p. 13). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429438127-2/GEOGRAPHY-COLLEGE-CHOICE-NICHOLAS-HILLMAN-WILLIAM-CASEY-BOLAND
HillmanN. W. (2014). Differential impacts of college ratings: The case of education deserts[Unpublished paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison].
17.
HoyleB., & KnowlesR. (1998). Transport geography: An introduction. In Modern Transport Geography (2nd rev. ed.; pp. 1–12). John Wiley & Sons.
18.
Kerala Government. (2018). Decision of the meeting of the State Transport Authority. Transport Commissionerate, Government of Kerala.
19.
KlasikD.,, BlaggK., & PekorZ. (2018). Out of the education desert: How limited local college options are associated with inequity in postsecondary opportunities. Social Sciences, 7(9), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/SOCSCI7090165
20.
LinJ. J.,, HuangY. C., & HoC. L. (2014). School accessibility and academic achievement in a rural area of Taiwan. Children’s Geographies, 12(2), 232–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2013.812308
21.
LongB. T. (2004). How have college decisions changed over time? An application of the conditional logistic choice model. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1–2), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.004
22.
López TurleyR. N. (2009). College proximity: Mapping access to opportunity. Sociology of Education, 82(2), 126–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070908200202
23.
Ministry of Human Resource and Development. (2020). AISHE final report 2019–20. In MHRD, India. MHRD.
24.
Niti Ayog. (2021). Annual report 2021–2022-Niti Ayog. NITI AAYOG.
25.
NiuS. X., & TiendaM. (2008). Choosing colleges: Identifying and modeling choice sets. Social Science Research, 37(2), 416–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.06.015
26.
Nyoni. (2017). Factors affecting students’ academic achievement in Zimbabwe’s rural secondary schools: A case study of Marimasimbe Secondary School in Jiri community. Dynamic Research Journals’ Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(March), 1–15.
27.
OgechiI.,, SnookK.,, DavisB. M.,, HansenA. R.,, LiuF., & ZhangJ. (2016). Pet ownership and the risk of dying from cardiovascular disease among adults without major chronic medical conditions. High Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Prevention, 23(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-016-0156-1
28.
RobinsonJ. A. (2018). The curious case of so-called ‘higher education deserts.’James G Martin Center for Academic Renewal.
29.
RouseC. E. (1995). Democratization or diversion? The effect of community colleges on educational attainment. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(2), 217. https://doi.org/10.2307/1392376
30.
SchirmerH.,, OrrD., & GwoscC. (2017, February). Intelligence brief: Students’ commuting time its implications. Eurostudent project: Supporting the social dimension of higher education.
31.
SimisterJ. (2011). Assessing the ‘Kerala model’: Education is necessary but not sufficient. Journal of South Asian Development, 6(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/097317411100600101
32.
SkinnerB. T. (2019). Choosing college in the 2000s: An updated analysis using the conditional logistic choice model. Research in Higher Education, 60(2), 153–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9507-1
33.
SørensenE. S., & KampA. (2016). Does distance determine who is in higher education? (Munich Personal RePEc Archive Working Paper 74517). https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/74517/
34.
SponslerB. A., & HillmanN. (2016, April). Where you live rather than what you know ? The problem with education deserts. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brown-center-chalkboard/2016/04/11/where-you-live-rather-than-what-you-know-the-problem-with-education-deserts/
35.
TilakJ. B. G. (2001). Higher education and development in Kerala. In Center for Socio-Economic and Environmental Studies: Vol. February (Issue 5). http://csesindia.org/admin/modules/cms/docs/publication/5.pdf
36.
TilakJ. B. G. (2016). How is Kerala doing in higher education? Rajagiri Journal of Social Development, 8(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1570.7368
37.
TripathiH. (2019). Higher education in Kerala: Development, equity and issues of access. South Asia Research, 39(3/Suppl), 42S–60S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0262728019872054
38.
TurleyR. N. L. (2006). When parents want children to stay home for college. Research in Higher Education, 47(7), 823–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9017-4
39.
VargheseN. V.,, PanigrahiJ., & RohatgiA. (2018). Concentration of higher education institutions in India. Centre for Policy Research in Higher Education, 110016(October), 1–74.
40.
WhiteP. M., & LeeD. M. (2020). Geographic inequalities and access to higher education: Is the proximity to higher education institution associated with the probability of attendance in England?Research in Higher Education, 61(7), 825–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09563-x
