Recognizing the academic benefits of access to print for young children, book distribution programs abound in the United States. Designed to promote book ownership for low-income families, programs have unique delivery systems, leading to a largely fragmented policy. This article describes an urban city’s effort to build a coordinated book distribution program. Phase 1 examines the extent of book distributions, integrating data from 74 organizations and their branches (297). Using geographic information systems, we determined the spatialized patterns of scarcity and/or opportunity and the alignment between the intended and actual audience. In Phase 2, we conducted nine focus groups from neighborhoods receiving these book distributions. Results highlight the complexities of a well-intentioned policy and how multiple methods might inform policymaking in the future.
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2014). Literacy promotion: An essential component of pedriatric primary care. Pediatrics, 134(2), 404–408. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1384
BassokD.FinchJ.LeeR.ReardonS.WaldfogelJ. (2016). Socioeconomic gaps in early childhood experiences: 1998 to 2010. AERA Open, 2(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416653924
5.
BoothA.CarrollC.IlottI. (2013). Desperately seeking dissonance: Identifying the disconfirming case in qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 23(1), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312466295
6.
BradleyR.CaldwellB.CorwynR. (2003). The child care HOME inventories: Assessing the quality of family child care homes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 18(3), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0885-2006(03)00041-3
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
9.
BusA.Van IjzendoornM.PellegriniA. (1995). Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Review of Educational Research, 65(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170476
DaviesS.RizkJ. (2018). The three generations of cultural capital research: A narrative review. Review of Educational Research, 88(3), 331–365. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317748423
12.
de BondtM.WillenbergI.BusA. (2020). Do book giveaway programs promote the home literacy environment and children’s literacy-related behavior and skills. Review of Educational Research, 90(3), 349–375. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465320922140
13.
DowdallN.Melendez-TorresG.MurrayL.GardnerF.HartfordL.CooperP. (2020). Shared picture book reading interventions for child language development: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Development, 91(2), e383–e399. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13225
14.
DrummondK.StipekD. (2004). Low-income parents’ beliefs about their role in children’s academic learning. Elementary School Journal, 104(3), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1086/499749.
15.
ElwoodS. (2009). Multiple representations, significations and epistemologies in community-based GIS. In CopeM.ElwoodS. (Eds.), Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach (pp. 57–74). Sage.
16.
ElwoodS.CopeM. (2009). Qualitative GIS: Forging mixed methods through representations, analytical innovations, and conceptual engagements. In CopeM.ElwoodS. (Eds.), Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach (pp. 12–23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
EspinosaL.LaffeyJ.WhittakerT.ShengY. (2006). Technology in the home and the achievement of young children. Findings from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. Early Education and Development, 17(3), 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1703_5
18.
EvansM.KelleyJ.SikoraJ. (2014). Scholarly culture and academic performance. Social Forces, 92(4), 1573–1605. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sou030
19.
EvansM.KelleyJ.SikoraJ.TreimanD. (2010). Family scholarly culture and educational success: Books and schooling in 27 nations. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 28(2), 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2010.01.002.
20.
GauvainM.MunroeR. (2012). Cultural change, human activity, and cognitive development. Human Development, 55, 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339451.
GubaE. (1978). Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation. Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California, Los Angeles.
23.
GumpP. (1989). Ecological psychology and issues of play. In BlochM.PellegriniA. D. (Eds.), The ecological context of children’s play (pp. 35–56). Ablex.
24.
GuthrieJ.KlaudaS. (2014). Effects of classroom practices on reading comprehension, engagement, and motivations for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(4), 387–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.81
25.
HernandezD. (2011). Double jeopardy: How third-grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. Annie E. Casey Foundation.
26.
JargowskyP. (2014). Concentration of poverty in the new millennium. The Century Foundation and Rutgers Center for Urban Research and Education.
27.
JocsonK.Thorne-WallingtonE. (2013). Mapping literacy-rich environments: Geospatial perspectives on literacy and education. Teachers College Record, 115(6), 1–24.
28.
KimJ.WhiteT. (2008). Scaffolding voluntary summer reading for children in grades 3 to 5: An experimental study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701746849
29.
KraaykampG. (2003). Literary socialization and reading preferences. Effects of parents, the library, and the school. Poetics, 31(3–4), 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(03)00033-0
30.
KrugerA.TomaselloM. (2000). Cultural learning and learning culture. In OlsonD.TorranceN. (Eds.), Handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching, and schooling (pp. 355–371). Blackwell.
31.
LindsayJ. (2010). Children’s access to print material and education-related outcomes: Findings from a meta-analytic review. Learning Points Associates.
32.
LuoR.Tamis-LeMondaC.MendelsohnA. (2020). Children’s literacy experiences in low-income families: The content of books matters. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.263
33.
McFarlandJ.HussarB.WangX.ZhangJ.WangK.RathbunA.BarmerA.Forrest CataldiE.Bullock MannF. (2018). The condition of education 2018 (NCES 2018144). Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2018144
34.
McGill-FranzenA.AllingtonR.YokoiL.BrooksG. (1999). Putting books in the room seems necessary but not sufficient. Journal of Educational Research, 93(2), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679909597631
35.
MertonR.KendallP. (1946). The focused interview. American Journal of Sociology, 51(6), 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1086/219886
36.
MilesM.HubermanM. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
37.
MolS.BusA. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021890
38.
MolS.BusA.deJongM.SmeetsD. (2008). Added value of dialogic parent-child book readings: A meta-analysis. Early Education and Development, 19(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280701838603.
39.
MorrowL.WeinsteinC. (1986). Encouraging voluntary reading: The impact of a literature program on children’s use of library centers. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(3), 330–346. https://doi.org/10.2307/747713
40.
MyrbergE.RosenM. (2009). Direct and indirect effects of parents’ education on reading achievement among third graders in Sweden. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 695–711. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X453031
41.
NeedlmanR.KlassP.ZuckermanB. (2006). A pediatric approach to early literacy. In DickinsonD.NeumanS. B. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 333–346). Guilford Press.
42.
NeumanS. B. (1999). Books make a difference: A study of access to literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(3), 286–312. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.34.3.3
43.
NeumanS. B. (2017). The information book flood: Is additional exposure enough to support early literacy development?Elementary School Journal, 118(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1086/692913.
44.
NeumanS. B.CelanoD. (2012). Giving our children a fighting chance: Poverty, literacy, and the development of information capital. Teachers College Press.
45.
NeumanS. B.MolandN. (2019). Book deserts: The consequences of income segregation on children’s access to books. Urban Education, 54(1), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916654525
46.
OrfieldM. (2002). American metropolitics: The new suburban reality. Brookings Institution.
47.
OwensA.ReardonS.JencksC. (2016). Income segregation between schools and school districts. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216652722.
PriceL.BradleyB.SmithM. (2012). A comparison of preschool teachers’ talk during storybook and information book read-alouds. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(3), 426–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.02.003
50.
RidziF.SylviaM.QiaoX.CraigJ. (2017). The Imagination Library Program and kindergarten readiness: Evaluating the impact of monthly book distribution. Journal of Applied Social Science, 11(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1936724416678023
51.
RodriquezE.Tamis-LeMondaC. (2011). Trajectories of the home learning environment across the first 5 years: Associations with children’s vocabulary and literacy skills at prekindergarten. Child Development, 82(4), 1058–1075. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01614.x
52.
RogoffB. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press.
53.
RoweM. (2018). Understanding socioeconomic differences in parents’ speech to children. Child Development Perspectives, 12(2), 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12271
SadowskiM.WillsonV. (2006). Effects of a theoretically-based large-scale reading intervention in a multicultural urban school district. American Educational Research Journal, 43(1), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.2102/00028312043001137
SilinskasG.SenechalM.TorppaM.LerkkanenM. (2020). Home literacy activities and children’s reading skills, independent reading, and interest in literacy activities from kindergarten to grade 2. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01508
Tamis-LeMondaC.LuoR.McFaddenK.BandelE.VallottonC. (2019). Early home learning environment predicts children’s 5th grade academic skills. Applied Developmental Science, 23(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1345634
60.
TateW. F.IV. (2008). “Geography of opportunity”: Poverty, place and educational outcomes. Educational Researcher, 37(7), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08326409
61.
TateW. F.IVHogrebeM. (2011). From visuals to vision: Using GIS to inform civic dialogue about African American males. Race Ethnicity and Education, 14(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2011.531980
62.
TharpR.GallimoreR. (1988). Rousing minds to life. Cambridge University Press.
van BergenE.van ZuijenT.BishopD.de JongP. (2016). Why are home literacy environment and children’s reading skills associated? What parental skills reveal. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.160
65.
VukelichC. (1994). Effects of play interventions on young children’s reading of environmental print. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 9(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2006(94)90003-5
66.
WhiteT.KimJ.KingstonJ.ChenH.FosterL. (2014). Replicating the effects of a teacher-scaffolded voluntary summer reading program: The role of poverty. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.62
67.
WhitehurstG. J.FalcoF.LoniganJ.FischelJ.DeBarysheB.Valdez-MenchacaM.CaulfieldM. (1988). Accelerating language development through picture book reading. Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 552–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.4.552
68.
YoonE.GulsonK.LubienskiC. (2018). A brief history of the geography of educational policy: Ongoing conversations and generative tensions. AERA Open, 4(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418820940
69.
YoonE.LubienskiC. (2017). Thinking critically in space: Toward a mixed-method geospatial approach to education policy analysis. Educational Researcher, 47(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X1773728.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
