First-year courses have been used to bolster college student success, but empirical evidence on their efficacy is mixed. We investigated whether a first-year science of learning course, focused on self-regulated learning, would benefit first-generation college students. We randomly assigned students to a treatment condition involving enrollment in the course, a comparison condition in which students had access to online course materials only, or a control condition. From this larger study, we recruited 43 students to participate in a laboratory task involving learning about the circulatory system with a computer. We found that treatment and comparison students experienced greater changes in conceptual knowledge than the control group, and we found differences in the enactment of monitoring and strategy use across conditions.
AdesopeO. O.TrevisanD. A.SundararajanN. (2017). Rethinking the use of tests: A meta-analysis of practice testing. Review of Educational Research, 87, 659–701.
2.
AlexanderP. A. (2013). Calibration: What is it and why it matters? An introduction to the special issue on calibrating calibration. Learning and Instruction, 24, 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.10.003
3.
AlexanderP. A.DinsmoreD. L.ParkinsonM. M.WintersF. I. (2011). Self-regulated learning in academic domains. In ZimmermanB.SchunkD. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 393–407). New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
AzevedoR. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 199–209.
5.
AzevedoR.CromleyJ. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia?Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 523–535.
6.
AzevedoR.GuthrieJ. T.SeibertD. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 87–111.
7.
AzevedoR.JohnsonA.BurkettC. (2015, July). Does training of cognitive and metacognitive regulatory processes enhance learning and deployment of processes with hypermedia?Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Pasadena, CA.
8.
AzevedoR.MoosD. C.GreeneJ. A.WintersF. I.CromleyJ. C. (2008). Why is externally regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia?Educational Technology Research & Development, 56, 45–72.
9.
BannertM.MengelkampC. (2008). Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted: Does the verbalization method affect learning?Metacognition and Learning, 3, 39–58.
10.
BannertM.ReimannP.SonnenbergC. (2014). Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students’ self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9, 161–185.
11.
BarefootB. O. (1992). Helping first-year college students climb the academic ladder: Report of a national survey of freshman seminar programming in American higher education (Doctoral dissertation, College of William and Mary). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1790&context=etd
12.
BartonA.DonahueC. (2009). Multiple assessments of a first-year seminar pilot. JGE: The Journal of General Education, 58, 259–278.
13.
Ben-EliyahuA.BernackiM. L. (2015). Addressing complexities in self-regulated learning: A focus on contextual factors, contingencies, and dynamic relations. Metacognition and Learning, 10, 1–13.
14.
BernackiM. L. (2018). Examining the cyclical, loosely sequenced, and contingent features of self-regulated learning: Trace data and their analysis. In SchunkD. H.GreeneJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 370–387). New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
Binbasaran TüysüzoğluB.GreeneJ. A. (2015). An investigation of the role of contingent metacognitive behavior in self-regulated learning. Metacognition & Learning, 10, 77–98.
16.
BjorkR. A.DunloskyJ.KornellN. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444.
17.
BlackA.TerryN.BuhlerT. (2016). The impact of specialized courses on student retention as part of the freshman experience. Allied Academies International Conference: Academy of Educational Leadership, 20, 85–92.
18.
BuiK. V. T. (2002). First-generation college students at a four-year university: Background characteristics, reasons for pursuing higher education, and first-year experience. College Student Journal, 36, 3–11.
19.
CahalanM.PernaL. (2015). Indicators of higher education equity in the United States: 45 year trend report. Washington, DC: The Pell Institute.
20.
Cambridge-WilliamsT.WinslerA.KitsantasA.BernardE. (2013). University 100 orientation courses and living-learning communities boost academic retention and graduation via enhanced self-efficacy and self-regulated learning. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 15, 243–268.
21.
ChenP.ChavezO.OngD. C.GundersonB. (2017). Strategic resource use for learning: A self-administered intervention that guides self-reflection on effective resource use enhances academic performance. Psychological Science, 18, 774–785.
22.
ChenX. (2005). First generation students in postsecondary education: A look at their college transcripts (NCES 2005-171). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
23.
ChiM. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271–315.
24.
ChoyS. (2001). Students whose parents did not go to college: Postsecondary access, persistence, and attainment (NCES 2001-126). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
25.
ClearyT. J.KitsantasA. (2017). Motivation and self-regulated learning influences on middle school mathematics achievement. School Psychology Review, 46, 88–107.
26.
ConeA. L. (1991). Sophomore academic retention associated with a freshman study skills and college adjustment course. Psychological Reports, 69, 312–314.
27.
ConeA. L.OwensS. K. (1991). Academic and locus of control enhancement in a freshman study skills and college adjustment course. Psychological Reports, 68(3 Suppl.), 1211–1217.
28.
De BackerL.Van KeerH.ValckeM. (2014). Promoting university students’ metacognitive regulation through peer learning: The potential of reciprocal peer tutoring. Higher Education, 70, 469–486.
29.
DeekensV. M.GreeneJ. A.LobczowskiN. G. (2018). Monitoring and depth of strategy use in computer-based learning environments for science and history. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 63–79.
30.
DemetriouC. (2014). Reflections at the finish line: The activities, roles, and relationships of college success for first-generation college students. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/concern/dissertations/cj82k8251
31.
DemetriouC.MeeceJ.Eaker-RichD.PowellC. (2017). The activities, roles, and relationships of successful first-generation college students. The Journal of College Student Development, 58, 19–36.
32.
DentA. L.KoenkaA. C. (2016). The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 425–474.
33.
DignathC.BüttnerG. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students: A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231–264.
34.
DinsmoreD. L. (2017). Strategic processing in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
DinsmoreD. L.AlexanderP. A. (2016). A multidimensional investigation of deep-level and surface-level processing. Journal of Experimental Education, 84, 213–244.
36.
DunloskyJ.RawsonK. A.MarshE. J.NathanM. J.WillinghamD. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4–58.
37.
DunloskyJ.ThiedeK. W. (2013). Four cornerstones of calibration research: Why understanding students’ judgments can improve their achievement. Learning and Instruction, 24, 58–61.
38.
DweckC. S.MasterA. (2008). Self-theories motivate self-regulated learning. In SchunkD.ZimmermanB. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 31–51). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
EomW.ReiserR. A. (2000). The effects of self-regulation and instructional control on performance and motivation in computer-based instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27, 247–260.
40.
EricssonK. A.SimonH. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251.
41.
EricssonK. A.SimonH. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
42.
ForsterB.SwallowC.FodorJ. H.FouslerJ. E. (1999). Effects of a college study skills course on at-risk first-year students. NASPA Journal, 36, 120–132.
43.
Gamez-VargasJ.OlivaM. (2013). Adult guidance for college: Rethinking educational practice to foster socially-just college success for all. Journal of College Admission, 221, 60–68.
44.
GarriottP. O.HudymaA.KeeneC.SantiagoD. (2015). Social cognitive predictors of first- and non-first-generation college students’ academic & life satisfaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62, 253–263.
45.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.MacArthurC.SantangeloT. (2018). Self-regulation and writing. In SchunkD. H.GreeneJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 138–152). New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
GreeneJ. A. (2018). Self-regulation in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
47.
GreeneJ. A.AzevedoR. (2007). Adolescents’ use of self-regulatory processes and their relation to qualitative mental model shifts while using hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36, 125–148.
48.
GreeneJ. A.AzevedoR. (2009). A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of sophisticated mental models. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 18–29.
49.
GreeneJ. A.BolickC. M.JacksonW. P.CaprinoA. M.OswaldC.McVeaM. (2015). Domain-specificity of self-regulated learning processing in science and history. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 111–128.
50.
GreeneJ. A.CopelandD. Z.DeekensV. M.YuS. (2018). Beyond knowledge: Examining digital literacy’s role in the acquisition of understanding in science. Computers & Education, 117, 141–159.
51.
GreeneJ. A.CostaL.-J.DellingerK. (2011). Analysis of self-regulated learning processing using statistical models for count data. Metacognition & Learning, 6, 275–301.
52.
GreeneJ. A.CostaL.-J.RobertsonJ.PanY.DeekensV. (2010). Exploring relations among college students’ prior knowledge, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning in a hypermedia environment. Computers & Education, 55, 1027–1043.
53.
GreeneJ. A.DeekensV. M.CopelandD. Z.YuS. (2018). Capturing and modeling self-regulated learning using think-aloud protocols. In SchunkD. H.GreeneJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 323–337). New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
GreeneJ. A.RobertsonJ.CostaL.-J. C. (2011). Assessing self-regulated learning using think-aloud protocol methods. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 313–328). New York, NY: Routledge.
55.
HammerD.BerlandL. K. (2014). Confusing claims for data: A critique of common practices for presenting qualitative research on learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 37–46.
56.
HattieJ.BiggsJ.PurdieN. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136.
57.
HerrenkohlL. R.CorneliusL. (2013). Investigating elementary students’ scientific and historical argumentation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22, 413–461.
58.
HoferB. K.YuS. L. (2003). Teaching self-regulated learning through a “learning to learn” course. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 30–33.
59.
HonigM. I. (2009). What works in defining “what works” in educational improvement: Lessons from education policy implementation research, directions for future research. In SykesG.SchneiderB.PlankD. N (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 333–347). New York, NY: Routledge.
60.
JohnsonA.AzevedoR.D’MelloS. (2011). The temporal and dynamic nature of self-regulatory processes during independent and externally assisted hypermedia learning. Cognition and Instruction, 29, 471–504.
61.
KarabenickS. A.ZushoA. (2015). Examining approaches to research on self-regulated learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 10, 151–163.
62.
KauffmanD. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 139–161.
63.
KenaG.Musu-GilletteL.RobinsonJ.WangX.RathbunA.ZhangJ.Wilkinson-FlickerS.BarmerA.Dunlop VelezE. (2015). The condition of education 2015 (NCES 2015-144). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
64.
KinzieJ.KuhG. (2016, November). Report prepared for the Lumina Foundation: Review of student success frameworks to mobilize higher education. Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Postsecondary Research.
65.
KramarskiB.MizrachiN. (2006). Online discussion and self-regulated learning: Effects of instructional methods on mathematical literacy. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 218–230.
66.
LauffE.IngelsS. J. (2013). Education longitudinal study of 2002 (ELS: 2002): A first look at 2002 high school sophomores 10 years later (NCES 2014-363). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
67.
LohfinkM. M.PaulsenM. M. (2005). Comparing the determinants of persistence for first-generation and continuing-generation students. Journal of College Student Development46, 409–428.
68.
McKinleyB.BrayboyJ. (2004). Hiding in the ivy: American Indian students and visibility in elite educational settings. Harvard Educational Review, 74, 125–152.
69.
Microsoft Corporation. (2007). Encarta premium. [Computer software]. Redmond, WA: Microsoft.
70.
MillerJ. W.LesikS. S. (2014). College persistence over time and participation in a first-year seminar. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 16, 373–390.
71.
MoosD. C. (2013). Examining hypermedia learning: The role of cognitive load and self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 22, 39–61.
72.
MoosD. C.AzevedoR. (2008). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: The role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 270–298.
73.
MoralesE. E. (2014). Learning from success: How original research on academic resilience informs what college faculty can do to increase the retention of low socioeconomic status students. International Journal of Higher Education, 3, 92–102.
74.
MullenC. A. (2011). Facilitating self-regulated learning using mentoring approaches with doctoral students. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 137–152). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
75.
NeitzelC.ConnorL. (2017). Messages from the milieu: Classroom instruction and context influences on elementary school students’ self-regulated learning behaviors. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 31, 548–560.
76.
ParisS. G.ParisA. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 89–101.
77.
PermzadianV.CredéM. (2016). Do first-year seminars improve college grades and retention? A quantitative review of their overall effectiveness and an examination of moderators of effectiveness. Review of Educational Research, 86, 277–316.
78.
PernaL. W.ThomasS. L. (2006). Commissioned report for the national symposium on postsecondary student success: Spearheading a dialog on student-success, a framework for reducing the college success gap and promoting success for all. Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.
79.
PerryN. E.WinneP. H. (2006). Learning from learning kits: gStudy traces of students’ self-regulated engagements with computerized content. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 211–228.
80.
PikeG. R.KuhG. D. (2005). First- and second-generation college students: A comparison of their engagement and intellectual development. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 276–300.
81.
PintrichP. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
82.
PintrichP. R.SmithD. A. F.GarciaT.McKeachieW. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
83.
PorterS. R.SwingR. L. (2006). Understanding how first-year seminars affect persistence. Research in Higher Education, 47, 89–109.
84.
RedfordJ.HoyerK. M. (2017). First-generation and continuing-generation college students: A comparison of high school and postsecondary experiences. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
85.
RogersonC. L.PoockM. C. (2013). Differences in populating first year seminars and the impact on retention and course effectiveness. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 15, 157–172.
86.
ScheiterK.SchubertC.SchülerA. (2018). Self-regulated learning from illustrated text: Eye movement modelling to support use and regulation of cognitive processes during learning from multimedia. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 80–94.
87.
SchellingsG.Van Hout-WoltersB. H. (2011). Measuring strategy use with self-report instruments: Theoretical and empirical considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 6, 83–90.
88.
SchunkD. H.GreeneJ. A. (2018). Historical, contemporary, and future perspectives on self-regulated learning and performance. In SchunkD. H.GreeneJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Routledge.
89.
StephensN. M.MarkusH. R.FrybergS. A.JohnsonC. S.CovarrubiasR. (2015). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 420–429.
90.
StrayhornT. L. (2013). Academic achievement: A higher education perspective. In HattieJ.AndermanE. M. (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 16–18). New York, NY: Routledge.
91.
TrevorsG.Feyzi-BehnaghR.AzevedoR.BouchetF. (2016). Self-regulated learning processes vary as a function of epistemic beliefs and contexts: Mixed method evidence from eye tracking and concurrent and retrospective reports. Learning and Instruction, 42, 31–46.
92.
TuckmanB. W.KennedyG. J. (2011). Teaching learning strategies to increase success of first-term college students. Journal of Experimental Education, 79, 478–504.
VandeveldeS.Van KeerH.SchellingsG.Van Hout-WoltersB. (2015). Using think-aloud protocol analysis to gain in-depth insights into upper primary school children’s self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 11–30.
95.
VeenmanM. V. J. (2007). The assessment and instruction of self-regulation in computer-based environments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 2(2–3), 177–183.
96.
VeenmanM. V. J. (2011a). Alternative assessment of strategy use with self-report instruments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 6, 205–211.
97.
VeenmanM. V. J. (2011b). Learning to self-monitor and self-regulate. In MayerR.AlexanderP. (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 197–218). New York, NY: Routledge.
98.
VeenmanM. V. J.ElshoutJ. J.GroenM. G. M. (1993). Thinking aloud: Does it affect regulatory processes in learning?Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 18, 322–330.
99.
WeinsteinC. E.AceeT. W. (2013). Helping college students become more strategic and self-regulated learners. In BembenuttyH.ClearyT. J.KitsantasA. (Eds.), Applications of self-regulated learning across diverse disciplines (pp. 197–236). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Press.
100.
WhippJ. L.ChiarelliS. (2004). Self-regulation in a web-based course: A case study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 52(4), 5–22.
101.
WingateU. (2007). A framework for transition: Supporting “learning to learn” in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 61, 391–405.
102.
WinneP. H. (2018). Cognition and metacognition within self-regulated learning. In SchunkD. H.GreeneJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 36–48). New York, NY: Routledge.
103.
WinneP. H.HadwinA. F. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In SchunkD.ZimmermanB. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 297–314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
104.
WinneP. H.PerryN. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
105.
WintersF. I.AzevedoR. (2005). High-school students’ regulation of learning during computer-based science inquiry. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33, 189–217.
106.
WintersF. I.GreeneJ. A.CostichC. M. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 429–444.
107.
YoungD. G.HoppJ. M. (2014). 2012–2013 National survey of first-year seminars: Exploring high-impact practices in the first college year (Research Report No. 4). Columbia: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.
108.
ZepedaC. D.RicheyJ. E.RonevichP.Nokes-MalachT. J. (2015). Direct instruction of metacognition benefits adolescent science learning, transfer, and motivation: An in vivo study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 954–970.
109.
ZerrR. J.BjerkeE. (2016). Using multiple sources of data to gauge outcome differences between academic-themed and transition-themed first-year seminars. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 18, 68–82.
110.
ZimmermanB. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48, 135–147.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
