Objective: This study examines whether there are differences among first-generation and continuing-generation community college students in the importance they place on achieving college-related goals and difficulties they face from college- and other life-related challenges. Methods: Data were drawn from the Community College Libraries and Academic Support for Student Success student survey. Results: Results from MANCOVA show that, after adjusting for age, gender identity, U.S. birth status, and race/ethnicity, first-generation college students (FGCSs) place more importance on achieving college-related goals and face greater difficulties from college- and other life-related challenges than continuing-generation college students (CGCSs). Contributions: These findings indicate that community colleges should offer more support to FGCSs pertaining to students’ goals and challenges so that all community college students may be successful in their academic pursuits. Future research should explore interaction effects among student demographics and their goals and challenges as well as interventions to support community college students. This is because community colleges enroll the largest number of FGCSs compared to other institutions of higher education, and FGCSs and community college students share challenges when it comes to obtaining a college degree.
BetancourtN.Wolff-EisenbergC. (2019, October24). Surveying community college students: Strategies for maximizing engagement and increasing participation. Ithaka S+R. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.312046
2.
BlanksteinM.Wolff-EisenbergC.Braddlee. (2018). Community college libraries & academic support for student success survey, United States, 2018 (ICPSR 37864) [Data set]. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37864.v2
3.
BlanksteinM.Wolff-EisenbergC.Braddlee. (2019, September30). Student needs are academic needs: Community college libraries and academic support for student success. Ithaka S+R. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.311913
4.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S.. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). SAGE.
5.
BryanE.SimmonsL. A. (2009). Family involvement: Impacts on post-secondary educational success for first-generation Appalachian college students. Journal of College Student Development, 50(4), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0081
6.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
7.
CollierP. J.MorganD. L. (2008). “Is that paper really due today?”: Differences in first- generation and traditional college students’ understandings of faculty expectations. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 55(4), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9065-5
8.
GarriottP. O.HudymaA.KeeneC.SantiagoD. (2015). Social cognitive predictors of first- and non-first-generation college students’ academic and life satisfaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(2), 253–263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cou0000066
9.
GarriottP. O.NisleS. (2018). Stress, coping, and perceived academic goal progress in first-generation college students: The role of institutional supports. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 11(4), 436–450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000068
10.
GlaessgenT. A.MacGregorC. J.Cornelius-WhiteJ. H. D.HornbergerR. S.BaumannD. M. (2018). First-generation students with undecided majors: A qualitative study of university reacculturation, NACADA Journal, 38(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.12930/NACADA-16-030
11.
HarlowA. J.BowmanS. L. (2016). Examining the career decision self-efficacy and career maturity of community college and first-generation students. Journal of Career Development, 43(6), 512–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845316633780
12.
HottingerJ. A.RoseC. P. (2006). Chapter 6: First-generation college students. In GohnL. A.AlbinG. R.. (Eds.), Understanding college student subpopulations: A guide for student affairs professionals (pp. 115–134). National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (NASPA), Inc.
13.
HouseL. A.NealC.KolbJ. (2020). Supporting the mental health needs of first generation college students. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 34(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/87568225.2019.1578940
14.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criterion for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
15.
IrlbeckE.AdamsS.AkersC.BurrisS.JonesS. (2014). First generation college students: Motivations and support systems. Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(2), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.02154
16.
JenkinsJ. J.SánchezL. A.SchraedleyM. A. K.HannansJ.NavickN.YoungJ. (2020). Textbook broke: Textbook affordability as a social justice issue. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.549
17.
KatrevichA. V.ArugueteM. S. (2017). Recognizing challenges and predicting success in first-generation university students. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 18(2), 40–44. https://jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM
18.
LipsonS. K.PhillipsM. V.WinquistN.EisenbergD.LattieE. G. (2021). Mental health conditions among community college students: A national study of prevalence and use of treatment services. Psychiatric Services, 72(10), 1126–1133. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.202000437
19.
LittleR. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
20.
MacCallumR. C.BrownM. W.SugawaraH. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
21.
McBrideP. E. (2019). Addressing the lack of mental health services for at-risk students at a two-year community college: A contemporary review. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 43(2), 146-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2017.1409670
22.
MoschettiR. V.HudleyC. (2015). Social capital and academic motivation among first- generation community college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 39(3), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2013.819304
23.
MuseusS. D.ChangT.-H. (2021). The impact of campus environments on sense of belonging for first-generation college students. Journal of College Student Development, 62(3), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2021.0039
24.
ParnesM. F.Suárez-OrozcoC.Osei-TwumasiO.SchwartzS. E. O. (2020). Academic outcomes among diverse community college students: What is the role of instructor relationships?. Community College Review, 48(3), 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552120909908
RoyS. N.BargmannR. E. (1958). Tests of multiple independence and the associated confidence bounds. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177706624
27.
SchelbeL.BeckerM. S.SpinelliC.McCrayD. (2019). First generation college students’ perceptions of an academic retention program. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 19(5), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v19i5.24300
28.
SpencerM. B.LodatoB. N.SpencerC.RichL.GraziulC.English-ClarkeT. (2019). Chapter four – Innovating resilience promotion: Integrating cultural practices, social ecologies and development-sensitive conceptual strategies for advancing child well-being. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 57, 101–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2019.05.005
29.
StebletonM. J.SoriaK. M.HuesmanR. L.Jr. (2014). First-generation students’ sense of belonging, mental health, and use of counseling services at public research universities. Journal of College Counseling, 17, 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.2014.00044.x
30.
StephensN. M.HamedaniM. G.DestinM. (2014). Closing the social-class achievement gap: A difference-education intervention improves first-generation students’ academic performance and all students’ college transition. Psychological Science, 25(4), 943–953. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613518349
31.
SyS. R.FongK.CarterR.BoehmeJ.AlpertA. (2011). Parent support and stress among first-generation and continuing-generation female students during the transition to college. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 13(3), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.13.3.g
32.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
33.
TateK. A.CapertonW.KaiserD.PruittN. T.WhiteH.HallE. (2015). An exploration of first-generation college students’ career development beliefs and experiences. Journal of Career Development, 42(4), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845314565025
34.
WangT. R. (2014). “I’m the only person from where I’m from to go to college”: Understanding the memorable messages first-generation college students receive from parents. Journal of Family Communication, 14(3), 270–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2014.908195
35.
WibrowskiC. R.MatthewsW. K.KitsantasA. (2016). The role of a Skills Learning Support Program on first-generation college students’ self-regulation, motivation, and academic achievement: A longitudinal study. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(3), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025116629152
36.
Wolff-EisenbergC.Braddlee. (2018a). Community college libraries and academic support for student success. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(2018), 872–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.10.004
37.
Wolff-EisenbergC.Braddlee. (2018b, August13). Amplifying student voices: The community college libraries and academic support for student success project. Ithaka S+R. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.308086
