Education entails conflicting perspectives about its subject matter. In the late 1980s, the conflict developed into a war between interpretive and causal paradigms. Did the confrontation result in a balance between these warring sides? We use text analysis to identify research trends in 137,024 dissertation abstracts from 1980 to 2010 and relate these to students’ academic employment outcomes. Topics associated with the interpretive approach rose in popularity, while the outcomes-oriented paradigm declined. Academic employment remained stably associated with topics in the interpretive approach, but their effect is moderated by the prestige of the students’ institutions. The relation between topic popularity and employability provides insight into field change and how the benefits of cultural shifts fall along the lines of institutional power.
AlexanderJ. C. (1988). The new theoretical movement. In SmelserN. (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (pp. 77–101). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
AndersonA.McFarlandD.JurafskyD. (2012, July). Towards a computational history of the ACL: 1980–2008. In Proceedings of the ACL-2012 special workshop on “Rediscovering 50 Years of Discoveries” (pp. 13–21). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
3.
BaezB.BoylesD. (2009). The politics of inquiry: Education research and the culture of science. Albany: SUNY Press.
4.
BailC. A. (2014). The cultural environment: Measuring culture with big data. Theory and Society, 43, 465–482. doi:10.1007/s11186-014-9216-5
5.
BailC. A.BrownT. W.MannM. (2017). Channeling hearts and minds: Advocacy organizations, cognitive-emotional currents, and public conversation. American Sociological Review, 82, 1188–1213. doi:10.1177/0003122417733673
6.
BallD. L.ForzaniF. M. (2007). 2007Wallace Foundation Distinguished Lecture: What makes education research “educational”?Educational Researcher, 36, 529–540. doi:10.3102/0013189X07312896
7.
Barnhouse WaltersP.LareauA.RanisS. (Eds.). (2009). Education research on trial: Policy reform and the call for scientific rigor. New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
BelcherD. D. (2009). How research space is created in a diverse research world. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 221–234. doi:10.1016/j.jslw .2009.08.001
9.
BleiD. M.LaffertyJ. D. (2007). A correlated topic model of science. Annals of Applied Statistics, 1, 17–35. doi:10.1214/07-AOAS114
10.
BoalerJ. (2008). When politics took the place of inquiry: A response to the National Mathematics Advisory Panel’s review of instructional practices. Educational Researcher, 37, 588–594. doi:10.3102/0013189X08327998
11.
BourdieuP. (1988). Homo academicus. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
BourdieuP. (1991a). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
BourdieuP. (1991b). The peculiar history of scientific reason. Sociological Forum, 6, 3–26. doi:10.1007/BF01112725
14.
BourdieuP. (1991c). The political ontology of Martin Heidegger. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
BourdieuP. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
BourdieuP. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity. Cambridge, England: Polity.
17.
BourdieuP.ChamboredonJ. C.PasseronJ. C. (1991). The craft of sociology: Epistemological preliminaries. New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110856460
18.
BridgesD. (2003). The discipline(s) of educational research. In Fiction written under oath? Essays in philosophy and educational research (pp. 33–50). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
19.
CalińskiT.HarabaszJ. (1974). A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 3, 1–27. doi:10.1080/03610927408827101
20.
CasanaveC. P. (2010). Taking risks? A case study of three doctoral students writing qualitative dissertations at an American university in Japan. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2009.12.002
21.
ClemensE. S.PowellW. W.McIlwaineK.OkamotoD. (1995). Careers in print: Books, journals, and scholarly reputations. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 433–494. doi:10.1086/230730
22.
Cochran-SmithM.LytleS. L. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2–11.
23.
CollinsR. (2002). The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
24.
CubanL. (2016). Education researchers, AERA presidents, and reforming the practice of schooling, 1916–2016. Educational Researcher, 45, 134–141.
25.
Danescu-Niculescu-MizilC.LeeL.PangB.KleinbergJ. (2012, April). Echoes of power: Language effects and power differences in social interaction. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 699–708). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
26.
DonmoyerR. (1996). Educational research in an era of paradigm proliferation: What’s a journal editor to do?Educational Researcher, 25(2), 19–25.
DonmoyerR. (2006). Take my paradigm . . . please! The legacy of Kuhn’s construct in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 1. doi:10.1080/09518390500450177
29.
EmirbayerM.JohnsonV. (2008). Bourdieu and organizational analysis. Theory and Society, 37, 1–44.
30.
EricksonF. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In WittrockM. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York, NY: Macmillan
31.
EvansJ. A.AcevesP. (2016). Machine translation: Mining text for social theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 42(1), 21–50.
32.
FarrellJ. (2016). Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U S A, 113, 92–97. doi:10.1073/pnas.1509433112
33.
FlodenR. E. (2001). Research on effects of teaching: A continuing model for research on teaching. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 3–16). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
34.
FosterJ. G.RzhetskyA.EvansJ. A. (2015). Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies. American Sociological Review, 80, 875–908. doi:10.1177/0003122415601618
35.
FoucaultM. (2013). Archaeology of knowledge. London, England: Routledge.
36.
FrickelS.GrossN. (2005). A general theory of scientific/intellectual movements. American Sociological Review, 70, 204–232. doi:10.1177/000312240507000202
37.
GageN. L. (Ed.). (1963). Handbook of research on teaching: A project of the American Educational Research Association (1 ed.). New York, NY: Rand McNally.
38.
GageN. L. (1989). The paradigm wars and their aftermath: A “historical” sketch of research on teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher, 18(7), 4–10.
GitomerD.BellC. (2016). Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. doi:10.3102/978-0-935302-48-6
42.
GopaulB. (2015). Inequality and doctoral education: Exploring the “rules” of doctoral study through Bourdieu’s notion of field. Higher Education, 70, 73–88. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9824-z
43.
GorardG. (2004). Combining methods in educational and social research. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
44.
GordonP. (1996). Introduction. In GordonP. (Ed.), A guide to educational research (pp. vii–x). Thousand Oaks, CA: Routledge.
45.
GrenfellM.JamesD. (2004). Change in the field—changing the field: Bourdieu and the methodological practice of educational research. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25, 507–523. doi:10.1080/014256904200026989
46.
GrimmerJ.StewartB. M. (2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis, 21, 267–297. doi:10.1093/pan/mps028
47.
HackingI. (2006). The emergence of probability: A philosophical study of early ideas about probability, induction and statistical inference. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511817557
48.
HallD.JurafskyD.ManningC. D. (2008, October). Studying the history of ideas using topic models. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 363–371). New York, NY: Association for Computational Linguistics.
49.
HeibergerR.Munoz-Najar GalvezS.McFarlandD. (2018, December). Rhetorics and reproduction: Field change in U.S. sociology 1980–2015. Paper presented at the 2nd European Symposium on Societal Challenges in Computational Social Science: Bias and Discrimination, Cologne, Germany.
50.
HofstraB.CortenR.Van TubergenF.EllisonN. B. (2017). Sources of segregation in social networks: A novel approach using Facebook. American Sociological Review, 82, 625–656.
51.
HofstraB.de SchipperN. C. (2018). Predicting ethnicity with first names in online social media networks. Big Data & Society, 5(1). doi:10.1177/2053951718761141
52.
HolmS. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
53.
InglisM.FosterC. (2018). Five decades of mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49, 462–500. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.49.4.0462
54.
JacobsM. D.SpillmanL. (2005). Cultural sociology at the crossroads of the discipline. Poetics, 33, 1–14.
55.
KamlerB.ThomsonP. (2008). The failure of dissertation advice books: Toward alternative pedagogies for doctoral writing. Educational Researcher, 37, 507–514. doi:10.3102/0013189X08327390
56.
Knorr-CetinaK. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
LabareeD. F. (2004). The trouble with ed schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
58.
LabareeD. F. (2012). Someone has to fail. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59.
LagemannE. C. (1997). Contested terrain: A history of education research in the United States, 1890–1990. Educational Researcher, 26(9), 5–17.
60.
LatherP. (2004). This is your father’s paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 15–34. doi:10.1177/1077800403256154
61.
LatourB. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
LeeM.MartinJ. L. (2015). Coding, counting and cultural cartography. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 3, 1–33. doi:10.1057/ajcs.2014.13
63.
LillisT.TuckJ. (2016). Academic literacies: A critical lens on writing and reading in the academy. In HylandK.ShawP. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 30–43). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
64.
LizardoO.StrandM. (2010). Skills, toolkits, contexts and institutions: Clarifying the relationship between different approaches to cognition in cultural sociology. Poetics, 38, 205–228. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2009.11.003
65.
LucasC.NielsenR. A.RobertsM. E.StewartB. M.StorerA.TingleyD. (2015). Computer-assisted text analysis for comparative politics. Political Analysis, 23, 254–277. doi:10.1093/pan/mpu019
66.
LucasL. (2006). The research game in academic life. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
67.
MackenzieN.KnipeS. (2006). Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues in Educational Research, 16, 193–205.
68.
MannheimK. (2013). Ideology and utopia. London, England: Routledge.
69.
McDonnellL. M. (2016). Evolving research perspectives on education politics and policy. Educational Researcher, 45, 142–148.
70.
McFarlandD. A.RamageD.ChuangJ.HeerJ.ManningC. D.JurafskyD. (2013). Differentiating language usage through topic models. Poetics, 41, 607–625. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2013.06.004
71.
MoodC. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26, 67–82. doi:10.1093/esr/jcp006
72.
MossP. A.HaertelE. H. (2016). Engaging methodological pluralism. In GitomerB.BellC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5 ed., pp. 127–247). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. doi:10.3102/978-0-935302-48-6_3
73.
MossP. A.PhillipsD. C.EricksonF. D.FlodenR. E.LatherP. A.SchneiderB. L. (2009). Learning from our differences: A dialogue across perspectives on quality in education research. Educational Researcher, 38, 501–517. doi:10.3102/0013189X09348351
74.
MunksgaardR.DemantJ. (2016). Mixing politics and crime: The prevalence and decline of political discourse on the cryptomarket. International Journal of Drug Policy, 35, 77–83. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.04.021
75.
MünchR. (2014). Academic capitalism: Universities in the global struggle for excellence. New York, NY: Routledge.
76.
National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
77.
ParéA.Starke-MeyerringD.McAlpineL. (2011). Knowledge and identity work in the supervision of doctoral student writing: Shaping rhetorical subjects. In Starke-MeyerringD.ParéA.ArtemevaN. (Eds.), Writing in knowledge societies (pp. 215–236). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
78.
PaytonM. E.GreenstoneM. H.SchenkerN. (2003). Overlapping confidence intervals or standard error intervals: What do they mean in terms of statistical significance?Journal of Insect Science, 3, 34. doi:10.1093/jis/3.1.34
79.
PolaninJ. R.Tanner-SmithE. E.HennessyE. A. (2016). Estimating the difference between published and unpublished effect sizes: A meta-review. Review of Educational Research, 86, 207–236. doi:10.3102/0034654315582067
80.
RichardsonV. (Ed.). (2001). Preface. In Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. ix–xii). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
81.
RobertsM. E.StewartB. M.AiroldiE. M. (2016). A model of text for experimentation in the social sciences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111(515), 988–1003. doi:10.1080/01621459.2016.1141684
82.
RobertsM. E.StewartB. M.TingleyD.LucasC.Leder-LuisJ.GadarianS. K.. . . RandD. G. (2014). Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1064–1082. doi:10.1111/ajps.12103
83.
RzhetskyA.FosterJ. G.FosterI. T.EvansJ. A. (2015). Choosing experiments to accelerate collective discovery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U S A, 112, 14569–14574. doi:10.1073/pnas.1509757112
84.
ShannonC. E. (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423. doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
85.
ShiF.FosterJ. G.EvansJ. A. (2015). Weaving the fabric of science: Dynamic network models of science’s unfolding structure. Social Networks, 43, 73–85. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2015.02.006
86.
ShulmanL. (1986) Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In WittrockM. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3–36). New York, NY: Macmillan.
87.
StevensM. L.ArmstrongE. A.ArumR. (2008). Sieve, incubator, temple, hub: Empirical and theoretical advances in the sociology of higher education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 127–151. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134737
88.
StevensM. L.Gebre-MedhinB. (2016). Association, service, market: Higher education in American political development. Annual Review of Sociology, 42, 121–142. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074240
89.
SwidlerA. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273–286.
90.
ToulminS. (1972). Rationality and scientific discovery. In SchaffnerK. F.CohenR. S. (Eds.), PSA: Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (pp. 387–406). Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.
91.
TurnerJ. H. (2016). Academic journals and sociology’s big divide: A modest but radical proposal. The American Sociologist, 47, 289–301.
92.
Umana-TaylorA. J. (2001). Ethnic identity development among Mexican-origin Latino adolescents living in the US (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri, Columbia.
WilsonE. (2017). Foreword. In WilsonE. (Ed.), School-based research: A guide for education students. (pp. xii–xiv). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
95.
WolfeA. (1990). Books vs. articles: Two ways of publishing sociology. Sociological Forum, 5(3), 477–489. doi:10.1007/BFO1115097
96.
WillinskyJ. (2001). The strategic education research program and the public value of research. Educational Researcher, 30(1), 5–14.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
