Many argue that the California Master Plan for Higher Education is no longer effective in meeting the needs of students. This policy analysis assesses the impact of California higher education policy on the state’s community colleges that are considered minority-serving institutions (MSIs). Using longitudinal data to determine how the metrics have changed over time, we focus on three public policies that are manifestations of the master plan: (1) transfer between the California Community Colleges and California State University segments, (2) state funding for each segment, and (3) enrollment quotas for the California State University and University of California segments. We assess enrollment, finance, transfer, persistence, and completion measures to answer our primary research questions. While we find challenges for MSI students advancing to the completion of a 4-year degree, our findings also demonstrate that MSI community colleges can encourage minority student retention and associate’s degree and certificate completion. By centering MSIs in the state policy context, this study brings to light the growing interrelated relationship between federal and state efforts to reduce racial inequality in higher education.
AndersonD. M.Goldrick-RabS. (2016). Aid after enrollment: Impacts of a statewide grant program at public two-year colleges. Madison: Wisconsin HOPE Lab.
2.
AttewellP.LavinD.DominaT.LeveyT. (2006). New evidence on college remediation. Journal of Higher Education, 7, 886–924.
3.
BaileyT. R.JaggarsS. S.JenkinsD. (2015). Redesigning America’s community colleges. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
BaumS.MaJ.PayeaK. (2013). Education pays: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. New York, NY: College Board.
5.
BohnS.ReyesB.JohnsonH. (2013). The impact of budget cuts on California’s community colleges. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California. Retrieved from http://www.ppic.org/main/publication.asp?i=1048
6.
BolandW. C.GasmanM.NguyenT. H.SamayaoA. C. (2015). Striking gold in the golden state: Harnessing the power of minority serving institutions. Philadelphia, PA: Penn Center for Minority Serving Institutions.
7.
BolandW. C.SamayoaA. C.NguyenT.GasmanM.ChenE.ZhangV. (2015). Striking gold in the golden state: Harnessing the power of minority serving institutions in California. Philadelphia, PA: Penn Center for Minority Serving Institutions.
8.
BrownM. C.DavisJ. E. (2001). The historically Black college as social contract, social capital, and social equalizer. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(1), 31–49.
California State University. (2015). Impacted undergraduate majors and campuses in the California State University 2016–2017. Retrieved from http://www.calstate.edu/sas/impactioninfo.shtml
14.
CallanP. (2009). The master plan and the erosion of college opportunity. Boulder, CO: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.
15.
CallanP. M.DoyleW.FinneyJ. E. (2000). Evaluating state higher education performance: Measuring up 2000. Change, 33(2), 10–19.
16.
ChettyR.FriedmanJ. N.SaezE.TurnerN.YaganD. (2017). Mobility report cards: The role of colleges in intergenerational mobility. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
ConradC.GasmanM. (2015). Educating a diverse nation: Lessons from minority serving institutions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
ContrerasF.ContrerasG. J. (2015). Raising the bar for Hispanic serving institutions: An analysis of college completion and success rates. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 14, 151–170.
20.
CrispG.NuñezA. M. (2014). Understanding the racial transfer gap: Modeling underrepresented minority and nonminority students’ pathways from two-to four-year institutions. Review of Higher Education, 37, 291–320.
21.
DavisR. (1991). Social support networks and undergraduate student academic success related outcomes: A comparison of Black students on Black and White campuses. In AllenW. R.EppsE. G.HaniffN. Z. (Eds.), College in Black and White: African American students in predominantly White and in historically Black public universities (pp. 143–157). Albany: State University of New York Press.
22.
DouglassJ. (2000). The California idea and American higher education: 1850 to the 1960 master plan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
DouglassJ. A. (2010). From chaos to order and back? A revisionist reflection on the California Master Plan for Higher Education @ 50 and thoughts about its future. Berkeley: University of California, Center for Studies in Higher Education.
24.
FinneyJ.OroszK.RisoC.BolandW. (2014). From master plan to mediocrity: Higher education performance and policy in California. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Institute for Research on Higher Education.
25.
FloresS. M.ParkT. J. (2015). The effect of enrolling in a minority-serving institution for Black and Hispanic students in Texas. Research in Higher Education, 56, 247–276.
26.
GasmanM. (2006). Salvaging “academic disaster areas”: The Black college response to Christopher Jencks’ and David Riesman’s 1967 Harvard Educational Review article. Journal of Higher Education, 77, 317–352.
27.
GasmanM.BaezB.TurnerC. S. V. (2008). Understanding minority serving institutions. Albany: State University of New York Press.
28.
GasmanM.ConradC. (2013). Minority serving institutions: Educating all students. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Penn Center for Minority Serving Institutions.
29.
GasmanM.TudicoC. (2009). Historically Black colleges and universities: Triumphs, troubles and taboos. New York, NY: Palgrave Press.
30.
GeiserS.AtkinsonR. C. (2013). Beyond the master plan: The case for restructuring baccalaureate education in California. California Journal Politics and Policy, 5, 67–123. doi:10.1515/cjpp-2012-0042
31.
GittellM.KleimanN. S. (2000). The political context of higher education. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 1058–1091.
32.
Goldrick-RabS.BrotonK.FrankV. (2014). Single stop USA’s community college initiative implementation assessment. Detroit, MI: Kresge Foundation.
33.
GrodskyE.JacksonE. (2009). Social stratification in higher education. Teachers College Record, 111, 2347–2384.
34.
GruskyD. B. (Eds.). (2014). Social stratification: Class, race, and gender in sociological perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
35.
HansenW. L.WeisbrodB. A. (1969). The distribution of costs and direct benefits of public higher education: The case of California. Journal of Human Resources, 4, 176–191.
HillmanN. W.OriansE. L. (2013). Community colleges and labor market conditions: How does enrollment demand change relative to local unemployment rates?Research in Higher Education, 54, 765–780.
38.
HirtJ. B.StrayhornT. L.AmelinkC. T.BennettB. R. (2006). The nature of student affairs work at historically Black colleges and universities. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 661–676.
HubbardS. M.StageF. K. (2009). Attitudes, perceptions, and preferences of faculty at Hispanic serving and predominately Black institutions. Journal of Higher Education, 80, 270–289.
LongB. T.KurlaenderM. (2009). Do community colleges provide a viable pathway to a baccalaureate degree?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 30–53.
45.
Malcom-PiqueuxL.BensimonE. M.SuroR.FischerA.BartleA.LoudenbackJ.RivasJ. (2013). Addressing Latino outcomes at California’s Hispanic-serving institutions. Los Angeles, CA: USC Rossier School of Education, Center for Urban Education.
46.
MooreC.ShulockN. (2014). From community college to university: Expectations for California’s new transfer degrees. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute.
47.
MooreC.TanC.ShulockN. (2014). Average won’t do: Performance trends in California higher education as a foundation for action. Sacramento: California State University, Institute for Higher Education Leadership and Policy.
48.
MortensonT. (2013–2014). California higher education opportunity data book. Postsecondary Education Opportunity. Retrieved from http://www.postsecondary.org/default.asp
49.
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (2008). Measuring up 2008: The national report card for higher education. San Jose, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://measuringup2008.highereducation.org/
National Commission on Asian American and Pacific Islander Research in Education. (2014). Measuring the impact of MSI-funded programs on student success: Findings from the evaluation of Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander–serving institutions. Retrieved from http://www.apiasf.org/pdfs/2014_peer_report/APIASF_and_CARE_PEER_Report_April_2014.pdf
52.
National Commission on Asian American and Pacific Islander Research in Education. (2015). The impact of scholarships for Asian American and Pacific Islander community college students: Findings from an experimental design study. Retrieved from http://www.apiasf.org/research/2015_CARE_Report.pdf.
53.
NuñezA.ElizondoD. (2013). Closing the Latino/a transfer gap: Creating pathways to the baccalaureate (Perspectivas: Issues in Higher Education Policy and Practice, No. 2). Tempe, AZ: American Association of Hispanics in Higher Education.
54.
NúñezA.HurtadoS.Calderón GaldeanoE. (Eds.). (2015). Hispanic-serving institutions: Advancing research and transformative practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
PernaL. W.FinneyJ. E. (2014). The attainment agenda: State policy leadership in higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
58.
RichardsonR.Jr.MartinezM. (Eds). (2009). Policy and performance in American higher education: An examination of cases across state systems. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
59.
RichardsonR.Reeves BraccoK.CallanP.FinneyJ. (1998). California. In Designing state higher education systems for a new century (chap. 3, pp. 44–71). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
60.
RosenbaumJ. E.Deil-AmenR.PersonA. E. (2007). After admission: From college access to college success. New York: NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
61.
SavG. T. (2010). Funding historically Black colleges and universities: Progress toward equality?Journal of Education Finance, 35, 295–307.
62.
SchragP. (2006). California: America’s high stakes experiment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
63.
ShulockN.OffensteinJ.EschC. (2011). Dollars and sense: Analysis of spending and revenue patterns to inform fiscal planning for California higher education. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Leadership and Policy. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED534113.pdf
64.
ShulockN.MooreC. (2007). Invest in success: How finance policy can increase student success at California’s community colleges. Sacramento: California State University, Institute for Higher Education Leadership and Policy.
65.
StevensM. L.ArmstrongE. A.ArumR. (2008). Sieve, incubator, temple, hub: Empirical and theoretical advances in the sociology of higher education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 127–151.
66.
TandbergD. A.HillmanN. W. (2014). State higher education performance funding: Data, outcomes and policy implications. Journal of Education Finance, 39, 222–243.
67.
TeranishiR. T.AlcantarC. M.MartinM.NguyenB. M. (2015). The return on investment for an AANAPISI-funded program: Outcomes for Asian American and Pacific Islander community college students. Philadelphia, PA: Penn Center for Minority Serving Institutions.
ZumetaW.BrenemanD. W.CallanP. M.FinneyJ. E. (2012). Financing American higher education in the era of globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
71.
ZumetaW.FrankleD. (2007). California community colleges: Making them stronger and more affordable. San Jose, CA: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.
