This article explores how two elementary school students responded to their teacher’s invitation in a civic classroom to make a difference to the world. We consider how the teacher framed the construct of civic efficacy and how the students refracted these ideas in their navigation of a civic education project. Closely analyzing these students’ experiences and responses, we question what differences are made when students are encouraged to think of themselves as citizens who can make a difference. Noting dissonances and ambivalences in the students’ responses, the conceptual resources of “figured worlds” enable an analysis of the interplay of discourses, interactions, sensory experiences, and material artifacts as civic identities are constituted. The two students’ differing responses are analyzed in relation to other figured worlds that students and teachers daily negotiate: of compliant citizenship, productive citizenship, and consumer citizenship. The overlaps, dissonances, and/or divergences in discourses and artifacts from various figured worlds of citizenship render some students more recognizable as civically “engaged” and “efficacious” than others.
Abu El-HajT. R. (2009). Becoming citizens in an era of globalization and transnational migration: Re-imagining citizenship as critical practice. Theory Into Practice, 48(4), 274–282.
2.
AngellA. V. (2004). Making peace in elementary classrooms: A case for class meetings. Theory & Research in Social Education, 32(1), 98–104.
3.
AppleM.BeaneJ. A. (Eds.). (1995). Democratic schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
4.
BanduraA. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78.
5.
BiestaG. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
6.
BlackR. (2012). Educating the reflexive citizen: Making a difference or entrenching difference? (Unpublished doctoral disseration). University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
7.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ.-C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture (NiceR., Trans.). London: SAGE.
8.
ButlerJ. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. London: Routledge.
9.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2012). Implementing the Common Core state standards. Washington, DC: Author.
10.
CookD. T. (2013). Taking exception with the child consumer. Childhood, 20(4), 423–428.
11.
Darling-HammondL. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
12.
DaviesB.HarréR. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63.
13.
DeweyJ. (1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
14.
EvansR. W. (2015). Schooling corporate citizens: How accountability reform has damaged civic education and undermined democracy. New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
EversJ.KneyberR. (Eds.). (2016). Flip the system: Changing education from the ground up. New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
ExpósitoL. P. (2014). Rethinking political participation: A pedagogical approach for citizenship education. Theory and Research in Education, 12(2), 229–251.
17.
FlacksM. (2007). “Label jars not people”: How (not) to study youth civic engagement. In BestA. L. (Ed.), Representing youth: Methodological issues in critical youth studies (pp. 60–83). New York and London: New York University Press.
18.
FlanaganC. (2013). Teenage citizens: The political theories of the young. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
HollandD. (2010). Symbolic worlds in time/spaces of practice: Identities and transformations. In WagoonerB. (Ed.), Symbolic transformation: The mind in movement through culture and society (pp. 269–283). New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
HollandD.LachicotteW. J. (2007). Vygotsky, Mead, and the new sociocultural studies of identity. In DanielsH.ColeM.WertschJ. V. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 101–135). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21.
HollandD.LachicotteW. J.SkinnerD.CainC. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
HollandD.LaveJ. (2009). Social practice theory and the historical production of persons. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 2, 1–15.
23.
HollandD.LeanderK. (2004). Ethnographic studies of positioning and subjectivity: An introduction. Ethos, 32(2), 127–139.
24.
HouserN. O. (1995). Social studies on the back burner: Views from the field. Theory & Research in Social Education, 23(2), 147–168.
25.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research. New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
JohnstonJ. (2008). The citizen-consumer hybrid: Ideological tensions and the case of Whole Foods Market. Theory and Society, 37(3), 229–270.
27.
JubasK. (2007). Conceptual con/fusion in democratic societies: Understandings and limitations of consumer-citizenship. Journal of Consumer Culture, 7(2), 231–254.
28.
KeelsM.Burdick-WillJ.KeeneS. (2013). The effects of gentrification on neighborhood public schools. City & Community, 12(3), 238–259.
29.
LarkinsC. (2014). Enacting children’s citizenship: Developing understandings of how children enact themselves as citizens through actions and acts of citizenship. Childhood, 21(1), 7–21.
30.
LeanderK. (2002). Locating Latanya: The sitauted production of identity artifacts in classroom interaction. Research in the Teaching of English, 37, 198–250.
31.
LeeS. J. (1994). Beyond the model-minority stereotype: Voices of high- and low-achieving Asian American students. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 25(4), 413–429.
32.
LevinsonM. (2012). No citizen left behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
LingardB. (2011). Policy as numbers: Ac/counting for educational research. Australian Educational Researcher, 38(4), 355–382.
34.
LintnerT. (2006). Social studies (still) on the back burner: Perceptions and practices of K–5 social studies instruction. Journal of Social Studies Research, 30(1), 3.
35.
ListerR. (2007). Why citizenship: Where, when and how children?Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2), 693–718.
36.
MacedoS.Alex-AssensohY.BerryJ. M.BrintnallM.CampbellD. E.FragaL. R.. . . WalshK. C. (2005). Democracy at risk: How political choices undermine citizen participation, and what we can do about it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
37.
MashburnA. J.DownerJ. T.RiversS. E.BrackettM. A.MartinezA. (2014). Improving the power of an efficacy study of a social and emotional learning program: Application of generalizability theory to the measurement of classroom-level outcomes. Prevention Science, 15, 146–155.
38.
MichaelA.AndradeN.BartlettL. (2007). Figuring “success” in a bilingual high school. The Urban Review, 39(2), 167–189.
39.
MitraD. L.SerriereS. C. (2015). Civic education in the elementary grades: Promoting student engagement in an era of accountability. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
40.
Moosa-MithaM. (2005). A difference-centred alternative to theorization of children’s citizenship rights. Citizenship Studies, 9(4), 369–388.
41.
National Council for the Social Studies. (2010). National curriculum standard for social studies: A framework for teaching, learning, and assessment. Washington, DC: Author:
42.
National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K–12 civics, economics, geography, and history. Retrieved from http://www.socialstudies.org/c3
43.
NgoB.LeeS. J. (2007). Complicating the image of model-minority success: A review of Southeast Asian American education. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 415–453.
44.
PajaresF. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578.
45.
ParkerW. C. (2011). Social studies in elementary education (14th ed.). Newmarket, ON: Pearson Education.
46.
PutnamR. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of the American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
47.
PykettJ.SawardM.SchaeferA. (2010). Framing the good citizen. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 12, 523–538.
48.
RizviF.LingardB. (2009). Globalising education policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
49.
RubinB. C. (2007). Learner identity amid figured worlds: Constructing (in)competence at an urban high school. The Urban Review, 39(2), 217–249.
50.
RubinB. C.JonesM. (2007). Student action research: Reaping the benefits for students and school leaders. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 91(4), 363–378.
51.
SahlbergP. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
52.
TuckE.YangK. W. (2014). Introduction to youth resistance research and theories of change. In TuckE.YangK. W. (Eds.), Youth resistance research and theories of change (pp. 1–23). New York, NY: Routledge.
53.
UriettaL. J. (2007). Identity production in figured worlds: How some Mexican Americans become Chicana/o activist educators. The Urban Review, 39(2), 117–144.
54.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
WattsR. J.FlanaganC. (2007). Pushing the envelope on youth civic engagement: A developmental and liberation psychology perspective. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(6), 779–792.
56.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
WestheimerJ.KahneJ. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269.
58.
WoodB. (2015). Participating as young citizens in diverse communities. In WynJ.CahillH. (Eds.), Handbook of children and youth studies (pp. 405–417). New York, NY: Springer.
59.
YinR. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
Yuval-DavisN. (2007). Intersectionality, citizenship and contemporary politics of belonging. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 10(4), 561–574.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
