This mixed-method study examines the think-aloud protocols of 48 randomly assigned undergraduate students to understand what effect embedding a visual coding system, based on reliable visual cues for establishing historical time period, would have on novice history students’ ability to contextualize historic documents. Results indicate that using multiple embedded images per time period significantly improves students’ ability to source and contextualize historical sources.
Al-BalushiS. M.Al-HajriS. H. (2014). Associating animations with concrete models to enhance students’ comprehension of different visual representations in organic chemistry. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 15, 47–58.
3.
BaddeleyA. D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
BaronC. (2012). Understanding historical thinking at historic sites. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 833–847. doi:10.1037/a0027476
5.
BartonK. C. (2001). A sociocultural perspective on children’s understanding of historical change: Comparative findings from Northern Ireland and the United States. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 881–913.
6.
BartonK. C.LevstikL. S. (1996). Back when God was around and everything: Elementary children’s understanding of historical time. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 419–454.
7.
BennettP. (1970). What happened at Lexington Green? An inquiry into the nature and methods of history. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.
8.
Boerman-CornellW. (2015). Using historical graphic novels in high school history classes: Potential for contextualization, sourcing, and corroborating. The History Teacher, 48(2), 209–224.
9.
BowenD. H.GreeneJ. P.KisidaB. (2013). Learning to think critically: A visual art experiment. Educational Researcher, 43, 37–44.
10.
BrittM.AglinskasC. (2002). Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instructions, 20, 485–522.
11.
BrownR. H. (1996). Learning how to learn: The Amherst Project and history education in the schools. The Social Studies, 87, 267–273.
12.
Center for History and New Media, George Mason University, & Stanford History Education Group. (2008). Historical thinking matters. Retrieved from http://historicalthinkingmatters.org/.
13.
ChiM. T.KoeskeR. D. (1983). Network representation of a child’s dinosaur knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 19(1), 29–39.
14.
ClarkJ. M.PaivioA. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210.
15.
De KoningB. B.van der SchootM. (2013). Becoming part of the story! Refueling the interest in visualization strategies for reading comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 261–287.
16.
De La PazS. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 139–156.
17.
De La PazS.FeltonM.Monte-SanoC.CroningerR.JacksonC.DeograciasJ. S.HoffmanB. P. (2014). Developing historical reading and writing with adolescent readers: Effects on student learning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42(2), 228–274. doi:10.1080/00933104.2014.908754
18.
DuvalE.HodginsW.SuttonS.WeibelS. (2002). Metadata principles and practicalities. D-Lib Magazine, 8(4).
19.
EricssonK. A.SimonH. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
FioreS. M.CuevasH. M.OserR. (2003). A picture is worth a thousand connections: The facilitative effects of diagrams on mental model development and task performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 185–199.
21.
GoodrumC.DalrympleH. (1990). Advertising in America: The first 200 years. New York, NY: Harry N. Abrams, Inc.
22.
HarpS. F.MayerR. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 414–434.
23.
HegartyM.JustM. A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(6), 717–742.
24.
Hynd-ShanahanC.HolschuhJ. P.HubbardB. P. (2004). Thinking like a historian: College students’ reading of multiple historical documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(2), 141–176.
25.
KingD. (1997). The Commisar vanishes: The falsification of photographs and art in Stalin’s Russia. Ontario: Henry Holt.
26.
KintschW. (2004). The construction-integration model of text comprehension and its implications for instruction. In RuddellR.UnrauN. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1270–1328). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
27.
KonkleT.BradyT. F.AlvarezG. A.OlivaA. (2010). Scene memory is more detailed than you think: The role of categories in visual long-term memory. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1551–1556. doi:10.1177/0956797610385359
28.
LeinhardtG.YoungK. M. (1996). Two texts, three readers: Distance and expertise in reading history. Cognition and Instruction, 14(4), 441–486.
29.
LenznerA.SchnotzW.MullerA. (2013). The role of decorative pictures in learning. Instructional Science, 41(5), 811–831.
30.
LevieW. H.LentzR. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology, 30(4), 195–232.
31.
MathewsonJ. H. (1999). Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science Education, 83(1), 33–54.
MayerR. E.AndersonR. B. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 444–452. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.444
34.
MayerR.GalliniJ. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words?Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 715–726.
35.
MojeE. B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96–107.
36.
MosborgS. (2002). Speaking of history: How adolescents use their knowledge of history in reading the daily news. Cognition & Instruction, 20(3), 323–358.
NavaskyV. S. (2013). The art of controversy: Political cartoons and their enduring power. New York, NY: Knopf.
39.
NGA, & CCSSO. (2010). Common core state standards. Washingotn, DC: National Governor’s Association.
40.
NokesJ. D.DoleJ. A.HackerD. J. (2007). Teaching high school students to use heuristics while reading historical texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 492–504.
41.
OlivaA. (2005). Gist of the scene. In IttiL.ReesG.TsotsosJ. K. (Eds.), Neurobiology of attention (pp. 251–256). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press, Inc.
42.
PerfettiC.BrittM. A.RouetJ.-F.GeorgiM. C.MasonR. A. (1994). How students use texts to learn and reason about historical uncertainty. In CarreteroM.VossJ. F. (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and social sciences (pp. 257–283). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
PhillipsL. M.NorrisS. P.MacnabJ. S. (2010). Visualization in mathematics, reading and science education. New York, NY: Springer.
44.
PotterM. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for picturesJournal of Experimental Psychology-Human Learning and Memory, 2(5), 509–522. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.2.5.509
45.
ReboraC.StaitiP.HirschlerE. E.StebbinsJ.TroyenC. (1995). John Singleton Copley in America. New York, NY: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
46.
ReismanA. (2012). Reading like a historian: A document-based history curriculum intervention in urban high schools. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 86–112.
47.
RouetJ.FavartM.BrittM. A.PerfettiC. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 85–106.
48.
ScheurmanG. (1998). Revisiting Lexington Green. Social Education, 62(1).
49.
SchnotzW.BannertM. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 141–156.
50.
SchnotzW.KurschnerC. (2008). External and internal representations in the acquisition and use of knowledge: Visualization effects on mental model construction. Instructional Science, 36, 175–190.
ShemiltD. (2000). The caliph’s coin: The currency of narrative frameworks in history teaching. In StearnsP. N.SexiasP.WineburgS. (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 83–101). New York, NY: New York University Press.
TallyB.GoldenbergL. B. (2005). Fostering historical thinking with digitized primary sources. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(1), 1–21.
VanSledrightB. A. (2002). Fifth graders investigating history in the classroom: Results from a researcher-practitioner design experiment. Elementary School Journal, 103(2), 131–160. doi:10.1086/499720
57.
VossJ.TylerS.YengoL. (1983). Individual differences in the solving of social science problems. In DillonR. F.SchmeckR. R. (Eds.), Individual differences in cognition. New York: Academic Press.
58.
WilschutA. (2012). Images of time: The role of an historical consciousness of time in learning history. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
59.
WineburgS. S (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73–87.
60.
WineburgS. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: an expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22(3), 319–346.
61.
WineburgS.MartinD.Monte-SanoC. (2011). Reading like a historian: Teaching literacy in middle and high school history classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
62.
WoodenJ. (2008). “I had always heard Lincoln was a good person, but . . . ”: A study of sixth graders’ reading of Lincoln’s views on Black-White relations. Social Studies, 99, 23–30.
63.
YangS. C. (2003). Computer-mediated history learning: Spanning three centuries project. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 299–318.
64.
YangS. C. (2007). E-critical/thematic doing history project: Integrating the critical thinking approach with computer-mediated history learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2095–2112.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
