This qualitative study examined how secondary teachers were assigned to teach courses intended to expand English learners’ (ELs’) access to academic subjects. Theoretically, this research extends the “contexts of reception” framework from immigration studies into the educational realm by investigating how teachers—as one important contextual variable—entered into settings designed for immigrant-origin ELs. Analysis examined institutional processes, norms, and policies as well as participants’ practices. Findings suggest that novice teachers were most likely to be placed into separate EL content-area classrooms, unless more senior teachers requested these assignments or administrators intervened. Ultimately, this article uses teacher assignment processes to illustrate how contexts for immigrant-origin youth are constructed and contested and how ELs’ opportunities to learn were jeopardized in local settings.
AchinsteinB.OgawaR. T.SpeiglmanA. (2004). Are we creating separate and unequal tracks of teachers? The effects of state policy, local conditions, and teacher characteristics on new teacher socialization. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 557–603. doi:10.3102/00028312041003557
2.
AppleM. W. (2005). Education, markets, and an audit culture. Critical Quarterly, 47(1-2), 11–29. doi: 10.1111/j.0011-1562.2005.00611.x
3.
ArkoudisS. (2006). Negotiating the rough ground between ESL and mainstream teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(4), 415–433. doi:10.2167/beb337.0
4.
BransfordJ.DerryS.BerlinerD.HammernessK.BeckettK. L. (2005). Theories of learning and their role in teaching. In Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 40–87). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
CallahanR. M. (2005). Tracking and high school English learners: Limiting opportunity to learn. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 305–328. doi:10.3102/00028312042002305
7.
CallahanR. M.WilkinsonL.MullerC. (2010). Academic achievement and course taking among language minority youth in U.S. schools: Effects of ESL placement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(1), 84–117. doi:10.3102/0162373709359805
8.
CannC. (2012). In search of equity: Teacher tracking in math. In KellyS. (Ed.), Assessing teacher quality: Understanding teacher effects on instruction and achievement (pp. 111–136). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
9.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. (2005). Who teaches whom? Race and distribution of novice teachers. Economics of Education Review, 24, 377–392. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.06.008
10.
Cohen-VogelL. (2007). Allocating quality: Collective bargaining agreements and administrative discretion over teacher assignment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(4), 433–461.
11.
CorneliusW. A. (2002). Ambivalent reception: Mass public responses to the “new” Latino immigration to the United States. In Suárez-OrozcoM.PáezM. (Eds.), Latinos: Remaking America (pp. 165–189). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
12.
DabachD. B. (2009). Teachers as a context of reception for immigrant youth: Adaptations in “sheltered” and “mainstream” classrooms. Doctoral thesis, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
13.
DabachD. B. (2011). Teachers as agents of reception: An analysis of teacher preference for immigrant-origin second language learners. The New Educator, 7(1), 66–86.
14.
DabachD. B. (2014). “I am not a shelter!”: Stigma and social boundaries in teachers’ accounts of students’ experience in separate “sheltered” English learner classrooms. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 19(2), 98–124. doi:10.1080/10824669.2014.954044
Darling-HammondL. (1995). Inequality and access to knowledge. In BanksJ.BanksC. A. (Eds.), Handbook on research on multicultural education (pp. 465–483). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
17.
Darling-HammondL. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44.
18.
Darling-HammondL. (2007). Race, inequality and educational accountability: The irony of “No Child Left Behind.”Race Ethnicity and Education, 10(3), 245–260.
19.
Darling-HammondL.BerryB. (2006). Highly qualified teachers for all. Educational Leadership, 64(3), 14–20.
20.
DentlerR. A.HafnerA. L. (1997). Hosting newcomers: Structuring educational opportunities for immigrant children. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
21.
EricksonF. (2004). Talk and social theory: Ecologies of speaking and listening in everyday life. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
22.
FengL. (2010). Hire today, gone tomorrow: New teacher classroom assignments and teacher mobility. Education Finance and Policy, 5(3), 278–316. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00002
23.
FilindraA.BlandingD.CollC. G. (2011). The power of context: State-level policies and politics and the educational performance of the children of immigrants in the United States. Harvard Educational Review, 81(3), 407–438.
24.
FinleyM. (1984). Teachers and tracking in a comprehensive high school. Sociology of Education, 57(4), 233–243.
25.
GamoranA. (1987). The stratification of high school learning opportunities. Sociology of Education, 60, 135–155. doi:10.3102/00346543057004415
26.
GándaraP. (2013). Meeting the needs of language minorities. In CarterP. L.VelnerK. G. (Eds.), Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance (pp. 156–168). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27.
GándaraP.MoranR.GarcíaE. (2004). The legacy of Brown: Lau and language policy in the United States. Review of Research in Education, 28, 27–56.
GutiérrezR. (1996). Practices, beliefs and cultures of high school mathematics departments: Understanding their influence on student advancement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(5), 495–529.
30.
HallettT.VentrescaM. J. (2006). Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Theory and Society, 35(2), 213–236.
31.
HamannE. T. (2003). The educational welcome of Latinos in the New South. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
32.
HamannE. T.RosenL. (2011). What makes the anthropology of educational policy implementation ‘anthropological’? In LevinsonB.PollockM. (Eds.), A companion to the anthropology of education (pp. 461–477). West Sussex, UK: Blackwell-Wiley.
33.
HammernessK.Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ.BerlinerD.Cochran-SmithM.McDonaldM.ZeichnerK. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358–389). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34.
HarklauL. (2014). Bureaucratic dysfunctions and the education of Latino youth. Manuscript submitted for publication.
35.
HoldawayJ.AlbaR. (2009). Educating immigrant youth: The role of institutions and agency. Teachers College Record, 111(3), 597–615.
36.
HonigM. (2006). New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
37.
IngersollR. M. (2002). The teacher shortage: A case of wrong diagnosis and wrong prescription. NASSP Bulletin, 86(631), 16–31.
38.
Jaffe-WalterR.LeeS. J. (2011). “To trust in my root and to take that to go forward”: Supporting college access for immigrant youth in the global city. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 42(3), 281–296. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1492.2011.01132.x
39.
KalogridesD.LoebS.BéteilleT. (2013). Systematic sorting: Teacher characteristics and class assignments. Sociology of Education, 86(2), 103–123.
40.
KannoY.KangasS. E. (2014). “I’m not going to be, like, for the AP”: English language learners’ limited access to advanced college-preparatory courses in high school. American Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 848–878. doi:10.3102/0002831214544716
41.
KannoY.VargheseM. (2010). Immigrant and refugee ESL student’s challenges to accessing four-year college education: From language policy to educational policy. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 9(5), 310–328.
42.
LampertM.BeasleyH.GhousseiniH.KazemiE.FrankeM. (2010) Using designed instructional activities to enable novices to manage ambitious mathematics teaching. In SteinM. K.KucanL. (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the discipline (pp. 129–141). New York, NY: Springer.
43.
LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37–62.
44.
Lau v. Nichols, 414 U.S. 563 (1974).
45.
LeeS. J.HawkinsM. R. (2015). Policy, context and schooling: The education of English learners in new destinations. Manuscript submitted for publication.
46.
LevinsonB. A.SuttonM.WinsteadT. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power: Theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Educational Policy, 23(6), 767–795.
47.
LittleJ. W. (1993). Professional community in comprehensive high schools: The two worlds of academic and vocational teachers. In LittleJ. W.McLaughlinM. W. (Eds.), Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts (pp. 137–163). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
48.
LittleJ. W.BartlettL. (2010). The teacher workforce and problems of educational equity. Review of Research in Education, 34, 285–328. doi:10.3102/0091732X09356099
49.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50.
MalsbaryC. M.DabachD. B.Martinez-WenzlM. (2014). Immigration and education: Delineating dimensions in the field. Manuscript submitted for publication.
51.
MarrowH. B. (2005). New destinations and immigrant incorporation. Perspectives on Politics, 3(4) 781–799.
52.
MarrowH. B. (2011). New destination dreaming: Immigration, race, and legal status in the rural American south. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
53.
MeadM. (1951). The school in American culture: The Inglis lecture at Harvard University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
56.
OakesJ. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
57.
OlsenL. (1997). Made in America. New York, NY: The New Press.
58.
OlsenL. (2010). Reparable harm: Fulfilling the unkept promise of educational opportunity for California’s long term English learners. Retrieved from http://www.californianstogether.org/reports/
59.
PeskeH. G.HaycockK. (2006). Teaching inequality: How poor and minority students are shortchanged on teacher quality: A report and recommendations by the Education Trust. Washington, DC: Education Trust.
60.
PollackM. (2008). Because of race: How Americans debate harm and opportunity in our schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61.
PortesA. (1997). Immigration theory for a new century: Some problems and opportunities. International Migration Review, 31(4), 799–825.
62.
PortesA.RumbautR. G. (2006). Immigrant America: A portrait (3rd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
63.
ReevesJ. (2004). “Like everybody else”: Equalizing educational opportunity for English language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 38(1), 43–66.
64.
ReitzJ. G. (Ed.). (2003). Host societies and the reception of immigrants. Boulder, CO: Lynne Riener Publishers/Center for Comparative Immigration Studies.
65.
Richardson BrunaK.VannR.Perales EscuderoM. (2007). What’s language got to do with it?: A case study of academic language instruction in a high school “English Learner Science” class. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 36–54.
66.
RyanG. W.BernardH. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85-109.
67.
SabersD. S.CushingK. S.BerlinerD. C. (1991). Differences among teachers in a task characterized by simultaneity, multidimensionality, and immediacy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 63–88. doi:10.3102/00028312028001063
68.
SiskinL. S. (1997). The challenge of leadership in comprehensive high schools: School vision and departmental divisions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33, 604–623.
69.
SiskinL. S.LittleJ.W. (1995). The subject department: Continuities and critiques. In SiskinL. S.LittleJ. W., The subjects in question: Departmental organization at the high school (pp. 1–22). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
70.
SpindlerG.SpindlerL. (1990). The American cultural dialogue and its transmission. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer.
71.
Stanton-SalazarR. (2001). Manufacturing hope and despair: The school and kin support networks of U.S.-Mexican youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
72.
StritikusT.NguyenD. (2010). Universalist and differentialist approaches to instruction for high-school-age immigrants: Tensions in practice and policy. Bilingual Research Journal, 33(3), 329–345.
73.
Suárez-OrozcoC.Suárez-OrozcoM.TodorovaI. (2008). Learning a new land: Immigrant students in American society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
ThompsonJ. P.WindschitlM.BraatenM. (2013). Developing a theory of ambitious early-career teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 574–615. doi:10.3102/0002831213476334
76.
ThompsonK. D. (2013). Is separate always unequal? A philosophical examination of ideas of equality in key cases regarding racial and linguistic minorities in education. American Educational Research Journal, 50(6), 1249–1278.
77.
TomlinsonC. A. (2014). Differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
78.
ValdésG. (2001). Learning and not learning English: Latino students in American schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
79.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany, NY: State University of New York (SUNY) Press.
80.
ZeichnerK.BierM. (2013). The turn toward practice and clinical experiences in US teacher education. Beitrage Zur Lehrerbildung/Swiss Journal of Teacher Education, 30(2), 153–170.
81.
ZhouM. (1992). Chinatown: The socioeconomic potential of an urban enclave. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
