Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-10
English Learner Labeling: How English Learner Classification in Kindergarten Shapes Teacher Perceptions of Student Skills and the Moderating Role of Bilingual Instructional Settings
Prior research has shown that English learner (EL) classification is consequential for students; however, less is known about how EL classification affects student outcomes. In this study, we examine one hypothesized mechanism: teacher perceptions. Using a national data set (Early Childhood Longitudinal Study—Kindergarten Cohort of 2010–2011 or ECLS-K:2011), we use coarsened exact matching to estimate the effect of kindergarten EL status on teachers’ perceptions of students’ academic skills. We further explore whether that impact is moderated by instructional setting (bilingual vs. English immersion). We find evidence that EL classification results in lower teacher perceptions. This impact is, however, moderated by bilingual environments. In bilingual classrooms, we do not find evidence that EL classification results in diminished perceptions. This study adds to research on teacher perceptions and the effects of EL classification.
AbediJ. (2004). The No Child Left Behind Act and English language learners: Assessment and accountability issues. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033001004
AugustD.ShanahanT. (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language Minority Children and Youth. LEA.
4.
AuwarterA. E.ArugueteM. S. (2008). Effects of student gender and socioeconomic status on teacher perceptions. Journal of Educational Research, 101(4), 242-246. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.101.4.243-246
5.
BakerC. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (Vol. 79). Multilingual Matters.
6.
BakerS.LesauxN.JayanthiM.DiminoJ.ProctorC. P.MorrisJ.RussellR.Linan-ThompsonS. (2014). Teaching Academic Content and Literacy to English Learners in Elementary and Middle School. IES Practice Guide. NCEE2014-4012. What Works Clearinghouse. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/practiceguide/english_learners_pg_040114.pdf
7.
BiancoM. (2005). The effects of disability labels on special education and general education teachers’ referrals for gifted programs. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(4), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.2307/4126967
8.
BlanchardS.MullerC. (2015). Gatekeepers of the American Dream: How teachers’ perceptions shape the academic outcomes of immigrant and language-minority students. Social Science Research, 51, 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.10.003
9.
BurkamD. T.LoGerfoL.ReadyD.LeeV. E. (2007). The differential effects of repeating kindergarten. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12(2), 103–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824660701261052
CallahanR. (2005). Tracking and high school English learners: Limiting opportunity to learn. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002305
12.
CallahanR.GándaraP. (2014). Bilingual advantage: Language, literacy, and the labor market (CallahanR.GándaraP. Eds.). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092437
13.
CarlsonD.KnowlesJ. (2016). The effect of English language learner reclassification on student ACT scores, high school graduation, and postsecondary enrollment: Regression discontinuity evidence from Wisconsin. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(3), 559–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21908
14.
Cervantes-SoonC. G.DornerL.PalmerD.HeimanD.SchwerdtfegerR.ChoiJ. (2017). Combating inequalities in two-way language immersion programs: Toward critical consciousness in bilingual education spaces. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 403–427. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X17690120
15.
CimpianJ. R.ThompsonK. D.MakowskiM. B. (2017). Evaluating English learner reclassification policy effects across districts. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1 Suppl.), 255S–278S. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216635796
16.
CookT. D.ShadishW. R.WongV. C. (2008). Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: New findings from within-study comparisons. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(4), 724–750. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20375
17.
CummingA. (2008). Assessing oral and literate abilities. In ShohamyE. G.HornbergerN. H. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2 ed., Vol. 7, pp. 3–18). Springer.
18.
D. J. et. al. v. State of California, No. B260075 (Second District California Court of Appeal 2015).
19.
DabachD. B. (2011). Teachers as agents of reception: An analysis of teacher preference for immigrant-origin second language learners. The New Educator, 7(1), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2011.551736
20.
DabachD. B.Suárez-OrozcoC.HernandezS. J.BrooksM. D. (2018). Future perfect? Teachers’ expectations and explanations of their Latino immigrant students’ postsecondary futures. Journal of Latinos and Education, 17(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2017.1281809
21.
DowneyD. B.PribeshS. (2004). When race matters: Teachers’ evaluations of students’ classroom behavior. Sociology of Education, 77(4), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070407700401
22.
DuGoffE. H.SchulerM.StuartE. A. (2014). Generalizing observational study results: Applying propensity score methods to complex surveys. Health Services Research, 49(1), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12090
23.
DusekJ. B.JosephG. (1983). The bases of teacher expectancies: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.75.3.327
24.
EscamillaK. (2006). Semilingualism applied to the literacy behaviors of Spanish-speaking emerging bilinguals: Bi-illiteracy or emerging biliteracy?Teachers College Record, 108(11), 2329–2353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00784.x
25.
EstradaP. (2014). English learner curricular streams in four middle schools: Triage in the trenches. Urban Review, 46(5), 535–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-014-0276-7
26.
Every Student Succeeds Act, 114-95 C.F.R. (2015).
27.
FarkasG. (2003). Racial disparities and discrimination in education: What do we know, how do we know it, and what do we need to know?Teachers College Record, 105(6), 1119–1146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00279
28.
FergusonR. F. (2003). Teachers’ perceptions and expectations and the Black-White test score gap. Urban Education, 38(4), 460–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085903038004006
29.
FloresN.KleynT.MenkenK. (2015). Looking holistically in a climate of partiality: Identities of students labeled Long-Term English Language Learners. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 14(2), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2015.1019787
30.
FoxL. (2015). Seeing potential: The effects of student–teacher demographic congruence on teacher expectations and recommendations. AERA Open, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858415623758
31.
FránquizM. E.SalazarM. d. C.DeNicoloC. P. (2011). Challenging majoritarian tales: Portraits of bilingual teachers deconstructing deficit views of bilingual learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2011.625884
32.
GalloS.LinkH.AllardE.WorthamS.MortimerK. (2014). Conflicting ideologies of Mexican immigrant English across levels of schooling. International Multilingual Research Journal, 8(2), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2013.825563
33.
GándaraP.HopkinsM. (Eds.). (2010). Forbidden language: English learners and restrictive language policies. Teachers College Press.
34.
GándaraP.MoranR. F.GarciaE. (2004). Legacy of Brown: Lau and language policy in the United States. Review of Research in Education, 28(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X028001027
35.
GándaraP.RumbergerR. W.Maxwell-JollyJ.CallahanR. (2003). English learners in California schools: Unequal resources, unequal outcomes. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(36), 1–54. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v11n36.2003
36.
GarciaE. B.SulikM. J.ObradovicJ. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of students’ executive functions: Disparities by gender, ethnicity, and ELL status. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(5), 918–931. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000308
37.
GarcíaS. B.GuerraP. L. (2004). Deconstructing deficit thinking: Working with educators to create more equitable learning environments. Education and Urban Society, 36(2), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124503261322
38.
GarrettR.HongG. (2016). Impacts of grouping and time on the math learning of language minority kindergartners. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(2), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715611484
39.
GiffordB.ValdésG. (2006). The linguistic isolation of Hispanic students in California: The challenge of reintegration. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 105(2), 125–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7984.2006.00079.x
40.
GutiérrezK. D.OrellanaM. F. (2006). At last: The “problem” of English learners: Constructing genres of difference. Research in the Teaching of English, 40(4), 502–507.
41.
Hansen-ThomasH.CavagnettoA. (2010). What do mainstream middle school teachers think about their English language learners? A tri-state case study. Bilingual Research Journal, 33(2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2010.502803
42.
HarklauL. (1999). The ESL learning environment in secondary school. In FaltisC.WolfeP. (Eds.), So much to say: Adolescents, bilingualism, and ESL in the secondary school (pp. 42–60). Teachers College Press.
43.
HinnantJ. B.O’BrienM.GhazarianS. R. (2009). The longitudinal relations of teacher expectations to achievement in the early school years. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 662–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014306
44.
HopkinsM. (2013). Building on our teaching assets: The unique pedagogical contributions of bilingual educators. Bilingual Research Journal, 36(3), 350–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2013.845116
45.
IacusS. M.KingG.PorroG. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr013
46.
JohnsonA. (2019). The effects of English learner classification on high school graduation and college attendance. AERA Open, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419850801
47.
JussimL.EcclesJ.MadonS. (1996). Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations: Accuracy and the quest for the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 281–388). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60240-3
48.
JussimL.HarberK. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(2), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_3
49.
KannoY.KangasS. (2014). “I’m not going to be, like, for the AP”: English language learners’ limited access to advanced college-preparatory courses in high school. American Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 848–878. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214544716
50.
KatzS. R. (1999). Teaching in tensions: Latino immigrant youth, their teachers, and the structures of schooling. Teachers College Record, 100(4), 809–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00017
51.
KiblerA. K.ValdésG. (2016). Conceptualizing language learners: Socioinstitutional mechanisms and their consequences. Modern Language Journal, 100(Suppl. 1), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12310
LeeJ.ZhouM. (2015). The Asian American achievement paradox. Russell Sage Foundation.
54.
LinkB.PhelanJ. (2013). Labeling and stigma. In AneshenselC. S.PhelanJ. C.BiermanA. (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of mental health (pp. 525–541). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4276-5_25
55.
LinquantiR.CookG. (2015). Re-examining reclassification: Guidance from a national working session on policies and practices for exiting students from English learner status. Council of Chief State School Officers.
56.
Lippi-GreenR. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. Routledge.
57.
LlosaL. (2008). Building and supporting a validity argument for a standards-based classroom assessment of English proficiency based on teacher judgments. Educational Measurement, 27(3), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00126.x
58.
LoebS.SolandJ.FoxL. (2014). Is a good teacher a good teacher for all? Comparing value-added of teachers with their English learners and non-English learners. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714527788
59.
LopezA. A.PoolerE.LinquantiR. (2016). Key issues and opportunities in the initial identification and classification of English learners. ETS Research Report Series, 2016(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12090
60.
LópezF. A. (2017). Altering the trajectory of the self-fulfilling prophecy: Asset-based pedagogy and classroom dynamics. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116685751
61.
LópezN. (2003). Hopeful girls, troubled boys: Race and gender disparity in urban education. Psychology Press.
62.
MadonS.JussimL.KeiperS.EcclesJ.SmithA.PalumboP. (1998). The accuracy and power of sex, social class, and ethnic stereotypes: A naturalistic study in person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1304–1318. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982412005
63.
MartínezR. A. (2018). Beyond the English learner label: Recognizing the richness of bi/multilingual students’ linguistic repertoires. The Reading Teacher, 71(5), 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1679
64.
Martínez-RoldánC. M.MalavéG. (2004). Language ideologies mediating literacy and identity in bilingual contexts. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 4(2), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798404044514
65.
MasterB.LoebS.WhitneyC.WyckoffJ. (2016). Different skills? Identifying differentially effective teachers of English language learners. Elementary School Journal, 117(2), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1086/688871
66.
MatthewsJ. S.LópezF. (2019). Speaking their language: The role of cultural content integration and heritage language for academic achievement among Latino children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 57(April), 72-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.005
67.
MavrogordatoM.WhiteR. S. (2017). Reclassification variation: How policy implementation guides the process of exiting students from English learner status. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 281–310. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716687075
68.
McKownC.WeinsteinR. S. (2008). Teacher expectations, classroom context, and the achievement gap. Journal of School Psychology, 46(3), 235–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.05.001
69.
MeiselsS. J.BickelD. D.NicholsonJ.XueY.Atkins-BurnettS. (2001). Trusting teachers’ judgments: A validity study of a curriculum-embedded performance assessment in kindergarten to grade 3. American Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038001073
70.
MeisselK.MeyerF.YaoE. S.Rubie-DaviesC. M. (2017). Subjectivity of teacher judgments: Exploring student characteristics that influence teacher judgments of student ability. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65(July), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.021
71.
MollL. C.AmantiC.NeffD.GonzalezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
72.
MurnaneR. J.WillettJ. B. (2010). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. Oxford University Press.
73.
MurphyA. F.TorffB. (2019). Teachers’ beliefs about rigor of curriculum for English language learners. Educational Forum, 83(1), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2018.1505991
74.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. (Eds.). (2017). Promoting the educational success of children and youth learning English: Promising futures. National Academies Press.
75.
National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). Early childhood longitudinal study spring 2011 kindergarten teacher questionnaire (child level). U.S. Department of Education.
76.
National Research Council. (2011). Allocating federal funds for state programs for English language learners. National Academies Press.
77.
OakesJ. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. Yale University Press.
78.
OatesG. (2003). Teacher-student racial congruence, teacher perceptions, and test performance. Social Science Quarterly, 84(3), 508–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8403002
OlsenL. (1997). Made in America: Immigrant students in our public schools. New Press.
81.
PageR. (1987). Teachers’ perceptions of students: A link between classrooms, school cultures, and the social order. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 18(2), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1987.18.2.04x0667q
82.
ParkesJ. (2008). Who chooses dual language education for their children and why. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 11(6), 635–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050802149267
83.
PepinskyT. B. (2018). A note on listwise deletion versus multiple imputation. Political Analysis, 26(4), 480–488. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.18
84.
PettitS. K. (2011). Teachers’ beliefs about English language learners in the mainstream classroom: A review of the literature. International Multilingual Research Journal, 5(2), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2011.594357
85.
PolatN.MahalingappaL.HughesE.KarayigitC. (2019). Change in preservice teacher beliefs about inclusion, responsibility, and culturally responsive pedagogy for English learners. International Multilingual Research Journal, 13(4), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2019.1597607
86.
RaganA.LesauxN. (2006). Federal, state, and district level English language learner program entry and exit requirements: Effects on the education of language minority learners. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(20). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v14n20.2006
87.
ReadyD. D.WrightD. L. (2011). Accuracy and inaccuracy in teachers’ perceptions of young children's cognitive abilities: The role of child background and classroom context. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 335–360. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210374874
88.
ReyesM.HwangN. (2019). Middle school language classification effects on high school achievement and behavioral outcomes. Educational Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904818823747
89.
RobinsonJ. P. (2011). Evaluating criteria for English learner reclassification: A causal-effects approach using a binding-score regression discontinuity design with instrumental variables. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 267–292. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711407912
90.
Robinson-CimpianJ. P.ThompsonK. D. (2016). The effects of changing test-based policies for reclassifying English learners. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(2), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21882
91.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387), 516-524. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1984.10478078
92.
RosenthalR.JacobsonL. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. Holt, Rinehart & Winston
93.
Rubie-DaviesC. M. (2010). Teacher expectations and perceptions of student attributes: Is there a relationship?British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(Pt. 1), 121-135. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X466334
SalernoA. S.AndreiE.KiblerA. K. (2019). Teachers’ misunderstandings about hybrid language use: Insights into teacher education. TESOL Journal, 10(3), e00455. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.455
96.
SaundersW.MarcellettiD. (2012). The gap that can't go away: The catch-22 of reclassification in monitoring the progress of English learners. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373712461849
97.
ShinN. (2018). The effects of initial English language learner classification on students’ later academic outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717737378
98.
SireciS. G.Faulkner-BondM. (2015). Promoting validity in the assessment of English learners. Review of Research in Education, 39(1), 215–252. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X14557003
99.
SolórzanoR. W. (2008). High stakes testing: Issues, implications, and remedies for English language learners. Review of Educational Research, 78(2), 260–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308317845
100.
SorhagenN. S. (2013). Early teacher expectations disproportionately affect poor children's high school performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031754
101.
SteeleJ. L.SlaterR. O.ZamarroG.MillerT.LiJ.BurkhauserS.BaconM. (2017). Effects of dual-language immersion programs on student achievement: Evidence from lottery data. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1 Suppl.), 282S–306S. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216634463
102.
TachL. M.FarkasG. (2006). Learning-related behaviors, cognitive skills, and ability grouping when schooling begins. Social Science Research, 35(4), 1048–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.08.001
103.
TenenbaumH. R.RuckM. D. (2007). Are teachers’ expectations different for racial minority than for European American students? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.253
104.
TourangeauK.NordC.LeT.SorongonA.HagedornM.DalyP. (2015). User’s manual for the ECLS-K: 2011 Kindergarten data file and electronic codebook. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
105.
UmanskyI. M. (2016). To be or not to be EL: An examination of the impact of classifying students as English learners. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(4), 714–737. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716664802
106.
ValdésG. (1997). Dual-language immersion programs: A cautionary note concerning the education of language-minority students. Harvard Educational Review, 67(3), 391–430. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.67.3.n5q175qp86120948
107.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: US-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. State University of New York Press.
108.
Van den BerghL.DenessenE.HornstraL.VoetenM.HollandR. W. (2010). The implicit prejudiced attitudes of teachers: Relations to teacher expectations and the ethnic achievement gap. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 497–527. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209353594
109.
WalkerA.ShaferJ.IiamsM. (2004). “Not in my classroom”: Teacher attitudes towards English language learners in the mainstream classroom. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 2(1), 130-160.
110.
WayneA. J.YoungsP. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89–122. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543073001089
WileyT. G.LukesM. (1996). English-only and standard English ideologies in the U.S. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 511–535. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587696
113.
YoonB. (2008). Uninvited guests: The influence of teachers’ roles and pedagogies on the positioning of English language learners in the regular classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 495–522. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208316200
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
