Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Recent evidence on the large variance in teacher effectiveness has spurred interest in teacher labor markets. Research documents that better qualified teachers typically work in more advantaged schools but cannot determine the relative importance of supply versus demand. To isolate teacher preferences, we document which schools prospective teachers interviewed at during job fairs in Chicago. We find substantial variation in the number of applicants per school, ranging from under five to over 300. Schools serving more advantaged students have more applicants per vacancy, on average, and teacher preferences vary systematically by their own demographic characteristics. School geographic location is highly predictive of applications, even after controlling for distance from applicants’ home addresses and a host of school and neighborhood characteristics.

Keywords

distribution of teachers across schools teacher labor supply teacher labor markets teacher preferences urban schools

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aaronson

Barrow

Sander

(2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25, 95–135.

Allison

P. D.

(2002). Missing data. Series: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Alonso

(1964). Location and land use. Toward a general theory of land rent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Baker

B. D.

Cooper

B. S.

(2005). Do principals with stronger academic backgrounds hire better teachers? Policy implications for improving high-poverty schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(3), 449–479.

Boyd

Lankford

Loeb

Ronfeldt

Wyckoff

(2011). The role of teacher quality in retention and hiring: Using applications-to-transfer to uncover preferences of teachers and schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(1), 88–110.

Boyd

Lankford

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2005a). The draw of home: How teachers’ preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(1), 1134–1132.

Boyd

Lankford

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2005b). Explaining the short careers of high-achieving teachers in schools with low-performing students. American Economic Review, 95(2), 166–171.

Cannata

(2010). Understanding the teacher job search process: Espoused preferences and preferences in use. Teachers College Record, 112(12), 2889–2934.

Clark

W. A.

Huang

Withers

(2003). Does commuting distance matter?: Commuting tolerance and residential change. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33(2), 199–221.

10.

Clotfelter

C. T.

Ladd

H. F.

Vigdor

J. L.

(2005). Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. Economics of Education Review, 24(4), 377–392.

11.

Clotfelter

C. T.

Ladd

H. F.

Vigdor

J. L.

(2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Human Resources, 41(4), 778–820.

12.

Dee

T. S.

(2004). The race connection: Are teachers more effective with students who share their ethnicity? Education Next, 4(2), 52–59.

13.

Goldhaber

Gross

Player

(2007). Are public schools really losing their “best”? Assessing the career transitions of teachers and their implications for the quality of the teacher workforce (CALDER working paper). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509666.pdf

14.

Glaeser

Vigdor

(2012). The end of the segregated century: racial separation in America’s neighborhoods, 1890–2010. New York, NY: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.

15.

Grissom

J. A.

Keiser

L. R.

(2011). A supervisor like me: Race, representation, and the satisfaction and turnover decisions of public sector employees. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(3), 557–580.

16.

Hanson

Johnston

(1985). Gender differences in work-trip length: Explanations and implications, Urban Geography, 6, 193–219.

17.

Hanson

Pratt

(1988). Reconceptualizing the links between home and work in urban geography. Economic Geography, 64(4), 299–321.

18.

Hanushek

E. A.

Kain

J. F.

O’Brien

D. M.

Rivkin

S. G.

(2005). The market for teacher quality (NBER Working Paper #11154). Cambridge, MA: NBER.

19.

Hanushek

E. A.

Kain

J. F.

Rivkin

S. J.

(2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 34, 326–354.

20.

Hanushek

E. A.

Rivkin

S. G.

(2007). Pay, working conditions, and teacher quality. The Future of Children, 17(1), 69–86.

21.

Ingersoll

(2003). Out-of-field teaching and the limits of teacher policy. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teacher Policy.

22.

Lankford

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37–62.

23.

Liu

Johnson

S.M.

(2006). New teachers’ experiences of hiring: Late, rushed, and information poor. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(3), 324–360.

24.

Madden

J. F.

(1981). Why women work closer to home. Urban Studies, 18(2), 181–194.

25.

Massey

D. S.

Gross

A. B.

Shibuya

(1994). Migration, segregation, and the geographic concentration of poverty. American Sociological Review, 59, 425–445.

26.

McPherson

Smith-Lovin

Cook

J. M.

(2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.

27.

Nye

Konstantopoulos

Hedges

L. V.

(2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237–257.

28.

Papay

J. P.

West

M. R.

Fullerton

J. B.

Kane

T. J.

(2011). Does practice-based teacher preparation increase student achievement? Early evidence from the Boston Teacher Residency (No. w17646). Cambridge, MA: NBER.

29.

Reininger

(2012). Hometown disadvantage? It depends on where you’re from: Teachers’ location preferences and the implications for staffing schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(2), 127–145.

30.

Rockoff

J. E.

(2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94, 247–252.

31.

Scafidi

Stinebrickner

Sjoquist

D. L.

(2007). Race, poverty, and teacher mobility. Economics of Education Review, 26, 145–159.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB

New Evidence on Teacher Labor Supply

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material