The underrepresentation of girls from nondominant backgrounds in the sciences and engineering continues despite recent gains in achievement. This longitudinal ethnographic study traces the identity work that girls from nondominant backgrounds do as they engage in science-related activities across school, club, and home during the middle school years. Building a conceptual argument for identity trajectories, the authors discuss the ongoing, cumulative, and contentious nature of identity work and the mechanisms that foster critical shifts in trajectories. The authors argue that the girls view possible future selves in science when their identity work is recognized, supported, and leveraged toward expanded opportunities for engagement in science. This process yields layered meanings of (possible) selves and of science and reconfigures meaningful participation in science.
ArcherL.DeWittJ.OsborneJ.DillonJ.WillisB.WongB. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94, 617–639.
2.
BrickhouseN. W.PotterJ. (2001). Young women’s scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 965–980.
3.
Calabrese BartonA.TanE. (2010). We be burnin: Agency, identity and learning in a Green Energy program. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187–229.
4.
Calabrese BartonA.TanE.RivetA. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Education Research Journal, 45, 68–103.
5.
CarloneH. B.Haun-FrankJ.WebbA. (2011). Assessing equity beyond knowledge- and skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth-grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 459–485.
6.
CollinsP. H. (2000a). Black feminist thought (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
CollinsP. H. (2000b). Gender, Black feminism, and Black political economy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 568(1), 41–53.
8.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–167.
9.
EisenhartM.FinkelE. (1998). Women’s science: Learning and succeeding from the margins. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
GutierrezK. D.Baquedano-LopezP.TejedaC. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303.
11.
HillC.CorbettC.St. RoseA. (2011). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering & mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
12.
HollandD.LachicotteW.SkinnerD.CainC. (2001). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
HollandD.LaveJ. (2009). Social practice theory and the historical production of persons. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 2, 1–15.
14.
HollandD.LeanderK. M. (2004). Ethnographic studies of positioning and subjectivity: An introduction. Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology, 32, 127–139.
15.
JohnsonA.BrownJ.CarloneH.CuevasA. K. (2011). Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 339–366.
16.
LeanderK. M. (2002). Locating Latanya: The situated production of identity artifacts in classroom interaction. Research in the Teaching of English, 37(2), 198–250.
17.
LeanderK. M.PhillipsN. C.TaylorK. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329–394.
18.
LindahlB. (2007, July). A longitudinal study of student’s attitudes towards science and choice of career. Paper presented at the 80th NARST International Conference, New Orleans, LA.
19.
NasirN. i. S. (2011). Racialized identities: Race and achievement among African American Youth. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
NasirN. i. S.CooksJ. (2009). Becoming a hurdler: How learning settings afford identities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 40, 41–61.
21.
National Academies. (2007). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
22.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
23.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). Highlights from PISA 2006: Performance of U.S. 15-year-old students in science and mathematics literacy in an international context. Washington, DC: Author.
24.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The nation’s report card. Washington, DC: Author.
25.
PolmanJ. L.MillerD. (2010). Changing stories. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 879–918.
26.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
TanE.Calabrese BartonA. (2008). From peripheral to central, the story of Melanie’s metamorphosis in an urban middle school science class. Science Education, 92(4), 567–590.
28.
UrrietaL. (2007). Identity production in figured worlds: How some Mexican Americans become Chicana/o activist educators. The Urban Review, 39, 117–144.
29.
WengerE. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
30.
WorthamS. (2006). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
