This exploratory qualitative study examines the views of two Somali fathers on science, nature, and content of science that Somali students should be taught, and how science intersects with Somali sociocultural practices. The fathers were interviewed for over a year. We analyzed data inductively using a systematic qualitative process. The findings of the study show that the Somali fathers desired their children to learn science that was useful in Somali lives and connected to their sociocultural experiences. Learning evolution science created resistance and challenges to Somali fathers’ views of scientific evolution and future careers in science-related fields. Because of their deep-rooted Islamic faith, the fathers’ views of scientific evolution created internal resistance and challenges for themselves and for their children. In addition, Somali fathers expressed a greater sense of responsibility to resist the labels that science assigns in the “name of disease diagnosis.” A larger implication of this study might call upon urban school teachers to seek out Somali adults and parents as resources to make science teaching and learning socioculturally more relevant and respectful.
AikenheadG. S. (2002). Integrating Western and aboriginal sciences: Cross-cultural science teaching. Research in Science Education, 31, 337–355.
2.
AkeeR. K. Q.CopelandW. E.KeelerG.AngoldA.CostelloE. J. (2010). Parents’ incomes and children’s outcomes: A quasi-experiment. American Economic Journal of Applied Economics, 2, 86–115.
3.
AlbrechtN.UpadhyayB. (2018). What do refugee mothers want in U.S. school science: Learning from the perceptions of science of three Somali mothers. The Urban Review, 50, 604-629.
4.
AllenJ. (2007). Creating welcoming schools: A practical guide to home-school partnerships with diverse families. Teachers College Press.
5.
AltersB. J.AltersS. M. (2001). Defending evolution in the classroom: A guide to the creation/evolution controversy. Jones & Bartlett.
6.
BjörklundA.SalvanesK. G. (2011). Education and family background: Mechanisms and policies. In HanushekE.WelchF. (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 3, pp. 201–247). Elsevier.
7.
BoujaoudeS.AsgharA.WilesJ. R.JaberL.SarieddineD.AltersB. (2011). Biology professors’ and teachers’ positions regarding biological evolution and evolution education in a Middle Eastern society. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 979–1000.
8.
BranchG. (2008). Creationism as a global phenomenon. In RobbinsR. H.CohenM. (Eds.), Darwin and the Bible: The cultural confrontation (pp. 137–151). Allyn & Bacon.
9.
BranchG.ScottE. C.RosenauJ. (2010). Dispatches from the evolution wars: Shifting tactics and expanding battlefields. Annual Review of Human Genetics and Genomics, 11, 317–338.
10.
BryanL.AtwaterM. (2002). Teacher beliefs and cultural models: A challenge for science teacher preparation programs. Science Education, 86, 821–839.
11.
Calabrese BartonA.DrakeC.PerezG.St. LouisK. (2004). Ecologies of parental engagement in urban education. Educational Researcher, 33(4), 3–12.
12.
Calabrese BartonA.TanE. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 50–73.
13.
ChiswickB. R.DebBurmanN. (2004). Educational attainment: Analysis by immigrant generation. Economics of Education Review, 23, 361–379.
14.
ChrispeelsJ. H.RiveroE. (2001). Engaging Latino families for student success: How parent education can reshape parents’ sense of place in the education of their children. Peabody Journal of Education, 76, 119–169.
15.
CobernW. (2000). The nature of science and role of knowledge and belief. Science & Education, 9, 219–246.
16.
ColeJ. (1993). Islam and creationism (NCSE Reports, 13). National Center for Science Education.
17.
ColeM. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Harvard.
DagherZ.BoujaoudeS. (2005). Students’ perceptions of the nature of evolutionary theory. Science Education, 89, 378–391.
20.
DearingE.McCartneyK.WeissH. B.KreiderH.SimpkinsS. (2004). The promotive effects of family educational involvement for low-income children’s literacy. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 445–460.
21.
DenzinN.LincolnY. (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publication.
22.
DenizH.DonnellyL.YilmazI. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 420–443.
23.
DuncanG. J.Ziol-GuestK. M.KalilA. (2010). Early-childhood poverty and adult attainment, behavior, and health. Child Development, 81, 306–325.
24.
EpsteinJ. L. (2010). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. West Perception Press.
25.
EpsteinJ. L.SalinasK. C. (2004). Partnering with families and communities. Educational Leadership, 61, 12–18.
26.
EpsteinJ. L.SandersM. G.SimonB. S.SalinasK. C.JansornN. R.Van VoorhisF. L. (2009). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action (2nd edition). Corwin Press.
27.
FlemingM.KenyonL. O.KenyonL.UpadhyayB. (2015). Democratic science: Engaging middle school students in meaningful practices through community engagement. Education in Democracy, 7, 37–63.
28.
FoxK. V. (1996). Silent voices: A subversive reading of child sexual abuse. In EllisC.BochnerA. (Eds.) Composing ethnography: Alternative forms of qualitative writing (pp. 330–356). Thousand Oaks, CA: Alta Mira Press.
29.
GeeJ. P. (1990). Critical perspectives on literacy and education. Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Routledge.
30.
GeshekterC. L.WarsamaS. A. (1996). An introduction to humour and jokes in Somali culture. Voice and Power: The Culture of Language in North-East Africa, 3, 141–153.
31.
HagiwaraS.Calabrese BartonA. C.ContentoI. (2007). Culture, food, and language: Perspectives from immigrant mothers in school science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 475–515.
32.
HarawayD. (2008). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599.
33.
HermansP. (2004). Applying Ogbu’s theory of minority academic achievement to the situation of Moroccans in the Low Countries. Intercultural Education, 15, 431–439.
34.
HertzR. (1997). Reflexivity and voice (Ed.). Sage Publication.
35.
HillN. E.TaylorL. C. (2004). Parental school involvement and children’s academic achievement: Pragmatics and issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 161–164.
LandrineH. (1995). Introduction: Cultural diversity, contextualization, and feminist psychology. In LandrineH. (Ed.), Bringing cultural diversity to feminist psychology: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 55–75). American Psychological Association.
38.
LópezG. R.ScribnerJ. D.MahitivanichchaK. (2001). Redefining parental involvement: Lessons from high-performing migrant-impacted schools. American Educational Research, 38, 253–288.
39.
MansourN. (2011). Science teachers’ perceptions of science and religion vs. the Islamic perspective: Conflicting or compatible?Science Education, 95, 281–309.
40.
MappK. L. (2003). Having their say: Parents describe why and how they are engaged in children’s learning. School Community Journal, 13, 35–64.
41.
McBrienJ. L. (2005). Educational needs and barriers for refugee students in the United States: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75, 329–364.
42.
McNeilD. (2009, March17). An outbreak of autism, or a statistical fluke?The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com
43.
MillerJ. (2009). Teaching refugee learners with interrupted education in science: Vocabulary, literacy and pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 571–592.
44.
MollL. C. (1990). Vygotsky and education. Cambridge University Press.
45.
National Academy of Sciences. (2008). Science, evolution, and creationism. National Academies Press.
46.
NietoS.BodeP. (2011). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
47.
NiyozovS.PulimG. (2009). Teachers’ perspectives on the education of Muslim students: A missing voice in Muslim education research. Curriculum Inquiry, 39, 637–677.
48.
PachecoM. (2012). Learning in/through everyday resistance: A cultural-historical perspective on community resources and curriculum. Educational Researcher, 41, 121–132.
49.
PeñaD. C. (2000). Parent involvement: Influencing factors and implications. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 42–54.
50.
PipherM. (2002). The middle of everywhere: Helping refugees enter the American community. Harcourt.
51.
PlutynskiA. (2010). Should intelligent design be taught in public school science classrooms?Science & Education, 19, 779–795.
52.
PutnamD. B.NoorM. C. (1999). The Somalis: Their history and culture. Washington, DC: The Refugee Service Center, Center for Applied Linguistics.
53.
RemtullaA. (1993). The reaction of Muslim Arab scholars to the Darwinian revolution. Muslim Education Quarterly, 10, 57–64.
54.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
55.
SayinU.KenceA. (1999). Islamic scientific creationism: A new challenge in Turkey. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 19, 18–20.
56.
ScribnerJ. D.YoungM. D.PedrozaA. (1999). Building collaborative relationships with parents. In ReyesP.ScribnerJ. D.ScribnerA. P. (Eds.), Lessons from high-performing Hispanic schools: Creating learning communities (pp. 36–60). Teachers College Press.
57.
SirinS.FineM. (2008). Muslim American youth: Understanding hyphenated identities through multiple methods. New York University Press.
58.
SmithJ. G. (2006). Parental involvement in education among low-income families: A case study. The School Community Journal, 16, 43–56.
59.
SoutherlandS. A.SinatraG. M.MatthewsM. R. (2001). Belief, knowledge, and science education. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 325–351.
60.
TraniR. (2004). I won’t teach evolution; it’s against my religion. And now for the rest of the story . . .The American Biology Teacher, 66, 419–442.
61.
UpadhyayB.GiffordA. (2010). Changing lives: Coteaching immigrant students in a middle school science classroom. In MurphyC.ScantleburyK. (Eds.), Coteaching in international contexts: Research and practice (pp. 267-283). Springer.
62.
UpadhyayB.MaruyamaG.AlbrechtN. (2017). Taking an active stance: How urban elementary students connect sociocultural experiences in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 39, 2528-2547.
63.
ValdésG. (1996). Con respeto: Bridging the distances between culturally diverse families and schools. Teachers College Press.
64.
Van VoorhisF. L. (2011). Costs and benefits of family involvement in homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22, 220–249.
VereeckenC.HaerensL.BourdeaudhuijD. I.MaesL. (2010). The relationship between children’s home food environment and dietary patterns in childhood and adolescence. Public Health Nutrition, 13, 1729–1735.
67.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
68.
ZineJ. (2007). Safe havens or religious ghettos: Narratives of Islamic schooling in Canada. Race and Ethnicity in Education, 10, 71–92.
69.
ZineJ. (2008). Canadian Islamic schools: Unveiling the politics of faith, gender, knowledge and identity. University of Toronto Press.
