Concomitant with the increase in the number of paraprofessionals assisting students with disabilities is the emergence of legal issues pertaining to the need, selection, responsibilities, preparation, and supervision of those paraprofessionals. The purpose of this article is to provide a legal analysis of administrative and judicial decisions concerning these issues and to propose guidelines for ensuring appropriate paraprofessional involvement in the educational programs for students with disabilities.
AlexanderK.AlexanderM. D. (2001). American Public School Law (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
2.
Allen v. Crawford. 20 IDELR 1115 (Ga. Ct. Appeals, 1993).
3.
AshbakerB.MorganJ. (1999). The “S” in ASCD: Teachers supervising paraeducators for professional development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (San Francisco, March 1999). Retrieved Jan. 17, 2005 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/.
4.
BackusL.CichoskiKellyE. (2001). Supporting students with challenging behaviors: A paraeducator curriculum. Vermont University Center on Disability and Community Inclusion. Retrieved Jan. 11, 2005, at http://www.eric.ed.gov/.
5.
Bangor School Department, 36 IDELR 192 (SEA ME 2002).
6.
Board of Education of the City of New York. 28 IDELR (SEA NY 1998).
7.
Board of Education of the Harrison Central School District, 41 IDELR 285 (SEA NY 2004).
8.
Board of Education of the Oakridge Public Schools, 40 IDELR 274 (SEA MI 2003).
9.
Brevard County School Board, 41 IDELR 288 (SEA FL 2004).
10.
BrownL.FarringtonK.KnightT.RossC.ZieglerM. (1999). Fewer paraprofessionals and more teachers and therapists in educational programs for students with significant disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 24(4), 249–252.
Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F., 29 IDELR 966 (S. Ct. 1999).
13.
Center on Disability and Community Inclusion. (2004). Paraeducator support of students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Retrieved May 5, 2005, from http://wum.edu/.
14.
ChopraR. V.FrenchN. K. (2004). Paraeducator relationships with parents of students with significant disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 25(4), 240–251.
15.
Clovis United School District, 36 IDELR 201 (SEA CA 2001).
16.
Conecuh County School board, 27 IDELR 112 (SEA AL 1997).
17.
Connally Independent School District, 34 IDELR 309 (SEA TX 2001).
18.
Del Norte County Unified School District, 33 IDELR 50 (SEA CA 2000).
19.
DemchakM. A.MorganC. R. (1998). Effective collaboration between professionals and paraprofessionals. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 17(2), 10–15.
20.
DiSalvoC. A.OswaldD. P. (2002). Peer-mediated interventions to increase the social interactions of children with autism: Consideration of peer expectancies. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 17(4), 1989–2007. Retrieved May 10, 2005, from: http://infotrac.galegroup.com/
21.
DowningJ. E.RyndakD. L.ClarkD. (2000). Paraeducators in inclusive classrooms: Their own perceptions. Remedial and Special Education, 21(3), 171–181.
22.
DrecktrahM. E. (2000). Preservice teachers' preparation to work with paraeducators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 23(2), 157–164.
23.
Dublin Unified School District, 37 IDELR 22 (SEA CA 2002).
24.
Elmore County Board of Education, 37 IDELR 230 (SEA AL 2002).
25.
EtscheidtS. K.BartlettL. (1999). The IDEA amendments: A four-step approach for determining supplementary aids and services. Exceptional Children, 65(2), 163–174.
26.
FordyceR. (1995). Delegation: A paraprofessional perspective. In KrajicekM. J.SteinkeG. D., The National Conference on Developing Policy and Practice to Implement IDEA Related to Invasive Procedures for Children With Special Health Care Needs, Denver, August 6–7, 1994. Retrieved May 9, 2005, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/.
27.
Freeport School District 145, 34 IDELR 104 ISEA IL 2000).
28.
FrenchN. K. (1998). Working together: Resource teachers and paraeducators. Remedial and Special Education, 19(6), 357–368.
29.
FrenchN. K. (1999). Paraeducators and teachers: Shifting roles. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(2), 69–73.
30.
FrenchN. K. (2001). Supervising paraprofessionals: A survey of teacher practices. Journal of Special Education, 35(1), 41–53.
31.
FrenchN. K.ChopraR. V. (1999). Parent perspectives on the roles of paraprofessionals. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 24(4), 259–272.
32.
FreschiD. F. (1999). Guidelines for working with one-to-one aides. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(4), 42–45.
33.
Gellerman v. Calaveras Unified School District, 37 IDELR 125 (9th Cir. 2002).
34.
GerberS. B.FinnJ. D.AchillesC. M.Boyd-ZahariasJ. (2001). Teacher aides and students' academic achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 123–143.
35.
Gerber Union Elementary School District, 26 IDELR 199 (SEA CA 1997).
36.
GiangrecoM. F. (2003). Working with paraprofessionals. Educational Leadership, 61(2), 50–53.
37.
GiangrecoM. F.BroerS. M.EdelmanS. W. (1999). The tip of the iceberg: Determining whether paraprofessional support is needed for students with disabilities in general education settings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 24(4), 281–291.
38.
GiangrecoM. F.BroerS. M.EdelmanS. W. (2001). Teacher engagement with students with disabilities: Differences between paraprofessional service delivery models. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 26(2), 75–86.
39.
GiangrecoM. F.BroerS. M.EdelmanS. W. (2002). “That was then, this is now!” Paraprofessional supports for students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptionality, 10(1), 47–64.
40.
GiangrecoM. F.DoyleM. B. (2002). Students with disabilities and paraprofessional supports: Benefits, balance, and band-aids. Focus on Exceptional Children, 34(7), 1–12.
41.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS. W.BroerS. M. (2001). Respect, appreciation, and acknowledgment of paraprofessionals who support students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67(4), 485–498.
42.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS. W.BroerS. M. (2003). Schoolwide planning to improve paraeducator supports. Exceptional Children, 70(1), 63–79.
43.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS. W.BroerS. M.DoyleM. B. (2001). Paraprofessional support of students with disabilities: Literature from the past decade. Exceptional Children, 68(1), 45–63.
44.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS.LuisellliT. E.MacFarlandS. (1997). Helping or hovering? Effects of instructional assistant proximity on students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64(1), 7–18.
45.
GoesslingD. P. (1998). The invisible elves of the inclusive school: Paraprofessionals. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San Diego, April 13–17, 1998). Retrieved January 17, 2005, from: http://www.eric.ed.gov/.
46.
Greer v. Rome City School District, 967 F.2d 470 (11th Cir. 1992).
47.
Harris County School System, 26 IDELR 193 (SEA GA 1997).
48.
Hendrick Hudson District Board of Education v. (1982). Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 102 S. Ct. 3034, 73 L. Ed., 2d, 690.
49.
HertelV. (1994). School health services. Presentation at the National Conference on Developing Policy and Practice to Implement IDEA Related to Invasive Procedures for Children with Special Health Care Needs. Retrieved January 17, 2005, from: http://www.eric.ed.gov/.
50.
HiltonA.GerlachK. (1997). Employment, preparation, and management of paraeducators: Challenges to appropriate services for students with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 71–76.
51.
Hingham Public Schools, 33 IDELR 292 (SEA MA 2000).
52.
Independent School District No. 11, Anoka-Hennepin, 36 IDELR 81 (SEA MN 2001).
53.
Jackson County Board of Education, 38 IDELR 83 (SEA AL 2002).
54.
JonesK. H.BenderW. N. (1993). Utilization of paraprofessionals in special education: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 14(1), 7–14.
55.
KatsiyannisA.HodgeJ.LanfordA. (2000). Paraeducators: Legal and practice considerations. Remedial and Special Education, 21(5), 297–304.
56.
Kevin G v. Cranston School Committee, 27 IDELR 32 (1st Cir. 1997).
57.
Killeen Independent School District. 39 IDELR 21, (SEA TX 2003).
58.
KilloranJ.TemplemanT. P.PetersJ.UdellT. (2001). Identifying paraprofessional competencies for early intervention and early childhood special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(1), 68–73.
59.
KoegelL. K.KoegelR. L.FreaW.Green-HopkinsI. (2003). Priming as a method of coordinating educational services for students with autism. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 34(3), 228–235. Retrieved May 10, 2005, from http://vnweb.hwwilsonweb.com.
60.
KotkinR. A. (1995). The Irvine paraprofessional program: Using paraprofessionals in serving students with ADHD. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30(4), 235–240.
61.
Lake Travis Independent School District, 4 ECLPR 500 (SEA TX 2003).
62.
LehrD. H.GreeneJ. (2002). Educating students with complex health care needs in public schools: The interactions of health care, education, and the law. Journal of Health Care Law and Policy, 5, 68–85. Retrieved January 17, 2005, from http://web.lexis-nexis.com/.
63.
LikinsM. (2003). NCLB implications for paraprofessionals. Principal Leadership, 3(5), 10–13.
64.
Limestone County Board of Education, 31 IDELR 122 (SEA AL 1999).
65.
Linn-Mar Community School District, 41 IDELR 24 (SEA IA 2004).
66.
LongJ. (1994). Basic civics review: Branches of government and their respective functions. Presentation at the National Conference on Developing Policy and Practice to Implement IDEA Related to Invasive Procedures for Children With Special Health Care Needs. Retrieved January 17, 2005, from: http://www.eric.ed.gov/.
67.
Los Angeles Unified School District, 28 IDELR 324 (SEA CA 1998).
68.
Malden Public Schools, 42 IDELR 73 (SEA MA 2004).
69.
Manalansan v. Board of Education of Baltimore City, 35 IDELR 122 (DC MD 2001).
70.
MarksS. U.SchraderC.LevineM. (1999). Paraeducator experiences in inclusive settings: Helping, hovering, or holding their own?Exceptional Children, 65(3), 315–328.
71.
Menlo Park City Elementary School District, 36 IDELR 230 (SEA CA 2002).
72.
McConnellS. R. (2002). Interventions to facilitate social interaction for young children with autism: Review of available research and recommendations for educational intervention and future research. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(5), 351–372. Retrieved May 5, 2005, from http://www.springerlink.com.
73.
MillsapM.MossM.GamseB. (1993). The Chapter 1 implementation study: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
74.
Mobile County Board of Education, 34 IDELR 164 (SEA AL 2001).
75.
Molly L. v. Lower Merion School District, 36 IDELR 182 (ED PA 2002).
76.
Montgomery County Public Schools, 27 IDELR 658 (SEA MD 1997).
MuellerP. H.MurphyF. V. (2001). Determining when a student requires paraeducator support. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(6), 22–27.
79.
National Association for School Nurses (NASN). (2002). School health nursing services role in health care. Retrieved January 27, 2005, from http://www.nasn.org/.
80.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1999). Learning disabilities: Use of paraprofessionals. A report from the National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(1), 23–30.
81.
Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory (NREL). (1999). Designing state and local policies for the professional development of instructional paraeducators. Portland, OR: NREL.
82.
Olympia School District, 103 LRP 38306(SEA WA 2003).
83.
ParsonsM. B.ReidD. H. (1999). Training basic teaching skills to paraeducators of students with severe disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(4), 48–54.
84.
Pell City Board of Education, 38 IDELR 253 (SEA AL 2003).
85.
PickettA. L.LikinsM.WallaceT. (2003). The employment and preparation of paraeducators: The state of the art, 2003. The National Resource Center for Paraprofessionals. Retrieved January 12, 2005, from http://www.nrcpara.org/.
86.
Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16, 441 IDELR 130 (3rd Cir, 1988).
87.
PugachM. C.JohnsonL. J. (1995). Collaborative practitioners, collaborative schools. Denver, CO: Love Publishing Co.
88.
RiggsC. G. (2001). Ask the paraprofessionals: What are your training needs?Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(3), 78–83.
89.
RiggsC. G.MuellerP. H. (2001). Employment and utilization of paraeducators in inclusive settings. Journal of Special Education, 35(1), 54–62.
90.
Sacramento City Unified School District, Board of Education v. Rachel H. by Robert Holland, 20 IDELR 812 (9th Cir. 1994)].
91.
SalzbergC. L.MorganJ. (1995). Preparing teachers to work with paraeducators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 18(1), 49–55.
92.
San Diego Unified School District, 41 IDELR 195 (SEA CA 2004).
93.
San Francisco Unified School District, 5 ECLPR 377 (SEA CA 2002).
94.
Silsbee Independent School District, 25 IDELR 1023 (SEA TX 1997).
95.
Sioux City Community School District, and Western Hills Area Education Agency (AEA 12), 104 LRP 10804 (SEA IA 2003).
96.
Skelly v. Brookfield LaGrange Park School District 95 (ND IL 1997).
97.
Slama v. Independent School District No. 2580, 39 IDELR 3 (DC MN 2003).
South River Board of Education, 39 IDELR 88 (SEA NJ 2003).
100.
SpringateK. W.StegelinD. A. (1999). Building school and community partnerships through parent involvement. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
101.
Stenger v. Stanwood School District, 30 IDELR 945 (WA Ct. Appeals, 1999)
102.
Tomlinson v. Board of Education of the City of Elmira, 583 N.Y.S.2d 664 (S. Ct. NY 1992).
103.
Vidor Independent School District, 27 IDELR 679 (SEA TX 1998).
104.
WadsworthD. E.KnightD. (1996). Paraprofessionals: The bridge to successful full inclusion. Intervention in School and Clinic, 31(3), 166–171.
105.
WallaceT.ShinJ.BartholomayT.StahlB. J. (2001). Knowledge and skills for teachers supervising the work of paraprofessionals. Exceptional Children, 67(4), 520–533.
106.
Waterbury Board of Education, 37 IDELR 262 (SEA CT 2002).
107.
Watson Chapel School District, 34 IDELR 51 (SEA AK 2000).
108.
WelchM.RichardsG.OkadaT.RichardsJ.PrescottS. (1995). A consultation and paraprofessional pull-in system of service delivery: A report on student outcomes and teacher satisfaction. Remedial and Special Education, 16(1), 16–28.
109.
WertsM. G.HarrisS.TilleryC. Y.RoarkR. (2004). What parents tell us about paraeducators. Remedial and Special Education, 25(4), 232–239.
110.
WertsM.ZigmondN.LeeperD. (2001). Paraprofessional proximity and academic engagement: Students with disabilities in primary-aged classrooms. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36(4), 424–440.
111.
WheelerJ. J.RicheyD. (2005). Behavior management: Principles and practices of positive behavior supports. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
112.
YellM. (2002). Teacher liability for student injury and misconduct. Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice. Retrieved January 12, 2005, from http://cecp.air.org/.
113.
YoungB.SimpsonR.MylesB. S.KampsD. M. (1997). An examination of paraprofessional involvement in supporting students with autism. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 12(1), 31–38.
114.
ZabalaJ.BluntM.CarlD. (2000). Quality indicators for assistive technology services in school settings. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(4), 25–36.
