This study investigated the effects of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on student-selected work skills for 4 students with moderate to severe disabilities. The students learned to set their own goals, develop an action plan, implement the plan, and adjust their goals and plans as needed. Three of the 4 participants achieved their self-selected goals, and 1 student did not meet the mastery criterion, but performed at a higher level during the training condition than in baseline. The results provide support for self-determination instruction for transition-age youth with moderate to severe disabilities.
AgranM.BlanchardC.WehmeyerM. L. (2000). Promoting transition goals and self-determination through student self-directed learning: The self-determined learning model of instruction. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 351–364.
3.
AgranM.BlanchardC.WehmeyerM. L.HughesC. (2002). Increasing the problem-solving skills of students with developmental disabilities participating in general education. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 279–288.
4.
AgranM.SnowK.SwanerJ. (1999). Teacher perceptions of self-determination: Benefits, characteristics, strategies. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34(3), 291–301.
5.
AgranM.WehmeyerM. L. (1999). Teaching problem solving to students with mental retardation. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
6.
American Association on Mental Retardation. (1992). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
7.
BlackorbyJ.WagnerM. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399–413.
8.
CardilloJ. R. (1994). Summary score conversion key. In KiresukT. J.SmithA.CardilloJ. R. (Eds.), Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory, and measurement (pp. 273–281). Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
9.
CarrR. W. (1979). Goal attainment scaling as a useful tool for evaluating progress in special education. Exceptional Children, 46, 88–95.
10.
FieldS.MartinJ.MillerR.WardM.WehmeyerM. (1998). A practical guide for teaching self-determination. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
11.
FrankA. R.SitlingtonP. L. (1993). Graduates with mental disabilities: The story three years later. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 30–37.
12.
FrankA. R.SitlingtonP. L. (2000). Young adults with mental disabilities: Does transition planning make a difference?Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 35(2), 119–134.
13.
GreeneG.Kochhar-BryantC. A. (2003). Pathways to successful transition for youth with disabilities. Columbus, OH: Prentice-Hall.
14.
HalloranW. D. (1993). Transition services requirement: Issues, implications, challenge. In EavesR. C.McLaughlinP.J. (Eds.), Recent advances in special education and rehabilitation (pp. 210–224). Boston, MA: Andover Medical Publishers.
15.
HughesC.CarterE. W. (2000). The transition handbook: Strategies high school teachers use that work. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
16.
HughesC. H.HuangB.KimJ.KillianD. J.HarmerM. L.AlcantaraP. R. (1997). A preliminary validation of strategies that support the transition from school to adult life. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 20, 1–14.
17.
KiresukT. J.LundS. H. (1976). Process and measurement using goal attainment scaling. In GlassG. V. (Ed.), Education studies review manual (Vol. 1). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
KiresukT. J.SmithA.CardilloJ. R., (Eds.) (1994). Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory, and measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
19.
MartinJ. E.MarshallL. Huber (1996). ChoiceMaker: A comprehensive self-determination transition program. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30(3), 147–156.
20.
MithaugD. E.WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.MartinJ. E.PalmerS. (1998). The self-determined learning model of instruction: Engaging students to solve their learning problems. In WehmeyerM. L.SandsD. J. (Eds.), Making it happen: Student involvement in educational planning, decision-making and instruction (pp. 299–328). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
21.
MorningstarM. E.Kleinhammer-TramillP. J.LattinD. L. (1999). Using successful models of student-centered transition planning and services for adolescents with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31, 1–19.
22.
PerainoJ. M. (1992). Post 21 follow up studies: How do special education graduates fare? In WehmanP. (Ed.), Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
23.
RichardsS. B.TaylorR. L.RamasamyR.RichardsR. Y. (1999). Single subject research: Applications in educational and clinical settings. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
24.
SitlingtonP. L.FrankA. R.CarsonR. (1991, October) Iowa statewide follow-up study: Changes in the adult adjustment of graduates with mental disabilities one vs. three years out of school. Des Moines, IA: Iowa Department of Education.
25.
WehmanP. (1996). Life beyond the classroom. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
26.
WehmeyerM. L. (1999). A functional model of self-determination: Describing development and implementing instruction. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14, 53–61.
27.
WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.HughesC. (1998). Teaching self-determination to students with disabilities, Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
28.
WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.HughesC. (2000). A national survey of teachers' promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. Journal of Special Education, 34, 58–68.
29.
WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.PalmerS. B.MithaugD. (1999). A teacher's guide to implementing the self-determined learning model of instruction: Adolescent version. Arlington, TX: The Arc of the United States.
30.
WehmeyerM. L.KelchnerK. (1995). The Arc's Self-Determination Scale. Arlington, TX: The Arc National Headquarters.
31.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. (in press). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities.
32.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.AgranM.MithaugD. E.MartinJ. E. (2000). Promoting causal agency: The self-determined learning model of instruction. Exceptional Children, 66, 439–453.
33.
WehmeyerM. L.SchwartzM. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245–255.
34.
WehmeyerM. L.SchwartzM. (1998). The self-determination focus of transition goals for students with mental retardation. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 21, 75–86.
