Increasingly, researchers have linked greater self-determination capacities to improved postsecondary outcomes for youth with disabilities. Although leadership is one component of self-determination, little is known about how youth and young adults with disabilities define, develop, and demonstrate leadership. In this qualitative interview study, the authors examined the perspectives on youth leadership development of 34 young adults with disabilities. Participants identified key attitudes and skills possessed by leaders and addressed the influence these qualities have on others. They also communicated their own experiences of developing their capacities as leaders, emphasizing the importance of early involvement in school and community activities and their relationships with family members, teachers, mentors, and friends. The authors offer recommendations for fostering youth leadership during the transition period.
CadwalladerT.WagnerM.GarzaN. (2003). Participation in extracurricular activities. In WagnerM.CadwalladerT.MarderC. (Eds.), Life outside the classroom for youth with disabilities (pp. 4.1–4.8). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
2.
CametoR.LevineP.WagnerM. (2004). Transition planning for students with disabilities: A special topic report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
3.
CarterE. W.LaneK. L.CrnoboriM.BruhnA. L.OakesW. P. (in press). Self-determination interventions for students with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders: Mapping the knowledge base. Behavioral Disorders.
4.
CarterE. W.SwedeenB.MossC. K.PeskoM. J. (2010). “What are you doing after school?” Promoting extracurricular involvement for transition-age youth with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 45, 275–283. doi:10.1177/1053451209359077
5.
CarterE. W.TrainorA. A.SunY.OwensL. (2009). Assessing the transition-related strengths and needs of adolescents with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children, 76, 74–94.
6.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
DeFurS.KorinekL. (2010). Listening to student voices. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues, and Ideas, 83(1), 15–19.
8.
FlanaganC.LevineP. (2010). Civic engagement and the transition to adulthood. Future of Children, 20(1), 159–179.
9.
GrenwelgeC.ZhangD.LandmarkL. (2010). Comprehensive leadership training for youth with disabilities: A new and improved youth leadership forum model. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(4), 62–68.
10.
HubermanA. M.MilesM. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428–444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
HurdN.ZimmermanM.XueY. (2009). Negative adult influences and the protective effects of role models: A study with urban adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 777–789. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9296-5
12.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
13.
KlauM. (2006). Exploring youth leadership in theory and practice. New Directions for Youth Development, 2006(109), 57–87. doi:10.1002/yd.155
14.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
National Alliance for Secondary Education and Transition. (2005). National standards and quality indicators: Transition toolkit for systems improvement. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Secondary Education and Transition
16.
National Collaborative on Workforce and Disability for Youth. (2005). Youth development and youth leadership in programs. InfoBrief, 11, 1–8.
17.
National Collaborative on Workforce and Disability for Youth. (2009). Guideposts for success (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
PowersK.GeenenS.PowersL. E. (2009). Similarities and differences in the transition expectations of youth with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 132–144. doi:10.1177/0885728809346302
20.
PowersL. E.GarnerT.ValnesB.SquireP.TurnerA.CoutureT.DertingerR. (2007). Building a successful adult life: Findings from youth-directed research. Exceptionality, 15, 45–56. doi:10.1080/09362830709336925
21.
SimeonssonR. J.CarlsonD.HuntingtonG. S.McMillenJ. S.BrentJ. L. (2001). Students with disabilities: A national survey of participation in school activities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23, 49–63. doi:10.1080/096382801750058134
22.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.BrewerD. M.WoodW. M. (2005). A content and methodological review of self-advocacy intervention studies. Exceptional Children, 72, 101–125.
23.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.WoodW. M.BrewerD. M.EddyS. (2005). A conceptual framework of self-advocacy for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 43–54. doi:10.1177/07419325050260010601
24.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181. doi:10.1177/0885728809346960
25.
WehmeyerM. L.FieldS. (2007). Instructional and assessment strategies to promote the self-determination of students with disabilities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
26.
WehmeyerM.PalmerS. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131–144.
