The 1990 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) reauthorization introduced transition mandates that included a “student involvement in transition planning” requirement, creating an emphasis on promoting such involvement so as to enhance the self-determination of students with disabilities and positive transition-related outcomes. This study used a randomized-trial control group design to study the impact of one widely used program to promote student involvement, the Self-Directed Individualized Education Program (IEP), on the self-determination and transition empowerment of youth with disabilities. A repeated-measures MANCOVA was conducted to determine the differences between an intervention group and the placebo-control group. Results showed that instruction using the Self-Directed IEP was significant on students’ level of self-determination, and positive differences were found in transition knowledge when compared with a placebo-control group.
ArndtS. A.KonradM.TestD. W. (2006). Effects of the Self-Directed IEP on student participation in planning meetings. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 194–207.
2.
CrossT.CookeN. L.WoodW. M.TestD. W. (1999). Comparison of the effects of MAPS and ChoiceMaker on student self-determination skills. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 499–510.
3.
FixsenD. L.NaoomS. F.BlaséK. A.FriedmanR. M.WallaceF. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida.
4.
GetzelE. E.BrielL. W. (2006). Pursuing postsecondary education opportunities for individuals with disabilities. In WehmanP. (Ed.), Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities (pp. 355–368). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
5.
GetzelE. E.ThomaC. A. (2008). Experiences of college students with disabilities and the importance of self-determination in higher education settings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 77–84.
6.
GrahamJ. W.CumsilleP. E.Elek-FiskE. (2003). Methods for handling missing data. In SchinkaJ. A.VelicerW. F. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 87–114). New York, NY: John Wiley.
7.
IzzoM. V.LambP. (2003). Developing self-determination through career development activities: Implications for vocational rehabilitation counselors. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 19, 71–78.
8.
KelleyK. R.BartholomewA.TestD. W. (2013). Effects of the Self-Directed IEP delivered using computer-assisted instruction on student participation in education planning meetings. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 67–77.
9.
KorenP.DeChilloN.FriesenB. (1992). Measuring empowerment in families whose children have emotional disabilities: A brief questionnaire. Rehabilitation Psychology, 37, 305–321.
10.
LeeY.WehmeyerM.PalmerS.Williams-DiehmK.DaviesD.StockS. (2010). Examining individual and instruction-related predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities: Multiple regression analyses. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 1–12.
11.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12.
MartinJ. E.MarshallL. H. (1994). ChoiceMaker self-determination transition assessment and curriculum. Colorado Springs: University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, Center for Educational Research.
MartinJ. E.MarshallL. H.SaleR. P. (2004). A 3-year study of middle, junior high, and high school IEP meetings. Exceptional Children, 70, 285–297.
15.
MartinJ. E.Van DyckeJ. L.ChristensenW. R.GreeneB. A.GardnerJ. E.LovettD. L. (2006). Increasing student participation in IEP meetings: Establishing the Self-Directed IEP as an evidence-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72, 299–316.
16.
MartinJ. E.ZhangD. D.TestD. W. (2012). Student involvement in the transition process. In WehmeyerM. L.WebbK. W. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent transition education for youth with disabilities (pp. 62–63). London, England: Routledge.
17.
McGlashing-JohnsonJ.AgranM.SitlingtonP.CavinM.WehmeyerM. (2003). Enhancing the job performance of youth with moderate to severe cognitive disabilities using the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 28, 194–204.
18.
MithaugD. E.CampeauP. L.WolmanJ. M. (2003). Assessing self-determination prospects among students with and without disabilities. In MithaugD. E.MithaugD. K.AgranM.MartinJ. E.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determined learning theory: Construction, verification, and evaluation (pp. 61–76). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
OlsonC. L. (1979). Practical considerations in choosing a MANOVA test statistic: A rejoinder to Stevens. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 1350–1352.
20.
PalmerS. B.WehmeyerM. L.GipsonK.AgranM. (2004). Promoting access to the general curriculum by teaching self-determination skills. Exceptional Children, 70, 407–420.
21.
PalmerS. B.WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A.Williams-DiehmK. L.SoukupJ. H. (2012). An evaluation of the beyond high school model on the self-determination of students with intellectual disability. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 35, 76–84.
22.
PowersL. E.TurnerA.WestwoodD.MatuszewskiJ.WilsonR.PhillipsA. (2001). TAKE CHARGE for the future: A controlled field-test of a model to promote student involvement in transition planning. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 89–104.
23.
SchaferJ. L.GrahamJ. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.
24.
Seabrooks-BlackmoreJ.WilliamsG. (2012). Student involvement in the transition process. In WehmeyerM. L.WebbK. W. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent transition education for youth with disabilities (pp. 98–99). London, England: Routledge.
25.
ShogrenK. A.BroussardR. (2011). Exploring the perceptions of self-determination of individuals with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 86–102.
26.
ShogrenK. A.PalmerS. B.WehmeyerM. L.Williams-DiehmK.LittleT. (2012). Effect of intervention with the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on access and goal attainment. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 320–330.
27.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.SoukupJ. H.LittleT.GarnerN.LawrenceM. (2007). Examining individual and ecological predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 73, 488–509.
28.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.SoukupJ. H.LittleT.GarnerN.LawrenceM. (2008). Understanding the construct of self-determination: Examining the relationship between the Arc’s Self-Determination Scale and the American Institute for Research Self-Determination Scale. Assessment for Effective Instruction, 33, 94–107.
29.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
30.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.RichterS. M.WhiteJ.MazzottiV.WalkerA. R.KorteringL. (2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 115–128.
31.
TestD. W.MasonC.HughesC.KonradM.NealeM.WoodW. M. (2004). Student involvement in individualized education program meetings. Exceptional Children, 70, 391–412.
32.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL. J.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181.
33.
TestD. W.NealeM. (2004). Using the self-advocacy strategy to increase middle graders’ IEP participation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 135–145.
34.
ThomaC. A.WehmeyerM. L. (2005). Self-determination and the transition to postsecondary education. In GetzelE. E.WehmanP. (Eds.), Going to college: Expanding opportunities for people with disabilities (pp. 49–68). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
35.
TurnbullA.TurnbullR. (2001). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: Collaborating for empowerment (4th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
36.
VandercookT.YorkJ.ForestM. (1989). The McGill Action Planning System (MAPS): A strategy for building the vision. The Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 14, 205–215.
37.
Van DyckeJ. L. (2005). Determining the impact of the Self-Directed IEP instruction on secondary IEP documents (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oklahoma, Norman.
38.
Van ReusenA. K.BosC. S.SchumakerJ. B. (1994). Self-advocacy strategy for educational and transition planning. Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
39.
WehmanP. (2001). Supported employment in business: Expanding the capacity of workers with disabilities. St. Augustine, FL: Training Resource Network, Inc.
40.
WehmeyerM. L. (1996). Student self-report measure of self-determination for students with cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 282–293.
41.
WehmeyerM. L.AberyB.MithaugD. E.StancliffeR. J. (2003). Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
42.
WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.HughesC. (2000). A national survey of teachers’ promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 58–68.
43.
WehmeyerM. L.FieldS.DorenB.JonesB.MasonC. (2004). Self-determination and student involvement in standards-based reform. Exceptional Children, 70, 413–425.
44.
WehmeyerM. L.KelchnerK. (1995). The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale. Arlington, TX: The Arc National Headquarters.
45.
WehmeyerM. L.LattimoreJ.JorgensenJ. D.PalmerS. B.ThompsonE.SchumakerK. M. (2003). The self-determined career development model: A pilot study. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 19, 79–87.
46.
WehmeyerM. L.LawrenceM.KelchnerK.PalmerS.GarnerN.SoukupJ. (2004). Whose Future is it Anyway? A student-directed transition planning process (2nd ed.). Lawrence, KS: Beach Center on Disability.
47.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.LeeY.Williams-DiehmK.ShogrenK. (2011). A randomized-trial evaluation of the effect of Whose Future is it Anyway? On self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 45–56.
48.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.ShogrenK.Williams-DiehmK.SoukupJ. (2013). Establishing a causal relationship between interventions to promote self-determination and enhanced student self-determination. The Journal of Special Education, 46, 195–210.
49.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.SoukupJ. H.GarnerN. W.LawrenceM. (2007). Self-determination and student transition knowledge and skills: Predicting involvement. Exceptionality, 15, 31–44.
50.
Williams-DiehmK.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.SoukupJ. H.GarnerN. W. (2008). Self-determination and student involvement in transition planning: A multivariate analysis. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 14, 25–36.
51.
WolmanJ.CampeauP.DuBoisP.MithaugD.StolarskiV. (1994). AIR Self-Determination Scale and user guide. Palo Alto, CA: American Institute for Research.
