Outcome indices were compared across groups of individuals who either remained in institutional settings or transferred from an institutional setting to various community living arrangements. All individuals included in the analysis had been labeled as having profound mental retardation. The community group exceeded or matched institution groups with respect to service hours, community integration, and adaptive behavior. Greater productivity, in terms of vocational activity, was noted in the two institution settings. Persons in the community had slightly greater difficulty in obtaining medical services. Nonmedical unmet needs were greater in the community programs.
American Medical Association. (1978). AMA drug evaluations. Chicago:
2.
AndersonL.PolisterB.ProutyR.LakinC. (1999). Services provided by state and nonstate agencies in 1998. In ProutyR.W.LakinK.C. (Eds.), Residential services for persons with developmental disabilities: Status and trends through 1998 (pp. 70–78). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Research and Training Center on Community Living, Institute on Community Integration.
3.
BraddockD.HempR. (1997). Toward family and community mental retardation services in Massachusetts, New England, and the United States. Mental Retardation, 35, 241–256.
4.
BrattA.JohnstonR. (1988). Changes in lifestyle for young adults with profound handicaps following discharge from hospital care into a “second generation” housing project. Mental Handicap Research, 1 (1), 49–74.
5.
CampbellD. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24 (4), 409–429.
6.
CloseD. (1977). Community living for severely and profoundly retarded adults: A group home study. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 12 (3), 256–262.
7.
ConneallyS.BoyleG.SmythF. (1992). An evaluation of the use of small group homes for adults with severe and profound mental handicaps. Mental Handicap Research, 5 (2), 146–168.
8.
ConroyJ. (1977). Trends in deinstitutionalization of the mentally retarded. Mental Retardation, August, 44–46.
9.
ConroyJ.BradleyV. (1985). The Pennhurst longitudinal study: Combined report of five years of research and analysis. Philadelphia: Temple University Developmental Disabilities Center; Boston: Human Services Research Institute.
10.
CraigE.McCarverR. (1984). Community placement and adjustment of deinstitutionalized clients: Issues and findings. In EllisN.BrayN. (Eds.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 12, pp. 99–152). Orlando: Academic Press.
11.
DagnanD.LookR.RuddickL.JonesJ. (1995). Changes in the quality of life of people with learning disabilities who moved from hospitals to live in community-based homes. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 18 (2), 115–122.
12.
DevlinS. (1989). Reliability assessment of the instruments used to monitor the Pennhurst class members. Philadelphia: Temple University Developmental Disabilities Center.
13.
FelceD.de KockU.ReppA. (1986). An eco-behavioral analysis of small community based houses and traditional large hospitals for severely and profoundly mentally handicapped adults. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 7 (4), 393–408.
14.
FelceD.PerryJ. (1996). Adaptive behavior gains in ordinary housing for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 9 (2), 101–114.
15.
FineM.TangemanP.WoodardJ. (1990). Changes in adaptive behavior of older adults with mental retardation following deinstitutionalization. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 94, 661–668.
16.
FiorelliJ.ThurmanK. (1979). Client behavior in more and less normalized residential settings. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 14, 85–94.
17.
FullertonA.DouglassM.DodderR. (1999). A reliability study of measures assessing the impact of deinstitutionalization. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20 (6), 387–400.
18.
HaneyJ. (1988). Empirical support for deinstitutionalization. In HealL.HaneyJ.AmadoA. (Eds.), Integration of developmentally disabled individuals into the community (pp. 37–58). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
19.
HuckS.McLeanR. (1975). Using a repeated measures ANOVA to analyze the data from a pretest-posttest design: A potentially confusing task. Psychological Bulletin, 82 (4), 511–518.
20.
IsettR.SpreatS. (1979). Test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the AAMD Adaptive Behavior Scale. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, 93–95.
21.
LarsonS.LakinC. (1989). Deinstitutionalization of persons with mental retardation: Behavioral outcomes. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 324–332.
22.
LordJ.PedlarA. (1991). Life in the community: Four years after the closure of an institution. Mental Retardation, 29, 213–221.
23.
LynchP.KellowJ.ThomasW.VictorL. (1997). The impact of deinstitutionalization on the adaptive behavior of adults with mental retardation: A meta analysis. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 32, 255–261.
24.
MaistoA.HughesE. (1995). Adaptation to group home living for adults with mental retardation as a function of previous residential placement. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 39, 15–18.
25.
NihiraK.FosterR.ShellhaasM.LelandH. (1974). AAMR Adaptive Behavior Scale. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.
26.
O'ConnorG. (1976). Home is a good place. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.
27.
Oklahoma State University. (1992). Developmental Disabilities Quality Assurance Questionnaire. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University Department of Sociology.
28.
Olmstead v. L.C. and E.W., 119 S. Ct 2176 (1999).
29.
O'NeillJ.BrownM.GordonW.SchonhornR. (1985). The impact of deinstitutionalization on activities and skills of severely and profoundly mentally retarded multiply handicapped adults. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 6 (3), 361–371.
30.
ProutyR.LakinC. (1996). Residential Services for Persons with developmental disabilities: Status and trends through 1995 (Rep. No. 48). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration/ UAP.
31.
RoseK.WhiteJ.ConroyJ.SmithD. (1993). Following the course of change: A study of adaptive and maladaptive behaviors of young adults living in the community. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 149–154.
32.
SpreatS.IsettR. (1980). An examination of performance decrement in institutionalized mentally retarded persons. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 3, 385–397.
33.
SpreatS.TellesJ.ConroyJ.FeinsteinC.ColombattoJ. (1987). Attitudes toward deinstitutionalization: National survey of families of institutionalized persons with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 25, 267–274.
34.
StancliffeR.AveryB. (1997). Longitudinal study of deinstitutionalization and the exercise of choice. Mental Retardation, 35, 159–169.
35.
StraussD.KastnerT. (1996). Comparative mortality of people with mental retardation in institutions and the community. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 26–40.
36.
Voice of the Retarded. (2000, January). Position paper: Quality of care for people with mental retardation.
