The Arc, a national organization on mental retardation, conducted a national survey to determine the degree to which students with mental retardation use assistive technology and to identify barriers to this outcome. Findings from the survey support earlier suggestions that students with mental retardation underutilize assistive technology. The survey found that in most cases, the number of students who could benefit from devices but did not have access to them exceeded the number who actually had devices. The discussion examined barriers to device utilization.
ArcThe (1993). Assistive technology for people with mental retardation. Arlington, TX: The Arc National Headquarters.
2.
DatilloJ. (1987). Computerized assessment of leisure preferences: A replication. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 22, 128–133.
3.
DererK.PolsgroveL., & RiethH. (1996). A survey of assistive technology applications in schools and recommendations for practice. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 62–80.
4.
FlippoK.F.IngeK.J., & BarcusJ.M. (Eds.) (1995) Assistive technology: A resource for school, work and community. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
5.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (1990). Public Law 101–476, 20 U.S.C. Sections 1400 et seq.
6.
IngeK.J., & ShepherdJ. (1995). Assistive technology applications and strategies for school system personnel. In FlippoK.F.IngeK.J., & BarcusJ.M. (Eds.), Assistive technology: A resource for school, work and community (pp. 133–166). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
7.
National Council on Disability (1993). Study on the financing of assistive technology devices and services for individuals with disabilities: A report to the President and the Congress of the United States. Washington, DC: National Council on Disability.
8.
NorusisM.J. (1992). SPSS for Windows, base system user's guide, Release 5.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.
9.
RealonR.E.FavellJ.E., & DayvaultK.A. (1988). Evaluating the use of adapted leisure materials on the engagement of person who are profoundly, multiply, handicapped. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 23, 228–237.
10.
RealonR.E.FavellJ.E., & PhillipsJ.F. (1989). Adapted leisure materials vs. standard leisure materials: Evaluating several aspects of programming for person who are profoundly handicapped. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 24, 168–177.
11.
Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988, PL 100–407. (August 19, 1988). Title 29, U.S.C. 2201 et seq: U.S. Statutes at Large, 102, 1044–1065.
12.
WalkerP. (1991). Where there is a way, there is not always a will: Technology, public policy, and the school integration of children who are technology-assisted. Children's Health Care, 20, 68–74
13.
WehmeyerM.L. (1995). The use of assistive technology by people with mental retardation and barriers to this outcome: A pilot study. Technology and Disability, 4, 195–204.
14.
WehmeyerM.L. (1997). A national survey of the use of assistive technology by adults with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 36, 44–51
