ApplebaumP.GrissoT. (1988). Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine, 319, 1635–1637.
2.
BeauchampT. J.ChildressJ. F. (1979). Principles of biomedical ethics (chaps. 2 and 3). New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
BerryJ.ShapiroA. (1975). Married mentally handicapped patients in the community. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 68(12), 27–30.
4.
BrandonM. W. G. (1960). A survey of 200 women discharged from a mental deficiency hospital. Journal of Mental Science, 106, 355–356.
5.
Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927).
6.
CarltonC. E. (1977). Injuries to the ureter. Urologic Clinics of North America, 4(1), 33–44.
7.
Committee on Bioethics. (1988). Ethical concerns in sterilization of persons with mental retardation. Washington, D.C.: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
8.
Committee on Ethics. (1988, September). Committee opinion (No. 63). Washington, DC: American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
9.
CraftA.CraftM. (1983). Sex education and counseling for mentally handicapped people (pp. 22–26). Baltimore: University Park Press.
10.
CranfordR. E.DouderaA. E. (1984, February). The emergence of institutional ethics committees. Law, Medicine, and Health Care, pp. 13–20.
11.
CummingP. D.WallaceE. L.SchorrJ. B.DoddR. Y. (1989). Exposure of patients to human immunodeficiency virus through the transfusion of blood components that test antibody negative. New England Journal of Medicine, 321, 941–945.
12.
DeutschA. (1949). The mentally ill in America (2nd ed.) New York: Columbia University Press.
13.
EasterdayC.H.GrimesD. A.RiggsJ. A. (1983). Hysterectomy in the United States. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 62, 203–212.
14.
Eifenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972).
15.
ElkinsT. E.BrownD. (1986). An approach to Down syndrome in light of Baby Doe. Issues in Law and Medicine, 1, 420–440.
16.
ElkinsT. E.GaffordL. S.WilksC. S.MuramD.GoldenG. (1986). A model clinic approach to the reproductive health concerns of the mentally handicapped. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 68, 185–189.
17.
ElkinsT. E.HoyleD.DarntonT.McNeeleyS. G.HeatonC. S. (1988). The use of a societally based ethics/advisory committee to aid in decisions to sterilize mentally handicapped patients. Adolescent and Pediatric Gynecology, 1, 190–194.
18.
ElkinsT. E.StrongC.WolfeA. R.BrownD. (1986, June). An ethics committee in a reproductive health clinic for mentally handicapped persons. Hastings Center Report, p. 20–22.
19.
GouldS. (1987). The flamingo's smile: Reflections of natural history (pp. 306–318). New York: W.W. Norton.
20.
GreenspanS.BuddK. S. (1986). Research in mentally retarded patients. In GallagherJ. J.VietzeP. M. (Eds.), Families of handicapped persons: Research, programs, and issues (pp. 115–127). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
21.
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
22.
HaavikS. F.MenningerK. A. (1981). Sexuality, law, and the developmentally disabled person: Legal and clinical aspects of marriage, parenthood, and sterilization (pp. 125–140) Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
23.
HolderA. (1982). In re CDM: Should involuntary sterilization be without the general jurisdiction of a court?Detroit College Law Revue, 3, 719.
24.
HugginsG. R.SandheimerS. J. (1984). Complications of female sterilization: Immediate and delayed. Fertility and Sterility, 14, 337–353.
25.
In re Grady, 85 N.J. 235; 426 A.2d. 467 (1981).
26.
In re Hayes, 93 Wash. 228; 608 P.2d. 635, 640 (1980).
27.
In re Moe, 385 Mass. App. 555; 432 A.2d. 712, 717 (1982).
28.
In re Metro Conservatorship of Valerie N., 40 Cal.3d. 143, 219 Cal. Rptr. 386, 707, P.2d. 760 (1985).
29.
KaunitzA. M.ThompsonR. F.KaunitzK. K. (1986). Mental retardation: A controversial indication for hysterectomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 68, 436–438.
30.
KindreganC. (1966). Sixty years of compulsory eugenic sterilization: “Three generations of imbeciles” and the Constitution of the United States. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 43, 123–124.
31.
MacklinR.GaylinW. (1981). Mental retardation and sterilization: A problem of competency and paternalism (pp. 63–67). New York: Plenum Press.
32.
McNeeleyS. G.ElkinsT. E. (1989). Gynecologic surgery and surgical morbidity in mentally handicapped women. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 74, 155.
33.
MosesK. L. (1983). The impact of initial diagnosis: Mobilizing family resources. In MulickJ. A.PueschelS. A. (Eds.), Parent professional partnerships in developmental disability services (pp. 11–34). Cambridge, MA: Ware.
34.
North Carolina Association for Retarded Children v. North Carolina, 420 F. Supp. 451, 454 (M.D. N.C. 1976).
35.
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1982). Substantive and procedural principles of decision-making for incapacitated patients. In Making Health Care Decisions, Vol. One: Report (pp. 177–188). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
36.
ReedS.ReedE. (1965). Mental retardation: A family study. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.
37.
Reif v. Weinberger, Federal Register 372 F. Supp. 1196 (D.D.C. 1974).
38.
Roe. v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
39.
Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942).
40.
Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978).
41.
Superintendent of Belchertown State School v. Saikewicz, 373 Mass. 724, 370 N.E.2d. 417 (1977).
42.
Van der MerweJ. V.RouxJ. P. (1987). Sterilization of mentally retarded persons. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, 42, 489–493.
43.
WaltersL.GaylinW. (1976). Sterilizing the retarded child. Hastings Center Report, 6(2), 13–15.
44.
WheelessC. R. (1975). Abdominal hysterectomy for surgical sterilization in the mentally retarded: A review of parental opinion. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 122, 872.