Abstract
Background
Rhinoplasty is one of the most challenging esthetic surgeries. The ability to achieve precise and predictable changes in the shape and position of the nasal tip is still among one of the demanding areas of rhinoplasty. Columellar strut is one of many techniques to ensure an adequate nasal tip projection and rotation; however, there is little evidence to support long-term efficacy of this technique.
Methods
In a clinical trial, 93 patients who were rhinoplasty candidates were studied prospectively. They were randomly divided into two groups according to the use of columellar strut. The outcome measures were gaining and maintaining tip projection and rotation in the long term. Standardized photographs before and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery were the measurements to compare the results between two groups.
Results
The mean age was 23.3 ± 4.8 years. In 47 cases, surgery was performed using columellar strut and in 45 cases this method was not used. Preoperatively, nasolabial angle and tip projection were not significantly different between the two groups. In addition, postoperatively, the mean of nasolabial angel and tip projection were not significantly different in the two groups 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The decreasing of these parameters was not significantly different during follow-up in the two groups.
Conclusion
It seems that columellar strut is not an essential technique to enhance and maintain tip projection and/or rotation in rhinoplasty. Using good techniques in qualified hands give the best results in the long term even without columellar strut.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.